<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; asus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/asus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Asus Eee PC T91MT Appeases The Multitouch Faithful</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-t91mt-appeases-the-multitouch-faithful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-t91mt-appeases-the-multitouch-faithful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original T91 from Asus wasn&#8217;t quite the touchscreen netbook we&#8217;d been hoping for thanks to the average tablet XP software and lack of multitouch. But Asus is never a company to sit on their hands, so they&#8217;ve updated the T91 to the T91MT, which adds Windows 7 and multitouch.
The T91MT has an 8.9-inch 1024&#215;600 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/t91mt-asus.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/t91mt-asus.jpg" alt="t91mt asus" title="t91mt asus" width="535" height="600" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-368269" /></a>The original T91 from Asus <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/asus-eee-t91-touch-tablet-review-keep-dreaming/">wasn&#8217;t quite the touchscreen netbook we&#8217;d been hoping for</a> thanks to the average tablet XP software and lack of multitouch. But Asus is never a company to sit on their hands, so they&#8217;ve updated the T91 to the T91MT, which adds Windows 7 and multitouch.<span id="more-368261"></span></p>
<p>The T91MT has an 8.9-inch 1024&#215;600 screen with a 256-level pressure sensor, runs on an Atom Z520 processor with 1GB RAM, a 32GB SSD and all the standard wireless and connectivity. It weighs 960 grams with the battery, which is pretty sweet, and comes preloaded with Windows 7 Home Premium.</p>
<p>Multitouch does come at a bit of a premium though, with the T91MT set to set you back $999.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.asus.com.au/">Asus</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-t91mt-appeases-the-multitouch-faithful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee PC 1201N: A Great Deal, But Have We Been Had?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-1201n-a-great-deal-but-have-we-been-had/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-1201n-a-great-deal-but-have-we-been-had/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1201n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee 1201n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On one hand, the Asus Eee 1201N, the first Ion-packing Eee, will arrive in December for $US500. That includes Win 7, a dual core Atom processor, 2GB RAM, 250GB HDD and 12-inch (1366&#215;768) display. But on the other&#8230;
Should we consider $US500 a good deal?
Yes and no. The formfactor is thin and quite small &#8212; 3cm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_asus1201_hero.jpg" alt="" class="center" />On one hand, the Asus Eee 1201N, the first <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/asus-eee-pc-1201ns-specs-will-eat-the-other-netbooks-alive/">Ion-packing Eee</a>, will arrive in December for $US500. That includes Win 7, a dual core Atom processor, 2GB RAM, 250GB HDD and 12-inch (1366&#215;768) display. But on the other&#8230;<span id="more-368140"></span></p>
<p>Should we consider $US500 a good deal?</p>
<p>Yes and no. The formfactor is thin and quite small &mdash; 3cm thick and just 1.45kg. That&#8217;s great. It&#8217;s a big-screen netbook&#8230; which I guess is a small laptop.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m not arguing that this is probably the most promising netbook of all time. But remember when we were getting Core 2 Duo computers like this from Dell/HP/etc for the same price? Yeah, they were chunky machines. But what happened to those computers? Where did they go?</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m not hallucinating here.</p>
<p>Yes, the 1201N looks like a very cool little laptop, and I&#8217;m pumped to use an Eee that can handle HD video on a beautiful screen and through tempting HDMI-out. I&#8217;m not really upset about the Eee itself. I&#8217;m upset that the budget, jack-of-all trades laptop has virtually died as we&#8217;ve seen this artificial performance cap put on the budget laptop market. Then again, maybe Ions have enough power that none of us will mourn the loss of cheaper, fatter Core 2 Duos. When reviews hit and the dust settles, we&#8217;ll know for sure.</p>
<p>Until then, read Laptop&#8217;s impressions: [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/asus-eee-pc-1201n">Laptop</a> via <a href="http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/19/asus-eee-pc-1201n-netbook-officially-announced/">Netbook Choice</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/asus-ion-packing-eee-pc-1201n-gets-official-gets-handled/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-eee-pc-1201n-a-great-deal-but-have-we-been-had/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus TS Mini NAS Windows Home Server Backs Up 10 PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-ts-mini-nas-windows-home-server-backs-up-10-pcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-ts-mini-nas-windows-home-server-backs-up-10-pcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n280]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows home server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you heard of that new service that allows you to connect to the internet at one gigabit per second to access your very own two terabytes of storage space? Me neither. That&#8217;s probably why you need the Asus TS Mini NAS.
