<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PS3 May Get Cross-Game Chat With Next Firmware Update</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ps3-may-get-cross-game-chat-with-next-firmware-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ps3-may-get-cross-game-chat-with-next-firmware-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bedlam in the official Playstation forums: Someone slipped up and accidentally confirmed that cross-game chat may be coming in the next Playstation 3 firmware update. The post was quickly deleted, which forumgoers are taking as evidence of the slip&#8217;s truth.
Cross-game text chat has been around since April, but voice chat has so far been a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ps3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_ps3.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Bedlam in the official Playstation forums: Someone slipped up and accidentally confirmed that cross-game chat may be coming in the next Playstation 3 firmware update. The post was quickly deleted, which forumgoers are taking as evidence of the slip&#8217;s truth.<span id="more-360418"></span></p>
<p>Cross-game text chat has been around since April, but voice chat has so far been a no-show. Kotaku writes that they tried to contact Sony for a truly official response, but only received a curt reply:</p>
<blockquote><p> As you know, we haven&#8217;t made any announcements on upcoming firmware and don&#8217;t comment on rumour or speculation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> It&#8217;s quite possible that the next firmware update will in fact bring cross-game chat, but I think we&#8217;re getting a bit too excited over a forum post. [<a href="http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=uncharteddf&amp;message.id=68482#M68482">Playstation Forums</a> via <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2009/10/ps3-cross-game-chat-coming-in-firmware-update/">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ps3-may-get-cross-game-chat-with-next-firmware-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG Chat Pillows FTW</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/omg-chat-pillows-ftw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/omg-chat-pillows-ftw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pillows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throwboy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Throwboy people are at it again with more pillows for 21st century boys and girls. Now with chat dialogs with common chat phrase contractions, from WTF to FTW, going through OMG and BRB. Wait, no TFSU? For shame. [Throwboy]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/chat_available_now.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_chat_available_now.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/upgrade_your_sofa_to_leopard_for_149-2/">Throwboy</a> people are at it again with more pillows for 21st century boys and girls. Now with chat dialogs with common chat phrase contractions, from WTF to FTW, going through OMG and BRB. Wait, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/291184/how-to-install-apps-on-your-iphone-easily-no-hacking-skills-required">no TFSU</a>? For shame. [<a href="http://throwboy.com/omg.php">Throwboy</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/omg-chat-pillows-ftw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Now With Voice Chat and Video</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/gmail_now_with_voice_chat_and_video-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/gmail_now_with_voice_chat_and_video-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/gmail_now_with_voice_chat_and_video-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google just added voice and video chat capabilities to Gmail, the perennially in beta web mail program. It uses a special web browser plug-in available for PC and Mac, which only requires a camera. Apparently, the separate Google Talk application is not getting yet the video capability and the company is not discussing the subject. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/gmail-logo.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Google just added voice and video chat capabilities to Gmail, the perennially in beta web mail program. It uses a special web browser plug-in available for PC and Mac, which only requires a camera. Apparently, the separate Google Talk application is not getting yet the video capability and the company is not discussing the subject. For now, you will be able to access it from the web browser, with the capability to tear the video chat into a separate window. According to Google spokesman Jason Freidenfelds, the idea is to make it &#8220;quicker and easier to communicate with other people by whatever means is best convenient.&#8221; Which of course really means &#8220;easy to access video sex from any computer&#8221;. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4AA7AZ20081111">Reuters</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: google, chat, gmail, top, video --><span id="more-314671"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/gmail_now_with_voice_chat_and_video-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/iphone_sdk_limitation_only_one_usermade_app_running_concurrently_no_background_processes-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/iphone_sdk_limitation_only_one_usermade_app_running_concurrently_no_background_processes-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ichat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/iphone_sdk_limitation_only_one_usermade_app_running_concurrently_no_background_processes-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The enthusiastic high-fives of future iPhone instant messaging users yesterday might be quite a bit less enthusiastic today when they find out that Apple is not going to allow user-made SDK applications to run in the