Keep in mind, though two of these list for $US400, most cap at $US250, and they’re all toys. They don’t have a heck of a lot of AI, though they do have an impressive array of user-triggered functionality and some goofy “spontaneous” behaviour. You ain’t getting C-3PO no matter where you turn, not even R2-D2, but there’s something cool about each of these:

Mr. Personality – $US245
This is one weird bot. Turn it on and it will act like one of the many “personalities” you have downloaded to it, telling jokes, reading fortunes and interacting with you along the way.
Pros: 3-legged, multi-directional wheels move in all directions easily; multiple personalities technically mean relief from boredom; depending on the personality, it’ll call you “master”
Cons: The default personality is very annoying; not enough functions to stay entertaining; obstacle sensors are too sensitive
Worth the money? Doubtful. Depending on the power of the development community some fun personalities may emerge, but they are severely limited by the options on the remote.

Rovio – $US240
Maybe the most technical bot of the bunch, the Rovio is a webcam-on-wheels controlled via an internet interface. With some smart manoeuvring, you can snoop on your daughter’s date in the living room from the privacy of your bedroom. Or, if you have your own domain server, you can control the Rovio from anywhere in the world. It has major limitations, like an awful camera and outside of Internet Explorer you can’t hear any sound, but its API allows customisation so there’s true potential that has yet to be reached.
Pros: Good looking, highly interactive UI; like Roomba, can return to its base to charge itself when batteries run low
Cons: Seriously shitty webcam; setting it up on a Mac is torture; if you bought this thinking you can easily control it from anywhere in the world for free you’re SOL
Worth the money? Not yet. The Rovio is a great concept, but you’ll be much better off waiting for version 2.0… or maybe 3.0.

Femisapien – $US50
She’s the female companion to Robosapien, and she’ll blow you kisses, dance to music or speak in her very own gibberish language with you. She doesn’t do anything very fancy, but she’s the only girl here, so she looks better doing it than most of these other bots.
Pros: Fairly interactive; relatively inexpensive; giant robot boobs
Cons: Command system very complicated; routines aren’t all that exciting
Worth the money? Only if your name is Zoltan.

iDance WALL-E – $US53
The cheapest WALL-E of the crop, and a less expensive alternative to the Rolly, iDance WALL-E dances—if you can call it that—to the beat of your MP3 player, or his own built in sound bank. A one-trick pony, but I’ll be damned if it isn’t an adorable trick.
Pros: Look at that little bot—how could you not love it? His dancing is fun and silly, and he couldn’t be any easier to use
Cons: The speaker sucks; WALL-E’s moves don’t match the music closely like Rolly’s do
Worth the money? When we first saw the iDance WALL-E, he was only supposed to cost $US25 bucks. But now, at twice the price, it’s definitely one bot we can live without.

Ultimate WALL-E – $US400
The name says it all: The biggest WALL-E of the litter is ultimate in every way. It will follow you around, dance to your music, or perform a pre-programmed series of movements and noises. Best of all, it uses a really interesting controller that can move WALL-E using a touchpad.
Pros: Big enough to seem realistic; a ton of features so it won’t bore quickly
Cons: Expensive; controller has too many buttons that don’t do very much; did I mention “expensive”?
Worth the money? Who has that kind of money to spend on a robot? Especially one that isn’t programmable, upgradable or all that intelligent. It should’ve stayed at its original $US190 price.

U-Command WALL-E – $US130
U-Command WALL-E is the Baby Bear of the WALL-E bunch, just right in almost every way. Its controls are comparable to the Ultimate WALL-E, it can move, dance and make noises on your command, all for a much more attractive price.
Pros: Essentially a “lite” version of the Ultimate WALL-E for less than half the price, versatile controls allow for repeated play without getting too stale
Cons: The only WALL-E without a line-in speaker for MP3s; not as technically impressive as other over-$US100 contenders
Worth the money? Totally. Even at $US130, it’s one of the cheaper robots on the list, and the most fun right out of the box.

Sony Rolly – $US400
At first glance, the Rolly doesn’t fit the traditional robot mold. The egg-shaped MP3 speaker looks like it’s just another smooth white gadget with an “i” in front of its name. But when you see it in action, it’s one of the most exciting little toys around, dancing wildly and putting on a light show to the rhythm of the songs coming from its body.
Pros: Great speaker; customises dance/light shows to your own songs; amusing even after repeated viewings
Cons: Can’t customise songs on a Mac (but you can on a Vaio!); can’t jump to a specific track on the device
Worth the money? Surprisingly, it might well be. I can’t put my finger on it exactly, but I get a huge kick out of the Rolly. The fluidity and snazziness of the movement and lights explains the steep cost.

