<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; customer service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Palm Pre Experiencing Big Ol&#8217; Backup Failures</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/palm-pre-experiencing-big-ol-backup-failures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/palm-pre-experiencing-big-ol-backup-failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=369079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve been backing up your Pre, you might think that if you, say, drop it in the toilet, you&#8217;ll be set to have all your data placed on a replacement. That might not be the case.
It looks like the Palm Profile has been having issues with corrupted backups, leaving users trying to restore from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_pre-smoke.jpg" alt="" class="right" />If you&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-to-back-up-any-smartphone/">backing up your Pre</a>, you might think that if you, say, drop it in the toilet, you&#8217;ll be set to have all your data placed on a replacement. That might not be the case.<span id="more-369079"></span></p>
<p>It looks like the Palm Profile has been having issues with corrupted backups, leaving users trying to restore from a backup without their data. It&#8217;s not everyone who&#8217;s had this problem, just more people than can be called a fluke.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Palm&#8217;s statement on the matter:</p>
<blockquote><p> We are seeing a small number of customers who have experienced issues transferring their Palm Profile information to another Palm webOS device. Palm and Sprint are working closely together to support these customers to successfully transfer their information to the new device.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Good to know, clumsy Pre owners. [<a href="http://www.precentral.net/palm-profiles-suffering-major-backup-failures">PreCentral</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/palm-pre-experiencing-big-ol-backup-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&#8217;s Tech Support People Are As Happy As Their Customers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atts-tech-support-people-are-as-happy-as-their-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atts-tech-support-people-are-as-happy-as-their-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s just plausible enough to be real, and just real enough to be crushingly depressing. 
[Digg via Consumerist]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/darlene.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_darlene.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It&#8217;s just plausible enough to be real, and just real enough to be crushingly depressing. <span id="more-367808"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://digg.com/comedy/I_think_I_got_through_to_one_of_the_AT_T_support_chat_people">Digg</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/5407532/att-rep-wants-to-die">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atts-tech-support-people-are-as-happy-as-their-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Girlfriend&#8217;s Call To Dell: 90 Min, 10 Reps, Nothing Accomplished</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/my-girlfriends-call-to-dell-90-min-10-reps-nothing-accomplished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/my-girlfriends-call-to-dell-90-min-10-reps-nothing-accomplished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lisa said to me, &#8220;Maybe Dell will let me swap out my new battery for a smaller one? I&#8217;ll just call and ask.&#8221; I felt a spike of fear. Which was legitimised within two hours.
The call sounded painful from across the house. The first 10 minutes, it was clear she was talking to a robot. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dell___hell___wallpaper_by_preeemo.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/12/an-evening-of-confus.html">Lisa said</a> to me, &#8220;Maybe Dell will let me swap out my new battery for a smaller one? I&#8217;ll just call and ask.&#8221; I felt a spike of fear. Which was legitimised within two hours.<span id="more-366617"></span></p>
<p>The call sounded painful from across the house. The first 10 minutes, it was clear she was talking to a robot. Then it was clear she was either talking to someone very stupid or someone very unfamiliar with English as she kept repeating, &#8220;No, I just want to know if I can swap out my 6-cell battery for a 3-cell battery.&#8221; She must have said it 50 times over 90 minutes. Someone even admitted to trying to make a commission off of her by selling her a new battery. That battery would have cost half of the price of a brand new netbook. In the end, customer service didn&#8217;t do anything to help her. It&#8217;s been years since I&#8217;ve needed customer service, so maybe every PC company is this bad now, but I hope not. </p>
<p>If you have any horror/pleasantly surprising stories of your own, please let me know in the comments. [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/12/an-evening-of-confus.html">BoingBoing</a>, image from <a href="http://preeemo.deviantart.com/art/Dell-quot-Hell-quot-Wallpaper-44722066">preemo at deviant art</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/my-girlfriends-call-to-dell-90-min-10-reps-nothing-accomplished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>64% Of Men Don’t RTFM Before Calling Tech Support</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/64-of-men-don%e2%80%99t-rtfm-before-calling-tech-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/64-of-men-don%e2%80%99t-rtfm-before-calling-tech-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of the sexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gadget Helpline, a UK tech support service, found that well over half of their male customers didn&#8217;t even bother to read the manual before calling tech support. C&#8217;mon guys, is that the best we can do?
