<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; QOTD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/question-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do You &#8220;Get&#8221; The Chrome OS?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/do-you-get-the-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/do-you-get-the-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we got our first glimpse at Google&#8217;s Chrome OS and learned what it&#8217;s all about. So let&#8217;s start a discussion about some of the big issues.
1. First and foremost, do you &#8220;get&#8221; what Google is trying do do here? Does it make sense? Is it a good idea?
2. Google OS will be available first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/chrome_os.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_chrome_os.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Today we got our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/google-chrome-first-official-screenshots-updating-live/">first glimpse</a> at Google&#8217;s Chrome OS and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-chrome-os/">learned what it&#8217;s all about</a>. So let&#8217;s start a discussion about some of the big issues.<span id="more-368273"></span></p>
<p>1. First and foremost, do you &#8220;get&#8221; what Google is trying do do here? Does it make sense? Is it a good idea?</p>
<p>2. Google OS will be available first on netbooks and ONLY on netbooks starting in a year. Do you think netbooks will even be relevant a year from now?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2277330.js"> </script></p>
<p>3. Google also mentions that the first generation of the Chrome OS will focus on secondary machines. Do you even have a need for a secondary machine, or is one computer with a traditional OS enough?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2277334.js"> </script></p>
<p>4. Google notes that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-is-google-chrome-os-explained-by-google/">web browsing is the most important function of a computer</a> . Without it, many of us probably wouldn&#8217;t use a computer in the first place. So my question is, how much of your time spent on a computer is completely offline?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2277354.js"> </script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/do-you-get-the-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At What Point Would Our Cyborg-Selves Cease To Be Human?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/at-what-point-would-our-cyborg-selves-cease-to-be-human/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/at-what-point-would-our-cyborg-selves-cease-to-be-human/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#8217;s the RobotCop question. How much of your body would you have to replace with machines before you could no longer be considered human? Let&#8217;s break it down into percentages.
 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/robocop_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_robocop_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Yes, it&#8217;s the RobotCop question. How much of your body would you have to replace with machines before you could no longer be considered human? Let&#8217;s break it down into percentages.<span id="more-366928"></span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2250723.js"> </script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/at-what-point-would-our-cyborg-selves-cease-to-be-human/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Ability Would Be Your First Choice For Cyborg Enhancement?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-ability-would-be-your-first-choice-for-cyborg-enhancement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-ability-would-be-your-first-choice-for-cyborg-enhancement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyborgs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you could enhance one ability with a machine implant what would it be? Before you say something about sex, consider all of the other amazing possibilities.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cyborg_superman.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_cyborg_superman.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>If you could enhance one ability with a machine implant what would it be? Before you say <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-future-of-sex-is-torrenting-yourself/">something about sex</a>, consider all of the other <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/this-cyborg-life/">amazing possibilities</a>.<span id="more-366580"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-ability-would-be-your-first-choice-for-cyborg-enhancement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would You Buy A TwitterPeek?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/would-you-buy-a-twitterpeek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/would-you-buy-a-twitterpeek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitterpeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gave you our opinion on the TwitterPeek, but we wanted to get your take on the subject. Would you actually buy a device that only does Twitter? Why or why not?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/twitterpeek_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_twitterpeek_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>We <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-twitterpeek-is-so-dumb-it-makes-my-brain-hurt/">gave you our opinion on the TwitterPeek</a>, but we wanted to get your take on the subject. Would you actually buy a device that only does Twitter? Why or why not?<span id="more-365048"></span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/2214249"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/would-you-buy-a-twitterpeek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs&#8217; &#8220;Blood-Curling&#8221; Name for the iMac: What&#8217;s Your Guess?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-do-you-think-steve-jobs-blood-curling-name-for-the-imac-was/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-do-you-think-steve-jobs-blood-curling-name-for-the-imac-was/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy who came up with the name iMac said that Steve Jobs had a terrible first name for it. So bad it would &#8220;curdle your blood.&#8221; However, he won&#8217;t say what it was. What could it be? I&#8217;ll start&#8230;
The Macternet! OK, that doesn&#8217;t really curdle my blood, but I&#8217;m sure you will do better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_imac-jobs-macternet.jpg" alt="" class="center" />The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/steve-jobs-original-name-for-the-imac-was-horrifyingly-bad/">guy who came up with the name iMac</a> said that Steve Jobs had a terrible first name for it. So bad it would &#8220;curdle your blood.&#8221; However, he won&#8217;t say what it was. What could it be? I&#8217;ll start&#8230;<span id="more-364758"></span></p>
<p>The Macternet! OK, that doesn&#8217;t really curdle my blood, but I&#8217;m sure you will do better in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-do-you-think-steve-jobs-blood-curling-name-for-the-imac-was/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Giz Readers Own Macs Than PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/more-giz-readers-own-macs-than-pcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/more-giz-readers-own-macs-than-pcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac vs. pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly, our poll yesterday revealed that Mac owners were running neck and neck with PC owners, each commanding 41 per cent of the vote. Although Mac owners have maintained an extremely slight edge over the last few hours in actual numbers.


