Remember when Anonymous threatened to destroy the entire internet? We laughed and ultimately their words were just hacker hubris. But it got us thinking — could someone actually destroy the internet?
Giz Au Editor’s Note: Yes, some of this article is rather US-specific, but then the internet is a global thing. Also: No, we’re not saying you should destroy the internet, at all. Read the whole article and this will become clear.
We did some digging, and guess what: with enough effort, the entire thing can be shattered. Physically. Completely. Here’s how to kill the internet.
Before we destroy mankind’s greatest, vastest machine, let’s get something polite out of the way: don’t. Destroying the internet’s core infrastructure would constitute the greatest act of global terrorism in history and/or a declaration of war against every sovereign nation in existence — to say nothing of the danger it would put both you and others in. This is a thought exercise.
So put on your thought exercise caps and come with us on a journey across the world. Let’s figure out how this could possibly be done. Let’s figure out exactly what it would take, what cords to rip — because the internet under attack is an oft-invoked idea. What would true defeat really mean? What would the web’s downfall even look like? Where would it happen? Core parts of the internet have been (digitally) assaulted before — and there’s no reason to believe it won’t happen again.
The first step on this trip is mental. We need to begin by no longer treating the internet like a ghost. It’s made of more metal, plastic and fibre than you can fathom — and it’s spread across the whole world, a monster machine that hugs the entire globe. So we hunted down the web’s physical foundation, across land and see, to pinpoint exactly what you’d need to take out. Hypothetically. It turns out, Anonymous’ threat isn’t insane — just the way they talked about doing it. You can’t destroy a signal while using it; the internet’s destruction requires analogue violence, not some beefed up DDoS strike.
We always think of threats against the internet as cyberwarfare or some abstraction, virtual to the point of meaningless. But this is mostly bluster and software-mongering. The enormous, invisible truth of the internet is that it’s enormously strong. There’s no main switch, no self-destruct button, no wire to be snipped for an easy blackout. The internet, through a mix of chaotic serendipity and brilliant planning, is redundant to the point of near invincibility. Like a fibre optic hydra, you can hack off great expanses of it, and the thing will keep chugging. It’s smart, almost self-sustaining, able to repair and reroute its paths from one continent and country to another, making up detours on the fly. This happens from time to time. Alan Mauldin, an expert with internet infrastructure analysis firm TeleGeography, rattles off a few recent instances:
In February, two of the three cables serving East Africa were cut in the Red Sea. It impaired connectivity for some customers in a few Eastern African countries, but most folks were smart enough to have capacity on multiple cables on both coasts. There have been many cases of multiple cables damaged in the Med., Red Sea, and South China Sea in the past 5 to 6 years. The Japanese tsunami last year damaged a lot of cables – yet, the Internet connectivity to Japan was relatively unaffected due to multiple restoration options.
The internet: tsunami proof.
But for all its durability, the internet isn’t immortal. It’s strong because it was built to be strong. And because it was built like you’d build a monument or bench, it can be destroyed. Just like every other physical thing on the planet. We think of it as a crystal cloud, an inexorable force of the cosmos that runs on its own, as susceptible to destruction as gravity. But let’s get one thing straight: With enough effort, you could destroy the internet as thoroughly as a tree chopped straight through. The thousand-headed beast can be decapitated in full, not just hindering it, but slaying it. You just need to know where to start slicing.
Cut the Cables
Forget wireless. The internet exists because of hundreds of thousands of miles of thick, old-fashioned cables. Hundreds upon hundreds of undersea, intercontinental cable lines, criss-crossing around the world, are what put your tweets onto a monitor in Pakistan. As mentioned, the cables are wired to back each other up — when one fails, another picks up the slack. But hey — what if you snipped them all? The internet is a network of networks. The laptops in your house, the desktops in your office, a server farm in Moscow — they’re all wrangled together by these byzantine cable connections. Kill the connections, and the networks can’t speak across oceans. The internet is instantly fractured.
Here is every single internet cable in the world.
Don’t take TeleGeography’s word for it — they’re aggregating data given out freely. Feel free to ask the US Federal Communications Commission, which mandates a (publicly available) licence for every single cable that touches US shores. These servers, like much of the internet’s vulnerable innards, are an “open secret,” explains Andrew Blum, author of Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet. Here’s the latest list from their end:
The cables, as with anything underwater, come straight out of the water, often just lying atop a beach like this one.
