<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; animals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Robot Polar Bears: Less Dangerous Than Real Bears, For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/robot-polar-bears-less-dangerous-than-real-bears-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/robot-polar-bears-less-dangerous-than-real-bears-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polar bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of replacing the St. Louis Zoo&#8217;s deceased polar bears with live ones, zoo officials put robots up in their place. This slightly-better-than-average yard display will surely be remembered as the humble beginning of the robot bear uprising.
The robot polar bears are part of the zoo&#8217;s holiday exhibit, and it&#8217;s unclear if they&#8217;ll be around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/robotpolarbears-scene.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_robotpolarbears-scene.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Instead of replacing the St. Louis Zoo&#8217;s deceased polar bears with live ones, zoo officials put robots up in their place. This slightly-better-than-average yard display will surely be remembered as the humble beginning of the robot bear uprising.<span id="more-368586"></span></p>
<p>The robot polar bears are part of the zoo&#8217;s holiday exhibit, and it&#8217;s unclear if they&#8217;ll be around after the season is over. Let&#8217;s face it, though. These would have to be some damn good robot bears to convince me to see them over live polar bears.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/robot_polar_bears.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_robot_polar_bears.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>PETA is encouraging the zoo to keep developing the animatronic animals, but listen PETA, hear me out. Sure, you&#8217;re trying to keep animals out of captivity. You&#8217;re also promoting the creation of an advanced, highly mobile robot bear army.</p>
<p>I encourage you to rethink your position. [<a href="http://www.inhabitots.com/2009/11/20/st-louis-zoo-exhibits-electronic-proxies-in-place-of-dead-polar-bears/">Inhabitots</a> via <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/11/20/electronic-proxies-replace-dead-polar-bears-at-st-louis-zoo/">Inhabitat</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/robot-polar-bears-less-dangerous-than-real-bears-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Develop Phaser That Can Stun (Worms)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/scientists-develop-phaser-that-can-stun-worms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/scientists-develop-phaser-that-can-stun-worms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultraviolet light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news: Scientists have developed a Star Trek-like phaser that can be set to stun. The bad news: It only works on worms, so far.
 Researchers have now found a way to paralyse tiny worms when they expose them to ultraviolet light. Even when the ultraviolet light was turned off the animals stayed stunned. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/phaser.jpg" alt="" class="right" />The good news: Scientists have developed a <em>Star Trek</em>-like phaser that can be set to stun. The bad news: It only works on worms, so far.<span id="more-368412"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Researchers have now found a way to paralyse tiny worms when they expose them to ultraviolet light. Even when the ultraviolet light was turned off the animals stayed stunned. However, if they were subsequently exposed to a different form of light they recovered again and were able to move.</p>
<p>The researchers claim that this is the first time that such an effect has been demonstrated in an animal. Although some of the worms died, most of them lived through the process.</p>
<p>The effect is caused by using a molecule which changes its shape when exposed to ultraviolet light.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Well, it&#8217;s a start I suppose. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6607725/Star-Trek-like-phaser-developed.html">Telegraph</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/250271479/this-x-that-happy-world-toilet-day">The Daily What</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/scientists-develop-phaser-that-can-stun-worms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Bulldog Is Better At Tony Hawk Than You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-bulldog-is-better-at-tony-hawk-than-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-bulldog-is-better-at-tony-hawk-than-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony hawk ride]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tony Hawk Ride comes with a skateboard controller. You know what that means: dogs playing video games. What&#8217;s amazing about this video is just how good this dog is. Impressive! 
[YouTube]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N1GkrkcFXsg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/N1GkrkcFXsg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>Tony Hawk Ride comes with a skateboard controller. You know what that means: dogs playing video games. What&#8217;s amazing about this video is just how good this dog is. Impressive! <span id="more-368300"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1GkrkcFXsg">YouTube</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-bulldog-is-better-at-tony-hawk-than-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CatPaint Single-Pawedly Justifies The Existence Of The App Store</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/catpaint-single-pawedly-justifies-the-existence-of-the-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/catpaint-single-pawedly-justifies-the-existence-of-the-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Within seconds of installing CatPaint, I felt like the Matisse of adding cats to photos. Within minutes, I was Leonardo da goddamn Vinci.