These Intel Atom N280 1.66GHz Windows Home Servers can back up to 10 PCs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/p_500_01.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Have you heard of that new service that allows you to connect to the internet at one gigabit per second to access your very own two terabytes of storage space? Me neither. That&#8217;s probably why you need the Asus TS Mini NAS.<span id="more-367843"></span></p>
<p>These Intel Atom N280 1.66GHz Windows Home Servers can back up to 10 PCs and serve all the files you want. It has two 3.5-inch bays for up to 2 terabytes of storage space, with one Gigabit Ethernet port, and six USB 2.0 ports to add more storage or whatever you want. [<a href="http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=mb22YySzt9LeoWc6">Asus</a> via <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Asus-Intros-First-3D-Notebook-TS-Mini-NAS-Drive/">Hot Hardware</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/asus-ships-windows-home-server-packin-ts-mini-nas-drive/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-ts-mini-nas-windows-home-server-backs-up-10-pcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Asus G51J 3D Laptop Is &#8216;3D Done Right&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-asus-g51j-3d-laptop-is-3d-done-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-asus-g51j-3d-laptop-is-3d-done-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus g51j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We reviewed Acer&#8217;s 3D laptop not so long ago. We found it fun, but reeking of gen 1 quirks. Now Laptop Mag has played with a new 3D laptop by Asus and found it to be pretty fantastic.
The Asus G51J 3D is the first laptop to feature NVIDIA&#8217;s new 3D vision technology, and it takes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_8190.jpg" alt="" class="center" />We reviewed Acer&#8217;s 3D laptop not so long ago. We found it fun, but reeking of gen 1 quirks. Now <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/acer-aspire-as5738dg-review-3d-on-the-small-screen/">Laptop Mag</a> has played with a new 3D laptop by Asus and found it to be pretty fantastic.<span id="more-367790"></span></p>
<p>The Asus G51J 3D is the first laptop to feature NVIDIA&#8217;s new 3D vision technology, and it takes advantage of a high performance, 15.6-inch 120Hz LCD that, when coupled with shutter glasses (yup, you still need glasses) garnered these praises from Laptop:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230;unlike the TriDef technology that powers Acer&#8217;s 3D laptop, titles optimised for 3D vision give you a great sense of depth without negatively affecting gameplay. On first person shooters, for example, we found it difficult to aim when using the Acer 5738DG. On the Asus G51J 3D, you don&#8217;t make any compromises in terms of control or accuracy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> For the 3D tech, you&#8217;ll take a resolution hit (there&#8217;s no 3D 1080P display option) and pay a $US200 premium, making the full gaming $US1700.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that Acer&#8217;s system, while utilising only rudimentary polarised glasses 3D, costs under $US800. [<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/acer-aspire-as5738dg-review-3d-on-the-small-screen/">Laptop Mag</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-asus-g51j-3d-laptop-is-3d-done-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop Reliability Study: Asus And Toshiba Come Out On Top</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laptop-reliability-study-asus-and-toshiba-come-out-on-top/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laptop-reliability-study-asus-and-toshiba-come-out-on-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squaretrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data from SquareTrade (one of the bigger warranty providers) says Asus and Toshiba have the least hardware malfunctions over three years, while one-in-four HP laptops are projected to experience problems. Oh, and crappy netbooks are worst of all.
They say that sub-$400 netbooks are 20 per cent more likely to fail in the first year. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/squaretrade1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_squaretrade1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>New data from SquareTrade (one of the bigger warranty providers) says Asus and Toshiba have the least hardware malfunctions over three years, while one-in-four HP laptops are projected to experience problems. Oh, and crappy netbooks are worst of all.<span id="more-367510"></span></p>
<p>They say that sub-$400 netbooks are 20 per cent more likely to fail in the first year. But no real surprises there.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/squaretrade2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_squaretrade2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<p>SquareTrade says it randomly selected over 30,000 laptops and netbooks covered by its warranty plans for the study. Brands with a minimum of 1000 laptops included Acer, Apple, Asus, Dell, Gateway, HP, Lenovo, Sony and Toshiba. Accidental damage and software issues handled by the retailer were not included in the numbers.</p>
<p>Summary below, while the full report can be found at: [<a href="http://www.squaretrade.com/pages/laptop-reliability-1109/">SquareTrade</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p> • Over 31 percent of laptops will fail in the first three years of ownership.<br />
• Of these failures, two-thirds came from hardware malfunctions (20.4 percent) and one-third (10.6 percent) was reported as accidental damage.<br />
• Asus and Toshiba were the most reliable manufacturers, with fewer than 16 percent having a hardware malfunction over three years.<br />
• Netbooks are projected to have a 20 percent higher failure rate from hardware malfunctions than more expensive laptop computers.<br />
• Manufacturers proved to be a more reliable determinant of reliability than the type of laptop and should be a greater factor in making a purchase decision.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laptop-reliability-study-asus-and-toshiba-come-out-on-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Delays Eee Keyboard Again, But Adds Capacitive Touchscreen</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-delays-eee-keyboard-again-but-adds-capacitive-touchscreen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-delays-eee-keyboard-again-but-adds-capacitive-touchscreen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK Asus, what the hell? I&#8217;ve drooled over your entertainment-PC-in-a-keyboard with wireless HDMI for months now. You said October looked good, but now it&#8217;s delayed until early next year? At least you&#8217;re making the 5-inch touchscreen a capacitive panel now.
