<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; cellphones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/cellphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mobile Phone-Using Pedestrians At Higher Risk Of &#8220;Getting Run Over&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/mobile-phone-using-pedestrians-at-higher-risk-of-getting-run-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/mobile-phone-using-pedestrians-at-higher-risk-of-getting-run-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=369214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First driving, now even walking: The combination of mobile phone use and motion seems to be the most dangerous threat facing Americans today.
Two new studies have shown that pedestrians using mobile phones are significantly more likely to get smacked by a car than anybody else. A simulation indicated that older people are especially likely to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/payphone.jpg" alt="" class="left" />First driving, now even walking: The combination of mobile phone use and motion seems to be the most dangerous threat facing Americans today.<span id="more-369214"></span></p>
<p>Two new studies have shown that pedestrians using mobile phones are significantly more likely to get smacked by a car than anybody else. A simulation indicated that older people are especially likely to be distracted, even more so if they&#8217;re unsteady on their feet to begin with (so maybe think about getting Grandma a nice large-print novel for Christmas instead of a Droid).</p>
<p>Interestingly, listening to music was found to have no effect on pedestrian safety, which I&#8217;d like to personally refute. I can say without a doubt that while listening to certain music (Spank Rock, I&#8217;m looking at you), I am noticeably more cocky and likely to get hit by a car while strutting across a busy street. But then, I&#8217;m not a scientist; thus, I trust the results of these studies and will continue to blare loud, filthy rap music while disregarding all pedestrian laws and guidelines. [<a href="http://www.labspaces.net/100638/Walking_hazard__Cell_phone_use____but_not_music____reduces_pedestrian_safety">LabSpaces</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/mobile-phone-using-pedestrians-at-higher-risk-of-getting-run-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaked AT&amp;T Memo Outlines Spin Tactics Regarding Verizon Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/leaked-att-memo-outlines-spin-tactics-regarding-verizon-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/leaked-att-memo-outlines-spin-tactics-regarding-verizon-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att internal memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[there's a map for that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll admit that I got a slight chuckle out of this particular memo sent to AT&#38;T employees today. It explains that the company has in fact filed a lawsuit against Verizon for the rather hilarious &#8220;There&#8217;s a Map for That&#8221; ad campaign and proceeds to instruct employees to use any inquiries as a chance to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit that I got a slight chuckle out of this particular memo sent to AT&amp;T employees today. It explains that the company has in fact <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/att-suing-verizon-because-map-ad-is-confusing/">filed a lawsuit against Verizon</a> for the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/verizon-bitch-slaps-att-in-theres-a-map-for-that-commercial/">rather hilarious &#8220;There&#8217;s a Map for That&#8221; ad campaign</a> and proceeds to instruct employees to use any inquiries as a chance to talk about AT&amp;T&#8217;s great qualities:<span id="more-364885"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> <b>Channels:</b> COR, DMDR, LD, and NR Internal<br />
<b> Roles:</b> Reps &amp; Above<br />
<b>Markets:</b> All<br />
<b>Contact:</b> Your Manager</p>
<p>AT&amp;T filed a lawsuit on November 4, 2009 against Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;There&#8217;s a Map for That&#8221; advertising campaign. Independent research shows that the maps in the advertisements mislead consumers into believing that we do not offer any wireless service in the vast majority of the country. In fact, AT&amp;T&#8217;s 2.5G EDGE network covers 1.75 million square miles of the United States, reaching some 296 million people, roughly the same number reached by Verizon&#8217;s network. This network supports popular services like e-mail, surfing the Web, texting, and voice calling, including the activities shown in the Verizon TV advertisements. In addition, our 3G service, the nation&#8217;s fastest, is available in more than 9,400 cities and towns.</p>
<p> We filed the lawsuit in Federal District Court in Atlanta and asked that Verizon be prohibited from misleading consumers regarding the scope of our wireless network.</p>
<p> How should I respond to customers who ask about the lawsuit?</p>
<p> While we cannot speculate on the complaint filed, it is a great opportunity to remind customers of AT&amp;T&#8217;s many advantages that over 81 million customers enjoy, including:</p>
<p>* Best Network<br />
* The best coverage worldwide (More Bars in More PlacesTM).<br />
* The nation&#8217;s fastest 3G network and the only national 3G carrier providing simultaneous voice and data usage.<br />
* The most devices that work in the most places including Japan and South Korea (3G 2100 MHz device required).<br />
