
We know that Einstein always has the last laugh, but this is hilarious: the faster-than-light particles that could have wrecked Einstein’s relativity theory are no more. It was a mistake in the test readings caused by a loose cable.
Didn’t anyone from the Genius Bar tell them about the first rule of tech support? Check your cables first! Oh, scientists!
Researchers at CERN have found out that a bad fibre-optics link between a GPS unit and a computer was causing the 60-nanosecond timing discrepancy that was driving everyone mad. Once they realised this, the cable was tightened and the difference was gone. Yes, the faster-than-light neutrinos are not real (at least, we haven’t detected them if they exist) and the universe can breathe once again and keep destroying galactic wonders.
Apparently, the 60-nanosecond difference comes from the time it took to the data to travel through the cable, which fully accounts for the unexplainable 60-nanosecond neutrino speedup.
Surprising Experiment
Last year, physicists published the results of a three-year experiment that timed about 16,000 neutrino packets launched from CERN facilities in Geneva, travelling through Earth and arriving 2.43 milliseconds later to the subterranean facilities of Italy’s Gran Sasso National Laboratory. There, the Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus (the OPERA particle detector) recorded the hits.
When scientists discovered that the particles were arriving 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light — with only a 10-nanosecond error margin — they freaked out. Most physicists pointed out that this must be a mistake, since Einstein’s theory clearly establishes that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
But CERN repeated the experiments and found the same results, which further puzzled out everyone. Still, they vowed to find the cause of the problem or definitely confirm the shocking findings. Now, it seems that a lousy cable connection was the simple answer to the whole problem.
Researchers say that they have to test the whole thing again, but it looks like the mystery may have been solved. Meanwhile, Einstein’s atoms are laughing somewhere in space. [Science]



















MotorMouth
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:05 AMThere was always going to be a rational explanation and this makes sense of the results. We can all now get on with our lives.
Dave
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:13 AMYeah I had the same problem with my keyboard the other day.
Matt
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:20 AMAre you my grandmother, Dave?
Nathan
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:20 AMMy faith in science is restored.
David
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:20 AMIsn’t the first rule of tech support “Have you tried turning it off an on again”?
S0ULphIRE
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 1:26 PMdon’t know how that relates to a loose cable being the problem?
Sylver
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 5:42 PMHe’s right and wrong at the same time.
The first rule of IT is to check the hardware layer, the loose cable being ecactly that.
Apollo
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 6:57 PMIm still wondering why you’d ask a “genius” that clearly isnt.
Gabriel
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:23 AMThe last time i read about this, the article said that other groups replicated the test and got the same results…I guess they replicated the loose cable too. Or perhaps the internet lied to us???! *shock*
Flux
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 11:41 PMNobody else replicated the results. Lots of folks with particle accelerators TRIED to replicate results, because that’s how science works, but nobody announced corroborating data. But thanks for playing.
Timmahh00@gmail.com
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:23 AMWell that is disappointing, however I’m more interested in where I can get a full 1920×1080 copy of smiling Albert right there,… love it!
Timmahh00@gmail.com
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:25 AMAh, no probs… right here -
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=laughing+albert+einstein+photo&num=30&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=deM&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&prmd=imvnsob&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=IHlFT_i9Mo-ZiQfRm_D2Ag&ved=0CCUQsAQ&biw=1894&bih=898
awallafashagba
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:36 AMgurgles
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=big+picture+of+einsteins+face+
Timmahh
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 11:02 AMHow do you think I found the ones I did see? Thanks anyway
Antipodean
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:37 AMToo small
Timmahh
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:58 AMYeah, jumped the gun, anyone know where I can find one? :)
xyberian
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 10:47 AMthats what they want you to think!!! ITS A CONSPIRACYYYYYY!!
*puts on tin foil hat*
Simon
Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 11:42 PMIs it just me or is Gizmodo’s reporting getting really sloppy lately? The story is that they discovered two faults in the experiment, both which would have opposing timing effects. So, no, the matter isn’t settled,; the experiment will be rerun in May.