<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; department of defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/department-of-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This Is Where Each Of Your 1421 Trillion Dollars Is Going In 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-is-where-each-of-your-1421-trillion-dollars-is-going-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-is-where-each-of-your-1421-trillion-dollars-is-going-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death and taxes 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know where your tax money is going next year? Here&#8217;s more than you can handle in the new 2010 edition of the Death and Taxes poster. Zoom in to see how much those F-35 fighters and lasers cost.
The Death and Taxes poster shows every single expense according to the president&#8217;s 2010 budget request. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/us-budget.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_us-budget.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Want to know where your tax money is going next year? Here&#8217;s more than you can handle in the new 2010 edition of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/death_and_taxes_shows_fascinating_terrible_view_on_military_tech_spending-2/">Death and Taxes poster</a>. Zoom in to see how much those <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/how-they-make-the-f-35-lightning-ii-video/">F-35 fighters</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/boeing_airborne_laser_weapon_fires_for_the_first_time-2/">lasers</a> cost.<span id="more-342551"></span></p>
<p>The Death and Taxes poster shows every single expense according to the president&#8217;s 2010 budget request. The circles you see here are proportional in size to their actual weight in the total budget. Each of the figures include the percentage change compared to 2009.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_howmuch.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></p>
<p>Defense spending is more or less the same, only increasing by 2%. And still, everything else looks minuscule.</p>
<p><object width="840" height="450"><param name="movie" value="http://demo.zoomorama.com/zml/DT/browser.swf?indexURL=http://demo.zoomorama.com/zml/DT/zml/index.zml"><param name="wmode" value="window"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://demo.zoomorama.com/zml/DT/browser.swf?indexURL=http://demo.zoomorama.com/zml/DT/zml/index.zml" wmode="window" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="840" height="450"></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-is-where-each-of-your-1421-trillion-dollars-is-going-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon&#8217;s Robot Hummingbird Christened &#8220;Nano Air Vehicle&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/pentagons-robot-hummingbird-christened-nano-air-vehicle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/pentagons-robot-hummingbird-christened-nano-air-vehicle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hummingbirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano air vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot hummingbird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon&#8217;s wacky sci-fi department DARPA has been working on robotic hummingbird-based drones to serve as miniature spies. They&#8217;re not nearly as agile or adorable as real hummingbirds, but DARPA is well on their way to achieving that dream.

Program manager Todd Hylton is aiming for &#8220;an approximately 10-gram aircraft that can hover for extended periods, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/hummingbirddrone_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The Pentagon&#8217;s wacky sci-fi department DARPA has been working on robotic hummingbird-based drones to serve as miniature spies. They&#8217;re not nearly as agile or adorable as real hummingbirds, but DARPA is well on their way to achieving that dream.<span id="more-340315"></span></p>
<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cov7-XWUa18&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cov7-XWUa18&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object></p>
<p>Program manager Todd Hylton is aiming for &#8220;an approximately 10-gram aircraft that can hover for extended periods, can fly at forward speeds up to 10 meters per second, can withstand 2.5-meter-per-second wind gusts.&#8221; Right now, though, the teeny robobird can only fly for about 20 seconds at a time. But with some hard work, some day we will produce a robotic hummingbird that will strike fear into the hearts of our enemies. Wait, is fear the right word? [<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/07/video-pentagons-robo-hummingbird-flies-like-the-real-thing/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/pentagons-robot-hummingbird-christened-nano-air-vehicle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon&#8217;s New &#8220;Suburb Warrior&#8221; UAVs Promise To Try To Kill Slightly Fewer Civilians</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/pentagons-new-suburb-warrior-uavs-promise-to-try-to-kill-slightly-fewer-civilians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/pentagons-new-suburb-warrior-uavs-promise-to-try-to-kill-slightly-fewer-civilians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburb warrior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uav]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmanned aerial vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weaponry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon&#8217;s current crop of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are insanely powerful&#8212;the &#8220;Hellfire&#8221; is so named for a reason&#8212;but also fairly imprecise, often killing innocent, nearby civilians. The DoD&#8217;s new UAVs hope to cut down on such casualties.
In a recent briefing, the Department of defence laid out its new plans: Smaller and far more precise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/suburb-warrior-061709-lg__1_.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The Pentagon&#8217;s current crop of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are insanely powerful&mdash;the &#8220;Hellfire&#8221; is so named for a reason&mdash;but also fairly imprecise, often killing innocent, nearby civilians. The DoD&#8217;s new UAVs hope to cut down on such casualties.<span id="more-338651"></span></p>
<p>In a recent briefing, the Department of defence laid out its new plans: Smaller and far more precise UAVs with badass names like &#8220;Suburb Warrior&#8221; and &#8220;Sniper&#8221; that will hunt in groups, rather than just blowing suspected hideouts to pieces with Hellfire missiles. The Suburb Warrior, for example, is designed to fire volleys of mini-missiles in tight formation, which makes a nice change from previous missiles that often demolished entire city blocks.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, these new UAVs should see production in about five years, by which time who knows what kind of battles we&#8217;ll need to fight&mdash;or who&#8217;ll be leading the Pentagon. But it&#8217;s a step in the right direction, that&#8217;s for sure. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/feature/new-air-force-drones-in-pakistan-061709">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/pentagons-new-suburb-warrior-uavs-promise-to-try-to-kill-slightly-fewer-civilians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