Sometimes the best apps are the simplest, and CatPaint is nothing if not simple. Cats can be added to pre-existing photos or cat-scarce shots from the iPhone&#8217;s camera, and either saved to your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/photo_02.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Within seconds of installing CatPaint, I felt like the Matisse of adding cats to photos. Within minutes, I was Leonardo da goddamn <em>Vinci</em>.<span id="more-367935"></span></p>
<p>Sometimes the best apps are the simplest, and CatPaint is nothing if not simple. Cats can be added to pre-existing photos or cat-scarce shots from the iPhone&#8217;s camera, and either saved to your camera roll or sent via email. Using it takes a while to get used to: Once you&#8217;ve selected a cat from the app&#8217;s animal palette and set the slider for size, each tap on the photo instantly splashes a new cat at the point of contact, which can&#8217;t be edited, save for a temperamental shake-to-delete function. But seriously, <em>not the point</em>:<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_photo_5.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-18_at_4.38.40_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-18_at_4.38.40_pm.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-18_at_4.38.54_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-18_at_4.38.54_pm.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>See?!? $1.19. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/catpaint/id339462921?mt=8">iTunes</a> via <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/143919/2009/11/catpaint.html?lsrc=rss_main">Macworld</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/catpaint-single-pawedly-justifies-the-existence-of-the-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Upsetting Video Ever Of An Automatic Chicken Plucker</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-most-upsetting-video-ever-of-an-automatic-chicken-plucker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-most-upsetting-video-ever-of-an-automatic-chicken-plucker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is Janet&#8217;s Whizbang Chicken Plucker, built using the instructions from the hit best-selling book Anyone Can Build a Tub-Style Mechanical Chicken Plucker. It is absolutely f—king horrifying, and I apologise in advance. 
[Eat Me Daily via Kottke]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jMGZMoENjcU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jMGZMoENjcU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="570" height="360"></embed></object></p>
<p>This is Janet&#8217;s Whizbang Chicken Plucker, built using the instructions from the hit best-selling book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0972656448?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=eatmedail-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0972656448"><em>Anyone Can Build a Tub-Style Mechanical Chicken Plucker</em></a>. It is absolutely f—king horrifying, and I apologise in advance. <span id="more-367805"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.eatmedaily.com/2009/11/janets-homemade-chicken-plucking-machine-video/">Eat Me Daily</a> via <a href="http://kottke.org/09/11/diy-chicken-plucking-machine">Kottke</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-most-upsetting-video-ever-of-an-automatic-chicken-plucker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Geographic Photographer Meets Deadly Leopard Seal</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/national-geographic-photographer-meets-deadly-leopard-seal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/national-geographic-photographer-meets-deadly-leopard-seal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national geographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul nicklen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
National Geographic photographer Paul Nicklen was in Antarctica to capture shots of leopard seals. One approached him, jaws wide and ready for biting&#8230; and if you haven&#8217;t heard the rest of the story yet, you need to watch this brief clip.
I&#8217;m not man enough to dive into freezing waters to document the lives of animals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zxa6P73Awcg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zxa6P73Awcg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>National Geographic photographer Paul Nicklen was in Antarctica to capture shots of leopard seals. One approached him, jaws wide and ready for biting&#8230; and if you haven&#8217;t heard the rest of the story yet, you need to watch this brief clip.<span id="more-367271"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not man enough to dive into freezing waters to document the lives of animals that could rip off my head without a second thought, but I&#8217;m sure glad that YouTube exists so I can sit here in my underwear and enjoy the experience vicariously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/national-geographic-photographer-meets-deadly-leopard-seal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA To Bomb Monkeys With Gamma Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkeys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear NASA, I love you, but come on&#8230; monkey radiation tests? What is this? The &#8217;50s? Are you going to resuscitate J. Edgar Hoover next? Didn&#8217;t you guys see Matthew Broderick and Helen Hunt saving the monkeys in Project X?