* The nation&#8217;s largest wireless and wireline broadband provider.<br />
* The nation&#8217;s largest company-owned and operated WiFi network with more than 20,000 hotspots, including Starbucks, McDonald&#8217;s and Barnes and Noble, as well as access to over 120,000 hotspots around the world.<br />
* The leading provider of local and long distance voice services.</p>
<p> Greatest Value – The fairest value with Rollover® allowing customers to keep their unused minutes month to month.<br />
Best Products &#8211; The most innovative exclusive devices such as the iPhoneTM 3GS.<br />
Most Convenient Services<br />
* The most customer friendly free self-service tools with *Services for checking usage, paying bills, and adding features.<br />
* The most convenient and cost-effective way for customers to manage their accounts with Combined Billing for wireless and wireline products.<br />
* Industry leading 30-day satisfaction guarantee.</p>
<p> As always, if you have an inquiry from the media, please refer them to your local media relations team member. </p>
</blockquote>
<p> I guess that if you&#8217;ve made a mockery of the court system with a ridiculous lawsuit, then you might as well use the attention for a bit of spin. [<a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/11/04/leaked-att-memo-if-anyone-asks-about-the-verizon-lawsuit-just-tell-them-were-awesome/">Mobile Crunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/leaked-att-memo-outlines-spin-tactics-regarding-verizon-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry Bold 9700 Impressions: Small And Chirpy, Like A Black Hummingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BlackBerry Bold 9700 in a word? Compact. It&#8217;s efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.
Succinctly, it&#8217;s the new BlackBerry to buy if you&#8217;re on T-Mobile or AT&#38;T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it&#8217;s their first 3G BlackBerry.
 gawkerGallery(5397352,12,''); It&#8217;s not very much like the original Bold at all, which was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__088.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/rim-blackberry-bold-9700-onyx-t-mobiles-first-3g-blackberry/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a> in a word? Compact. It&#8217;s efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.<span id="more-364884"></span></p>
<p>Succinctly, it&#8217;s the new BlackBerry to buy if you&#8217;re on T-Mobile or AT&amp;T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it&#8217;s their first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5397352,12,''); </script>It&#8217;s not very much like the original Bold at all, which was the Escalade of BlackBerrys: big, obnoxious, but seriously comfortable to drive because it gave you tons of room to spread your legs (err, thumbs). If you&#8217;re used to that, at first the 9700&mdash;which is even smaller and lighter than the Tour on Sprint and Verizon&mdash;feels like you&#8217;ve been shoved inside of a clown car because the keyboard and screen, while retaining the same shape and resolution, respectively, have been shrink-rayed. (Note: In the gallery, the T-Mobile one is the Bold 9700, the AT&amp;T phone is the original Bold.)</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__090.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__090.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>But, then you realise you&#8217;re not typing any slower, or less precisely. The 9700&#8217;s keyboard isn&#8217;t as flat out <em>comfortable</em> as the original Bold&mdash;purely a matter of physics&mdash;but it&#8217;s a minor marvel of ergonomics that RIM has recession-sized the keyboard this effectively. They&#8217;re simply brilliant at building keyboards. The screen has the same resolution as the Bold&#8217;s, but in a smaller size, meaning it has a higher pixel density. Despite that extra clarity, I felt a bit constrained by it, especially browsing the web.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the second BlackBerry to ditch all-too-easily-slain-by-lint trackball for an optical trackpad, and the first that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">not built for Walmart</a>. You&#8217;ll miss the trackball for about 15 seconds. Like I said before, the trackpad&#8217;s 90 percent as good as the ball. You might miss the physical feedback, and it sometimes doesn&#8217;t totally accurately interpret a diagonal swipe that you know wouldn&#8217;t be a problem with the ball but it&#8217;s good enough, and by far the most accurate and responsive trackpad I&#8217;ve used on a phone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s running BlackBerry OS 5.0 which isn&#8217;t <em>tons</em> different than the OS that shipped on the original Bold or Curve 8900, but it&#8217;s definitely springier and it has a few brushstrokes of added polish here and there. One place you notice is the browser&mdash;while not as fast as the iPhone 3GS or Android, it has some extra zip to it, and it even sped past the Storm 2 loading pages, despite racing on T-Mobile&#8217;s 3G network vs. Verizon&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Basically, barring any major bugs that pop up over the next couple of days, this is the BlackBerry you probably wanna bug your corporate overlords to handcuff to your pants if you&#8217;re on AT&amp;T or T-Mobile, since it&#8217;ll slide into them easier than any BlackBerry yet. I just hope you enjoy the feel of faux leather. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Approves &#8216;Asian Boobs&#8217; App, Just To Mess With Us [NSFW]</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-approves-asian-boobs-iphone-app-just-to-mess-with-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-approves-asian-boobs-iphone-app-just-to-mess-with-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple loves rejecting apps for having swear words in them, but a database of scantily clad Asian ladies? Approved! Who needs a rhyme or reason when you can be random and inscrutable? [iTunes Link via TechCrunch]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/asianboobsapp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_asianboobsapp.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Apple loves rejecting apps <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/iphone_app_store_bans_book_app_for_naughty_language-2/">for having swear words in them</a>, but a database of scantily clad Asian ladies? Approved! Who needs a rhyme or reason when you can be random and inscrutable? [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=324187335&amp;mt=8">iTunes Link</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/23/app-store-hypocrisy-update-asian-boobs-fine-top-seller-satirical-app-banned/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-approves-asian-boobs-iphone-app-just-to-mess-with-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Behold II May Come To T-Mobile November 18</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsung-behold-ii-may-come-to-t-mobile-november-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsung-behold-ii-may-come-to-t-mobile-november-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behold ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung behold ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile samsung behold ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobiles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s forget about T-mobile&#8217;s Project Dark for a moment. Looks like the release date for the Samsung Behold II may have leaked. Oh, and there&#8217;s another T-Mobile handset dubbed &#8220;Tap&#8221; with a street date of November 11th.
I sincerely doubt many cares about the Tap as its feature set is nothing to write home about, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_tmo.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Let&#8217;s forget about <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-project-dark-rumour-update-financed-phones-tiered-unlimited-plans/">T-mobile&#8217;s Project Dark</a> for a moment. Looks like the release date for the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsung-behold-ii-hits-t-mobile-pairs-android-with-touchwiz-interface/">Samsung Behold II</a> may have leaked. Oh, and there&#8217;s another T-Mobile handset dubbed &#8220;Tap&#8221; with a street date of November 11th.<span id="more-361298"></span></p>
<p>I sincerely doubt many cares about the Tap as its feature set is nothing to write home about, but with a lower-end touch screen phone like that, a shiny new Android-based gadget, and whatever mysteries Project Dark will bring, T-Mobile looks like they&#8217;ll have a very merry, early Christmas. [<a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/november-launch-date-fun/">TmoNews</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/t-mobile-tap-coming-november-11-samsung-behold-ii-on-november-1/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsung-behold-ii-may-come-to-t-mobile-november-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mamorino Anti-Kidnapping Phone, You Know, For Kids</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mamorino-anti-kidnapping-phone-you-know-for-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mamorino-anti-kidnapping-phone-you-know-for-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-kidnapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kddi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mamorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kids-friendly KDDI&#8217;s mobile phone keeps children safe from kidnapping, with a built-in GPS, and a ring that gets laser-soldered to their noses. I mean, I guess&#8212;otherwise, how can you prevent kidnappers from tossing the mobile phone away? [Dvice]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Mamorino908724523-thumb-550x456-26445.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Mamorino908724523-thumb-550x456-26445.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>This kids-friendly KDDI&#8217;s mobile phone keeps children safe from kidnapping, with a built-in GPS, and a ring that gets laser-soldered to their noses. I mean, <i>I guess</i>&mdash;otherwise, how can you prevent kidnappers from tossing the mobile phone away? [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/10/kddi-and-secom.php">Dvice</a>]<span id="more-361234"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mamorino-anti-kidnapping-phone-you-know-for-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mystery HTC Android Phone Appears, Discloses Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mystery-htc-android-phone-appears-discloses-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mystery-htc-android-phone-appears-discloses-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An HTC Android phone popped up today, offering few clues&#8212;aside from a few hastily snapped pics&#8212;about what it&#8217;s called, what it does, or what it wants.