background. This means every application, from IM to VoIP to GPS mapping, will have to terminate entirely when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/iphonechatapp.jpg" class="center"/>The enthusiastic high-fives of future <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/apple_iphone_sdk_roundup_everything_you_need_to_know-2.html">iPhone instant messaging</a> users yesterday might be quite a bit less enthusiastic today when they find out that Apple is not going to allow user-made SDK applications to run in the background. This means every application, from IM to VoIP to GPS mapping, will have to terminate <i>entirely</i> when the user switches out to take a call or change a song. How does this affect you? It means you won&#8217;t be a be able to receive IMs unless you&#8217;re currently inside the IM app, forcing you to disconnect when you take a call. There&#8217;s an upside and a downside to this decision.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: aim, apple, chat, ichat, instant messaging, iphone, iphone sdk, limitations, sdk --><br />
<span id="more-280530"></span>
<p>First, we already know that apps running in the background as a process is possible on the iPhone. The iPod app, SMS app, and various other apps all run in the background now and continue running no matter where you go in the phone. Also, user-made Installer.app apps like Apollo (an IM client) already run in the background just fine. So why did Apple make this limitation that all apps have to quit whenever the user switches out? Memory management. From Apple&#8217;s Human Interface Guidelines for the iPhone:</p>
<p><img alt="iphonehig.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/iphonehig.png" width="701" height="179" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/></p>
<p>Apple has no idea what combination of applications you could possibly install on your phone, and they can&#8217;t control it. If you were to install two apps that took up loads of the iPhone&#8217;s memory (we&#8217;re talking RAM), and they both ran in the background, it would slow down the phone&#8217;s other, more important tasks such as calling or iPodding. If this were the case, Apple would be blamed for making a slow or non-responsive phone even when it&#8217;s not actually Apple&#8217;s fault. This is exactly the thing that goes on in Windows Mobile devices. It&#8217;s fine when you&#8217;re just running normal, natively-installed apps, but when you get to multi-tasking with your own installed programs, the phone becomes sluggish and everyone curses Microsoft. Apple wants none of this.</p>
<p>So the implication to you, the end-user, is that you can&#8217;t have apps running in the background, constantly checking the internet. This means no RSS reader that&#8217;s always up-to-date and no IM apps that always sit in the background, listening for messages. If you&#8217;re wondering Exchange&#8217;s push email and calendars are going to work in this scheme, it&#8217;ll be integrated into Apple&#8217;s first-party Mail system, which <i>can</i> be allowed to run in the background. </p>
<p>But in the end, it&#8217;s only a small portion of apps that are really affected by this rule. Games or utilities can save their app status to disk often so that you can resume where you left off when you start it back up. But until the iPhone allows SDK-applications to run in the background, you&#8217;re probably better off using a web-based chat application in Safari (which already has permission to). [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/iphone-sdk-some-of-the-details-arent-great/">Tech Crunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/iphone_sdk_limitation_only_one_usermade_app_running_concurrently_no_background_processes-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PlayStation 3 Getting In-Game Voice Chat in Firmware 2.4?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/playstation_3_getting_ingame_voice_chat_in_firmware_24-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/playstation_3_getting_ingame_voice_chat_in_firmware_24-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/playstation_3_getting_ingame_voice_chat_in_firmware_24-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony Computer Entertainment UK Boss Ray Maguire just let this bit slip about a future firmware update, which Sony usually doesn&#8217;t comment on.


Our momentum will continue with the introduction of in-game communication in the summer, firmware update 2.4 and the strongest line-up of games through our third party partners and our own studios. I&#8217;d personally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/xmb_manual.jpg" class="left"/>Sony Computer Entertainment UK Boss Ray Maguire just let this bit slip about a future firmware update, which Sony usually doesn&#8217;t comment on.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: 2.4, chat, cross media bar, firmware, firmware 2.4, gaming, in-game chat, in-game xmb, playstation, playstation 3, ps3, update, xmb, xross media bar --><br />
<span id="more-279823"></span><br />