That&#8217;s what NASA is planning to do: use squirrel monkeys to test the possible effect of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/projectx-chimp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_projectx-chimp.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Dear NASA, I love you, but come on&#8230; monkey radiation tests? What is this? The &#8217;50s? Are you going to resuscitate J. Edgar Hoover next? Didn&#8217;t you guys see Matthew Broderick and Helen Hunt saving the monkeys in <em>Project X</em>?<span id="more-366823"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what NASA is planning to do: use squirrel monkeys to test the possible effect of radiation in humans for long-term space missions. This is the first time the agency is going to test with monkeys since the days of the Mercury Project.</p>
<p>They plan to bomb 27 squirrel monkeys with high-energy gamma-ray radiation, the equivalent of what astronauts could get in a three-year voyage. This obviously can result in two things: monkeys dying in pain or giant green monkeys destroying the whole East Coast.</p>
<p>Clearly, a lose-lose situation.</p>
<p>The $US1.75 million project has encountered strong opposition from animal welfare organisations, but NASA spokesman Bill Jeffs gives a good argument:</p>
<blockquote><p> NASA-funded research has shown that simulated space radiation can affect nerve cells in culture and also the behaviour of mice and rats, but these studies are limited in the extent they can be extrapolated to human behaviour and performance. Studies in nonhuman primates are essential to be able to best predict neurobehavioral effects of radiation on humans.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Would you prefer 27 squirrel monkeys dying in experiments or six dead astronauts in a capsule floating on the Pacific Ocean? [<a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091112-nasa-space-monkeys-radiation.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+spaceheadlines+%28SPACE.com+Headline+Feed%29">Space.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Replacement Penises Grown In Lab (For Rabbits Now, Humans Later?)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/replacement-penises-grown-in-lab-for-rabbits-now-humans-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/replacement-penises-grown-in-lab-for-rabbits-now-humans-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rabbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the future, the compliment to give a guy will be to say that he&#8217;s hung like a rabbit. It&#8217;ll imply that he has the super-high libido that comes with fully-functional, custom-engineered penises like those being successfully implanted in bunnies.
I don&#8217;t know how the fluffy creatures lost their most precious parts in the first place, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bunnycock.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bunnycock.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>In the future, the compliment to give a guy will be to say that he&#8217;s hung like a rabbit. It&#8217;ll imply that he has the super-high libido that comes with fully-functional, custom-engineered penises like those being successfully implanted in bunnies.<span id="more-365651"></span></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how the fluffy creatures lost their most precious parts in the first place, but scientists decided to grow entire penises from scratch and implant them into a group of rabbits. The results were fully functional, completely responsive sex organs in all the rabbits and &#8220;when given the chance to have sex, eight [of them] were able to ejaculate, and four became fathers&#8221;. Impressive conception rate considering they were working with brand new equipment.</p>
<p>The hope is to one day reproduce those results for humans and aid those requiring penile reconstruction. Until then though, I suppose that &#8220;replacement penis&#8221; will keep implying the involvement of batteries. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/penis-engineering/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/replacement-penises-grown-in-lab-for-rabbits-now-humans-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learn Your Way Around A Cow&#8217;s Rectum With A Robot</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/learn-your-way-around-a-cows-rectum-with-a-robot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/learn-your-way-around-a-cows-rectum-with-a-robot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterinary science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ‘Haptic Cow&#8217; may have recently won Sarah Baillie the Most Innovative Teacher of the Year Award, but did she ever consider the real cow&#8217;s feelings? Imagine the rush of emotions: jealousy, relief, maybe even arousal.