They’re sometimes disguised or partially buried. But sometimes they’re just lying out on the sand like an abandoned boogie board. “They’re supposed to be buried,” explains Blum. “But often the ocean has its way.” For those times when the cable still remains below the beach, you can use an industrial line tracer like this one to find the right spot. Dig ‘er up, and then go to town.
We asked the burly crew at Best Made, crafter of damn-fine axes, what they’d recommend for cutting through the internet’s backbone, and how much elbow grease it’d take. Naturally, they recommend using an axe:
Looking at the make up of the cable and it’s diameter, I’d say a half dozen swings maybe less, provided they’re accurately placed and the cable is held securely on a sturdy surface. The toughest part of the cable would most likely be the polycarbonate sleeve, everything else I think would succumb to the axe fairly readily.
Although the exact location of many of the cables and their onshore landing stations are kept a secret by private corporate owners, many aren’t — in fact, they’re found on popular beaches and bustling towns.
Here are two cable spots that, according to TeleGeography, would be the most devastating if destroyed. Striking a node like this would only result in slowdowns and setbacks, not total annihilation. Sites from across the ocean would be immediately inaccessible — many others would be so slow as to be unusable. The internet still runs — confusedly and very slowly — but this is a good start.
Take the cable laid across Mastic Beach, in the Long Island residential mega-zone of Brookhaven. Its cable coordinates are online for the world to see.
So too are the cable link at a beach in Manahawkin, New Jersey.
Sites like these link America’s eastern seaboard with western Europe and serve as some of the most dense, crucial infrastructure points in the world. Get these out of the way, and you’ve made a good dent into the internet’s guts. Global finance is now over, leading to an instant worldwide financial collapse — sorry. Skype is broken, as is every other means of talking between continents over the internet. You can’t email your friends abroad. You can’t order Barbour coat from the UK. Tweets from the Middle East are stuck there.
The other most crippling attacks would be executed as follows, using the list of towns and beaches above:
Singapore
Egypt (both on the Med and Red Sea)
SW United Kingdom
Tokyo
Hong Kong
South Florida
Marseilles
Sicily
Mumbai
Chennai
The internet is now no longer global — every continent and island is, well, an island. The most basic part of the internet is scooting data anywhere around the globe in an instant. That’s over now.
Ruin the Root Servers
“Google.com” is a crutch. Typing in a domain name actually translates an obscure numerical identifier, the IP address: 74.125.228.37. And there’s no way you’re going to remember 74.125.228.37, along with tens upon tens of other such numbers for every site you visit each day. This is how a network of machines is usable by us puny, finite humans.
Compare: “Hey, check out Twitter.com!”
Versus: “Hey, check out 199.59.148.10!”
You get the point.
There are 13 servers, labelled only by a single letter, backed up hundreds of times over, that are responsible for decoding _________.com (and .net, and .org, etc) before serving up the corresponding IP address. Knock these machines offline, and the alphabet isn’t part of the internet anymore; if you want to navigate what’s left of the web, you better have a pad and pencil, or an extremely good memory.
So how would one find and destroy these servers? Like the cables that feed (well, fed) them, the servers are also an open secret. In order for them to be any use at all, they have to be absolutely transparent — the web is worthless unless it’s a free orgy of interoperability. And the best way to make sure everyone gets theirs is to just make the details of the root servers — and their locations — public. It just takes the tiniest amount of digging.
Let’s say we want to obliterate the “K” servers, operated by a company called RIPE NCC. Go to its website, and from there it’s as simple as scrolling across a Google Map. Oh, here’s a server located in Miami. Click on it — it’s located in the NAP of the Americas data complex, which a simple Google search will point out is located at 50 NE 9th St, Miami, Florida. You can take the 6 bus straight there. But if you’re going to wipe the place out, be prepared for security — these places are guarded like Nazi bunkers to make sure nobody enters without a damn good reason.
The M server array, operated by the WIDE Project, has a location in Seoul. Their website will show you the way — here’s a Google Street View pic to make things simple.
