<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; bombs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/bombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The True, Heartbreaking Faces Of The Nuclear Era</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I write about high-tech weapons. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to obliterate each other for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this mad race. Warning: graphic images.
A few years after the United States unleashed the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s05_00009473.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s05_00009473.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Sometimes I write about <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/weapons/">high-tech weapons</a>. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">obliterate each other</a> for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/how_each_nuclearcapable_country_got_its_bombs_visualized-2/">mad race</a>. <strong>Warning: graphic images.</strong><span id="more-365713"></span></p>
<p>A few years after the United States unleashed <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/what-is-this-12/">the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki</a>, the Soviet Union tested their first nuclear warhead ever. They appropriately called it &#8220;First Lightning&#8221;, the opening of a series of 456 atomic tests that brought hell to Earth 60 years ago. For all of us, that summons terrifying but beautiful images like this into our brains:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_licorne-atomic-blast.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Sadly, to more than one million innocent people living near the Semipalatinsk Polygon &mdash; the Soviet nuclear testing site in the northeast of Kazakhstan &mdash; it means this:<br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s01_00009823.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/74/gallery_s01_00009823.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s03_00001340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/81/gallery_s03_00001340.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s10_00000267.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/8b/gallery_s10_00000267.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s22_00004607.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/dc/gallery_s22_00004607.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>For three generations, and more to come, those tests mean deformed babies. They mean premature aging and countless diseases caused by radiation poisoning. The bombs&#8217; ghosts still live in the dead steppe, their invisible fangs ready to suck seven years off the life of every person living around that place. That&#8217;s the difference in life-expectancy with the rest of Kazakhstan.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s not the only horror inflicted by weapons in the Soviet Union &mdash; or in the rest of the world. I recently read all about them in a fascinating book by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Kapu%C3%85%C2%9Bci%C3%85%C2%84ski">Ryszard Kapuściński</a>, one of the best journalists and writers of our time. The book, called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_(Polish_book)"><em>Imperium</em></a>, talks about the Soviet Union through a series of adventures and trips that reach all the corners of the Red Empire. The mosaic is a frightening view of the deadliest, most insensitive killing machine that has ever existed, all through the eyes of the people who suffered it. Not even Hitler matched the horrors of Stalin and his cohorts.</p>
<p>But while Kapuściński&#8217;s raw prose have moved me to tears many times, these images by <a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Ed Ou</a> are a perfect summary of the horrors inflicted upon hundreds of millions that Kapuściński describes in his book.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s12_00004707.jpg" alt="" class="center" />However, as I watch through glassy eyes how Mayra Zhumageldina massages her daughter Zhannoor, or how 29-year-old Berik Syzdykov sings and plays piano despite being deformed and blind after being exposed to a nuclear blast while he was inside his mum&#8217;s womb, I try to smile a bit. I try to be a bit optimistic because, no matter how monstrous some men and women can be, the human spirit always seems to find a way to survive. [<a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Adventures With Light</a> and <a href="http://www.reportage-bygettyimages.com/">Getty Images</a> via <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/kazakhstans_radioactive_legacy.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bomb-Sniffing Gadget That&#8217;s (Definitely Not) Saving Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ade 651]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The promise of the ADE 651 is seductive: a handheld detector which susses out bombs, guns, drugs and human bodies from up to a kilometre away. And the Iraqi military swears by it! One problem: It doesn&#8217;t seem to work.