Apparently, 24 per cent of all females calling in had read the manual before picking up the phone. Good on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/battle_of_the_sexes_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Gadget Helpline, a UK tech support service, found that well over half of their male customers didn&#8217;t even bother to read the manual before calling tech support. C&#8217;mon guys, is that the best we can do?<span id="more-365423"></span></p>
<p>Apparently, 24 per cent of all females calling in had read the manual before picking up the phone. Good on you, ladies. Apparently you&#8217;re far less lazy than us when it comes to reading.</p>
<p>We guys are worse at figuring out the easy stuff, too. Twelve per cent of male callers needed to do something stupid to fix the problem, like plugging the item in or <i>turning it on</i>, versus 7 per cent of female callers.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also much less pleasant to talk to. Even through the average female customer spends 33 per cent more time on the phone than the average male, 66 per cent of the helpline staff said they preferred talking to female callers.</p>
<p>Of course, I know that all of you male readers fall into the category of never reading the manual and never having needed to. But still, we could be doing better. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8346810.stm">BBC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/64-of-men-don%e2%80%99t-rtfm-before-calling-tech-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise! Psystar&#8217;s Rebel EFI Software And Customer Service Shady</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/surprise-psystars-rebel-efi-software-and-customer-service-are-shady/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/surprise-psystars-rebel-efi-software-and-customer-service-are-shady/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psystar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebel efi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psystar&#8217;s Rebel EFI software promises that you can install OS X on any PC with a Core 2 Duo, Quad, i7 or Xeon Nehalem processor for $US50, but we are discovering that you will probably end up getting screwed royally.
While CrunchGear was able to get Rebel EFI working, it is important to point out that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_psystar_efi.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Psystar&#8217;s Rebel EFI software promises that you can install OS X on any PC with a Core 2 Duo, Quad, i7 or Xeon Nehalem processor for $US50, but we are discovering that you will probably end up getting screwed royally.<span id="more-364972"></span></p>
<p>While <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/yep-psystars-rebel-efi-works-make-your-pc-a-mac-for-us50/">CrunchGear was able to get Rebel EFI working</a>, it is important to point out that we tried several times to get the software up and running with no success on the exact same computer. Then we got this email from a frustrated reader:</p>
<blockquote><p> Two weeks ago, I purchased Psystar&#8217;s RebelEFI software. While I own several Macs, I also have a fairly new PC with a Core 2 Duo and Intel motherboard that I thought would be a perfect specimen.</p>
<p>Before I purchased the software, I downloaded the trial version of RebelEFI. Sure enough, I was able to boot and install OS X 10.6. I installed the RebelEFI utility in OS X and because it was a trial, the hardware compatibility feature was disabled. (Why this feature would be disabled in a trial version?) I called Psystar with several questions and asked what would happen if some of my hardware was not compatible? The sales person told me that they would be able to access the software&#8217;s hardware compatibility list and be able to supply me with drivers for the incompatible hardware.</p>
<p>I purchased the software and ran the hardware compatibility test. It showed me lack of compatibility for my video, audio and USB 2.0, however there was no way to send them the results of this test. When I questioned this, I sent Psystar a tech support ticket through the software&#8217;s Customer Support feature. I was told in a reply that I would have to fill out a DCR form. I asked what a DCR form is and where I could find it. (They assumed I would automatically know this information).</p>
<p>After not hearing anything for a week, I tried calling Customer Support and was greeted with a message that support is only handled via email. I again asked the same question via email and 3 days later I received a PDF file in response. It basically says I have to send Psystar my computer for them to make it completely compatible. WHAT???? At no point during the purchase was I told I may have to send them my computer. I am now in the process of trying to get my money back.</p>
<p>Mac OS X on any computer? FAIL</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Send your computer to a <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/psystar/">shady hackintosh company</a> that refuses to accept any responsibility for devices shipped to their lab? Yeah&#8230;I don&#8217;t think so. But here&#8217;s the proof (click to enlarge):</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/Labs_DCR.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/95/gallery_Labs_DCR.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/Labs_DCR_page_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/b3/gallery_Labs_DCR_page_2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>As the days have worn on, Psystar&#8217;s response to this customer&#8217;s issue has deteriorated to the point that they are no longer responding to his attempts to email for a refund. In fact, they&#8217;ve stopped taking customer-support calls entirely and have switched to a far less personal email-based help program.</p>
<p>In other words, a $US50 solution to run OS X on a PC sounded too good to be true, and it looks like it is. So, I&#8217;m inclined to go with a flat out DO NOT BUY on this one. However, let me put the question to you &mdash; have you purchased this software? Did you experience a similar problem? [<em>Thanks Brian!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/surprise-psystars-rebel-efi-software-and-customer-service-are-shady/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Dell: A &#8220;Hard Drive For Laptops&#8221; Program Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hey-dell-a-hard-drive-for-laptops-program-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hey-dell-a-hard-drive-for-laptops-program-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this guy sends his laptop to Dell for repair and Dell sends him back a hard drive&#8230;just a hard drive in a box. So what&#8217;s the problem here?
