<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; biometrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/biometrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Ideas for Seamless Biometric Security on iPhone and MacBook</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/apples_ideas_for_seamless_biometric_security_on_iphone_and_macbook-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/apples_ideas_for_seamless_biometric_security_on_iphone_and_macbook-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/apples_ideas_for_seamless_biometric_security_on_iphone_and_macbook-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me, the biometric readers you see on most laptops are obnoxious blemishes&#8212;they really can&#8217;t make them more discrete? Apple feels the same way, so I like their ideas for seamless biometric security.


The most realistic and likely biometric tool is a hidden sensor within a touchscreen or notebook&#8217;s trackpad that would detect fingerprints, vein patterns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/bios.jpg" alt="" />To me, the biometric readers you see on most laptops are obnoxious blemishes&mdash;they really can&#8217;t make them more discrete? Apple feels the same way, so I like <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/27/apple_developing_stealth_biometric_security_for_iphone.html">their ideas</a> for seamless biometric security.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: apple, biometric, biometrics, iphone, macbook, notebook, patent, patents, security, verizonbestmodo --><br />
<span id="more-332320"></span>
<p>The most realistic and likely biometric tool is a hidden sensor within a touchscreen or notebook&#8217;s trackpad that would detect fingerprints, vein patterns or even the shape of your ear when you use the phone or notebook like normal, making the whole process nearly invisible. The patent also considers face recognition using the webcam&mdash;but considering our past experience with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/lenovo_ideapad_u110_review_verdict_short_ride_in_a_reasonablypaced_machine-2.html">VeriFace&#8217;s tech</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/what_to_know_about_iphoto_09_face_detection_and_recognition-2.html">iPhoto&#8217;s face recognition</a>, that sounds kinda lousy. The &#8220;ew, creepy&#8221; solution they propose is collecting a user&#8217;s DNA to recognise their genetic makeup when they come into contact with the machine.</p>
<p>Oh and there&#8217;s a couple of ideas like arranging shapes or patterns that are sorta Android&#8217;s neato puzzle lock. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/27/apple_developing_stealth_biometric_security_for_iphone.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/apples_ideas_for_seamless_biometric_security_on_iphone_and_macbook-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security Wants To Use Your Foul Stench as a Lie Detector</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/homeland_security_wants_to_use_your_foul_stench_as_a_lie_detector-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/homeland_security_wants_to_use_your_foul_stench_as_a_lie_detector-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body odour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/homeland_security_wants_to_use_your_foul_stench_as_a_lie_detector-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security is planning a study to find out if human body odour can be used as a biometric identifier and/or a means of detecting a lie.


DHS is currently collecting human odour samples and beginning preliminary work to uncover indicators that could be used against potential criminals. Essentially, they believe that an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/pig-pen-lie-detector-2.jpg" alt="" />The Department of Homeland Security is planning a study to find out if human body odour can be used as a biometric identifier and/or a means of detecting a lie.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: biometrics, body odor, body odor lie detector, department of homeland security, dhl, lie detector, smelly lies --><br />
<span id="more-330333"></span>
<p>DHS is currently collecting human odour samples and beginning preliminary work to uncover indicators that could be used against potential criminals. Essentially, they believe that an odour may not only be unique to a particular individual, but can also a &#8220;useful indicator of certain human behaviors.&#8221; This research has a foundation in recent studies that have used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to analyse organic compounds in human sweat. These studies have indicated that there may very well be marker compounds in human sweat that can be used to identify individuals, and that these &#8220;odour fingerprints&#8221; can change over time for as yet unknown reasons.</p>
<p>Naturally, civil liberties advocates (especially the smelly ones) are taking issue with this research, claiming that the department had &#8220;misplaced priorities.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The history of DHS&#8217; deployment of these technologies has been one colossal failure after another,&#8221; he said. &#8220;There is no lie detector. This research has been a long, meandering journey, which has taken us down one blind alley after another.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Personally, I would have to agree with the ACLU on this one. I&#8217;m no scientist, but I would imagine that there are too many variables like diet and scented perfumes/creams that could result in inconsistencies. It seems like less of an exact science than other biometric technologies. [<a href="http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2009/03/09/DHS_wants_to_use_human_body_odor_as_biometric_identifier_clue_to_deception/UPI-20121236627329/">UPI</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/homeland_security_wants_to_use_your_foul_stench_as_a_lie_detector-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Spends Billions On High Tech IDs, Has No Way To Read Them</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/uk_spends_billions_on_high_tech_ids_has_no_way_to_read_them-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/uk_spends_billions_on_high_tech_ids_has_no_way_to_read_them-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/uk_spends_billions_on_high_tech_ids_has_no_way_to_read_them-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to the British government for spending the equivalent of $US6.6 billion US on a biometric National Identity Card program without budgeting for a single card reader. Truly, they operate like a finely-tuned machine.


