<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; box2box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/box2box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Datto&#8217;s Box2Box Is Easy But Expensive Peer to Peer Offsite Backup</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dattos_box2box_is_easy_but_expensive_peer_to_peer_offsite_backup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dattos_box2box_is_easy_but_expensive_peer_to_peer_offsite_backup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box2box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dattos_box2box_is_easy_but_expensive_peer_to_peer_offsite_backup-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Offsite backup is the way to go if you want your data to survive a fire, but it usually requires costly monthly subscription fees and bandwidth usage. Datto&#8217;s Box2Box does not.


Datto&#8217;s previous boxes consisted of an on-site (in your home/office) NAS that uploads its contents onto a server for safekeeping. This Box2Box consists of two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/box2box.jpg" />Offsite backup is the way to go if you want your data to survive a fire, but it usually requires costly monthly subscription fees and bandwidth usage. Datto&#8217;s Box2Box does not.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: offsite backup, box2box, datto, datto box2box --><br />
<span id="more-324571"></span>
<p>Datto&#8217;s <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/datto">previous boxes</a> consisted of an on-site (in your home/office) NAS that uploads its contents onto a server for safekeeping. This Box2Box consists of two boxes, one at your place and one at your friend&#8217;s, that synchronises between each other. This way there&#8217;s no subscription fee for online storage, but you still have to transfer the files between the two boxes&mdash;a time-intensive task the first time you do it over a cable modem connection.</p>
<p>Although there&#8217;s no subscription fee, you still have to pay for the box itself, and prices are quite high.</p>
<p>Two 250GB boxes come at $US620, two 500GB are $US660 and two 1TB are $US850. If you&#8217;re somewhat familiar with Linux, you could build a cheap homebrew version yourself, but for small businesses that don&#8217;t have much of an IT staff, it&#8217;s not a bad choice. [<a href="http://www.dattobackup.com/box2box-preorder.php">Datto</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dattos_box2box_is_easy_but_expensive_peer_to_peer_offsite_backup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