Security tends to be around the clock, but not always — and it’s mainly to keep strangers from wandering inside and pushing the wrong button. Destroying the building that houses these servers would be the same as blowing up any other building that doesn’t contain the vital brain shards of the internet.
Repeat this process for every other server array — you can find a master list here.
Destroy the Data Centres
What have we accomplished so far? With all the cables cut, the internet is landlocked, broken up into a handful of tiny internets that can’t talk to one another. Messages can’t be sent around the world anymore. Hell, Japan is completely isolated. After demolishing the root servers, web addresses are reduced to incomprehensible code numbers. The destruction of the internet is ready for its coup de grâce: blow up the boxes that hook what’s left together.
Data centres are unassuming buildings filled with servers that host the websites we browse, the emails we read, and the vault of lo-res Facebook photos you racked up all through university. They’re enormous, often windowless structures that aren’t designed for people. They’re houses for computers, not flesh — they’re often dark most of the time — to keep them cool, and because computers don’t mind working without lights on. But they’re vital to the people who want to sprint through the web, allowing your ISP to link up with the rest of the internet. Some of these centres in particular are mega-hubs, “public internet exchanges”, open bazaars of ISPs from every corner of the globe converging on one floor of one building. All of the lines hitting one point. Remember that axe? Yeah.
New York City’s 60 Hudson Street facility, owned by a company called TELX, is a global destination — what Times Square is to glass-eyed tourists, an internet Babylon:
On the 9th floor of 60 Hudson, a 15,000 square foot facility known as the Meet-Me-Room is the convergence point of multiple layers of local, national and global fibre optic cables. This is where each carrier’s server, storage, and networking equipment resides as well as arrays of optical, coaxial or copper terminations which allows the carrier’s “colocation units” to connect to other networks through a series of connection panels. This physical hub of the Internet, essentially a gigantic Ethernet switch, is powered by a 10,000 Amp DC power plant.
Wreck this floor, or even the building itself, and the entire region’s connection starts crawling — the performance of the internet around the world would take a hit. Not only that — websites themselves are erased. Companies use these data centres to outsource their storage, meaning every photo or song you’ve ever uploaded, for example, could vanish once you start wrecking wall after wall of servers. If your ISP plugs in at one of these junctions, you might lose your home access altogether — severed at the source.
There are centres like 60 Hudson sprinkled across the globe, and eradicating the gear inside each would cripple the web stretching in every direction outward.
Here’s your hit list for the earth’s super data centres — the last punch you need to break what’s left of the net’s spine:
With all this gone, the web is all but dead. If you wanted to be thorough, the rest of the planet’s less important data centres can all be pinpointed and blown to hell.
Now data is entirely frozen. Nothing can get anywhere, because all the roads, bridges and traffic lights are in ruin. All that’s left of the internet is your office intranet, or the file-swapping in your dorm. The tiny shreds. There are nets, but none of them are inter.
Congratulations, you’re the world’s biggest arsehole.
But remember, to do this, you would’ve just completed the single most complex, sweeping act of destruction in human history. But with anything less, the internet would still be kicking.
And that’s what makes it so impossibly damn strong. Nobody will ever be able to pull off thousands of attacks around the entire planet at once, with one coordinated blast and chop. Unless you had a team of tens of thousands to strike everywhere at the exact same time, repairs would outpace destruction — this isn’t a job for a lone wolf. Short of a thermonuclear apocalypse — which would lead to some bigger problems than Facebook downtime — we just can’t damage so much stuff spread so widely. We just built it too well.
Scott White is an illustrator based in Herndon, Virginia. You can see his work here and follow him on Tumblr, Facebook and Twitter.
Cable photo: CBTO
Server photo: Clay Irving








































Type "Google" into Google.
That breaks the internet.
it crowd ftw!!!
Ctrl P, alright, let's do this.
you mean..
....Challenge accepted...
What about a virus that is designed to attack DNS servers? I'm pretty sure that this would only take out some until anti-virus companies find a cure and then you have backups of those core DNS servers.
Live in a developing country.
Great. Now we have made the instructions publicly available including master lists. When the aliens come, we are screwed.
This is a great thought exercise, and does highlight some very weak points in the current setup...
a mass dns posion would wreck havok
Wreak havoc you mean.