D-Rex – $US150
The scariest bot of the lot, D-Rex growls, attacks and lets out the sounds of bodily functions from every orifice. Rubbery, lizard-like skin and huge, moving yellow eyes add to the effect.
Pros: Creepy; fun to play with (for a while); the coolest looking of all the robots
Cons: Doesn’t do too enough; may scare little kids (or is that a “pro”?)
Worth the money? Tough call. D-Rex is probably the biggest robot here and isn’t that expensive for being so big. But since it only performs a few functions, don’t expect anything close
to a Pleo.

Elmo Live – $US60
What’s left to say about the newest version of every kid’s favourite fuzzy friend? It raps, dances and tells stories and jokes, all in the body of the most popular Muppet of a generation.
Pros: Buy this for your kids and they will love you forever.
Cons: Don’t buy this for your kids and they will hate you forever; also, the song “Elmo’s Gotta Get On Up” has been stuck in my head for damn near six months
Worth the money? Do you have a choice? At $US60 it’s a steal compared to most of these other bots… but good luck finding it.

And now…
The Winner: U-Command WALL-E. One of the few bots here that is fun to play with more than once, this WALL-E is cute, interactive and kids can enjoy him without driving parents crazy by playing the same thing over and over—*cough*Elmo Live*cough*.

Runner-Up: Rolly. I can’t stop looking at this little dude. His syncopated dancing demands attention from anyone who sees him, and he is the bot that performs his most essential function—playing music through a speaker—the best.

Honorable Mention: iDance WALL-E and Ultimate WALL-E. I like you both a lot, but why did you get me all excited with your decent prices, and then double them when I wasn’t looking? Not cool guys.

The Loser: Rovio. No offence here Rovio, we really like the though of a remote controlled, customizable webcam and we think you will get it right one day, but right now you cost too much and the most important feature you have—your webcam—is absolutely terrible.

Each side of the sign, designed by D3 LED, requires a 48-drive RAID pumping data at a rate of 3.2GB/second to a custom-built PC. From there, the data is fed through graphics cards to multiple DVI pipes, which lead to six DVI pixel splitters (known as a Spyders). The splitters take video data of a specific resolution and upscale it to the size needed for the display. Once the data is crunched and formatted for the sign, it’s sent out via 4Gbps ethernet to one of more than 12,000 display modules that make up the ginormous billboard.

Each module is a mini-computer, complete with MAC address, redundant 4-gigabit ethernet ports, power supply and a fan. Each panel can report all kinds of vital statistics, including its temperature. If there’s a problem, the panel reports itself to the main computer for easy troubleshooting. (Like a good communist, it can report problems with its neighbours, too.) The majority of the electronics are accessible from inside, so dangerous repair jobs on scaffolding suspended over Times Square are a thing of the past.

The sign’s modules are split into three sections, low-, medium- and high-resolution grids based on their distance from the street. (Why waste pixels for objects way high up?) The top, as you probably guessed, has the largest pixels, at 24mm, while the middle has 12mm and the bottom has 10mm.

The animators are faced with a tough challenge when creating content for the signs, as they must keep the different display sizes in mind so the animation appears cohesive throughout the sections. To help out the animators, sign creator D3 LED made a virtual copy of it that is 10,000 pixels high by 4,000 pixels wide, the equivalent of 43 megapixels. (It’s 20 times the resolution of HD, too.) They use an Adobe After Effects template to help coordinate placement of the animations on the slash-shaped sign.

As previously reported, a single 30-second spot on the billboard requires a staggering 150GB of data transferred through the system. But before you accuse D3 and Walgreens of hogging all of the power in New York, they attest that they are not. With the Con Ed bill in mind, their design reduced unnecessary copper wiring by over 300,000 feet and increased the voltage for more efficient power. They also set up an auto-dimmer (like you might have on your laptop) that adjusts the luminosity of the LEDs based on the ambient light outside. All of this makes it not necessarily cheap but at least cheaper than you’d think to operate.

The Walgreens sign is a complex, fascinating testament to the sheer power of LED displays. While most people living in New York avoid Times Square exactly because of things like this, tourists will undoubtedly flock to the centre to observe the sign up close, even though it can be seen from as far away as Bryant Park and the Port Authority. For now, it’s something that even this semi-jaded NYC resident can appreciate.

The Price: $US230

The Verdict: Once again, Flip has done a respectable job of bringing dead simple, high quality video recording to the masses. The MinoHD is light on features—no macro shooting, still picture taking, or video quality options—but it makes up for these shortcomings by its ease of use. The memory and battery are both built-in, and are sufficiently sized to take a day’s worth of video without filling up or going dead. The touch-sensitive buttons are more responsive than the original Mino, making zoom and playback a snap. Even the new editing software on the Flip, usually included on camcorders like this as an afterthought, is great, and you can make a YouTube-level video complete with background music and credits in just a few clicks.