Basically, they are set to roll out these cards to government officials and then on to private citizens as a way for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/residence-card.png" style="display:block;" />Kudos to the British government for spending the equivalent of $US6.6 billion US on a biometric National Identity Card program without budgeting for a single card reader. Truly, they operate like a finely-tuned machine.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: brilliant, biometric ids, card readers, england, national identity card, uk --><br />
<span id="more-325941"></span>
<p>Basically, they are set to roll out these cards to government officials and then on to private citizens as a way for the authorities to to protect identities and safeguard borders&mdash;but not a single police station, border entry point, or job centre has a reader capable of extracting information from the card&#8217;s biometric chip.</p>
<p>It took a Cambridge University security expert to explain the obvious:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If this capability is not there then the biometrics are, in short, a waste of time. I would have thought that the government would have tried to get the readers rolled out as soon as possible as it is only when you get serious deployments that you start to learn what can go wrong.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The government reaction to the situation was swift and decisive:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have always said that we would roll out the scheme incrementally. The card will not be as useful as it could be until we have got the volumes out there. There&#8217;s no prospect in the immediate future for the government directing anybody that you have to buy those things [readers] because we would be placing a burden on these organisations. The manufacturers of the machines have also got to decide whether it is worth their while to produce them. I think that organisations will decide in time that it is better, quicker and cheaper to have them.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Woah, wait a minute! This is going to cost money? Nobody said anything about <em>money</em>! [<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/66B+British+ID+Program+Has+No+Card+Readers/article14175.htm">Daily Tech</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/02/05/uk-spends-billions-on-high-tech-ids-forgets-to-buy-card-readers/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/uk_spends_billions_on_high_tech_ids_has_no_way_to_read_them-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony&#8217;s Mofiria Authentication Technology Scans Your Scary Finger Veins</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/sonys_mofiria_authentication_technology_scans_your_scary_finger_veins-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/sonys_mofiria_authentication_technology_scans_your_scary_finger_veins-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mofiria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/sonys_mofiria_authentication_technology_scans_your_scary_finger_veins-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony has announced &#8220;mofiria,&#8221; a biometric technology that relies on the unique vein pattern in fingers to authenticate users. Apparently, this method is more accurate than traditional fingerprint techniques.



&#8220;mofiria&#8221; uses a unique method where a CMOS sensor diagonally captures scattered light inside the finger veins, making a plane layout possible. As a result, a small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/mofiria.jpg" style="display:block;" />Sony has announced &#8220;mofiria,&#8221; a biometric technology that relies on the unique vein pattern in fingers to authenticate users. Apparently, this method is more accurate than traditional fingerprint techniques.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: biometrics, cellphones, finger vein, laptops, mofiria, security, sony, veins --><br />
<span id="more-325314"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;mofiria&#8221; uses a unique method where a CMOS sensor diagonally captures scattered light inside the finger veins, making a plane layout possible. As a result, a small and more flexible design can be realised in building this technology into mobile devices.</p>
<p>The vein pattern is extracted from the captured finger vein image, and data from the pattern is compressed into the size of one-tenth to store in memory, which makes it possible for the data to be stored on a mobile device. Sony&#8217;s unique algorithm achieves fast and easy operation. The vein pattern is quickly and accurately extracted from the captured finger vein image without a fixed finger position, as the position of a placed finger is automatically and simultaneously corrected. As a result, the authentication accuracy is less than 0.1% for the FRR (False Rejection Rate), less than 0.0001% for the FAR (False Acceptance Rate), and processing time for identification takes only about 0.015 sec*1 using a personal computer CPU and about 0.25 sec*2 when using a mobile phone CPU.</p>
<p>Sony plans to promote the &#8220;mofiria&#8221; technology for use in mobile devices, gateway security systems and solution services. Sony will aim for commercialising this technology within the 2009 fiscal year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but that crazy looking finger in the illustration makes this technology sort of frightening to me. [<a href="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200902/09-016E/index.html">Sony</a> and <a href="http://www.slashphone.com/sony-develops-compact-sized-high-accuracy-finger-vein-authentication-technology-dubbed-mofiria-024342">Slashphone</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/sonys_mofiria_authentication_technology_scans_your_scary_finger_veins-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Million Dollar Border Security Machines Fooled with Ten Cent Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/million_dollar_border_security_machines_fooled_with_ten_cent_tape-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/million_dollar_border_security_machines_fooled_with_ten_cent_tape-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/million_dollar_border_security_machines_fooled_with_ten_cent_tape-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for biometrics and immigration security: A South Korean woman managed to fool a million-dollar fingerprint reading machine in Japanese border controls using a simple piece of tape stuck to her fingers.


