<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; airports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/airports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The World’s Largest Earthquake-Safe Building</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-world%e2%80%99s-largest-earthquake-safe-building/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-world%e2%80%99s-largest-earthquake-safe-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new terminal at Istanbul&#8217;s Sabiha Gökçen Airport is the world&#8217;s largest earthquake-safe building. You&#8217;re looking at over 185,000sqm of scaffolding that supports it, all resting on top of giant geological roller skates.
Instead of being built on top of the soil, the whole structure rests on over 300 isolators. These giant bearings let the building [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bigairport-660x439.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bigairport-660x439.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The new terminal at Istanbul&#8217;s Sabiha Gökçen Airport is the world&#8217;s largest earthquake-safe building. You&#8217;re looking at over 185,000sqm of scaffolding that supports it, all resting on top of giant geological roller skates.<span id="more-368589"></span></p>
<p>Instead of being built on top of the soil, the whole structure rests on over 300 isolators. These giant bearings let the building move laterally during an earthquake. After Istanbul got rocked by a magnitude 7.4 monster in 1999, and another major quake predicted to occur within the next 30 years, you can see why engineers decided to make this massive building shake-resistant.</p>
<p>As terrible as a massive earthquake would be, it would be incredible to see a building this huge move from side to side. Maybe we will in a future &#8220;World&#8217;s Strongest Man&#8221; event. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/worlds-largest-earthquake-safe-building/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-world%e2%80%99s-largest-earthquake-safe-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA Computer Glitch Causing Widespread Flight Delays</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/faa-computer-glitch-causing-widespread-flight-delays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/faa-computer-glitch-causing-widespread-flight-delays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second time in 15 months, an FAA computer glitch has rippled through airports across the United States, causing major delays. 
Clearly, when one computer goes down in Salt Lake City and it drags down America&#8217;s entire air traffic system, something needs to be done. At any rate, if you&#8217;re in the US and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the second time in 15 months, an FAA computer glitch has rippled through airports across the United States, causing major delays. <span id="more-368181"></span></p>
<p>Clearly, when one computer goes down in Salt Lake City and it drags down America&#8217;s entire air traffic system, something needs to be done. At any rate, if you&#8217;re in the US and you have a flight to catch today, make sure to check its status before heading to the airport. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_flight_delays">AP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/faa-computer-glitch-causing-widespread-flight-delays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Diego Floating Airport Would Be A City Of Its Own</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/san-diego-floating-airport-would-be-a-city-of-its-own/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/san-diego-floating-airport-would-be-a-city-of-its-own/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam englund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Diego is in desperate need of a new airport, but no one wants it near their land. The so-obvious-that-you&#8217;ll-slap-your-forehead solution? Don&#8217;t build it on land; the ocean&#8217;s right there. There&#8217;s even a plan, but it&#8217;s more than an airport.
The idea comes from a guy named Adam Englund, but it&#8217;s definitely not just a floating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/floaty2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_floaty2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>San Diego is in desperate need of a new airport, but no one wants it near their land. The so-obvious-that-you&#8217;ll-slap-your-forehead solution? Don&#8217;t build it on land; the ocean&#8217;s right there. There&#8217;s even a plan, but it&#8217;s more than an airport.<span id="more-363021"></span></p>
<p>The idea comes from a guy named Adam Englund, but it&#8217;s definitely not just a floating airport. It&#8217;s an entire $US20 billion business plan. He&#8217;s dreamed up an airport on an &#8220;oil rig-style floating platform&#8221; with four storeys of space, a total of 18,580,000 square metres of it, which could be used for hotels, restaurants, even universities. An entire floating city.</p>
<p>It sounds insane, but apparently in initial reviews, Englund&#8217;s plan lacks any &#8220;fatal flaws&#8221;. I&#8217;d consider the absence of $US20 billion a fatal flaw, but the man&#8217;s a bigger optimist than I. [<a href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/22/crazy-or-brilliant-plan-to-build-a-floating-airport-off-the-california-coast/">Infrastructurist</a> via <a href="http://stokereport.com/rant/plan-build-giant-floating-airport-california-coast">Stoke Report</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/san-diego-floating-airport-would-be-a-city-of-its-own/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Gadgets That Will Make Your Life Easier At Airports</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/six-gadgets-that-will-make-your-life-easier-at-airports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/six-gadgets-that-will-make-your-life-easier-at-airports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tgif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much to my dismay, I&#8217;ll be spending a lot of time in airports this weekend &#8212; so I&#8217;ve dug up some products that might make life a little easier on the layover.