The video quality on the MinoHD is decent. Well-lit areas look good, but places with low-light are noisy and not as clean as the Zi6. The video gets choppy while panning, a problem shared with Kodak’s cam, but most things shot on the device will likely be single-angle clips of people getting punched in the nuts or popping zits, so this shouldn’t be much of an issue.

For comparison’s sake, here’s a clip I shot in low-light on the Zi6, the current cream of the HD crop. It’s much clearer than the MinoHD, and close-up focus looks nice. Sound quality is pretty comparable between the two.

Still, the price tag is a bit steep for such a small set of features. More serious aspiring viral video stars will miss options like recording in VGA to increase space, or a macro switch for close up shots. Also, the screen is so small that its difficult to see what you’re recording, which is necessary when the video is in 720p. All in all, the MinoHD is a super simple, solid quality, if a little pricey camcorder that will have you sharing videos in no time.[Flip]

The Price: $US150

The Verdict: The Turbines are great, especially given the sub-$US200 price point. They sound every bit as good as more expensive Shures, with clean, deep bass and crisp, clear mids and highs. They’re also the loudest pair of ear buds I’ve come across, blasting my iPhone and laptop to volumes I didn’t know existed, without ever getting noisy.

In fact, the worst thing about the Turbines was discovering how crappy most of my MP3 files really sound. Songs purchased from iTunes or ripped from CD were fine, I was able to pick out each instrument and hear things I normally couldn’t with lesser headphones, but files I’ve obtained with less reliable quality sounded like absolute garbage—the mix was all wrong, and the noise almost gave me a headache.

Also, by this point I expect most ear buds in this range to include a microphone/toggle switch, and was disappointed that these don’t. On the plus side, they generously come with five sets of tips so there is definitely a size that will fit your ears. All in all, the Turbines are a nice entry into the in-ear headphone arena by Monster, and fantastic sound quality for the price—just make sure your music lives up to their high standards. [Monster]

Flip Mino HD
Details
•Sleek, pocket-sized camcorder shoots breathtaking HD video
•Available in black or whatever you want
•4GB of on-board memory records up to 60 minutes of video
•Dimensions: 4″ x 2″ x 0.6″; weighs just 3.3 oz.
•HD 720p resolution (1280 x 720) in16:9 cinematic widescreen
•No glare display (1.5″)
•Sealed, rechargeable lithium ion battery (up to 2 hours of battery life)
•Flat back-panel with touch-sensitive buttons
•Instant playback, pause, fast forward/rewind, and delete features
•Connects to TV for instant viewing
•New built-in FlipShare™ software works on any PC or Mac:
•Save, organize, and edit videos with ease
•Email videos and video greeting cards
•Upload videos directly to AOL Video, MySpace, and YouTube
•Capture HD snapshots from your videos
•Create custom movies with your own music
•Order DVDs and have them shipped anywhere in the world
Suggested Retail Pricing: $229.99

When you go to the polls next Tuesday, no matter who you vote for, you will be motivated by words, images and videos you picked up online. There are some voters who don’t use the internet to gather information about candidates, but that number is dwindling, while the number of ways candidates can reach you online is growing. Sometimes 2004 is referred to as the first “internet” presidential election, but back then, social networking was in its infancy, YouTube was just a glimmer in some kids’ eyes, and Live Xboxes were few and far between. This year, candidates used text messages, videogames, satellite broadcasting and a highly contagious amount of viral video to broadcast platforms, hear from constituents and raise cash. This year we got the first real look at how races will run in the net age, titans clashing bit for bit over your very soul.

It’s 1kg, extremely light and thin, and the chrome finish on the trackpad area is much better looking than the generic plastic of similar models. The 10.2-inch matte screen is compact without straining your eyes, and the keyboard feels bigger than the original Eee’s (that or my fingers have gotten smaller to accommodate this segment of the PC industry). The only thing painfully tacky in the S101 is a Swarovski crystal accent on the hinge, but it isn’t very obvious until you glance at it.

At $US700, it’s not exactly cheap for an Atom-powered laptop running Windows XP off of a 16GB SSD, and that’s the only configuration you can order up. Still, in addition to its good looks, it’s got more inputs than a new MacBook: 3 USBs, a 4-in-1 card reader and VGA video out. It’ll arrive in copper brown and graphite; too bad that the champagne paint job, in the Continental’s opinion the best suited to accompany the Swarovski accents, won’t make it to the US. [Asus]