It happened at Tokyo airport. The woman has repeatedly entered Japan using the same trick without anybody noticing. Japanese officials say that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/33523451_d1313c7721.jpg" style="display:block;" />So much for biometrics and immigration security: A South Korean woman managed to fool a million-dollar fingerprint reading machine in Japanese border controls using a simple piece of tape stuck to her fingers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: biometrics, border security, fingerprint, fingerprint machines, immigration --><br />
<span id="more-321148"></span>
<p>It happened at Tokyo airport. The woman has repeatedly entered Japan using the same trick without anybody noticing. Japanese officials say that they suspect many others have been doing the same things, demonstrating that the biometric systems they installed in 30 airports in 2007&#8211;to the tune of $US45 million&#8211;are completely useless. The woman was deported in July 2007 for illegally staying in Japan as a bar hostess in Nagano, but she entered again with the system, using the tape and a fake passport allegedly provided by a South Korean broker. [<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/travel/woman-fools-japans-airport-security-fingerprint-system-20090102-78rv.html">Sydney Morning Herald</a> via <a href="http://www.fashionfunky.com/2009/01/million_dollar_security_machin.php">Fashion Funky</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/million_dollar_border_security_machines_fooled_with_ten_cent_tape-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jewellery Box Features USB and Fingerprint Authentication Security</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/jewelry_box_features_usb_and_fingerprint_authentication_security-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/jewelry_box_features_usb_and_fingerprint_authentication_security-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewellery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/jewelry_box_features_usb_and_fingerprint_authentication_security-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Paris Hilton would have avoided the $US2 million theft of her jewellery recently if she had one of these BioMirage Coffers. It can only be opened via fingerprint identification or a USB key.

That seems far more convenient than carrying around a key or remembering a passcode, but couldn&#8217;t you just take the whole thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/biomirage-coffer.jpg" />Perhaps Paris Hilton would have avoided the $US2 million theft of her jewellery recently if she had one of these BioMirage Coffers. It can only be opened via fingerprint identification or a USB key.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: security, biometrics, biomirage coffer, jewelry, jewelry box --><span id="more-320348"></span>
<p>That seems far more convenient than carrying around a key or remembering a passcode, but couldn&#8217;t you just take the whole thing with you and smash it open later on? I mean, it only weighs 4.5 kilos. It&#8217;s more like a high-tech deterrent when you think about it. Plus, the damn thing is $US579&mdash;so if you buy it you have already been robbed. [<a href="http://www.rcgstore.tv/html/catalogue.aspx?PID=6&#038;ID=1&#038;PIndex=|1|6|&#038;Repost=True">RCG Store </a>via <a href="http://www.everythingusb.com/biomirage-coffer-jewelry-box-15881.html">Everything USB</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/jewelry_box_features_usb_and_fingerprint_authentication_security-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At the End of the Day, $US15,000 Carbon Fibre Biometric Door Is Still Just A Door</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/at_the_end_of_the_day_15000_carbon_fibre_biometric_door_is_still_just_a_door-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/at_the_end_of_the_day_15000_carbon_fibre_biometric_door_is_still_just_a_door-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fibre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/at_the_end_of_the_day_15000_carbon_fibre_biometric_door_is_still_just_a_door-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon fibre is pretty, and it&#8217;s a cool technique to implement with car design&#8230; but what about doors? Who cares, you say? I agree, but it still didn&#8217;t stop this door from becoming a reality.

