<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; broadcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/broadcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>First White Spaces Broadband Trial Spreads Wi-Fi Via Broadcast TV</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/first-white-spaces-broadband-trial-spreads-wi-fi-via-broadcast-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/first-white-spaces-broadband-trial-spreads-wi-fi-via-broadcast-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NAB has been battling white spaces networks for years, but the technology that repurposes unused TV spectrum as a Wi-Fi signal is finally getting a trial period in Claudville, Virginia.
The idea is simple, but the politics aren&#8217;t. All white spaces networks do is stick data into the unused frequencies that neighbour television signals, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/static_03.jpg" alt="" class="right" />The NAB has been <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1332446720080314">battling white spaces networks for years</a>, but the technology that repurposes unused TV spectrum as a Wi-Fi signal is finally getting a trial period in Claudville, Virginia.<span id="more-361917"></span></p>
<p>The idea is simple, but the politics aren&#8217;t. All white spaces networks do is stick data into the unused frequencies that neighbour television signals, but broadcasters are afraid that TV signals aren&#8217;t robust enough to handle data being packed in so tightly. This trial will be the first real-world test of that belief.</p>
<p>Hopefully all will go well and the tech will be able to provide rural communities with the broadband they&#8217;ve been hurting for. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/first-white-space-broadband-deployment-in-small-virginia-town.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
<p><em>Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/87913776@N00/3241512841/">FutureAtlas</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/first-white-spaces-broadband-trial-spreads-wi-fi-via-broadcast-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Live HD TV Is Made: A Look Inside Sony&#8217;s Outside Broadcast Vans</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/how-live-hd-tv-is-made-a-look-inside-sonys-outside-broadcast-vans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/how-live-hd-tv-is-made-a-look-inside-sonys-outside-broadcast-vans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horseracing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ob vands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outside broadcast vans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smpte09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the outside, it looks like a regular truck: Your typical Isuzu chassis with a van on the back. If you drove past it on the road, you&#8217;d barely notice it. But when you step inside, it&#8217;s a wonderland of dials, knobs, screens and buttons – a technological nerdgasm – and it&#8217;s what makes your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van02-300x400.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van02" title="sony-ob-van02" class="alignleft size-large wp-image-342553" />From the outside, it looks like a regular truck: Your typical Isuzu chassis with a van on the back. If you drove past it on the road, you&#8217;d barely notice it. But when you step inside, it&#8217;s a wonderland of dials, knobs, screens and buttons – a technological nerdgasm – and it&#8217;s what makes your coverage of live sports events so entertaining. And yesterday at SMPTE09, I got to take a look inside two custom trucks built especially for Thoroughbred Racing Productions (TRP).<span id="more-342550"></span></p>
<p>It turns out that outside the ABC, none of the free to air TV networks actually own an outside broadcast (OB) van. So third parties are subcontracted to film live events. But where do these third parties get their vans from? The answer is both logical and surprising: Sony. The electronics giant has a special branch based at North Ryde where they build and customise trucks for a whole range of companies. At the SMPTE09 show, they were showing off two out of three trucks they&#8217;d custom built and designed for TRP.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van09.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van09" title="sony-ob-van09" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-342554" /><br />
The main van consisted of four separate sections. Up the front, facing a wall of 12 HD LCDs, is the visual section of the truck. It&#8217;s here that all the video feeds from the different cameras are controlled and mixed together. Among the various other technologies in this section are a pair of Bose speakers and an HP Touchsmart PC.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van07-300x400.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van07" title="sony-ob-van07" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-342555" /></p>
