<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; amd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ATI Radeon HD 5970: The World&#8217;s Fastest Graphics Card</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ati-radeon-hd-5970-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ati-radeon-hd-5970-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati radeon hd 5970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teraflops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ATI Radeon HD 5970 slaughters the competition in pretty much every benchmark thrown at it. It&#8217;s outrageously fast. We&#8217;re talking 5 teraflops here, people. Teraflops.
MaximumPC put the 5970 to the test, and found that it lives up to its promise. The 2GB dual-GPU card is the first to support DirectX 11, and basically doubles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/5970_01_full_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_5970_01_full_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The ATI Radeon HD 5970 slaughters the competition in pretty much every benchmark thrown at it. It&#8217;s outrageously fast. We&#8217;re talking 5 teraflops here, people. Teraflops.<span id="more-367776"></span></p>
<p>MaximumPC put the 5970 to the test, and found that it lives up to its promise. The 2GB dual-GPU card is the first to support DirectX 11, and basically doubles its wholly respectable predecessor (the 5870) in specs, capable of delivering nearly 5 teraflops of raw processing power. It&#8217;s a massive card, about 30cm long, designed mostly for heat dissipation, at which it apparently succeeds at. It&#8217;s also got easy access to overclocking via AMD&#8217;s OverDrive, and can drive up to three displays simultaneously with a maximum resolution of 7680&#215;1600. So it&#8217;s pretty much the greatest thing ever, and it&#8217;s got a price tag to match: $US600 upon its undisclosed release. Yow. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/ati_radeon_hd_5970_undisputed_performance_champ">MaximumPC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ati-radeon-hd-5970-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Phenom II Breaks 7GHz Barrier</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amd-phenom-ii-breaks-7ghz-barrier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amd-phenom-ii-breaks-7ghz-barrier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd phenom ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
7.08GHz. That&#8217;s the record-shattering speed an AMD Phenom II processor was overclocked to using a massive amount of liquid helium. You can watch the process in this documentary video set to a kickass soundtrack. [Crunchgear]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z6Hf6d404QY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z6Hf6d404QY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>7.08GHz. That&#8217;s the record-shattering speed an AMD Phenom II processor was overclocked to using a massive amount of liquid helium. You can watch the process in this documentary video set to a kickass soundtrack. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/13/amd-breaks-7ghz-barrier-with-liquid-helium-and-nu-metal/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amd-phenom-ii-breaks-7ghz-barrier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD&#8217;s Atom-Mauling Bobcat And High-End Bulldozer Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amds-atom-mauling-bobcat-and-high-end-bulldozer-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amds-atom-mauling-bobcat-and-high-end-bulldozer-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bobcat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulldozer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, AMD&#8217;s sorta revelling in getting handed $US1.25 billion by Intel, but more importantly, they&#8217;ve just revealed the future of AMD chips: The promised Atom competitor Bobcat and a new high-end architecture called Bulldozer.
Bobcat&#8217;s a low power chip at Atom, like for netbooks, that can run using less than 1W of power. It&#8217;ll be manufactured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_boooobcat.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Sure, AMD&#8217;s sorta revelling in <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-pays-amd-1-25-billion-to-end-antitrust-patent-wars/">getting handed $US1.25 billion by Intel</a>, but more importantly, they&#8217;ve just revealed the future of AMD chips: The promised <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/amd_revealing_atomkiller_plans_in_november-2/">Atom competitor Bobcat</a> and a new <a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/11/amd-bobcat-bulldozer.ars">high-end architecture called Bulldozer</a>.<span id="more-366568"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bobbycat.jpeg" alt="" class="center" />Bobcat&#8217;s a low power chip at Atom, like for netbooks, that can run using less than 1W of power. It&#8217;ll be manufactured using a 32nm process. It&#8217;s not hitting until 2011 though, and as Ars&#8217; Jon Stokes points out, by then Intel will have been at 32nm with Atom for a while, and already close to going to 22nm.</p>
<p>Bulldozer is AMD&#8217;s new server architecture, also slated for 2011 which uses a new design with two &#8220;tightly linked cores&#8221; as the heart. You can read about it in way more detail over at Ars, though for now, Stokes says it&#8217;s still hard to tell how competitive they&#8217;re going to be with Intel&#8217;s 2011 lineup. Guess we&#8217;ll see. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/11/amd-bobcat-bulldozer.ars">Ars</a>, <em>Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flasporty/2752012164/">Michele Eve</a>/Flickr</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/amds-atom-mauling-bobcat-and-high-end-bulldozer-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Pays AMD $US1.25 Billion To End Antitrust, Patent Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-pays-amd-1-25-billion-to-end-antitrust-patent-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-pays-amd-1-25-billion-to-end-antitrust-patent-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopolies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you were wondering if Intel&#8217;s business practices were as shady as the European Commission and the NY Attorney General think they are, look no further than this: Intel is paying $US1.25 billion &#8212; plus frills &#8212; to avoid fighting.
