<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; british</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/british/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>British Government to Launch Satellites Into Orbit on the Back of Virgin Galactic&#8217;s WhiteKnightTwo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/british_government_to_launch_satellites_into_orbit_on_the_back_of_virgin_galactics_whiteknighttwo-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/british_government_to_launch_satellites_into_orbit_on_the_back_of_virgin_galactics_whiteknighttwo-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaceships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin galactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white knight ii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/british_government_to_launch_satellites_into_orbit_on_the_back_of_virgin_galactics_whiteknighttwo-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the WhiteKnightTwo won&#8217;t be all play after all, as the British government wants to use Virgin Galactic&#8217;s spacecraft to send some state satellites into low orbit.


According to Flight Global, The Government wants to develop a rocket, dubbed &#8220;LauncherOne,&#8221; to sit on the back of WhiteKnightTwo and when the craft reaches the proper altitude, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/494x_whiteknighttwo_2.jpg" alt="" />Looks like the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/virgin_galactics_white_knight_branson_rutan_and_spaceman_buzz_captured_on_vid-2.html">WhiteKnightTwo</a> won&#8217;t be all play after all, as the British government wants to use Virgin Galactic&#8217;s spacecraft to send some state satellites into low orbit.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: space, british national space centre, launcherone, satellites, spacecraft, virgin galactic, virgin whiteknighttwo --><br />
<span id="more-327888"></span>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/18/322776/uk-government-to-back-air-launched-satellite-launcher.html">Flight Global</a>, The Government wants to develop a rocket, dubbed &#8220;LauncherOne,&#8221; to sit on the back of WhiteKnightTwo and when the craft reaches the proper altitude, launch off on its own to begin orbit. The microsatellites would be under 200kg in weight, though it&#8217;s unclear exactly what the satellites will do. But with all these add-ons, WhiteKnightTwo is starting to remind me of The Centurions or something. [<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/18/322776/uk-government-to-back-air-launched-satellite-launcher.html">Flight Global</a> via <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/18/322776/uk-government-to-back-air-launched-satellite-launcher.html">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/british_government_to_launch_satellites_into_orbit_on_the_back_of_virgin_galactics_whiteknighttwo-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Politician Wants OFLC Ratings For Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/british_politician_wants_oflc_ratings_for_websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/british_politician_wants_oflc_ratings_for_websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/british_politician_wants_oflc_ratings_for_websites.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British politician Andy Burnham wants the internet to have film-like ratings for every English speaking website. According to Reuters, he&#8217;s planning on negotiating with President Obama on drawing up new rules for websites around the world.
Obviously, I don&#8217;t need to tell you guys why this will never happen, but I will anyway.For a start, who&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="gizlogo m rating.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gizlogo%20m%20rating.jpg" width="535" height="77" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span>British politician Andy Burnham wants the internet to have film-like ratings for every English speaking website. According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4BQ0JV20081227?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews">Reuters</a>, he&#8217;s planning on negotiating with President Obama on drawing up new rules for websites around the world.</p>
<p>Obviously, I don&#8217;t need to tell you guys why this will never happen, but I will anyway.<span id="more-320658"></span>For a start, who&#8217;s going to be doing the rating? Considering the billions of English-speaking websites online already how does he plan on reviewing and rating every website? Plus there&#8217;s the fact that websites are constantly changing, evolving beasts &#8211; what&#8217;s to stop a PG-rated site from becoming M rated after someone posts a story that isn&#8217;t quite suitable for kids? The only conceivable solution would be an automated software solution, which would almost fail <em>and</em> slow down the internet as well.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the whole local angle &#8211; I mean, can we really expect to rate websites when we can&#8217;t even rate video games properly?</p>
<p>My guess is that this plan will be taken quietly out back and killed off&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4BQ0JV20081227?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/british_politician_wants_oflc_ratings_for_websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