<p>Behind the visual area is the audio section, where a Yamaha deck controls all the audio feeds, and outputs in stereo sound. Nick Buchner, who&#8217;s the Senior Product Marketing Manager for Content Creation at Sony was keen to stress that even though Sony actually built the truck, they customised it to the purchasers specifications, which often means using other companies&#8217; products, like the Yamaha deck. It&#8217;s for that reason, the van only output in stereo sound rather than 5.1, because it was all that TRP required.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van08-300x400.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van08" title="sony-ob-van08" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-342556" /></p>
<p>The next section in the van was specifically designed for slow motion replays, which is especially important for horseracing coverage. From this section of the van, controllers can send slow motion replays, directly to the course, to the broadcast and to the horse racing stewards for adjudication of a race. What&#8217;s more, they can do it moments after the race has finished thanks to the powerful dedicated servers in the truck. They&#8217;ve also got the ability in this section to burn content to DVD immediately.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van06-533x400.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van06" title="sony-ob-van06" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-342557" /></p>
<p>Finally up the back of the OB van is the engineering section. This is both where all the power behind the van is really held, as well as where all the equalisation of the video happens. It&#8217;s an interesting fact that none of the cameras used to film the sport actually does any white balancing or controlling of exposure – it&#8217;s all controlled back in the van so all the cameras being used can maintain the same quality. </p>
<p>The smaller van on display at the show &#8211; which is for smaller regional races &#8211; was just like a reduced version of the main van.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/sony-ob-van05-300x400.jpg" alt="sony-ob-van05" title="sony-ob-van05" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-342559" /></p>
<p>Some of the kit powering the van is pretty amazing – the slow-mo servers alone are worth about $400,000 each. But they&#8217;re needed – they render HD video in slow motion at bitrates around 400Gbps, and considering how important slow-mo is to racing, they&#8217;re worth every penny. In fact, the whole truck is pretty pricey – TRP&#8217;s big truck cost somewhere in the order of $3-4 million to build and customise, including all the special hardware inside. It takes about 6 months for the crew at Sony to actually build the truck, but the overall process of determining exactly what each client needs and the build takes about a year.</p>
<p>And as a guide as to what kind of stuff the vans comprise of, here you go:</p>
<blockquote><p>28 x HD cameras<br />
76:1 Stabilised lenses<br />
42:1 stabilised lenses<br />
2 x Phantom V10 Extreme Super Slo Cameras<br />
2 x HD PW700 XDCAM Camcorders<br />
8 x EVS XT2<br />
12 x HD XD-CAM Disc Recorders<br />
3 x Gigawave HD Link Systems<br />
8 x Digital Link Systems<br />
HD 3D Graphics, Virtual Graphics and Virtual reality</p></blockquote>
<p>It just goes to show that even though we reckon our consumer-level kit can be pretty awesome, it&#8217;s still miles behind what the people in broadcast get to play with. Lucky bastards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/how-live-hd-tv-is-made-a-look-inside-sonys-outside-broadcast-vans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Aliens Of Star Iota Horologii Are Just Watching Captain Kangaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-aliens-of-the-star-iota-horologii-are-just-watching-captain-kangaroo-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-aliens-of-the-star-iota-horologii-are-just-watching-captain-kangaroo-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When our broadcasts leave Earth, they slowly travel into space. There is, however, a sizable delay between what we watch and what distant aliens watch. This convenient chart shows us what TV various stars are receiving today. [AbstruseGoose via TDW]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/electromagnetic_leak.jpg" alt="" class="left" />When our broadcasts leave Earth, they slowly travel into space. There is, however, a sizable delay between what we watch and what distant aliens watch. This convenient chart shows us what TV various stars are receiving today. [<a href="http://abstrusegoose.com/163">AbstruseGoose</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/134142217/abstruse-goose">TDW</a>]<span id="more-340197"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-aliens-of-the-star-iota-horologii-are-just-watching-captain-kangaroo-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising During The Simpsons More Expensive On Hulu Than TV</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/advertising-during-the-simpsons-more-expensive-on-hulu-than-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/advertising-during-the-simpsons-more-expensive-on-hulu-than-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu ad rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ll laugh at this headline in the not so distant future, but for the first time, buying a 30-second ad during a Fox broadcast of The Simpsons costs less than buying the same ad on Hulu.
Television broadcast ads during The Simpsons cost $US20-$40 per thousand viewers. On the web, the rate jumps to $US60.