It seems like economy seats on aeroplanes are made for Hobbits. If only I was riding first class on a Swiss International flight. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much to my dismay, I&#8217;ll be spending a lot of time in airports this weekend &mdash; so I&#8217;ve dug up some products that might make life a little easier on the layover.<span id="more-356611"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/swiss_international_seats.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_swiss_international_seats.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It seems like economy seats on aeroplanes are made for Hobbits. If only I was riding first class on a Swiss International flight. The new cabins on their A330 fleet make it seem like you are sitting in a cafe or restaurant. [<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/new_aeroplane_interior_design_allows_for_romantic_dinner_for_two-2/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/mobile-edge-bags.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_mobile-edge-bags.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Needless to say, bringing gadgets on planes is a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/giz-explains-how-to-fix-the-airlines-stupid-gadget-rules/">pain in the arse these days</a>. Airport &#8220;checkpoint friendly&#8221; bags make it easier for security to check the contents of your bag which, in turn, helps you zip through faster. [<a href="http://www.mobileedge.com/">Mobile Edge</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/mobile_edge_tsa_compliant_laptop_bags_for_speedy_trips_through_security-2/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/best_buy_vending_machines.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Want a new iPod or digital camera for your trip? Gadget vending machines <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/best_buy_vending_machine_haunts_dallasforth_worth_airport-2/">like this one</a> can help you pass the time at airports. Maybe you want to use this opportunity to diversify your portfolio and invest in gold? No problem &mdash; there are <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/vending-machine-dispenses-gold-bars-to-go/">airport vending machines for that too</a>.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/nap_cap.jpg" alt="" class="right" />I have trouble sleeping on aeroplanes (see earlier reference to aeroplane Hobbit seats) and I don&#8217;t mind looking like an idiot for a few hours if it means getting a little extra rest. Enter the Nap Cap. It keeps your head from swaying side to side during the flight, making conditions more comfortable for sleeping. Of course, you will probably end up leaning forward, mouth wide open, drooling in your lap. [<a href="https://vacationgadgets.com/productmgmt/results.asp?nCatID=26&amp;nSubCatID=217&amp;sSubCat=Nap+Cap+%26+Nap+Strap+Stylish+Sleep+System">Vacation Gadgets</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/nap_cap_and_strap_sleeping_aids_have_endless_possibilities-2/">Link</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/cellphone_boarding_passes.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Several major airports have begun using mobile phone boarding passes to help save passengers time. Unfortunately, my airport isn&#8217;t one of them. [<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/american_airlines_brings_mobile_phone_boarding_passes_to_ohare-2/">Link</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/plane_sheets.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Even if you can&#8217;t have fancy seats like the ones featured earlier on this list, you can still spice things up with these PlaneSheets slipcovers. Choose from options like &#8220;Leopard&#8221; and &#8220;Camo&#8221;. Oh yes, you may be in coach but your style is first class all the way. Plus, the slipcovers help separate you from any germs and other nastiness that might be lurking on your seat. [<a href="http://www.planesheets.com/buy_washable_planesheets">PlaneSheets</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/six-gadgets-that-will-make-your-life-easier-at-airports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Stupid UFO Spotted At New York&#8217;s JFK Airport</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/very-stupid-ufo-spotted-at-new-yorks-jfk-airport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/very-stupid-ufo-spotted-at-new-yorks-jfk-airport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jfk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paraglider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ufo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=347812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As you can hear in this audio record, a Delta pilot spotted a UFO at New York&#8217;s JFK airport this Sunday. Allegedly, the object was a &#8220;paraglider&#8221; who landed illegally, and then took off on a potential collision course.