Wreck havok would mean destroying an xman.
+1 awesome
Lol, you can tell there's a lack of network nerds around. Not a single mention of the one thing that actually does often take out large chunks of internet. BGP anyone?
Heh... Dodo anyone?
You may have misunderstood me lol. But if I could upvote you I would XD
He is referencing what Dodo did here in Aus when they poisoned Telstra's BGP and took the whole network down for a while.
it was awesome, not being able to get to commbank etc, yay for dodo.
Yes you can tell. Naming buzzword acronyms doesn't really express what you think would be a possible way of producing a result.
In fact, of all the acronyms you could have picked BGP is the least likely to be a viable medium for wreaking chaos on the internet.
By design BGP is a 'decentralised' method of routing. It's a way of creating links without a master server by spiderwebbing connections to other networks.
What you are suggesting is instead of breaking a hundred fibre links and destroying a a few dozen of DNS servers, you think it would be easier to disable BGP on every router of every provider in the world.......
No, I'm suggesting introducing a new router with incorrectly advertised routing info. Not permanent, but permanent enough to be devastating .
Core parts of the internet have been "digitally" assaulted before .... tehehe
It wasn't assult... the internet was up for it
If Sydney is anything to go by, all we need is a few coordinated groups of construction workers to 'accidentally' cut cables at building sites...
or you can give me a few bucks and i can press the big red button to turn the internet off
Dude. seriously. DO NOT hit that big red button.
It's not the internet off switch.
It's the whole world off switch.
Then again ...............................
Don't fuck with the TelX datacenter in NYC, that's where MY vps is located!
Assholes.
entertaining, well read
goin down californy' way find me some internet
Episode 6 Season 12 South Park.
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/166182/its-just-gone
Considering there are hundreds of undersea cables I just don’t think its fesible to suggest one could cut the cables simultaneous. You might as well put down a giant meteor as a possibility that ends up destroying the internet. It’s just as likely.
Here my top 4 ways to destroy the internet that are actually doable.
1. EMP key data centres. Number 1 you wouldn't need to enter them to do this. Non nuclear EMPs are fairly straight forward to construct. None of their materials are on banned lists and because they’re not explosive etc you could easily load one up in a van, drive by the data centre bammo fry em. That said with the police state we have I think it would be fairly hard to organise in every western country coordinated attacks on key data centres (and those data centres that you'd be taking out would be the inter-carrier ones). The other thing is that sure you'd fry a heap of electronics but A - most of its backed up off site, B-routers are replaceable. So the net would go down and then as admins rebuilt their networks they’d come up.
I'd dare say a lot of data & money would be lost. You could even repeat and shake since the cost of EMP shielding in Telco grade switches would cost a bit.
2. Gain access to BGP tables and change all of the routes. You’d fuck the internet’s traffic management system. Sure you can take out a DNS but again those things are backed up and the TTL (time-to-live) means that most DNSs would continue to function regionally. But BGP on the other hand, attack the major carrier/ISP BGP routers and bamo no one is going no where fast. That said its harder said than done. Only a select group of people have access to BGP routers at any ISP and you'd need to hack those people which would be difficult since they're all techies in one form or another.
3. Some sort of stuxnet virus/worm that targets the major telcos. If someone was able to get stuxnet on a computer in an Iranian nuclear facility then I don't think it would be that difficult to get a virus with a similar payload onto a carriers network. In fact I'd dare say if you trained a team of a 50-100 religious fundamentalists in their network certificates etc you could easily get them into all of them major NOCs in the western world (people who runs NOCS are notoriously cheap and will hire a $40k grad any day of the week over a trained experienced admin). Give em the thumb drive with the virus and then watch as the internet crumbles.
4. This last one is the hardest and won't actually destroy all of the internet, but it'll still fuck up humanity and destroy a sizeable lump of the net. Basically you construct a series of rockets that target geosynchronous satellites. You don’t have to destroy all of them, just say 6 or so. Basically the thousands of fragments will end up as a cloud of debris that will destroy all other satellites and space stations, and make it next’s to impossible to launch anything else into space. With this move you'd take down GPS, military sats (early warning systems etc, keyhole), communication, environmental, and pay TV sats.
