<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Apple Ads Get In On The AT&amp;T Vs Verizon Slapfest</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-apple-ads-get-in-on-the-att-vs-verizon-slapfest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-apple-ads-get-in-on-the-att-vs-verizon-slapfest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You think Apple is going to take its fancy phone being relegated to the Island of Misfit Toys in a Verizon ad laying down? Nope. These two new iPhone ads seem to gun right at the big V.

[Engadget]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="570" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7777019&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7777019&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p>You think Apple is going to take its fancy phone being relegated to the Island of Misfit Toys in a Verizon ad laying down? Nope. These two new iPhone ads seem to gun right at the big V.<span id="more-368777"></span></p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="570" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7777115&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7777115&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/apple-hits-back-at-verizon-in-new-iphone-ads-video/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-apple-ads-get-in-on-the-att-vs-verizon-slapfest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vintage Cheese: Nothing Says Holidays Like A Family High On Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/vintage-cheese-nothing-says-holidays-like-a-family-high-on-tech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/vintage-cheese-nothing-says-holidays-like-a-family-high-on-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hands up if you&#8217;re taking a laptop home this weekend to escape family craziness by jumping online for a while. Me too. But if you believe these bizarre 1980s ads, computers were meant to foster an age of dazed family-togetherness.
Sure, the Wii might actually have a shot at keeping awkward conversation to a minimum, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_vintage80sad.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Hands up if you&#8217;re taking a laptop home this weekend to escape family craziness by jumping online for a while. Me too. But if you believe these bizarre 1980s ads, computers were meant to foster an age of dazed family-togetherness.<span id="more-368741"></span></p>
<p>Sure, the Wii might actually have a shot at keeping awkward conversation to a minimum, but it faces the same problem that the Commodore 64 had when it reigned supreme: You&#8217;ll still probably be booted from the TV when the football starts.</p>
<p>Technologizer has collected 10 of the most disturbingly perky tech ads from the 1980s, and it&#8217;s a fun look at how far we&#8217;ve (sorta) come. [<a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/22/a-1980s-home-computer-family-celebration/">Technologizer</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/vintage-cheese-nothing-says-holidays-like-a-family-high-on-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luke Wilson&#8217;s Droppin&#8217; Post Cards On Verizon Wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/luke-wilsons-droppin-post-cards-on-verizon-wireless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/luke-wilsons-droppin-post-cards-on-verizon-wireless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luke wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When I think escalating mega mobile phone carrier ad war, I think actor Luke Wilson. Oh wait, no I don&#8217;t, and yet here he is, again, striking back on behalf of AT&#038;T against Verizon Wireless.
Now, good on AT&#038;T for fighting back with more ads and not more silly lawsuits and all, but the Verizon holiday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wjwBHqa6lZI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wjwBHqa6lZI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>When I think escalating mega mobile phone carrier ad war, I think actor Luke Wilson. Oh wait, no I don&#8217;t, and yet here he is, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/att-goes-on-the-offensive-with-new-side-by-side-commercial/">again</a>, striking back on behalf of AT&#038;T against Verizon Wireless.<span id="more-368648"></span></p>
<p>Now, good on AT&#038;T for fighting back with more ads and not more silly lawsuits and all, but the Verizon holiday ad lineup is pretty strong, and I don&#8217;t see many Verizon customers losing sleep over Luke Wilson covering a giant coverage map with post cards.</p>
<p>As tipster Eric notes, AT&#038;T selectively does not mention Edge, 3G or voice/data distinctions in this commercial, opting instead for vague blanket statements like &#8220;AT&#038;T covers 97 per cent of all Americans &#8211; that&#8217;s over 300 million people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/luke-wilsons-droppin-post-cards-on-verizon-wireless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Goes On The Offensive With New &#8220;Side By Side&#8221; Commercial</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/att-goes-on-the-offensive-with-new-side-by-side-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/att-goes-on-the-offensive-with-new-side-by-side-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just as AT&#038;T&#8217;s injunction for the Verizon &#8220;There&#8217;s a map for that&#8221; ads to be taken off-air was denied, the company&#8217;s own pugnacious messages started playing. I somehow doubt that these &#8220;Side by Side&#8221; commercials are gonna make Verizon cry.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>Just as <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/judge-tells-att-to-stop-whining-as-the-verizon-ads-will-stay/">AT&#038;T&#8217;s injunction for the Verizon &#8220;There&#8217;s a map for that&#8221; ads to be taken off-air was denied</a>, the company&#8217;s own pugnacious messages started playing. I somehow doubt that these &#8220;Side by Side&#8221; commercials are gonna make Verizon cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/att-goes-on-the-offensive-with-new-side-by-side-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Tells AT&amp;T To Stop Whining As The Verizon Ads Will Stay</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/judge-tells-att-to-stop-whining-as-the-verizon-ads-will-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/judge-tells-att-to-stop-whining-as-the-verizon-ads-will-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like we&#8217;ll keep seeing Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;There&#8217;s a map for that&#8221; commercials as AT&#038;T&#8217;s injunction to have them taken off the air was denied. Granted, the judge had a weak moment of kindness and left room for a follow-up hearing.