Here&#8217;s how Intel describes the settlement:
 Intel Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices today announced a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_amd-cake_01.jpg" alt="" class="right" />In case you were wondering if Intel&#8217;s business practices were as shady as the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2/">European Commission</a> and the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-hit-with-a-massive-antitrust-suit-in-the-us-this-time/">NY Attorney General</a> think they are, look no further than this: Intel is paying $US1.25 billion &mdash; plus frills &mdash; <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/11/12/intel-amd-to-bury-antitrust-hatchet-intel-to-pay-125b/">to avoid fighting</a>.<span id="more-366480"></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how Intel describes the settlement:</p>
<blockquote><p> Intel Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices today announced a comprehensive agreement to end all outstanding legal disputes between the companies, including antitrust litigation and patent cross licence disputes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> So, they&#8217;re not fighting directly anymore, and the mountains of patent and antitrust disputes are resolved: Intel will pay this ridiculously large sum of money to AMD, and agree to not engage in anything even <em>resembling</em> monopolistic behaviour, and both companies will live in harmony, cross-licensing technologies and competing, but softly! Great. Well, sort of: Intel&#8217;s biggest problems right now don&#8217;t come from other companies, but from governments: Complaints from AMD no doubt helped spur investigations by the European Commission and New York Attorney General into Intel&#8217;s business practices, and as part of the agreement AMD is withdrawing their complaints with both agencies, but the EC issued their $US1 billion+ fine quite a while ago and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-hit-with-a-massive-antitrust-suit-in-the-us-this-time/">from the looks of it</a>, the AG&#8217;s office is eager to move forward with their investigation too. In other words, this probably isn&#8217;t the end of the pain for Intel.</p>
<p>That, kids, is why you don&#8217;t engage in anticompetitive practices in a two-company industry. [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/11/12/intel-amd-to-bury-antitrust-hatchet-intel-to-pay-125b/">WSJ Law Blog</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-pays-amd-1-25-billion-to-end-antitrust-patent-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC Makers May Have Too Much Stock, Deals On The Way?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pc-makers-may-have-too-much-stock-deals-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pc-makers-may-have-too-much-stock-deals-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like PC makers might have missed Ballmer&#8217;s call for tempered Windows 7 expectations. There&#8217;s a chance that they&#8217;re sitting on a glut of inventory now, is there any hope that excess stock will translate to even better holiday deals?