People who own PCs and Macs, the category I fall into, got 15 per cent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macvspc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macvspc.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Surprisingly, our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer/">poll yesterday</a> revealed that Mac owners were running neck and neck with PC owners, each commanding 41 per cent of the vote. Although Mac owners have maintained an extremely slight edge over the last few hours in actual numbers.<span id="more-363959"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/poll.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_poll.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_os_tracking_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
<p>People who own PCs and Macs, the category I fall into, got 15 per cent of the vote, which was also a little higher than I expected. Make of this what you will, but the difference between the poll compared to our OS tracking graphic pictured here should indicate why we wanted to focus on your own hardware &mdash; not the computer you use at work. At any rate, the race is really still too close to call. You have time to cast your vote and help tip the scales in your favour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/more-giz-readers-own-macs-than-pcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Use A Mac Or A PC As Your Personal Home Computer?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac vs. pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Windows 7 and Snow Leopard are both out in the wild, it is time, once again, to take stock of the state of home computing. That is to say, are you using a Mac or a PC?
Before you answer the poll, keep this in mind: work machines don&#8217;t count. Presumably, you made a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macvspc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macvspc.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Now that <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/windows-7/">Windows 7</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/snow-leopard">Snow Leopard</a> are both out in the wild, it is time, once again, to take stock of the state of home computing. That is to say, are you using a Mac or a PC?<span id="more-363741"></span></p>
<p>Before you answer the poll, keep this in mind: work machines don&#8217;t count. Presumably, you made a personal choice between a Mac or a PC for your private compute &mdash; and that is the one we want to know about.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/2185493"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would You Use The Multitouch Magic Mouse With A Multitouch Trackpad Laptop?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/would-you-use-the-multitouch-magic-mouse-with-a-multitouch-trackpad-laptop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/would-you-use-the-multitouch-magic-mouse-with-a-multitouch-trackpad-laptop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems redundant: the new multitouch Magic Mouse with a multitouch laptop&#8212;but some people might prefer it. Would you prefer a regular mouse? How about no mouse at all?
 
Would You Use a Multitouch Mouse With a Multitouch Laptop?(survey)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/magic_mouse.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_magic_mouse.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It seems redundant: the new <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-magic-mouse-hands-on/">multitouch Magic Mouse</a> with a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/white-macbook-refreshed-with-rubber-butt-led-backlighting/">multitouch laptop</a>&mdash;but some people might prefer it. Would you prefer a regular mouse? How about no mouse at all?<span id="more-361517"></span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> </script><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2146327/">Would You Use a Multitouch Mouse With a Multitouch Laptop?</a>(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">survey</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/would-you-use-the-multitouch-magic-mouse-with-a-multitouch-trackpad-laptop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Would You Like To Send The Street View Trike?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/where-would-you-like-to-send-the-street-view-trike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/where-would-you-like-to-send-the-street-view-trike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google street view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street view trike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Street View Trike has been around for a while, but now Google is looking for more places to send it. Know a cool spot where a car can&#8217;t go? Google wants to hear about it.
If you have any actual ideas, they&#8217;re looking for suggestions of parks, trails, university campuses, pedestrian malls, theme parks, zoos, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hr-4Aln1Il8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hr-4Aln1Il8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="360"></object></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/google_street_view_employs_hightech_tricycles_for_hardtoreach_places-2/">Street View Trike</a> has been around for a while, but now Google is looking for more places to send it. Know a cool spot where a car can&#8217;t go? Google wants to hear about it.<span id="more-360950"></span></p>
<p>If you have any actual ideas, they&#8217;re looking for suggestions of parks, trails, university campuses, pedestrian malls, theme parks, zoos, landmarks and sports venues. If you have any ideas about good shooting locales, head over to <a href="www.google.com/trike">www.google.com/trike</a> and submit them before October 28.</p>
<p>Google wants to hear about where the trike should go, but I&#8217;d rather hear where you guys think it <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> go. [<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/street-view-we-can-trike-wherever-you.html">Google</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/where-would-you-like-to-send-the-street-view-trike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Should We Blame For The Anticlimactic Balloon Boy Saga?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/who-should-we-blame-for-the-anticlimactic-balloon-boy-saga/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/who-should-we-blame-for-the-anticlimactic-balloon-boy-saga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balloon boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a thrilling chase sequence, Balloon Boy was found&#8230;to have never been in the balloon in the first place. We&#8217;re glad he&#8217;s safe, but now the question comes: Who&#8217;s to blame for this whole catastrophe?
Stevie Safran cleverly notes in Twitter that &#8220;Balloon Boy&#8217;s parents say he won&#8217;t be grounded, fail to recognise ironic choice of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_0bd873f3f813502c6815e2bfc0d3b48d.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_0bd873f3f813502c6815e2bfc0d3b48d.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>After <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/six-year-old-boy-flying-away-in-homemade-ufo/">a thrilling chase sequence</a>, Balloon Boy was found&#8230;<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ufo-balloonbrat-falcon-heene-found-safe-at-home/">to have never been in the balloon</a> in the first place. We&#8217;re glad he&#8217;s safe, but now the question comes: Who&#8217;s to blame for this whole catastrophe?<span id="more-360772"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/steviesaf">Stevie Safran</a> cleverly notes in Twitter that &#8220;Balloon Boy&#8217;s parents say he won&#8217;t be grounded, fail to recognise ironic choice of words&#8221;. But somebody&#8217;s gotta be punished for this, right? All kinds of public servants (emergency services, FAA) came out, on the taxpayer&#8217;s dime, for something that turned out to be totally unnecessary. So who&#8217;s to blame?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/2126480"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/who-should-we-blame-for-the-anticlimactic-balloon-boy-saga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