 Last week I called Dell Technical Support about my Dell Studio 1537 Laptop and a DVD drive which was making loud noises and ejecting all cds. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dell_package.jpg" alt="" class="center" />So, this guy sends his laptop to Dell for repair and Dell sends him back a hard drive&#8230;just a hard drive in a box. So what&#8217;s the problem here?<span id="more-364336"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Last week I called Dell Technical Support about my Dell Studio 1537 Laptop and a DVD drive which was making loud noises and ejecting all cds. I had the basic &#8220;mail-in&#8221; warranty which required I ship them the laptop back. After my phone conversation with overseas tech support I received an empty box with a prepaid packing slip to mail the laptop back. A couple days ago I received both an automated email and phone call that my laptop was coming back to me. This morning, Fedex delivered a refurbished hard drive &#8211; yes just a hard drive.</p>
<p>I began my calling spree this morning and spoke to 7, yes 7, different Dell reps who transferred me between technical support, customer service, and back to technical support. After about 90 minutes of phone calls, hold music, and redialing I&#8217;m stuck with a 250gb hard drive but no laptop. Who do I call for help?</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Oh, so he expected the <em>whole</em> computer to come back to him. I see. Perhaps this is some sort of new &#8220;you&#8217;ll get a hard drive and like it&#8221; approach to customer support Dell is trying out. I don&#8217;t see it working. Incidentally, Consumerist suggests sending emails to michael@dell.com in situations like this. Apparently, the messages are routed to an executive relations team that has been helpful in the past. [<a href="http://consumerist.com/5395028/i-sent-dell-my-laptop-and-all-i-got-back-was-this-stupid-hard-drive">Consumerist</a> Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60in3/3210001191/">60 in 3</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hey-dell-a-hard-drive-for-laptops-program-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile Lets Furious Sidekick Users Break Their Contracts For Free</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-lets-furious-sidekick-users-break-their-contracts-for-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-lets-furious-sidekick-users-break-their-contracts-for-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-Mobile&#8217;s initial apologia to Sidekick users grieving their lost data was a joke. A month of free data service? To access what? Now they&#8217;ve manned up, giving affected customers something they might actually want: A way out of their contracts.
An exasperated tipster who just spent some quality time across the phone from an equally exasperated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>T-Mobile&#8217;s initial apologia to Sidekick users grieving their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-sidekick-data-outrage-update-data-probably-lost-for-good/">lost data</a> was a joke. A month of free data service? <em>To access what?</em> Now they&#8217;ve manned up, giving affected customers something they might actually want: A way out of their contracts.<span id="more-359720"></span></p>
<p>An exasperated tipster who just spent some quality time across the phone from an equally exasperated T-Mobile rep told us what he was offered:<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> • I&#8217;m released from the contract if I want (Yeesh, of course I better be. I can&#8217;t believe I had to ask).<br />
• I can get a G1 for $US129 (not sure if that&#8217;s the normal contract renewal pricing or not; doesn&#8217;t sound like a great deal to me).<br />
• They also suggested Blackberries etc, but I didn&#8217;t get the pricing (since those are design disasters compared to SK or iPhone).</p>
</blockquote>
<p> So to break it down, your options are to accept about $US20 off a G1, which you, an avid Sidekick user, probably didn&#8217;t want anyway, move onto a BlackBerry, or to <em>leave</em>. Sidekick users are a dedicated bunch&mdash;there&#8217;s a good chance they came to T-Mobile just to use a particular handset&mdash;so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if people take them up on the offer.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see some kind of official announcement from T-Mobile regarding how they plan on dealing with their no doubt angry mass of Sidekick subscribers, but it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this shakes out: Remember, even though these people all bought their phones and service from T-Mo, the actual data loss is Danger&#8217;s (read: Microsoft&#8217;s) fault. It&#8217;s already clear that T-Mobile&#8217; is going to bear the brunt of the angry mob, but aside from getting <em>very sternly talked to</em> by nervous carriers, is Microsoft going to get out of this scot-free? <em>&mdash;Thanks, guy!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-lets-furious-sidekick-users-break-their-contracts-for-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ThinkPad&#8217;s $US100/Year Warranty Service Is Actually Pretty Good</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boing Boing Cory relates this tale using his $US100/year global support service for his Lenovo laptop and actually liking what eventually happened. Wha??