US District Court Judge Timothy Batten Sr remarked that people might &#8220;misunderstand&#8221; the commercials, &#8220;but that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mappp.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Looks like we&#8217;ll keep seeing Verizon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/verizon-bitch-slaps-att-in-theres-a-map-for-that-commercial/">&#8220;There&#8217;s a map for that&#8221; commercials</a> as AT&#038;T&#8217;s injunction to have them taken off the air was denied. Granted, the judge had a weak moment of kindness and left room for a follow-up hearing.<span id="more-367984"></span></p>
<p>US District Court Judge Timothy Batten Sr remarked that people might &#8220;misunderstand&#8221; the commercials, &#8220;but that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re misleading&#8221;. He continued to add that &#8220;most people who are watching TV are semi-catatonic&#8221; to begin with. Let&#8217;s hope his train of thought remains during the follow-up hearing on December 16, because the case is starting to lose any <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/verizon-to-att-the-truth-hurts-bitch/">entertainment value</a>. [<a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/judge-rejects-at-t-203765.html">AJC</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/atandt-loses-request-for-injunction-against-verizons-map-for-that/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/judge-tells-att-to-stop-whining-as-the-verizon-ads-will-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bacon Sunrise</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bacon-sunrise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bacon-sunrise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar mayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the apple-smoked mountains, the great yoke rose again. And the day began anew. 
[jenntotten via Geekologie]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/baconsunrise.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_baconsunrise.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Over the apple-smoked mountains, the great yoke rose again. And the day began anew. <span id="more-367660"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/bacon_sunrise_is_the_new_tequi.php">jenntotten</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/bacon_sunrise_is_the_new_tequi.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bacon-sunrise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon To AT&amp;T: &#8220;The Truth Hurts (Bitch!)&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/verizon-to-att-the-truth-hurts-bitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/verizon-to-att-the-truth-hurts-bitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so I may have added &#8220;bitch&#8221; for emphasis &#8212; but this AT&#038;T vs. Verizon lawsuit over the &#8220;Map for That&#8221; ads is turning into an all-out PR smackdown. This stuff isn&#8217;t even written in proper legal language anymore.
When your lawsuits sound like press releases, it&#8217;s because they probably are (not that we care, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/true.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_true.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>OK, so I may have added &#8220;bitch&#8221; for emphasis &mdash; but this AT&#038;T vs. Verizon lawsuit over the &#8220;Map for That&#8221; ads is turning into an all-out PR smackdown. This stuff isn&#8217;t even written in proper legal language anymore.<span id="more-367452"></span></p>
<p>When your lawsuits sound like press releases, it&#8217;s because they probably are (not that we care, the whole case is pretty entertaining). Check out this opening statement from Verizon:</p>
<blockquote><p> AT&#038;T did not file this lawsuit because Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;There&#8217;s A Map For That&#8221; advertisements are untrue; AT&#038;T sued because Verizon&#8217;s ads are true and the truth hurts.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> YA BURNT, AT&#038;T! Verizon goes on to accuse AT&#038;T of failing to adequately expand its 3G coverage to match demand for its smartphones, which is sort of a hard point for AT&#038;T to argue. Verizon claims that its advertisements are &#8220;literally true&#8221; (instead of philosophically true? Metaphorically true? True in the sense in which it is used in animal husbandry, as in purebred? What?) and not misleading, and that AT&#038;T has failed to provide customers with an accurate map of its coverage. It&#8217;s pretty great, really &mdash; if you&#8217;ve ever wished the American legal system was more like it is on <em>Law and Order</em>, this whole statement is a gift. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/16/verizon-responds-to-atandts-map-for-that-lawsuit-the-truth-hurt/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/verizon-to-att-the-truth-hurts-bitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1984&#8217;s &#8220;Masterpiece Of Micro-Processor Technology&#8221; [NSFW]</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/1984s-masterpiece-of-micro-processor-technology-nsfw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/1984s-masterpiece-of-micro-processor-technology-nsfw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the erotica phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, that&#8217;s their words, not mine &#8212; I&#8217;m almost lost for any. &#8220;Sculptured by a European artist … the Erotica phone plugs into any wall-jack and is fully-guaranteed.&#8221; I bet, just look how classy this gent seems with an ear full of cleavage.