 DAL164: Hey, do you see something over the&#8230; looks like a guy on a paraglider&#8230;almost over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aevR3S9w1Tg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aevR3S9w1Tg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object></p>
<p>As you can hear in this audio record, a Delta pilot spotted a UFO at New York&#8217;s JFK airport this Sunday. Allegedly, the object was a &#8220;paraglider&#8221; who landed illegally, and then <em>took off</em> on a potential collision course.<span id="more-347812"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> DAL164: Hey, do you see something over the&#8230; looks like a guy on a paraglider&#8230;almost over the approach, er, the threshold of two-two right?</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Looks like he hit the ground, dropped something off.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Now he&#8217;s airborne again. I guess is it ah, looks like some guy on a parachute.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The question is: What the hell was he or she dropping? Why has nobody has found the dropped object yet&mdash;if there was actually anything? Air, land and sea police searches didn&#8217;t find any traces of this very stupid and insane person. Or whatever it was, because for now it&#8217;s just &#8220;unidentified&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/450px-Paraglider_Motor.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></p>
<p>Thankfully, nothing happened as it climbed higher than 300 metres across JFK&#8217;s busy air traffic. [<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/as-the-croft-flies/2009/08/ufo-at-jkf-yo.html">Flightglobal</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/very-stupid-ufo-spotted-at-new-yorks-jfk-airport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSA Uses Decoy Luggage To Bust Airline Laptop Thieves</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tsa-uses-decoy-luggage-to-bust-airline-laptop-thieves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tsa-uses-decoy-luggage-to-bust-airline-laptop-thieves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is why you don&#8217;t check valuables people. A TSA officer and baggage handler working at JFK airport were recently busted stealing a MacBook Air and a T-Mobile Sidekick out of decoy luggage.
Both suspects were filmed by authorities rummaging through luggage bound for Miami on July 7th. They also switched luggage tags in a futile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_tsa-theif-3.jpg" alt="" class="left" />This is why you don&#8217;t check valuables people. A TSA officer and baggage handler working at JFK airport were recently busted stealing a MacBook Air and a T-Mobile Sidekick out of decoy luggage.<span id="more-341646"></span></p>
<p>Both suspects were filmed by authorities rummaging through luggage bound for Miami on July 7th. They also switched luggage tags in a futile attempt to hide their crimes. The pair faces up to 4 years in prison if convicted&mdash;giving them plenty of time to swap stories <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tsa_airport_screener_steals_over_200000_in_gadgets_almost_gets_away_with_it-2/">with this guy</a>. [<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/07/15/2009-07-15_sting_nabs_stickyfingered_jfk_airport_workers_going_through_luggage.html">Daily News</a> via <a href="http://gothamist.com/2009/07/15/jfk_airport_workers_stole_from_bagg.php#comments">Gothamist</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/5315217/genius-tsa-officer--baggage-handler-caught-stealing-from-decoy-luggage">The Consumerist</a> / Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jpf/278019395/">Flickr</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tsa-uses-decoy-luggage-to-bust-airline-laptop-thieves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clear Fast Track Airport Security Is No More</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/clear-fast-track-airport-security-is-no-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/clear-fast-track-airport-security-is-no-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear verified identity pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[id cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verified identity pass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing people to quickly hop through airport security with a TSA-verified biometric &#8220;fast passes,&#8221; Clear had great idea on their hands. Sadly, as of yesterday, their freeflowing security lanes will be closed.