Shows like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/url.gif" alt="" class="left" />We&#8217;ll laugh at this headline in the not so distant future, but for the first time, buying a 30-second ad during a Fox broadcast of <em>The Simpsons </em>costs less than buying the same ad on Hulu.<span id="more-339461"></span></p>
<p>Television broadcast ads during <em>The Simpsons</em> cost $US20-$40 per thousand viewers. On the web, the rate jumps to $US60.</p>
<p>Shows like <em>The Simpsons</em> and <em>CSI </em>are now commanding higher ad rates on Hulu and TV.com than on television. It&#8217;s a byproduct viewers being twice as likely to recall web ads than TV ads, according to Neilsen. (Which I would argue is a byproduct of Hulu showing us a lot fewer ads.) </p>
<p>But before we all declare TV dead, remember that Hulu has only 37 seconds of ads per &#8220;30-minute&#8221; show while a Fox broadcast includes a whopping 9 minutes of sales pitches. So there&#8217;s still technically more money in TV, which will change as soon as Hulu begins cramming 9 minutes of ads into each program. </p>
<p>Lots more on the story here: [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=atKGiQOMco.Y">Bloomberg</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/167344/simpsons_hulu_ads.html?tk=rss_news">PCWorld</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/advertising-during-the-simpsons-more-expensive-on-hulu-than-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital TV Transition Starts Today in Wilmington, NC: Let&#8217;s See Who Freaks Out</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/digital_tv_transition_starts_today_in_wilmington_nc_lets_see_who_freaks_out-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/digital_tv_transition_starts_today_in_wilmington_nc_lets_see_who_freaks_out-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/digital_tv_transition_starts_today_in_wilmington_nc_lets_see_who_freaks_out-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of you know, commercial analogue TV in this country will become all but extinct on February 17th 2009. However, the digital revolution begins today in Wilmington NC. Basically, the town and its 197,760 TV-watching households will serve as guinea pigs for the nationwide rollout. The town has been bombarded with information about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/screaming-old-man.jpg" class="left"/>As most of you know, commercial analogue TV in this country will become all but extinct on February 17th 2009. However, the digital revolution begins today in Wilmington NC. Basically, the town and its 197,760 TV-watching households will serve as guinea pigs for the nationwide rollout. The town has been bombarded with information about the switch, but the powers that be will be watching closely to see what unfolds. Will throngs of old people run screaming into the streets when <i>Wheel of Fortune</i> goes black? We will just have to wait and find out. [<a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/09/tvs_digital_transition_starts.php">TVWeek</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital switchover, analog tv, digital tv, fcc, test, tv, wilmington nc --><br />
<span id="more-305211"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/digital_tv_transition_starts_today_in_wilmington_nc_lets_see_who_freaks_out-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiVo Auto-Delete Flag Returns (Thank God It Was Only Star Trek)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/tivo_autodelete_flag_returns_thank_god_it_was_only_star_trek-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/tivo_autodelete_flag_returns_thank_god_it_was_only_star_trek-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/tivo_autodelete_flag_returns_thank_god_it_was_only_star_trek-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you didn&#8217;t already know, broadcasters can slip &#8220;flags&#8221; into TV shows telling your DVR to not record it or to delete it when it hits an expiration date. TiVo users last had a run-in with the auto-delete flag a couple years ago (Media Centre users had a more recent taste), but it looks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/tivodead.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />In case you didn&#8217;t already know, broadcasters can slip &#8220;flags&#8221; into TV shows telling your DVR to not record it or to delete it when it hits an expiration date. TiVo users last had a run-in with the auto-delete flag <a href="http://www.pvrblog.com/pvr/2005/09/tivo_72_os_adds.html">a couple years ago</a> (Media Centre users had <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2.html">a more recent taste</a>), but it looks like it&#8217;s back and haunting <em>Star Trek</em> fans.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: tivo, broadcast flags, dvr, pvr, star trek --><br />
<span id="more-302206"></span>
<p>Jeff recorded one of his favourite episodes of <em>Star Trek</em> at 1PM and got the message above, giving him a whole 2 1/2 hours to watch it. Last time, the flag was a gltich&#8211;it&#8217;s probably the case here, too, since the TiVo Copy Protection site doesn&#8217;t even exist. Still, it&#8217;s a nice reminder your magic box really only has as much as power as the broadcasters generously decide grant it. [<a href="http://www.pvrblog.com/pvr/2008/08/tivo-auto-delet.html">PVR Blog</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/tivo_autodelete_flag_returns_thank_god_it_was_only_star_trek-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flixwagon Broadcasts Video from Any iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_flixwagon_broadcasts_video_from_any_iphone_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_flixwagon_broadcasts_video_from_any_iphone_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_flixwagon_broadcasts_video_from_any_iphone_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs didn&#8217;t mention video features for the iPhone 3G or the new iPhone OS 2.0 but, thankfully, developers are working hard on it. Flixwagon has now created the first-ever video broadcast client for any iPhone. Just open the application, point the camera, and start transmitting video over the web.