Touch sensitive menu keys? Check.
And there&#8217;s our pal Android, and a camera of indeterminable mega pixelage. [The Unlockr via BGR]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-mystery-3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_htc-mystery-3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>An HTC Android phone popped up today, offering few clues&mdash;aside from a few hastily snapped pics&mdash;about what it&#8217;s called, what it does, or what it wants.<span id="more-361025"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-mystery.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_htc-mystery.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Touch sensitive menu keys? Check.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-mystery-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_htc-mystery-2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>And there&#8217;s our pal Android, and a camera of indeterminable mega pixelage. [<a href="http://theunlockr.com/2009/10/16/what-new-htc-android-phone-is-this/">The Unlockr</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/18/mysterious-htc-android-device-is-mysterious/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mystery-htc-android-phone-appears-discloses-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Levels Guns At Apple, Not AT&amp;T, With Droid Phone Blitz</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/verizon-levels-guns-at-apple-not-att-with-droid-phone-blitz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/verizon-levels-guns-at-apple-not-att-with-droid-phone-blitz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This 30-second Droid spot started airing last night during the ALCS. Dan may not like it, but even so there&#8217;s no denying that Verizon, in the words of Matt Buchanan, has gone totally balls in with an Android phone.
An Android 2.0 Motorola phone, to be precise, which we&#8217;ll officially get to see sometime in November.
Until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dPYM-XTqcec&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dPYM-XTqcec&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></object></p>
<p>This 30-second Droid spot started airing last night during the ALCS. Dan may <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ii-ihate-iverizons-inew-imarketing-icampaign/">not like it</a>, but even so there&#8217;s no denying that Verizon, in the <a href="http://twitter.com/mattbuchanan/status/4967569074">words of Matt Buchanan</a>, has gone totally balls in with an Android phone.<span id="more-361018"></span></p>
<p>An Android 2.0 Motorola phone, to be precise, which we&#8217;ll officially get to see sometime in November.</p>
<p>Until then, we can feast on rumours and speculation, revel in the broadside Verizon fired against Apple (not AT&amp;T, it should be noted), and of course dissect the actual marketing itself, as was done at Daring Fireball:</p>
<blockquote><p> 1. The whole site is Flash.<br />
2. The animation is pretty close to the commercial they showed during tonight&#8217;s Yankees-Angels game, which (I&#8217;ve heard) will be in heavy rotation during football games tomorrow.<br />
3. Those &#8220;iDon&#8217;t&#8221;s, with the straight primes instead of proper apostrophes, make the commercial look slapdash.<br />
4. Seems pretty clear that Verizon isn&#8217;t getting the iPhone any time soon.<br />
5. The small print notes that &#8220;Droid&#8221; is a registered trademark of Lucasfilm Ltd., licensed to Verizon.<br />
6. It&#8217;ll be running Android 2.0.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> All interesting stuff, yes, but is it weird that the biggest bit of news out of all this, to me, is that George Lucas controls the word droid? [<a href="http://phones.verizonwireless.com/motorola/droid/?cmp=OTC-Droid-redirect1">Verizon</a>, <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/17/verizon-droid">Daring Fireball</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/verizon-levels-guns-at-apple-not-att-with-droid-phone-blitz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile Project Dark Rumour Update: Financed Phones, Tiered Unlimited Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-project-dark-rumour-update-financed-phones-tiered-unlimited-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-project-dark-rumour-update-financed-phones-tiered-unlimited-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile project black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile project dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard plenty of rumours about Project Dark lately, including new unlimited plans, 21Mbps HSPA, and new handsets. The latest rumours, courtesy of Boy Genius Report, are whispers of Rent-A-Center style, contract-free unsubsidised phone purchasing and tiered unlimited plans.
