This Watch’s See-Through Sapphire Housing Will Cost You $US1.65m

The intricate gears and mechanisms of a watch with a complicated movement are usually hidden inside a metal housing. But not with Richard Mille’s latest creation, the RM65, which features a housing carved from a single block of sapphire crystal.

So if you were wondering how they justified that $US1.65 million price tag, there’s your answer. Besides providing an intimate view of the watch’s inner workings, the use of sapphire crystal also has some distinct pros and cons.

It’s typically used for the glass dome covering a watch’s face since it’s very scratch-resistant — meaning the entire M65 should stand up well to wear and tear. But because it’s still crystal, it’s not indestructible. So an unfortunate drop could leave one of the five lucky owners (it’s one of those super-limited-edition deals) of this timepiece with over one and a half million dollars worth of broken watch on their floor. [Richard Mille via Born Rich]

Discuss

(11 Comments)
  • [–]

    Vebi

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 12:36 PM

    When people pay millions to buy a Swatch. Subtlety evidently isn’t in fashion anymore.

  • [–]

    Luke

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM

    Did anyone else on the main page thought the price was $165 million?

    • [–]

      Daniel

      Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 12:50 PM

      Yup. I was intrigued in ready what justified that price. Then was let down D:

  • [–]

    Dan

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    i sometimes wonder how people come up with the ridiculous prices for these sort of things….

    • [–]

      Dan

      Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 12:56 PM

      person1: i think it should cost 1.63 million
      person2: nah, i think 1.65 million has a nicer sound.

  • [–]

    Sam Timmins

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM

    Rich people will buy ANYTHING…

  • [–]

    morf

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 3:20 PM

    i wish i was rich so i could justify buying this piece of shit looking watch.

  • [–]

    Kay

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 3:23 PM

    People shouldn’t be given the option of spending there money on things like this. The money could be used on so many other things

    • [–]

      Kay

      Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM

      Their

  • [–]

    Gordy

    Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 3:41 PM

    Doesn’t look any different to one I imagine made out of perspex, ha ha ha, for $20.

  • [–]

    chugs

    Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 9:55 AM

    i thought the header said $165m and i was like holy shit what an ugly watch

Join The Discussion