To be able to instantly detect contraband like this would be a game-changer in Iraq, where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-04_at_9.05.19_AM.jpg" alt="" class="right" />The promise of the ADE 651 is seductive: a handheld detector which susses out bombs, guns, drugs and human bodies from up to a kilometre away. And the Iraqi military swears by it! One problem: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">It doesn&#8217;t seem to work</a>.<span id="more-364677"></span></p>
<p>To be able to instantly detect contraband like this would be a game-changer in Iraq, where the (effectively) free transit of roadside bombs and IEDs is a constant threat, so the Iraqi government is willing to pay a premium for devices that promise as much &mdash; they&#8217;ve already bought 1500 of the detectors at a price of $US16,500 to $US60,000 each. Despite the steep price and fierce user loyalty though, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">US government officials say</a> the devices don&#8217;t work <em>at all</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p> Dale Murray, head of the National Explosive Engineering Sciences Security centre at Sandia Labs, which does testing for the Department of defence, said the centre had &#8220;tested several devices in this category, and none have ever performed better than random chance.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Capital &#8220;S&#8221; Sceptical organisations like the James Randi Educational Foundation have <a href="http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/231-a-direct-specific-challenge-from-james-randi-and-the-jref.html">joined the cause</a> too, flagging the ADE 651&#8217;s manufacturer&#8217;s claims that the device works with spooky-sounding &#8220;electrostatic magnetic ion attraction&#8221; and offering a (rhetorical) bounty to anyone who can prove they actually work.</p>
<p>ATSC, the company that manufactures the device out of the UK, wouldn&#8217;t even talk to the <em>New York Times</em>, cementing an already obvious conclusion: This is a case of a bogus company taking advantage of credulous, vulnerable consumers by selling a device that <em>seems</em> like it works by virtue of being many users&#8217; <em>only means of bomb detection</em>, meaning that they never notice when it doesn&#8217;t work &mdash; it&#8217;s just another car passing through a checkpoint; who knows if the bombing later that afternoon had anything to do with it!&mdash; and always notice when it does, even if by pure chance.</p>
<p>You may have failed miserably at designing a universal contraband detector, ATSC, but hey, at least your scam was well engineered. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yellow Jacket: The Unmanned Helicopter That Sniffs Out Bombs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/yellow-jacket-the-unmanned-helicopter-that-sniffs-out-roadside-bombs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/yellow-jacket-the-unmanned-helicopter-that-sniffs-out-roadside-bombs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helicopters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow jacket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roadside bombs are a source of fear for both soldiers as well as their worried families at home. Thankfully the Pentagon is working on projects such as Yellow Jacket: unmanned helicopters which detect electromagnetic emissions from potential improvised explosive devices (IEDs).
As many IEDs are set off using a wireless signal, these drones will be able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/helipanda.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_helipanda.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Roadside bombs are a source of fear for both soldiers as well as their worried families at home. Thankfully the Pentagon is working on projects such as Yellow Jacket: unmanned helicopters which detect electromagnetic emissions from potential improvised explosive devices (IEDs).<span id="more-364445"></span></p>
<p>As many IEDs are set off using a wireless signal, these drones will be able to survey areas for the electromagnetic emissions associated with receivers and provide an early warning to soldiers. No matter how silly the codename, this is one important project and I hope that it gets put into use as soon as possible. [<a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a6bfa0403-0d4e-4311-a574-617b470a67b5&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest">Aviation Week</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-10/unmanned-helipanda-sniffs-out-improvised-explosives">Pop Sci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/yellow-jacket-the-unmanned-helicopter-that-sniffs-out-roadside-bombs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA Concerned About Flight Attendants Carrying Handheld Bombs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/faa-concerned-about-flight-attendants-carrying-handheld-bombs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/faa-concerned-about-flight-attendants-carrying-handheld-bombs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#8217;re on pretty much every flight now: Handheld credit-card readers to buy snackies and drinks. None have exploded yet, but the FAA just issued special advisories to airlines, since they&#8217;re powered by explode-y lithium ion batteries.
Now, the FAA says the airlines need approval from the FAA&#8217;s hazardous materials division, and has asked them not to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bagcheck.png" alt="" class="left" />They&#8217;re on pretty much every flight now: Handheld credit-card readers to buy snackies and drinks. None have exploded yet, but the FAA <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/business/27fires.html?_r=1&amp;ref=technology">just issued special advisories</a> to airlines, since they&#8217;re powered by explode-y lithium ion batteries.<span id="more-363105"></span></p>
<p>Now, the FAA says the airlines need approval from the FAA&#8217;s hazardous materials division, and has asked them not to store spare lithium ion batteries for the readers on planes. A few airlines went through some special training to get the OK, but at least Delta and JetBlue don&#8217;t carry spares or charge the readers on board at all.</p>
<p>The current rate for gadgets exploding on planes is about one every four months, says a former NTSB dude. Which isn&#8217;t so bad, considering there are millions of flights happening in that time period. Still, I have the feeling this <a href="http://xkcd.com/651/">xkcd comic</a> is going to stay funny for the reasons it&#8217;s funny now for like another year, max. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/business/27fires.html?_r=1&amp;ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/faa-concerned-about-flight-attendants-carrying-handheld-bombs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Bomb Emergency Kit Appeals To The Paranoid In Me</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dirty-bomb-emergency-kit-appeals-to-the-paranoid-in-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dirty-bomb-emergency-kit-appeals-to-the-paranoid-in-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was a kid I saw The Day After, which left me having nightmares about nuclear bombs exploding in the horizon, and looting supermarkets for chocolate bars. Maybe that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m itching to buy this dirty bomb emergency kit.