AMD said they expect less of an increase in Q4 revenues due to &#8220;the big build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/New_Warehouse.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Sounds like PC makers might have missed Ballmer&#8217;s call for <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/steve-ballmer-slight-chance-windows-7-could-be-another-vista/">tempered Windows 7 expectations</a>. There&#8217;s a chance that they&#8217;re sitting on a glut of inventory now, is there any hope that excess stock will translate to even better holiday deals?<span id="more-361006"></span></p>
<p>AMD said they expect less of an increase in Q4 revenues due to &#8220;the big build we&#8217;ve seen of PCs in anticipation of the Win 7 launch.&#8221; Read: most PC makers aren&#8217;t going to be ordering too many components from AMD for a little while. Apparently that comment has led investors to think this is an industry-wide phenomenon, that PC makers have all the inventory they need and more.</p>
<p>Without knowing how widespread the effect is, let&#8217;s assume there are a ton of PCs out there. In that case, what will likely happen is the manufacturers will just sit on their inventory longer, and component suppliers will receive fewer orders. Hopefully, though, they&#8217;ll feel the need to turn around that inventory quickly, which would mean some awesome deals could be on the horizon. [<a href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091016/did-pc-makers-over-build-in-anticipation-of-windows-7/?mod=ATD_rss">All Things Digital</a>]</p>
<p><em>Image via Jfaneves</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pc-makers-may-have-too-much-stock-deals-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour: ATI Locked In For Next-Gen Xbox Graphics?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-ati-locked-in-for-next-gen-xbox-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-ati-locked-in-for-next-gen-xbox-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 720]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing is official, but Fudzilla&#8217;s sources suggest Microsoft liked the Xbox 360&#8217;s Xenos graphics enough to stay with ATI for its next console, possibly slated for 2012. Given the lead time, it may even be a 28-nanometre chip. [Fudzilla via CrunchGear]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Xbox360.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Nothing is official, but Fudzilla&#8217;s sources suggest Microsoft liked the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/Xbox-360/">Xbox 360&#8217;s</a> Xenos graphics enough to stay with ATI for its next console, possibly slated for 2012. Given the lead time, it may even be a 28-nanometre chip. [<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15936/1/">Fudzilla</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/14/ati-to-power-next-gen-xbox/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-ati-locked-in-for-next-gen-xbox-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series Is First To Drive 180in Monitors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ati-radeon-hd-5800-series-is-first-to-drive-180in-monitors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ati-radeon-hd-5800-series-is-first-to-drive-180in-monitors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati radeon hd 5800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati radeon hd 5850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati radeon hd 5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you remember that crazy, 6&#215;30-inch monitor rig by AMD? Well their upcoming ATI Radeon HD 5800 series graphics cards are what drive the uber display.
The two new cards, the ATI Radeon HD 5870 and the ATI Radeon HD 5850, are the first video cards in the industry to fully support DirectX 11. Beyond that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/atinew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_atinew.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Do you remember that crazy, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amds-eyefinity-graphics-card-drives-six-30-inch-monitors-at-once/">6&#215;30-inch monitor rig</a> by AMD? Well their upcoming ATI Radeon HD 5800 series graphics cards are what drive the uber display.<span id="more-355672"></span></p>
<p>The two new cards, the ATI Radeon HD 5870 and the ATI Radeon HD 5850, are the first video cards in the industry to fully support DirectX 11. Beyond that tidbit, they&#8217;re capable of producing 2.72 TeraFLOPS of computing power and are equipped with 1GB GDDR5 memory.</p>
<p>And yes, each is capable of driving six 30-inch monitors at once&mdash;what AMD refers to as &#8220;Eyefinity&#8221; technology.</p>
<p>Sadly, there&#8217;s still no word specific on pricing or availability, but these obviously aren&#8217;t bargain basement cards. [<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090922006705&amp;newsLang=en">BusinessWire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ati-radeon-hd-5800-series-is-first-to-drive-180in-monitors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Confirms Six-Core Consumer Processors Codenamed &#8220;Thuban&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-confirms-six-core-consumer-processors-codenamed-thuban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-confirms-six-core-consumer-processors-codenamed-thuban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd thuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hexa-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[six-core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just one day before Intel&#8217;s IDF conference, AMD dropped a little bit of a bomb on us, confirming that they will bring hexa-core processors to consumer computers. Even better, they&#8217;ll be backwards compatible with existing AM3 and AM2+ motherboards.