The increased responsiveness and gesture-based control better be worth the wait.
RegHardware also reports that the Wi-Fi/Ultra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_EeeKeyboardSilver.jpg" alt="" class="center" />OK Asus, what the hell? I&#8217;ve drooled over your entertainment-PC-in-a-keyboard with wireless HDMI for months now. You said <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/asus-eee-keyboard-confirmed-for-october/">October looked good</a>, but now it&#8217;s delayed until early next year? At least you&#8217;re making the 5-inch touchscreen a capacitive panel now.<span id="more-364905"></span></p>
<p>The increased responsiveness and gesture-based control better be worth the wait.</p>
<p>RegHardware also reports that the Wi-Fi/Ultra Wide Band aerial has been made an external dongle, because the keyboard&#8217;s metallic body reduced the signal. A planned non-metallic version will integrate the wireless receiver.</p>
<p>At Computex, the Eee Keyboard&#8217;s netbook-like specs included a 1.6GHz Atom processor, 1GB of DDR2 RAM, 16GB or 32GB solid-state hard disk, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI and battery (no word on its capacity). Considering it&#8217;s now pushed out to early 2010, hopefully they&#8217;ll swap in one of those new Atom processors, too. [<a href="//www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/11/04/asus_keyboard_update/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_EeeKeyboard.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-delays-eee-keyboard-again-but-adds-capacitive-touchscreen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 And Intel Chipset Causing iPhone Woes?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/windows-7-and-intel-chipset-causing-iphone-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/windows-7-and-intel-chipset-causing-iphone-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users on Apple&#8217;s discussion board have been experiencing issues with their PCs locking out iPhones when using Windows 7 with the Intel P55 USB chipset. It&#8217;s a pretty specific combo that you&#8217;re probably not running, so don&#8217;t panic.
The thread is only five pages long, but multiple users are claiming the exact same &#8220;0xE8000065&#8243; error message [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users on Apple&#8217;s discussion board have been experiencing issues with their PCs locking out iPhones when using Windows 7 with the Intel P55 USB chipset. It&#8217;s a pretty specific combo that you&#8217;re probably not running, so don&#8217;t panic.<span id="more-364119"></span></p>
<p>The thread is only five pages long, but multiple users are claiming the exact same &#8220;0xE8000065&#8243; error message when trying to sync their data. The issue appears on P55-based motherboards from Asus, MSI and Gigabyte, and it seems like Windows 7 64-bit is more prone to the problem than its 32-bit brother.</p>
<p>Keep in mind the P55 is a new chipset, and unless you&#8217;re computer is brand-spankin&#8217; new or you&#8217;re the DIY type, chances are you have a setup that works perfectly fine.</p>
<p>If you do have a new P55-based motherboard, Microsoft is looking into the issue. Hopefully a fix for you unlucky few will come soon enough. [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/iphone_p55_problems/">The Register</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/31/iphone-and-windows-7-dont-play-nice-intel-p55-chipset-to-blame/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/windows-7-and-intel-chipset-causing-iphone-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Continues USB 3.0 Onslaught With A Cheap PCI-E Card</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-continues-usb-3-0-onslaught-with-a-cheap-pci-e-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-continues-usb-3-0-onslaught-with-a-cheap-pci-e-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pci-e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superspeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, Asus is really going nuts with USB 3.0 gear this week. First this 3.0 compatible motherboard, now a SuperSpeed ready PCI-E card that won&#8217;t even break the bank at $US30.