The $US250 kit description says:
 Detects radiation and significantly removes radioactive material from human skin and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_dirty_bomb_kit_RAD_lg.jpg" alt="" class="left" />When I was a kid I saw The Day After, which left me having nightmares about <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">nuclear bombs exploding</a> in the horizon, and looting supermarkets for chocolate bars. Maybe that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m itching to buy this dirty bomb emergency kit.<span id="more-356746"></span></p>
<p>The $US250 kit description says:<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> Detects radiation and significantly removes radioactive material from human skin and other surfaces after a dirty bomb attack or other radiological events.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> It includes:</p>
<blockquote><p> • Our proprietary and patent-pending Quick Decon Mass Effect™ solutions for Radiation Decontamination. These water-based liquids come in convenient-to-use color-coded 32 oz. bottles with accompanying trigger sprayers (2). Our solutions are made from cosmetic-grade, FDA-approved materials and are not radioactive before use.<br />
• One quart (32 fl oz.) for Transition metals such as Cobalt, Cesium, Strontium and Thallium. See chart for all radioactive elements.<br />
• One quart (32 fl oz.) for Actinides such as Uranium, Plutonium, Technetium and Radium. See chart for all radioactive elements.<br />
• 2 RADTriage™ Personal Radiation Detectors<br />
# Decontamination Rad-wipes (45 per package)<br />
• Vinyl gloves for use during decontamination process (4 pairs)<br />
• Rad-Waste Bags (2)<br />
• Radioactive Material Caution Labels (2) for use with Rad-Waste Bags<br />
• Radiacwash Towelettes (6)<br />
• N95 Particulate Face Masks (4)<br />
• Instructions for Use<br />
• Instructions in PDF format<br />
• Downloadable Material Safety Data Sheets<br />
• MSDS for Transition Metals Solution<br />
• MSDS for Actinide Solution<br />
• Chart of Problematic Radioactive Elements showing Actinides and Transition Metals<br />
• A convenient and sturdy yellow hard-plastic carrying case easily identifiable as the Dirty Bomb Emergency Kit™ by its yellow and purple label</p>
</blockquote>
<p> After reading all that, somehow I have the feeling that I won&#8217;t need one of these in the case any dirty bomb explodes near me. I would just run around like a headless chicken, waiting for the people in the rad suits to arrive and get me into a bag. [<a href="http://www.nukepills.com/dirty-bomb-emergency-kit.htm">Nukepills</a> via <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/005033.html">Defense Tech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dirty-bomb-emergency-kit-appeals-to-the-paranoid-in-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How A Soviet Doomsday Master Missile Looks And Works</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/how-a-soviet-doomsday-master-missile-looks-and-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/how-a-soviet-doomsday-master-missile-looks-and-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icbms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mertvaya ruka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we learnt that the Soviets still have a working doomsday system in place. This is an SS-17 ICBM master missile, which are launched first. Once they are in the skies, they activate the launch for all the Russian nukes.
That includes every single nuclear weapon, every one of the Russian Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles in ground [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/e6uert6urty.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_e6uert6urty.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Yesterday we learnt that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/">the Soviets still have a working doomsday system in place</a>. This is an SS-17 ICBM master missile, which are launched first. Once they are in the skies, they activate the launch for <em>all</em> the Russian nukes.<span id="more-356524"></span></p>
<p>That includes every single nuclear weapon, every one of the Russian Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles in <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/titan_nuclear_missile_base_for/">ground silos</a>, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/russian-akula-class-attack-submarines-patrolling-us-east-coast/">nuclear submarines</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/russia_to_deploy_strategic_nuclear_bombers_in_cuba_venezuela/">heavy bombers</a> around the world. Scary stuff indeed.</p>
<p>But fear not, fellow humans, because the Dead Hand system is not <i>completely</i> automatic. The actual red button is apparently activated by a soldier hidden in some underground bunker.</p>
<p>Yes, I feel so much safer now. [<a href="http://www.gradremstroy.ru/news/komandnyj-centr-rvsn-kosvinskij-kamen.html">gradremstroy&mdash;in Russian</a> via <a href="http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2009/09/germania-nazi-monumental-plans-for.html">DRB</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/how-a-soviet-doomsday-master-missile-looks-and-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Nervous: Rusty Soviet Doomsday System Still Turned On</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icbms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mertvaya ruka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perimeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ussr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired Magazine has a fascinating article on the doomsday system that was built by the Soviets 25 years ago. It was designed to obliterate the US no matter what happened to the USSR&#8212;and it still works today. Shiver.