The processor will be a version of AMD&#8217;s six-core server processors, and will place all six cores [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/hexacore_teaser.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Just one day before Intel&#8217;s IDF conference, AMD dropped a little bit of a bomb on us, confirming that they will bring hexa-core processors to consumer computers. Even better, they&#8217;ll be backwards compatible with existing AM3 and AM2+ motherboards.<span id="more-355195"></span></p>
<p>The processor will be a version of AMD&#8217;s six-core server processors, and will place all six cores on one 45nm die. AMD warned that clock speeds will probably not be quite as high as current quad-core processors (MaximumPC suggests this may be due to &#8220;added thermal output from the two additional cores&#8221;), and will have 3MB of L2 and 6MB of L3 cache. It&#8217;ll be competing with Intel&#8217;s &#8220;Gulftown&#8221; (probably Core i9)when it debuts next year. But the best news here is the backward-compatibility &mdash; unlike Intel, you won&#8217;t have to replace your motherboard if you want to upgrade to the &#8220;Thuban&#8221; procs. We hope Intel follows suit, and we&#8217;ll let you know how they respond later this week from IDF. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/its_official_amd_confirms_hexacore_thuban_cpu">MaximumPC</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/amd-to-bring-six-core-thuban-processor-to-the-consumer-realm/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-confirms-six-core-consumer-processors-codenamed-thuban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Athlon II X4 620: Four Cores For $US99</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-four-cores-for-us99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-four-cores-for-us99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[640]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd athlon ii x4 620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd athlon ii x4 620 630]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microprocessors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD&#8217;s new Athlon II X4 chips are like a Phenom II minus the L3 cache. And they&#8217;re super-cheap: $US99 (2.6GHz-620), and $US122 (2.8GHz-630). Also looks like they hold their own against the $US150 Core 2 Quad 8200: [Maximum PC]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/AMD-AthlonIIX4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_AMD-AthlonIIX4.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>AMD&#8217;s new Athlon II X4 chips are like a Phenom II minus the L3 cache. And they&#8217;re super-cheap: $US99 (2.6GHz-620), and $US122 (2.8GHz-630). Also looks like they hold their own against the $US150 Core 2 Quad 8200: [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/cheap_chip_athlon_ii_x4_breaks_100_quadcore_barrier?page=0%2C0">Maximum PC</a>]<span id="more-353848"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-four-cores-for-us99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s Cheap, Light DM3 Packs 4GB RAM And Windows 7 For $US550</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hps-cheap-and-light-dm3-packs-4gb-ram-and-windows-7-for-us550/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hps-cheap-and-light-dm3-packs-4gb-ram-and-windows-7-for-us550/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dm3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp dm3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP&#8217;s DM3 swings both ways&#8212;AMD and Intel&#8212;with each chip titan&#8217;s take on low voltage processors. What&#8217;s common is that both versions start at $US550, are just over an inch thick and come with 4GB RAM and Windows 7 64-bit.
SPECIFICATIONS
OPERATING SYSTEM
PROCESSOR
PROCESSOR SPEED PROCESSOR CACHE BUS SPEED
MEMORY
ACCESSIBLE MEMORY SLOTS
VIDEO GRAPHICS
HARD DRIVE
FINISH AND FEATURES
DISPLAY NETWORK CARD
WIRELESS OPTION DIGITAL [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/dm3_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_dm3_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>HP&#8217;s DM3 swings both ways&mdash;AMD and Intel&mdash;with each chip titan&#8217;s take on low voltage processors. What&#8217;s common is that both versions start at $US550, are just over an inch thick and come with 4GB RAM and Windows 7 64-bit.<span id="more-353585"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>SPECIFICATIONS<br />
OPERATING SYSTEM<br />
PROCESSOR<br />