Probably cost more than $10m but damn sight easier than cutting all the optical fibre cables on the planet (simultaneously). Hell if you were truly evil and ran a global organisation like SPECTRE you could do a combo of all 4 of these.
Depending on the size of the EMP devices, I imagine it wouldn't be to hard (Beyond the travelling involved) to rig EMP devices in service tunnels / cellars / and hidden-and-rarely-accessed-locations near each of the major data hubs, set them up on satellite phones linked to a single number, which sets off a countdown on each device at once. Do a world tour, build and place your devices, call the number. Few months work and a lot of travelling, but feasibly doable by a lone person. Just have to hope none of the devices were found before your installations were done.
In the same manner I imagine if someone with some demolitions know-how, and who knew how to scuba dive, bought a boat, and sailed around the globe, they could feasibly use ground radar to pick up the locations of each cable near-shore, dive, place a water-proofed explosive on satellite phone trigger, and as above, link all the phones on a single number.
Both methods, or a combination of both, would severe all connections globally, within seconds of each other, and COULD be done by a single, well funded, and well motivated individual with the right know-how.
Lol I did the plumbing for a server in Perth, funny how easy it is, and a contractor can eadilygain access, feign a burst pipe or create one. Instant access... That's the problem with today, no one would help one another to achieve this.
Security for Data centers is pretty tight usually. i would say that a plumber would eb supervised should they need to enter a datacenter, especially the locked down bits. whats the time of an authorized person compared to potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of damage? malicious or accidental?
Just convince everyone to go back to writing letters and books and hard-copy photo albums and CDs and VHS and buying things at shops.
very marvelous plan myself and my friend dave on left of me are commiting this with my teacher kate!
Obviously this demonstrates the resilience of the internet, but it does point out that individual countries (I'm thinking of Australia in particular) need to protect (and possibly expand) their existing internet infrastructure. I'm no expert, but I suspect we might want more undersea cables and DNS servers - not to strengthen the whole internet, but simply to protect our own "patch" in the event of total global war.
At the very least, we want them to rid ourselves of those blasted quotas (TPG being the recent and only exception). Quota is the direct result of insufficient undersea cable connections to foster competition. ISPs are forced to estimate how much they will use and rent the bandwidth accordingly. Furthermore, Australia's population is seemingly just not great enough, or dense enough for ISPs to be willing to estimate this and balance the costs whilst still promising minimum connection speeds as per ISPs like iiNet. Being so physically distanced from the majority of the internet (the USA), speed I guess just became the priority in Australia. Backflow (domestic internet) quota on the flip side is just a dick move. I can't say for sure, but I'd put my money on that being something instigated by Telstra or corrupt pollies.
I suppose you could also write a virus designed to turn off or cause the server to ignore the temperature sensor and/or wipe hard drives completely erasing everything drivers / files / the OS simultaneously, it would probably be able to spread quickly and far if built well like stuxnet (I don't even think stuxnet is anywhere near close to what a virus optimised for destruction would be like at our current level of sophistication, there's always another trick you can add) this would very rapidly lead to thermal runaway and cause the servers to breakdown, if done simultaneously the damage may be exceedingly serious. However a virus like this could be used for massive amounts of general damage, think what would happen to schools, banks, stock exchanges, etc.
The ideas like ruling the world, destructing the world and now destroying the internet are always appealing to some insane characters and it is astonishing how many of them are going free - and very often their intelligence is far above average.
There are things in modern world that should never have been invented, if invented never have been published, if been published never have been built. The hole idea of terrorism is based on the fact that it will be published. The biggest hit terrorism could take is to stop publishing their acts and the counter acts - it would become powerless and useless!
How stupid must a journalist be to publish a thing like this? The result is that from this moment on the number of people who think about attracting attention by an act this is multiplying. There are now a thousand times more people who are thinking insane thoughts like this which based on this thoughtless irresponsible writing.
These people will start to act and even if they are not successful they may try and cause a lot of disturbance in our life, not only by sabotaging the internet but also by even more pushing security forces in becoming even more mad. Just watch how the Olympic games in London are secured, one would expect the blitz is expected to come back - this is all going out of control - and the rout cause is not terrorism, the rout cause is journalism!
+1.