<blockquote>Our momentum will continue with the introduction of in-game communication in the summer, firmware update 2.4 and the strongest line-up of games through our third party partners and our own studios. I&#8217;d personally like to thank our trade and business partners for helping us on the start of the PS3 journey.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, there&#8217;s going to be improved in-game chat (maybe expanded to every game via an in-game Xross Media Bar?) that&#8217;s even better than the chat we&#8217;ve already used now? Sign us up. [<a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/29792/Sony-hails-retail-as-PS3-hits-1m">MCVUK</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/363110/sony-teases-firmware-24-and-new-chat-functionality">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/playstation_3_getting_ingame_voice_chat_in_firmware_24-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Mozilla Messaging Breathe New Life Into Thunderbird?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/will_mozilla_messaging_breathe_new_life_into_thunderbird-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/will_mozilla_messaging_breathe_new_life_into_thunderbird-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thunderbird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/will_mozilla_messaging_breathe_new_life_into_thunderbird-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to revitalise Thunderbird in version 3.0, Mozilla has announced &#8220;Mozilla Messaging&#8221; which promises significant improvements to the email client&#8212;like calendar integration, better search, and a chat app. While the core focus will still be on email, Mozilla seems committed to developing a product that will offer a broader range of communications tools. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/thunderbird.png" class="left"/>In an attempt to revitalise Thunderbird in version 3.0, Mozilla has announced &#8220;Mozilla Messaging&#8221; which promises significant improvements to the email client&mdash;like calendar integration, better search, and a chat app. While the core focus will still be on email, Mozilla seems committed to developing a product that will offer a broader range of communications tools. Whether or not it will be good enough to get Thunderbird back on track remains to be seen. [<a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/">Mozilla Messaging</a> via <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/02/20/what_do_you_want_to_see_in_thunderbird-2.html">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: chat, email, im, mozilla, mozilla messaging, open source, software, thunderbird --><br />
<span id="more-278207"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/will_mozilla_messaging_breathe_new_life_into_thunderbird-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Chat&#8221; Concept is Like Living a Comic Strip</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/chat_concept_is_like_living_a_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/chat_concept_is_like_living_a_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/chat_concept_is_like_living_a_.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artist Aram Bartholl&#8217;s &#8220;Chat&#8221; concept enables users to engage in a conversation via brief text messages that are typed on a keyboard and projected onto a comic strip-like voice bubble overhead &#8212;not unlike the Voice Bubble Mirror from earlier this year. Even though the keyboard is wireless, a technician is needed to secure the bubble [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="chat.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/chat.jpg" width="300" height="400" class="left" />Artist Aram Bartholl&#8217;s &#8220;Chat&#8221; concept enables users to engage in a conversation via brief text messages that are typed on a keyboard and projected onto a comic strip-like voice bubble overhead &mdash;not unlike the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/voice_bubble_mirror_let_people.html">Voice Bubble Mirror</a> from earlier this year. Even though the keyboard is wireless, a technician is needed to secure the bubble behind the speaker, so the whole project falls short of greatness. A video of Chat in action is available after the break.<span id="more-270090"></span><object width="475" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfZraHuTe3c&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfZraHuTe3c&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="475" height="391"></embed></object></p>
<p>On the other hand, if the bubble could be mounted on a hat and the text could be punched in using a mobile phone or something similarly compact, it could be a fun way to engage in a conversation. Until you were tired of looking like an idiot that is. [<a href="http://www.datenform.de/chateng.html">Project Page</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2007/12/chat_puts_gaming_social_a.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890">Make</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/chat_concept_is_like_living_a_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Chat Bot Talks the Sexy Talk, Scores Chicks for You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/russian_chat_bot_talks_the_sex_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/russian_chat_bot_talks_the_sex_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/russian_chat_bot_talks_the_sex_3.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Russian website will soon offer CyberLover, a program that simulates chatroom flirting. The stated purpose is for nerds with no skillz, who can use it to talk to &#8220;up to 10 women at one time&#8221; and score some digits. Says the site: &#8220;Not a single girl has yet realised that she was communicating with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Sexy_Chat_Bot.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Sexy_Chat_Bot.jpg" width="463" height="343" class="center" />A Russian website will soon offer CyberLover, a program that simulates chatroom flirting. The stated purpose is for nerds with no skillz, who can use it to talk to &#8220;up to 10 women at one time&#8221; and score some digits. Says the site: &#8220;Not a single girl has yet realised that she was communicating with a program!&#8221; It also said that the program could perform virtual sex online. Sure, it&#8217;s all fun and games&mdash;until someone loses a credit card number, says an Australian anti-virus software developer PC Tools.<span id="more-269505"></span>The program could become the Don to your lonely Juan: Once it chats up the ladies (or supposed ladies, or supposed human non-chatbots), it hands them off to you: &#8220;Within half an hour the CyberLover program will introduce you to &#8230; girls, exchange photos and perhaps even a contact phone number.