The Benjamin-a-year plan entitles the user to a service rep to come out next-day, no matter where on the planet you are &#8212; provided it&#8217;s somewhere reasonable, we&#8217;d assume. The tech guy came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lenovo.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Boing Boing Cory relates <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">this tale</a> using his $US100/year global support service for his Lenovo laptop and actually <em>liking</em> what eventually happened. Wha??<span id="more-359252"></span></p>
<p>The Benjamin-a-year plan entitles the user to a service rep to come out next-day, no matter where on the planet you are &mdash; provided it&#8217;s somewhere reasonable, we&#8217;d assume. The tech guy came by his office and fixed exactly what was wrong, basically doing an in-house call that Apple stores, even with their notoriously decent service, couldn&#8217;t match. I mean, <i>in-house</i>? And they even ignored the fact that he put Linux on there instead of his original Vista?</p>
<p>He does some caveats on his experience with IBM/Lenovo as a whole, and you can check that out over at BB. [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Settles $4 Million In Complaints For Shady Service</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dell-settles-4-million-in-complaints-for-shady-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dell-settles-4-million-in-complaints-for-shady-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NY State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has announced that a $US4 million settlement has been reached with Dell over shady service plans and financing deals. New Yorkers that have bought a Dell since 2004 may be entitled to compensation.

 The settlement stemmed from complaints about Dell&#8217;s service plans that promised &#8220;at home&#8221; or &#8220;on site&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/cuomo_dell.jpg" alt="" class="left" />NY State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has announced that a $US4 million settlement has been reached with Dell over shady service plans and financing deals. New Yorkers that have bought a Dell since 2004 may be entitled to compensation.<span id="more-353778"></span><br />
<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> The settlement stemmed from complaints about Dell&#8217;s service plans that promised &#8220;at home&#8221; or &#8220;on site&#8221; service, but actually left callers on hold while other callers were pressured to remove components themselves, and from complaints that Dell&#8217;s financing arm &#8220;lured consumers to purchase its products&#8221; with no interest financing but switched buyers to high-interest financing without informing customers.</p>
<p>Cuomo said that New Yorkers who have bought Dell computers since 2004 may be eligible and that compensation could cover from the cost of a service plan, to cost of interest payments made to Dell, to cost of work done on computers that Dell was supposed to service.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I know what your thinking&mdash;Dell? No way! I hate to break it to you, but Dell <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/laptop-mag-determines-acer-dell-and-hp-have-the-worst-tech-support/">doesn&#8217;t exactly have a stellar record when it comes to customer service</a>. But there is hope for people that believe they might be eligible for compensation. New Yorkers with claims can go to <a href="http://www.nyagdell.com/">nyagdell.com</a>. [<a href="http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2009/09/dell_paying_4_million_in_settl.html">Syracuse.com</a> - <em>Thanks Ponies!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dell-settles-4-million-in-complaints-for-shady-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint Retracts $US100 Palm Pre Deal After Six Hours</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sprint-retracts-100-palm-pre-deal-after-six-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sprint-retracts-100-palm-pre-deal-after-six-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=352175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s how this went: A blogger found two explicit references on Sprint&#8217;s website to a deal that gave new Sprint subscribers a Pre for $US100. A few hours later, after an almost certainly hilarious &#8220;internal review&#8221;, they cancelled it.
It&#8217;s not especially strange for a company to renege on an unannounced offer or a minor typo, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/prevoice_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_prevoice_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Here&#8217;s how this went: A blogger found two <em>explicit</em> references</a> on Sprint&#8217;s website to a deal that gave new Sprint subscribers a Pre for $US100. A few hours later, after an almost certainly hilarious &#8220;internal review&#8221;, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090908/sprint-cancels-palm-pre-100-offer/">they cancelled it</a>.<span id="more-352175"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not especially strange for a company to renege on an unannounced offer or a minor typo, but that&#8217;s not quite what this was. It was an offer couched in specific written language, and that had full, publicly-available information pages. In other words, it had been fully devised&mdash;this wasn&#8217;t a data input mistake.</p>
<p>That said, the fact that it only applied to new subscribers would&#8217;ve caused a PR problem for Sprint, who would be effectively penalising their most loyal (read: preexisting) customers with the offer. And the two listed end dates did seem to indicate that maybe it wasn&#8217;t fully baked, or ready for prime time. Since the deal was listed <em>on their website,</em> Sprint says they&#8217;ll honour the service rebate to anyone who signed up for a contract in the last few hours, but after that, it&#8217;s closed. [<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090908/sprint-cancels-palm-pre-100-offer/">AllThingsD</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sprint-retracts-100-palm-pre-deal-after-six-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