In addition to the hefty $US15,000 price tag, this door boasts a biometric sensor that serves as the lock. Oh, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Door.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Carbon fibre is pretty, and it&#8217;s a cool technique to implement with car design&#8230; but what about doors? Who cares, you say? I agree, but it still didn&#8217;t stop this door from becoming a reality.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: carbon fiber, biometrics, brazil, custom, design, doors --><span id="more-318072"></span>
<p>In addition to the hefty $US15,000 price tag, this door boasts a biometric sensor that serves as the lock. Oh, and lots of carbon fibre. Did we mention it&#8217;s made of carbon fibre? There was, sadly, no word on what this door was protecting. An <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/calling_all_wannabe_dr_evils_super_secret_london_tunnel_lair_for_sale-2.html">underground secret lair</a>, perhaps?</p>
<p>Anyway, we sincerely hope the wealthy Brazilian businessman who commissioned this piece gets his money&#8217;s worth, because this sucker would do nicely as the door to the next <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5103558/scenes-from-last-nights-giz-gallery-meetup-beer-pizza-and-cod4-on-a-103+inch-tv?skyline=true&#038;s=x">Gizmodo Gallery</a>, don&#8217;t you think? [<a href="http://www.carbonfibergear.com/15000-carbon-fiber-biometric-scanner-door/">Carbon Fibre Gear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/at_the_end_of_the_day_15000_carbon_fibre_biometric_door_is_still_just_a_door-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Schools Getting Serious About GMAT Fraud With Palm Scans</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/business_schools_getting_serious_about_gmat_fraud_with_palm_scans-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/business_schools_getting_serious_about_gmat_fraud_with_palm_scans-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/business_schools_getting_serious_about_gmat_fraud_with_palm_scans-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Apparently, proxy test taking is a big enough problem that the nation&#8217;s top business schools will soon require that students undergo a palm vein scan before taking their GMATs. Like a fingerprint, the system of veins running through the hand is unique to every individual, and supporters claim that using vein scanning is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/palm-vein-scan.jpg" class="left"/> Apparently, proxy test taking is a big enough problem that the nation&#8217;s top business schools will soon require that students undergo a palm vein scan before taking their GMATs. Like a fingerprint, the system of veins running through the hand is unique to every individual, and supporters claim that using vein scanning is not only superior to the current digital fingerprint method, but it also does not come with the same stigma.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: test tech, biometrics, gmats, palm-scanning, security --><span id="more-298576"></span>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think that standardised tests are really worth a damn when it comes to admissions, so all of the fuss surrounding it seems pretty silly to me. At most, it should be weighted on the very tail end of a student&#8217;s accomplishments. Still, if dropping US$250 on the GMATs is in your future, palm-vein scanning will begin next month in Korea and India, with US centres starting around the fall. A world-wide rollout is expected by May. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB121669545112672811-ZhZ1AGoFt5L7xXYam8Tatr7S1_I_20090722.html?mod=rss_free">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/business_schools_getting_serious_about_gmat_fraud_with_palm_scans-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola Patents Biometric and Touch Sensitive Bluetooth Headsets</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_motorola_patents_biometric_and_touch_sensitive_bluetooth_headsets_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_motorola_patents_biometric_and_touch_sensitive_bluetooth_headsets_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_motorola_patents_biometric_and_touch_sensitive_bluetooth_headsets_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A series of Motorola patents recently made public reveal that the company has given some thought to incorporating biometric monitors into Bluetooth headsets and adding touch sensitive controls to the ROKR S9. Actually, there are two different versions of the biometric Bluetooth headset, both of which utilise a watch-like device to measure heart rate, temperature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/motorola-bluetooth-patent-1.gif" class="left" style="display:block;"/>A series of Motorola patents recently made public reveal that the company has given some thought to incorporating biometric monitors into Bluetooth headsets and adding touch sensitive controls to the ROKR S9. Actually, there are two different versions of the biometric Bluetooth headset, both of which utilise a watch-like device to measure heart rate, temperature and other vital signs then transmit them to a mobile phone and on to a distant server.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  motorola ,  biometrics ,  bluetooth ,  exercise ,  fitness ,  headsets ,  health ,  patents ,  rokr s9 ,  touch sensitive controls  --><br />
<span id="more-293672"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/motorola-bluetooth-patent-2.gif" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;"/>To be honest, I don&#8217;t think the world really needs a Bluetooth headset, heart rate monitor combo&#8211;but a modified S9 that would allow users to increase volume, change tracks or answer calls with touch sensitive panels seems promising. However, like any other patent application, there is no guarantee either of these products will ever see the light of day. [<a href="http://cellpassion.mobi/2008/06/06/motorola-patents-heartbeat-monitoring-touch-sensitive-bluetooth-headsets.aspx">Cellpassion</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_motorola_patents_biometric_and_touch_sensitive_bluetooth_headsets_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Biometric Face Scanner Can Tell the Difference Between Identical Twins</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/new_biometric_face_scanner_can_tell_the_difference_between_identical_twins-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/new_biometric_face_scanner_can_tell_the_difference_between_identical_twins-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sagawa advance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/new_biometric_face_scanner_can_tell_the_difference_between_identical_twins-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new biometric face scanner from the Japanese company Sagawa Advance has taken the technology to the next level, able to differentiate between identical twins with no problems at all. It does this by using an infrared scanner to analyse a whopping 40,000 data points on your face.


This is a good thing, because Sagawa Advance&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/twins.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>A new biometric face scanner from the Japanese company Sagawa Advance has taken the technology to the next level, able to differentiate between identical twins with no problems at all. It does this by using an infrared scanner to analyse a whopping 40,000 data points on your face.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: biometrics, face scanner, gadgets, sagawa advance --><br />
<span id="more-288695"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Sagawa-3D-face.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="362" height="400" style="display:block;float:none"/>This is a good thing, because Sagawa Advance&#8217;s scanner is used as access to high-security areas such as power plants and medical factories where they&#8217;ve got to make sure that it&#8217;s really the plant supervisor entering and not his evil twin bent on the destruction of the human race. That&#8217;s always the <i>worst</i>. [<a href="http://www.digitalworldtokyo.com/index.php/digital_tokyo/articles/biometric_face_scanner_tells_identical_twins_apart/">Digital World Tokyo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/new_biometric_face_scanner_can_tell_the_difference_between_identical_twins-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
