
But what happens when you deploy thaspia on a molecular level? You get a teeny tiny, very precise, cancer-killing grenade. It’s an entirely new approach that has its creators throwing around the word “cure”.
Thapsigargin, the active ingredient in the thapsia plant, does a fantastic job of killing tumour cells by destroying their calcium balance. But it will do that to any cell that crosses its path. So Genspera, a biotech company in San Antonio, Texas, found a way to strictly guide and control the drug through the bloodstream until it finds its target.
“That’s why we came up with the concept of producing a molecular grenade, so it activates only in the tumour,” said Craig Dionne, GenSpera’s president, CEO and director.
That’s no easy task. One of the reasons many cancer drugs cause such terrible side effects is because they leak into the bloodstream on their way to the tumour. The bone marrow is ravaged, hair falls out, and the liver and cardiovascular system can be damaged.
“We have none of that nonsense,” Dionne says.
The key to the cancer grenade’s precise explosive effect is its “pin”, a 5-amino-acid-long peptide that can be pulled only by an enzyme, called PSMA, found on the surface of blood vessels that feed cancer cells. Only when the peptide comes into contact with PMSA will it release the thapsigargin.
Other chemotherapy drugs slow the growth of cancer, and doctors consider them a success if they prolong a patient’s life for just a few months.
“We’re not trying to slow the growth,” Dionne told me. “We’re dropping a neutron bomb in the neighbourhood. Everything in the neighbourhood dies and goes away.”
Traditional chemotherapy is also designed to kill fast-growing cells, i.e. cells that are dividing out of control like cancer tumour cells do. The problem is that cancer stem cells, which continuously give rise to new tumours, actually divide very slowly, which can lead to a relapse. In animal studies, Genspera’s drug killed all the cancer cells plus the stem cells, leaving nothing behind that could seed more cancer growth — hence the talk of a cure.
“It looks like what we’ve seen in animals will be replicated in humans — that’s what we expect to see,” Dionne said.
Not to get too overly optimistic: the drug is in the earliest phase of FDA clinical trials. So far, researchers are excited and hopeful because they’ve cranked up the dosage more than they ever thought possible, and still have not seen side effects in patients. Twenty-six patients with various types of late-stage “solid tumour” cancer have participated in the trial and researchers will soon add 18 more. After that they hope to move on to the second phase of trials (FDA clinical trials usually include three phases: the first for safety, the second for safety and efficacy, and the final one to confirm safety and efficacy.)
Prostate cancer cells also grow slowly, so they can escape cancer treatments focused on killing fast-growing cells. Genspera’s next drug, which will be based on the same grenade technology, will target that disease. Also in the queue are brain and stomach cancer. Here’s hoping they bomb the crap out of all of them.
Image: Luigi Rignanese



















Roger
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 12:38 PMThat is frickin amazing.
Tim
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 1:02 PMHopefully they can target skin cancer too!
If all works out what new super bug will kill us all then!
Timmahh
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 1:13 PMHmmmm… Don’t hold your breath! Drugs like this have to go through incredible amounts of testing and red tape. Then even if it makes it to the market, most of the general public can’t afford it without re-mortgaging their houses. Also, most of these companies like to treat the symptoms not provide a cure, no money in curing a patient!!
Eighty7
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 1:22 PMAs nice as it would be to have a definitive cure for cancer i fear that even if such a thing were to exist it would be bought up by big pharma and locked away in their vaults for eternity. There’s more money in treating cancer than there would be curing it unless they make the cure super expensive to the point most could never afford it.
bdc
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 6:36 PMGreat article.
As for you naysayers and conspiracy types, from the sounds of things it is more like taking an aspirin, it’s not a cure, it’s a remedy, of course they will sell it to you, and of course you will be able to get cancer again, but it would just mean its a new cancer, not a resurgent cancer.
welbot
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 10:10 PMwow.. that pic looks exactly like Kings Sorrel from Gothic!
Phil
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 1:00 PMQue? “it’s not a cure, it’s a remedy” – er, what you meant to say was “it’s a cure, not a VACCINE”. Will NOT prevent cancer from occurring, will *cure* you of that cancer which you already have. For those who doubt: Dictionary.com defines one of the meanings of the word “cure” as “An agent, such as a drug, that restores health; a REMEDY.”