Unfortunately, the guys at Maximum PC didn&#8217;t have any USB 3.0 devices to run the card through its paces. All we know is that Windows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_usb3_02_small.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Man, Asus is really going nuts with USB 3.0 gear this week. First this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-is-the-first-usb-3-0-motherboard/">3.0 compatible motherboard</a>, now a SuperSpeed ready PCI-E card that won&#8217;t even break the bank at $US30.<span id="more-364106"></span></p>
<p>Unfortunately, the guys at Maximum PC didn&#8217;t have any USB 3.0 devices to run the card through its paces. All we know is that Windows 7 boots fine once it&#8217;s installed, and it gets similar USB 2.0 transfer rates to other controllers out there.</p>
<p>That said, we all know that USB 3.0 is going to be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/superspeed_usb_30_spec_finalized_its_fast-2/">blazing</a>. As long as the card performs anywhere near as fast as we expect from USB 3.0, the fact that it&#8217;ll be out &#8220;soon&#8221; and won&#8217;t cost much is good enough for me. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/exclusive_first_usb_30_and_sata_60_expansion_card_will_sell_30">Maximum PC</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/30/asus-u3s6-first-usb-3-0-sata-6-0-pci-e-card/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/asus-continues-usb-3-0-onslaught-with-a-cheap-pci-e-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android-Based Asus Smartbook Arrives Early Next Year</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/android-based-asus-smartbook-arrives-early-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/android-based-asus-smartbook-arrives-early-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That on-again, off-again Asus Eee PC with Android OS and 1GHz Snapdragon processor is, well, back on again. Asus now calls it&#8217;s their &#8220;secret weapon&#8221; and says it should arrive early next year for about $US180 bucks.
Maybe all the interest in Android 2.0 got them interested again.
As a reminder, Smartbooks are just Qualcomm&#8217;s name for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/news_computex2009-qualcommeee1ghz_full.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_news_computex2009-qualcommeee1ghz_full.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>That <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/asus_demos_snapdragonbased_eee_pc_with_android-2/">on-again</a>, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/asus_hey_guys_forget_you_ever_saw_that_android_netbook_ok-2/">off-again</a> Asus Eee PC with Android OS and 1GHz Snapdragon processor is, well, back on again. Asus now calls it&#8217;s their &#8220;secret weapon&#8221; and says it should arrive early next year for about $US180 bucks.<span id="more-363903"></span></p>
<p>Maybe all the interest in <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/a-visual-guide-to-android-2-0-so-much-nicer/">Android 2.0</a> got them interested again.</p>
<p>As a reminder, Smartbooks are just Qualcomm&#8217;s name for netbooks that use ARM-based processors, which are needed to run Android. (Acer actually <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/165896/acer_may_be_first_with_android_netbook.html">ported</a> Android to Atom processors for its <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/acer-aspire-one-aod250-holds-us-over-with-android-and-xp/">Aspire One</a> netbook). Nvidia is also pushing its ARM-based Tegra chip for Smartbooks. [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;langpair=zh-CN|en&amp;u=http://tech.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/Inc/2007cti-news-Tech-inc/Tech-Content/0,4703,12050902%2B122009103000244,00.html">Shanzai</a> (translated)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/android-based-asus-smartbook-arrives-early-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is The First USB 3.0 Motherboard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-is-the-first-usb-3-0-motherboard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-is-the-first-usb-3-0-motherboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel might be dicking around on USB 3.0, but Asus ain&#8217;t. The Xtreme Design P7P55D-E is apparently the very first USB 3.0 motherboard. It&#8217;s an Intel P55-based mobo that uses a third-party USB 3.0 controller for a pair of ports. 
It has 10 USB 2.0 orifices too. Personally, I&#8217;d just wait for a full USB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_146905.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Intel might be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/intel-may-postpone-usb-3-0-support-on-chipsets-until-2011/">dicking around on USB 3.0</a>, but Asus ain&#8217;t. The Xtreme Design P7P55D-E is apparently the <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/10/29/asus_superspeed_mobo/">very first USB 3.0 motherboard</a>. It&#8217;s an Intel P55-based mobo that uses a third-party USB 3.0 controller for a pair of ports. <span id="more-363648"></span></p>
<p>It has 10 USB <em>2</em>.0 orifices too. Personally, I&#8217;d just wait for a full USB 3.0 board, where <em>every</em> port&#8217;s USB 3.0. Otherwise, you&#8217;re just gonna feel cramped and then dumb, when you have to buy another board. If you must have the 3.0 <em>now</em> this slab supports CrossFire and SLI with a pair of PCIe x 16 slots, a pair of Gigabit ethernet ports and eSATA. Of course, there&#8217;s no price or date for this thing yet, which makes it a little less exciting, perhaps. As exciting as gimped USB 3.0 motherboards can get, anyway. [<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/10/29/asus_superspeed_mobo/">Register</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_usb30mobo.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-is-the-first-usb-3-0-motherboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