So what was it? Did tightened government regulations make operating impossible? Was there some kind of security breach? An issue with the TSA granting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/flyclear10_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Allowing people to quickly hop through airport security with a TSA-verified biometric &#8220;fast passes,&#8221; Clear had great idea on their hands. Sadly, as of yesterday, their freeflowing security lanes will be closed.<span id="more-339162"></span></p>
<p>So what was it? Did tightened government regulations make operating impossible? Was there some kind of security breach? An issue with the TSA granting a virtual monopoly to a private fast track service? Nope! It was something simpler, and more timely. Cue their goodbye email:</p>
<blockquote><p>Clear to Cease Operations</p>
<p>Dear xxxx xxxx,</p>
<p>At 11:00 p.m. PST today, Clear will cease operations. Clear&#8217;s parent company, Verified Identity Pass, Inc. has been unable to negotiate an agreement with its senior creditor to continue operations.</p>
<p>After today, Clear lanes will be unavailable.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Clear Customer Support</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Apparently not enough people were willing to spring for the service, which could cost as much as $US199. Looking at the numbers, though, it&#8217;s clear obvious that Clear never really took off, spreading to just 20 airports and garnering about 150,000 subscribers.</p>
<p>The company hasn&#8217;t yet announced how they plan to deal with those subscribers&mdash;an impatient bunch, I&#8217;m guessing&mdash;but as far as getting any kind of service refund, this sparingly worded announcement doesn&#8217;t bode well. [<a href="http://www.flyclear.com/">Clear</a>&mdash;<em>Thanks, Tom and David</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/clear-fast-track-airport-security-is-no-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPhone Saves Man From Power-Hungry TSA Goon Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/iphone-saves-man-from-power-hungry-tsa-goon-squad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/iphone-saves-man-from-power-hungry-tsa-goon-squad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve bierfeldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re just hearing about it now, but back in March a quick-thinking air traveler took advantage of a dim-witted TSA official who had let that fancy little patch they wear go to his head. Weapon of choice? An iPhone.
The man, Steve Bierfeldt, was detained for carrying too much money. Not that this is a crime [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/tsa.jpg" alt="" class="left" />We&#8217;re just hearing about it now, but back in March a quick-thinking air traveler took advantage of a dim-witted TSA official who had let that fancy little patch they wear go to his head. Weapon of choice? An iPhone.<span id="more-338853"></span></p>
<p>The man, Steve Bierfeldt, was detained for carrying too much money. Not that this is a crime or anything (it isn&#8217;t), but it was enough of a phantom infraction for the unnamed TSA official to remove him from line, put him in a windowless room, and interrogate him for an hour.</p>
<p>Enter the iPhone, and one of its many voice recorder apps (keep in mind this happened in March, so no 3.0 recorder just yet). Thanks to the recorder, we can now read about gems like this:</p>
<blockquote><p> On a recording a TSA agent can be heard berating Bierfeldt. One sample: &#8220;You want to play smartass, and I&#8217;m not going to play your f**king game.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p> All that because Bierfeldt, who&#8217;s in the employ of former presidential candidate Ron Paul, was trying to bring $US4,700 in campaign funds onto an aeroplane. An ACLU lawsuit is pending, which is probably the least surprising part of this entire story. [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/06/20/tsa.lawsuit/index.html?iref=mpstoryview">CNN</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/06/20/man-records-tsa-hara.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/iphone-saves-man-from-power-hungry-tsa-goon-squad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Medical Checkpoints Will Never Save Us From Apocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/why_medical_checkpoints_will_never_save_us_from_apocalypse-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/why_medical_checkpoints_will_never_save_us_from_apocalypse-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/why_medical_checkpoints_will_never_save_us_from_apocalypse-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This&#8212;border entry and exit checkpoints with thermoscan controls&#8212;is how your airport will look in a few years. If you are lucky. Swine Flu or not, this is our future. Or maybe it&#8217;ll be even worse:



See, while the Swine Flu may have not been as bad as originally thought, the fact is that it&#8217;s better to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1241638664906_h01_18883933.jpg" alt="" />This&mdash;border entry and exit checkpoints with thermoscan controls&mdash;is how your airport will look in a few years. If you are lucky. Swine Flu or not, this is our future. Or maybe it&#8217;ll be even worse:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: false security, feature, swine flu, top --><br />
<span id="more-335496"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1241638820914_h11_18861207.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>See, while the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/follow_the_swine_flu_pandemic_in_real_time_with_google_maps-2.html">Swine Flu may have not been as bad as originally thought</a>, the fact is that it&#8217;s better to be overly protective than sorry. Or at least, that&#8217;s what governments think.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just like anti-terrorist airport controls. These were increased to stupid levels after September 11 with measures like arbitrary limits on liquids, &#8220;Please Remove Laptop From Bag&#8221; rules, and the now-classic &#8220;Please Remove Your Shoes and Coat&#8221;&mdash;measures that only add hassle without actually increasing security. Not only they have been bypassed and rendered useless in countless occasions, but there are dozens of security breakpoints around airports everywhere that can be used by the bad guys to do bad things, even now.</p>
<p>We got those measures and everyone gladly accepted them, getting back to sleep into this false dream of total safety, all thanks to this daily airport security show and tell.</p>
<p>The same will happen with medical controls. Thermal scanners and cybersniffers capable of detecting viruses and germs designed to do the same thing: Give everyone a false sense of health safety.</p>
<p>It will be false because, until the technology is truly omniscient and really can detect the tiniest amount of <i>any</i> virus in any stage of development, the barrier will never be real. And even then, there will be other entry points for the virus. You just can&#8217;t put barriers in the air. You can try to contain, but at the end is a battle we are going to lose. At least for the time being.</p>
<p>Right now the fact is that, no matter how many controls we put in airports, if there&#8217;s a real outbreak of something really really nasty, with no cure whatsoever, we are fucked. Big time.</p>
<p>In the meantime, we will all get to re-enact that airport checkpoint scene from <i>Total Recall</i> every time we go on a trip. I can&#8217;t wait. [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/05/2009_swine_flu_outbreak.html">Boston.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/why_medical_checkpoints_will_never_save_us_from_apocalypse-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSA to Transition From Metal Detectors to Whole Body Scanners</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the TSA introduced whole body scanners as a means to search passengers posing a greater security risk (like those who set off metal detectors), they now plan to use the invasive technology on everyone.

Apparently the trials at 6 airports have gone so well that the TSA would like to have all passengers &#8220;go through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/bodyscan.jpg" alt="" />While the TSA introduced <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/218015/new-security-camera-can-see-through-clothes">whole body scanners</a> as a means to search passengers posing a greater security risk (like those who set off metal detectors), they now plan to use the invasive technology on <em>everyone</em>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: security, airport security, airports, gettypic, metal detectors, tsa, tsa scanners, whole body scanners, x-rays --><span id="more-333404"></span>
<p>Apparently the trials at 6 airports have gone so well that the TSA would like to have all passengers &#8220;go through the whole-body imager instead of the walk-through metal detector.&#8221; In other words, everyone who gets on a plane will be seen quasi-naked.</p>
<p>The TSA is quick to remind the public that the technician is &#8220;off-site&#8221; and unable to associate your grey naked body with your real, grey naked body.</p>
<p>Swapping all metal detectors to whole body scanners should make that 100ml liquid rule a thing of the past, but with each scanner running $US100,000 to $US170,000 apiece, the upgrade won&#8217;t exactly be free. And really, I think the TSA should be paying <em>me</em> if they expect to see my naked behind. At least then I&#8217;d know the money was worth it. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/business/07road.html?_r=2&#038;ref=technology">NYT</a> and <a href="http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2009/04/in_a_shift_the_transportation.html">Budget Travel</a> and Getty Images]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