PROCESSOR SPEED PROCESSOR CACHE BUS SPEED<br />
MEMORY<br />
ACCESSIBLE MEMORY SLOTS<br />
VIDEO GRAPHICS<br />
HARD DRIVE<br />
FINISH AND FEATURES<br />
DISPLAY NETWORK CARD<br />
WIRELESS OPTION DIGITAL MEDIA<br />
AUDIO KEYBOARD POINTING DEVICE<br />
EXTERNAL NOTEBOOK PORTS<br />
DIMENSIONS<br />
WEIGHT SECURITY<br />
• Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit(1)<br />
• AMD AthlonTM Neo X2 Dual-Core Processor for Ultrathin Notebooks L335(2a)(3a)(4b)<br />
• 1.60 GHz(4)<br />
• 512MB L2 Cache<br />
• Up to1600 MT/s system bus running at AC/DC mode 18 watt<br />
• 4096MB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm) • 2<br />
• ATI RadeonTM HD 3200 Graphics with 128MB Display Cache Memory AMD M780G with 64MB GDDR2 (sideport memory) with up to 1982MB total graphics memory(6)<br />
• 320GB (7200RPM) Hard Drive (SATA)(7)<br />
• Brushed aluminium finish in Modern Argento &amp; HP Webcam with integrated digital microphone(15)<br />
• 13.3&#8243; Diagonal High-Definition(8) HP LED BrightView Widescreen Display (1366 x 768)<br />
• Integrated 10/100BASE-T Ethernet LAN (RJ-45 connector)(9)<br />
• Wireless LAN 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN &amp; Bluetooth(10)(10a)<br />
• 5-in-1 integrated Digital Media Reader for Secure Digital cards, MultiMedia cards, Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, or xD Picture cards(17a)<br />
• Altec Lansing with SRS Premium Sound<br />
• Full size chicklet keyboard<br />
• Touch Pad supporting Multi-Touch gestures. With On/Off button and dedicated vertical Scroll Up/Down pad<br />
• 4 Universal Serial Bus (USB) 2.0: 1 Headphone out • 1 microphone-in • HDMI • 1 VGA (15-pin)<br />
• 1 RJ -45 (LAN)<br />
• Unpackaged: 12.83&#8243;(L)x 9.06&#8243;(D)x 0.96&#8243;(min H)/ 1.23&#8243;(max H)<br />
• Packaged: 17.9&#8243;(W) x 4.3&#8243;(D) x13.6&#8243;(H) • Unpackaged: 4.21 lbs(12)<br />
• Packaged: 9.2 lbs<br />
• Kensington® MicroSaver lock slot • Power-on password • Accepts 3rd party security lock devices SPECIFICATIONS<br />
SOFTWARE<br />
OPERATING SYSTEM<br />
PROCESSOR PROCESSOR SPEED PROCESSOR CACHE BUS SPEED MEMORY<br />
ACCESSIBLE MEMORY SLOTS<br />
VIDEO GRAPHICS<br />
HARD DRIVE<br />
FINISH AND FEATURES<br />
DISPLAY<br />
NETWORK CARD WIRELESS OPTION DIGITAL MEDIA<br />
AUDIO KEYBOARD POINTING DEVICE<br />
EXTERNAL NOTEBOOK PORTS<br />
DIMENSIONS WEIGHT SECURITY<br />
POWER<br />
OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES<br />
WARRANTY AND SUPPORT<br />
• Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit(1)<br />
• Intel® Pentium® Processor SU4100(2c)(3)(4b) • 1.30 GHz(4) • 2MB L2 Cache • 800MHz FSB(4a)<br />
• 4096MB DDR3 System Memory (2 Dimm) • Max supported =8192MB<br />
• 2<br />
• Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD (shared) with up to 1695MB total available graphics memory(6)<br />
• 500GB (7200RPM) Hard Drive (SATA)(7)<br />
• Brushed aluminium finish in Modern Argento &amp; HP Webcam with integrated digital microphone(15)<br />
• 13.3&#8243; Diagonal High-Definition(8) HP LED BrightView Widescreen Display (1366 x 768)<br />
• Integrated 10/100BASE-T Ethernet LAN (RJ-45 connector)(9)<br />
• Intel® WiFi Link 5100AGN(10b)<br />
• 5-in-1 integrated Digital Media Reader for Secure Digital cards, MultiMedia cards, Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, or xD Picture cards(17a)<br />
• Altec Lansing with SRS Premium Sound<br />
• Full size chicklet keyboard<br />
• Touch Pad supporting Multi-Touch gestures. With On/Off button and dedicated vertical Scroll Up/Down pad<br />
• 4 Universal Serial Bus (USB) 2.0: 1 Headphone out • 1 microphone-in • HDMI • 1 VGA (15-pin)<br />
• 1 RJ -45 (LAN) • Unpackaged: 12.83&#8243;(L)x 9.06&#8243;(D)x 0.96&#8243;(min H)/ 1.23&#8243;(max H)<br />
• Packaged: 17.9&#8243;(W) x 4.3&#8243;(D) x13.6&#8243;(H) • Unpackaged: 4.21 lbs(12)<br />
• Packaged: 9.2 lbs<br />
• Kensington® MicroSaver lock slot • Power-on password • Accepts 3rd party security lock devices<br />
• 65W AC adaptor • 6-Cell Lithium-Ion battery<br />
• HP 90W AC adaptor &#8211; KG298AA#ABA • HP FD06 Notebook Battery &#8211; VG586AA#UUF • HP USB Essentials Port Replicator &#8211; NK398AA#ABA<br />
• 1-Year Limited Hardware Warranty with Toll Free Support (NA) • 1-Year Free Hardware Technical Support • 30-Days Free Limited Software Support with 1-Year (from date of<br />
purchase) Free Limited Software Support with Product Registration.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hps-cheap-and-light-dm3-packs-4gb-ram-and-windows-7-for-us550/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