Developers in the Flixwagon lab created [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="445"><param name="FlashVars" value="id=38165&#038;movieUrl=http://vs00001.flixwagon.com.s3.amazonaws.com/5d3d57ecdce44e6397868f849d48c87c_60" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.flixwagon.com/flvPlayer.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.flixwagon.com/flvPlayer.swf" allowFullScreen="true" FlashVars="id=38165&#038;movieUrl=http://vs00001.flixwagon.com.s3.amazonaws.com/5d3d57ecdce44e6397868f849d48c87c_60" width="494" height="445" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /></object>Steve Jobs didn&#8217;t mention video features for the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/3g_iphone_first_hands_on-2.html">iPhone 3G</a> or the new <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_20_software_available_in_early_july_free_for_iphone.html">iPhone OS 2.0</a> but, thankfully, developers are <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/iphone_video_recording_now_wor.html">working hard on it</a>. Flixwagon has now created the first-ever video broadcast client for <i>any</i> iPhone. Just open the application, point the camera, and start transmitting video over the web.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  iphone ,  apple ,  broadcast ,  clips ,  flixwagon ,  iphone 3g ,  video ,  videos  --><br />
<span id="more-293194"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>Developers in the Flixwagon lab created the first-ever mobile client that can broadcast live high-quality video from unlocked iPhones to the web. The company wanted to experiment with ways to broadcast live video from the iPhone until the official SDK supports video. Flixwagon plans to continue working with the iPhone SDK in the future so that it can offer this functionality to all users once video becomes a standard iPhone feature.</p>
<p>After Flixwagon is installed on the phone, users can broadcast videos from it to the Flixwagon website with one click. Videos can be watched live or stored for future viewing. Also, they can be embedded in blogs via our flixee widget or uploaded to the user&#8217;s YouTube account. Users can also easily determine which of their contacts to share each video with.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you have an unlocked iPhone with Installer in it, you can <a href="http://www.flixwagon.com/alpha/Request">click here to join the alpha testing</a>. [<a href="http://www.flixwagon.com/iphone">Flixwagon</a> and <a href="http://www.flixwagon.com/watch/38188">Flixwagon iPhone Clips</a>]</p></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_flixwagon_broadcasts_video_from_any_iphone_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and Windows Media Center Love Broadcasters More Than You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/microsoft_and_windows_media_centre_love_broadcasters_more_than_you-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/microsoft_and_windows_media_centre_love_broadcasters_more_than_you-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows media center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/microsoft_and_windows_media_centre_love_broadcasters_more_than_you-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, courtesy of NBC, people with a Windows Media Centre DVR setup got a rude reminder that broadcasters can flip a switch (called a broadcast flag) to tell DVRs not to record a show. Here&#8217;s the thing: Honouring the flag is actually optional for software and hardware makers, after courts smacked down the FCC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/broadcastflags.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2.html">Last week</a>, courtesy of NBC, people with a Windows Media Centre DVR setup got a rude reminder that broadcasters can flip a switch (called a broadcast flag) to tell DVRs not to record a show. Here&#8217;s the thing: Honouring the flag is actually optional for software and hardware makers, after courts smacked down the FCC proposal to make them mandatory. But Microsoft has confirmed that they do whatever the broadcaster tells them, again, even though they don&#8217;t have to. NBC hasn&#8217;t confirmed yet whether or not the <em>American Gladiators</em>flag was intentional, but their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/microsoft_developing_copyright_filter_for_zune_will_block_pirated_content-2.html">history</a> doesn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/nbc_wants_itunes_to_block_pirated_content_from_ipods-2.html">give me a fuzzy feeling</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: american gladiator, dvr, gadgets, media center, microsoft, nbc, windows media center --><br />
<span id="more-289905"></span>