Obviously T-mobile is attempting to expand their customer base through Project Dark, and part of the approach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmodark_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_tmodark_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>We&#8217;ve heard plenty of rumours about Project Dark lately, including <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-project-dark-a-hyperfast-21mbps-3g-rollout/">new unlimited plans, 21Mbps HSPA</a>, and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-t-mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone-its-a-rescue-plan/">new handsets</a>. The latest rumours, courtesy of Boy Genius Report, are whispers of Rent-A-Center style, contract-free unsubsidised phone purchasing and tiered unlimited plans.<span id="more-361014"></span></p>
<p>Obviously T-mobile is attempting to expand their customer base through Project Dark, and part of the approach is to entice customers who would normally be forced to prepay monthly dues as well as full retail for a device:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;Even More Plus&#8221; will give those who would otherwise qualify for FlexPay the option to finance a phone. [...] Our sources tell us that the phones will not be subsidised and so there won&#8217;t be contracts for the devices, which means you pay the full retail price over the course of a set amount of time (up to 20 months is what we&#8217;re told). Not bad &#8211; for a $US500 device over that time is just $US25/month, as an example.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The next step appears to be offering the &#8220;Most Affordable Unlimited Rate Plans&#8221; in three flavours:</p>
<blockquote><p> [U]nlimited voice, unlimited voice and text, and unlimited voice/text/data all priced at $US40, $US50 and $US60, respectively.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> All unconfirmed rumours, of course, but moves like this could help T-mobile <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/expectations-of-t-mobiles-mysterious-project-black-are-sky-high/">leap up from fourth place in the Great Battle of the Carriers</a>. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/17/more-t-mobile-project-dark-rumors-financed-phones/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-project-dark-rumour-update-financed-phones-tiered-unlimited-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dialled Down Tamara Hope Palm Pre Ads Still Unsettling, Creepy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/dialled-down-tamara-hope-palm-pre-ads-still-unsettling-creepy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/dialled-down-tamara-hope-palm-pre-ads-still-unsettling-creepy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creepy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamas hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=346548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I really dunno about these. Even without Tamara Hope speaking directly into the camera, those looks are still creepy and ineffective. Seems the ad team still isn&#8217;t getting the message.
And I agree with the guys at Pre Thinking: She really, really, seems like she wants to say something at the beginning, before the ad cuts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EqXswDq7GvU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EqXswDq7GvU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object></p>
<p>I really dunno about these. Even without Tamara Hope speaking directly into the camera, those looks are still creepy and ineffective. Seems the ad team still isn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/palm-pre-ad-creator-pretends-that-his-commercials-are-good/">getting the message.</a><span id="more-346548"></span></p>
<p>And I agree with the guys at Pre Thinking: She really, really, seems like she wants to say something at the beginning, before the ad cuts to a close-up of the synched contacts functionality. It&#8217;s the same story with the second video, which showcases calendar linking.</p>
<p>Sorry Modernista, even with a shorter run time and less soul-sucking dialogue, these commercials still fail to market this phone effectively. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqXswDq7GvU">YouTube</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_oFsyqtY94&amp;feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.prethinking.com/home/2009/8/16/latest-tamara-hope-palm-pre-ads-oh-too-creepy-for-ya-how-abo.html">Pre Thinking</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/dialled-down-tamara-hope-palm-pre-ads-still-unsettling-creepy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