Miss Baillie&#8217;s invention solves one of the biggest problems in veterinary medicine. That is, once your hand is up a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cow.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_cow.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The ‘Haptic Cow&#8217; may have recently won Sarah Baillie the Most Innovative Teacher of the Year Award, but did she ever consider the real cow&#8217;s feelings? Imagine the rush of emotions: jealousy, relief, maybe even arousal.<span id="more-365417"></span></p>
<p>Miss Baillie&#8217;s invention solves one of the biggest problems in veterinary medicine. That is, once your hand is up a cow&#8217;s butt you can&#8217;t really see anything you&#8217;re doing. Now with robotic organs and a monitor, she can teach students exactly what they should (and definitely should not) be grabbing.</p>
<p>On a related note, Miss Baillie claims she is also working on a &#8216;Haptic Horse&#8217;. Kent Smith may well have some ideas for her, as evidenced by this September&#8217;s Photoshop Contest entry:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/KentSmith_HorseController.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_KentSmith_HorseController.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>If you&#8217;d like to be put in touch, Miss Baille, please let me know. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/haptic-cow/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/learn-your-way-around-a-cows-rectum-with-a-robot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Things Malcolm Ate</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-things-malcolm-ate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-things-malcolm-ate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My perspective is that nature always beats technology. Waves eat ships, roaches beat Mortein and earthquakes topple buildings. Every day, this conflict plays itself out in front of my eyes as Malcolm the puppy gnaws on gadgets.
I&#8217;ve had Malcolm for a year now. He&#8217;s a little dog. He&#8217;s a good boy although kind of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="375"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7463441&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7463441&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="375"></object></p>
<p>My perspective is that nature always beats technology. Waves eat ships, roaches beat Mortein and earthquakes topple buildings. Every day, this conflict plays itself out in front of my eyes as Malcolm the puppy gnaws on gadgets.<span id="more-365100"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/why_do_pets_always_walk_on_asdfadvcasdfasdf_computer_keyboards-2/">Malcolm</a> for a year now. He&#8217;s a little dog. He&#8217;s a good boy although kind of a moron, but Lisa and I love him. As a puppy, he chewed on a good variety of things (as puppies do). Pens probably reminded him of bones; he would jump onto Lisa&#8217;s chair to grab a pen from her desk and prance away with his prize, crunching away to get at the inky marrow. He&#8217;d attack shoelaces with such fervour you&#8217;d think they were spaghetti with meat sauce. Glasses, too. He liked biting up the ear pieces so they would be jagged and painful to wear. But now that he&#8217;s a bit older, he&#8217;s developed a primary affinity for eating gadgets.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_PB030006.jpg" alt="" class="center" />TV remotes are fun for him, but only rectangular ones and mostly on the corners. The Toshiba remote has a little bit of chew on the corners, but the AppleTV remote, made of that soft chicklet-looking plastic, is his favourite. If I leave it on the coffee table, I will find it under a couch cushion two days later looking more worn. The black IR cap has broken off and the battery case has popped out. I&#8217;m lucky he didn&#8217;t swallow the batteries. One time he even chewed through a 110V cable for a heating pad. I&#8217;d only unplugged it that morning!</p>
<p>Malcolm&#8217;s favourite thing to chew on is an animatronic lion cub. Someone sent it to me last year, unsolicited, and it turned into a dog toy. It&#8217;s basically a little robot cub that growls and moves its eyes and mouth. The size of a teddy bear. Malcolm used to be scared of it, but now he just unleashes all the hell a 4kg dog can on it. I think he hates it. After all he&#8217;s a flesh and blood dog, and the lion is a robotic cat. Not only is the conflict inter-species, but its a battle between a biological being and a robotic one.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_PB030004.jpg" alt="" class="center" />At first, he&#8217;d drag it across the floor by its limbs. After awhile he learned to grab it by the nape of the neck and shake it. After two months, the neck opened up as did the plastic spine which is surrounded by various cables that power the mouth and eye servos. He chewed through them and killed the robot. Sometimes he humps it, but its clearly dominance not cross-species homosexual technophilia. I think.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a point here. I just find it amusing and fun to watch nature&#8217;s greatest machines destroy the primitive man-made replicas. Man, do we have a <em>long</em> way to go.</p>
<p>*Yes, I spray things down with bitter apple now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-things-malcolm-ate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