<p>Hug your DVRs, people, because while NBC might be the most anal network about how people watch its shows (very like because it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89300376">last place in ratings</a>), they may very well be just the first to use broadcast flags this way (CBS would probably the be the last, they&#8217;re oddly the most forward-thinking network on the digital front). While the broadcast flag was conceptualised to protect premium and PPV content, it could increasingly be used to protect marquis shows like <em>Heroes</em>, to force you to view them on NBC&#8217;s terms, like at NBC.com. Why? Ad dollars.</p>
<p>But while it&#8217;s expected for networks to act like this, it&#8217;s sad that Microsoft is effectively choosing content producers over consumers, when it <em>doesn&#8217;t have to</em>, and as the EFF points out, &#8220;the only way customers know what Microsoft has agreed to is when the technology they&#8217;ve bought suddenly stops working.&#8221; And that&#8217;s just wrong. [<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9946780-7.html?tag=nefd.riv">Cnet</a> via <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/19/0237257&#038;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/microsoft_and_windows_media_centre_love_broadcasters_more_than_you-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Center&#8217;s Do Not Record Broadcast Flag Is Still Alive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, some Windows Media Center owners were blocked from recording American Gladiators and Medium because of an incorrectly set broadcast flag from NBC. What&#8217;s the deal here? The broadcasters (NBC, ABC, HBO) can turn on a flag in their data stream that tells whatever DVR machine on your end that it&#8217;s NOT alright to record [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/broadcastflag.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>Recently, some Windows Media Center owners were blocked from recording <i>American Gladiators</i> and <i>Medium</i> because of an incorrectly set broadcast flag from NBC. What&#8217;s the deal here? The broadcasters (NBC, ABC, HBO) can turn on a flag in their data stream that tells whatever DVR machine on your end that it&#8217;s <i>NOT</i> alright to record a show, protecting Pay-Per-View or premium channel content from being archived. This has actually been around for years.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: broadcast flag, dvr, media center, microsoft, pvr, tivo --><br />
<span id="more-289476"></span>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s had this ability in Media Centre to prevent specific shows from being recorded for a while, and the last time there was an error was a few years back during an episode of the Simpsons. It&#8217;s not something broadcasters usually do. This also isn&#8217;t a unique thing to Microsoft&mdash;TiVo has something similar but not quite as severe&mdash;it does illustrate the fact that if the providers wanted to, they could shut down your Media Centre DVR right now and you couldn&#8217;t do much about it. [<a href="http://justinjas.com/post/34602210">JustinJas</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080514-nbc-vista-copy-protection-snafu-reminds-us-why-drm-stinks.html">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/media_centers_do_not_record_broadcast_flag_is_still_alive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba IK-HD1 is World&#8217;s Smallest HDTV Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/toshiba_ikhd1_is_worlds_smallest_hdtv_camera-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/toshiba_ikhd1_is_worlds_smallest_hdtv_camera-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haroon Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/toshiba_ikhd1_is_worlds_smallest_hdtv_camera-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With vital measurements of 1.6-inches cubed and 65 grams in weight, Toshiba&#8217;s IK-HD1 waltzes in to easily steal the &#8220;Smallest HDTV Camera, Ever&#8221; title. Packed to the miniature eyeballs with three CCD chips, the 1K-HD1 can capture video at broadcast-quality at 1080i, but it won&#8217;t be making its way to your camcorder anytime soon. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/Big%20Little%201KHD1%20GI.jpg" class="left"   style="display:block;float:none"/>With vital measurements of 1.6-inches cubed and 65 grams in weight, Toshiba&#8217;s IK-HD1 waltzes in to easily steal the &#8220;Smallest HDTV Camera, Ever&#8221; title. Packed to the miniature eyeballs with three CCD chips, the 1K-HD1 can capture video at broadcast-quality at 1080i, but it won&#8217;t be making its way to your camcorder anytime soon. The tiny marvel is actually intended for professional broadcasting, and needs to be hooked up to a rather sizable control unit, which can be placed up to 90-feet away. It appears Mr Professional Broadcasting wins again. Dammit. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/04/toshibas_unbeli.php">DVice</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: 1k-hd1, broadcasting, camcorders, camera, cameras, ccd, hd, hdtv, high definition, professional, toshiba, video --><br />
<span id="more-284225"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/toshiba_ikhd1_is_worlds_smallest_hdtv_camera-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