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Sergei Shevchenko, a malware analyst at PC Tools, says: &#8220;As a tool that can be used by hackers to conduct identity fraud, CyberLover demonstrates an unprecedented level of social engineering.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that an endorsement or a condemnation? Either way it <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/hp_laptops_in_danger_of_backen.html">proves my point</a> about y&#8217;all going around visiting .ru sites. It&#8217;s only available in Russian, where it takes far fewer words to get a lady excited, as long as those words include &#8220;fur coat,&#8221; &#8220;vodka,&#8221; and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/millionaire_fair_features_12m_.html">&#8220;diamond-studded rims on my Bentley&#8221;</a>. If you do speak Russian, however, and want to CAREFULLY check out these claims, jump to Reuters for a link to the nasty.</p>
<p>CyberLover goes on sale February 15, perhaps as a suicide remedy on the morning after Valentine&#8217;s Day. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071213/wr_nm/russia_internet_dc">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/russian_chat_bot_talks_the_sex_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FlickIM: Another AIM Client For the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/flickim_another_aim_client_for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/flickim_another_aim_client_for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/flickim_another_aim_client_for.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone and their three-legged dog is coming up with an IM client for the iPhone, but this latest one from FlickIM isn&#8217;t quite good enough to dethrone our current champ, JiveTalk. FlickIM may have a fancy messaging interface and a cool contact selection dropdown (the default Safari selector), but it doesn&#8217;t have any options, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="flickim.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/flickim.jpg" class="left" />Everyone and their three-legged dog is coming up with an IM client for the iPhone, but this latest one from FlickIM isn&#8217;t quite good enough to dethrone our current champ, JiveTalk. FlickIM may have a fancy messaging interface and a cool contact selection dropdown (the default Safari selector), but it doesn&#8217;t have any options, it signs out all other AIM accounts, there&#8217;s only AIM support, and you can&#8217;t scroll up to see past messages. But it does have saved message delivery (that could be an AIM thing, actually) to store your messages when your EDGE is acting up. [<a href="http://www.flickim.com/">FlickIM</a>]<span id="more-249160"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/flickim_another_aim_client_for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIM on iPhone Woes? Try eBuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/aim_on_iphone_woes_try_ebuddy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/aim_on_iphone_woes_try_ebuddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/aim_on_iphone_woes_try_ebuddy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the AT&#038;T calling plans on the iPhone include 200 SMS messages, but if you&#8217;re pushing that limit where you&#8217;ll have to start paying per message, eBuddy gives you access to regular old AIM on your iPhone. Go to this URL and you can use AIM without paying a per-message charge. It&#8217;s not perfect, though.
First [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="iphone_aim_ebuddy.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/iphone_aim_ebuddy.jpg" width="478" height="384" class="center" />All the AT&#038;T calling plans on the iPhone include 200 SMS messages, but if you&#8217;re pushing that limit where you&#8217;ll have to start paying per message, eBuddy gives you access to regular old AIM on your iPhone. <a href="http://www.ebuddy.com/mobile/aim.php">Go to this URL</a> and you can use AIM without paying a per-message charge. It&#8217;s not perfect, though.</p>
<p>First of all, the type size of the messages is way too small on your screen&mdash;the text is barely even two points high. You can zoom in, but after every message you send, you must zoom in again. Also, messages don&#8217;t come in live; they&#8217;re fetched at the same time you send yours, making for some rather halting conversations and missed connections. Overall, it works, but it&#8217;s awkward.<span id="more-248583"></span>If you don&#8217;t send and receive a lot of messages, you&#8217;re probably better off using the iPhone&#8217;s SMS service. After all, that delightful iChat-like interface is hard to resist. Another choice if you&#8217;re using AIM: you can send messages to an iPhone (or any cellphone&#8217;s text messaging system for that matter), if you type +1 and then the 10 digit phone number as your buddy&#8217;s name. Any replies to your messages from your cellphone-toting buddy will count as a message, though.</p>
<p>You can also try <a href="http://www.meebo.com">Meebo</a>, the supposedly do-everything-anywhere messaging service, but all we&#8217;re getting at that site when we access it from our iPhone is a spinning cursor. Colleague Jason Chen had some luck with it and was actually able to communicate, but characterized it as &#8220;super slow,&#8221; and certainly not pantsworthy. Meanwhile, technicians at Meebo tell us they&#8217;re working on optimizing the service.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope this AIM/iPhone situation works itself out soon. Sure, AT&#038;T wants to generate cash from messaging, but we look forward to the day when we can just use AIM for free on the iPhone, unfettered and easy to use just like the rest of the apps on the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/aim_on_iphone_woes_try_ebuddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