 The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/war_games.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_war_games.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Wired Magazine has a <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPage=all">fascinating article</a> on the doomsday system that was built by the Soviets 25 years ago. It was designed to obliterate the US no matter what happened to the USSR&mdash;and it still works today. Shiver.<span id="more-355583"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American nuclear strike. Even if the US crippled the USSR with a surprise attack, the Soviets could still hit back. It wouldn&#8217;t matter if the US blew up the Kremlin, took out the defence ministry, severed the communications network, and killed everyone with stars on their shoulders. Ground-based sensors would detect that a devastating blow had been struck and a counterattack would be launched.</p>
<p>The technical name was Perimeter, but some called it Mertvaya Ruka, or Dead Hand. It was built 25 years ago and remained a closely guarded secret.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The scary thing is that Perimeter still works today. At least according to Valery Yarynich, a former Soviet colonel now 72 years old. Yarynich should know, though: He worked 30 years at the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff helping to build it.</p>
<p>US Officials won&#8217;t even like to mention it, but with the Cold War over and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/russian-akula-class-attack-submarines-patrolling-us-east-coast/">Russia being more or less a friend</a>, why risk having such a system in place? I really don&#8217;t like the idea of something going wrong in a rusty 25-year-old piece of Soviet-era technology.</p>
<p>Not when it can automatically launch a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">nuclear attack capable of taking out Humanity out of the map</a>. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPage=all">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is This?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/what-is-this-37/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/what-is-this-37/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is this]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=354613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it a communist naval mine? A communist robot? A communist giant ashtray? A communist trashcan? What? In the name of Mao Zedong I ask you: What are you, you weird ironclad device you?
It&#8217;s an anti-explosive container, placed in a subway station in Beijing. As China prepares for its 60th Anniversary&#8212;proclaimed on October 1, 1949&#8212;authorities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/bomb-container.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_bomb-container.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Is it a communist naval mine? A communist robot? A communist giant ashtray? A communist trashcan? What? In the name of Mao Zedong I ask you: What are you, you weird ironclad device you?<span id="more-354613"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an anti-explosive container, placed in a subway station in Beijing. As China prepares for its 60th Anniversary&mdash;proclaimed on October 1, 1949&mdash;authorities are tightening security against terrorist attacks even more. Because we all know that terrorists leave packages marked as &#8220;bomb&#8221; ready to be put into a bomb trashcan. [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/09/china_prepares_for_its_60th_an.html">Boston</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/what-is-this-37/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bomb Vase is a Hippie&#8217;s Secret Weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_bomb_vase_is_a_hippies_secret_weapon-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_bomb_vase_is_a_hippies_secret_weapon-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_bomb_vase_is_a_hippies_secret_weapon-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As a statement against war, these Peaceful Bomb Vases were created to hold flowers instead of violence. As someone with an irrational fear for potted plants, it makes me want to hide. [LikeCool via geekologie]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/bomb_vase.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>As a statement against war, these Peaceful Bomb Vases were created to hold flowers instead of violence. As someone with an irrational fear for potted plants, it makes me want to hide. [<a href="http://www.likecool.com/A_Peaceful_Bomb_Vase&mdash;Outdoor--Home.html">LikeCool</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/04/zomg_this_vase_is_the_bomb.php">geekologie</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: vases, bomb vase, bomb vases, bombs, peaceful bomb vase, peaceful bomb vases, war, war vase --><br />
<span id="more-335037"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_bomb_vase_is_a_hippies_secret_weapon-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>93-Year-Old Japanese Man Certified as Double A-Bomb Victim</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/93yearold_japanese_man_certified_as_double_abomb_victim-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/93yearold_japanese_man_certified_as_double_abomb_victim-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/93yearold_japanese_man_certified_as_double_abomb_victim-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have some lousy luck if you&#8217;re near the site of an A-bomb strike. You have really, really bad luck if, three days later, you get hit with another nuke.


That&#8217;s exactly what happened to Tsutomu Yamaguchi back in 1945. He was on a business trip in Hiroshima, where he suffered serious burns to his upper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/doublenuke.jpg" alt="" />You have some lousy luck if you&#8217;re near the site of an A-bomb strike. You have really, <i>really</i> bad luck if, three days later, you get hit with another nuke.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: nukes, bombs, history, japan, war, weapons --><br />
<span id="more-331891"></span>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what happened to Tsutomu Yamaguchi back in 1945. He was on a business trip in Hiroshima, where he suffered serious burns to his upper body after the US dropped a nuke on the city. He spent the night in the city then returned home to Nagasaki, just in time for the second bomb to drop.</p>
<p>He had previously been certified as a survivor of Nagasaki, but it&#8217;s just recently that he&#8217;s been certified as a survivor of both bombs. Of course, if the bombs were <i>that</i> bad, he wouldn&#8217;t still be alive 64 years later. What&#8217;s so bad about nukes, anyways? [<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_JAPAN_BOMB_VICTIM_ASOL-?SITE=YOMIURI&#038;SECTION=HOSTED_ASIA&#038;TEMPLATE=ap_national.html">AP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/93yearold_japanese_man_certified_as_double_abomb_victim-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