Keep it tasteless 1984. I&#8217;ve got no idea what fine publication this appeared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/eroticaphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_eroticaphone.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Hey, that&#8217;s their words, not mine &mdash; I&#8217;m almost lost for any. &#8220;Sculptured by a European artist … the Erotica phone plugs into any wall-jack and is fully-guaranteed.&#8221; I bet, just look how classy this gent seems with an ear full of cleavage.<span id="more-367433"></span></p>
<p>Keep it tasteless 1984. I&#8217;ve got no idea what fine publication this appeared in, but it looks like the sales came out of Mission, Kansas. And no, the 1800 number no longer works.</p>
<p>How much would this ultimate conversation piece have set you back? Just $US75, including shipping which takes 3-6 weeks. That&#8217;s an insane $US150 bucks today. I wonder how many they sold&#8230; [<a href="http://pacocamino.blogspot.com/2009/11/vintage-ad-erotica-phone-1984.html">Paco Camino</a> and <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vintage_ads/1489225.html">LiveJournal</a> via <a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/11/buygone-product-of-week-oral-sex-phone.html">CopyRanter</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/1984s-masterpiece-of-micro-processor-technology-nsfw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Spacey Makes Them Ducats Selling Olympus Cameras In The UK</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/kevin-spacey-makes-ducats-selling-olympus-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/kevin-spacey-makes-ducats-selling-olympus-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin spacey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Here is a new ad currently running in England, featuring Kevin Spacey, In it, he uses the word &#8220;hurty&#8221; to sell Olympus Pen cameras. Still hurting from K-Pax, K-Space? 
[Copyranter]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ua3dnCy7d-I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ua3dnCy7d-I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>Here is a new ad currently running in England, featuring Kevin Spacey, In it, he uses the word &#8220;hurty&#8221; to sell Olympus Pen cameras. Still hurting from K-Pax, K-Space? <span id="more-367360"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/11/kevin-spacey-says-hurty.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/kevin-spacey-makes-ducats-selling-olympus-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Armchair Reaches 29,952m In New Toshiba Commercial</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/video-armchair-reaches-29952m-in-new-toshiba-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/video-armchair-reaches-29952m-in-new-toshiba-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regza sv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telelvisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba regza sv lcd tvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The latest object to shoot high-def video from the edge of space is… an armchair. To promote its REGZA SV LCD TVs (LED backlight, local dimming), Toshiba trekked into the Black Rock Desert with a helium balloon. This is the result.
This is the first part of the ad. The second half for their Satellite T [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/k6PSbUl_68k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k6PSbUl_68k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>The latest object to shoot high-def video from the edge of space is… an armchair. To promote its REGZA SV LCD TVs (LED backlight, local dimming), Toshiba trekked into the Black Rock Desert with a helium balloon. This is the result.<span id="more-367191"></span></p>
<p>This is the first part of the ad. The second half for their Satellite T Series ULV laptops will come out next year. [<a href="http://socialnews.toshiba.co.uk/?ReleaseID=14262">Toshiba UK</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/16/toshiba-space-chair-ad-takes-armchair-viewing-into-space-vide/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Facts about the shoot:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p> • The shots were taken at a staggering 98,268 feet above the earth using Toshiba&#8217;s own cameras<br />
• To reach the altitude required and to conform with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, the weight of the rig had to be carefully managed to a weight of no more than four pounds<br />
• Tied to the rig was a specially created full-sized model chair made of biodegradable balsa wood – the chair was made by a company called Artem and cost about £2,500<br />
• Launch coordinates of the rig were &#8211; 119 degrees, 14 minutes by 40 degrees, 48 minute (12 miles North-East of the town of Gerlach, Nevada)<br />
• The quality of the footage from the Toshiba IK-HR1S cameras was: 1920&#215;1080 pixel count; 1080i @ 50hz; 100 Mbps<br />
• The temperature dropped to minus 90 degrees when the chair reached 52,037 feet<br />
• The chair took 83 minutes to reach an altitude of 98,268 feet where it broke and took just 24 minutes to fall back down to earth with the rig.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/video-armchair-reaches-29952m-in-new-toshiba-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
