This Is Lockheed Martin’s New Amazing Fighter

Last December, Lockheed Martin assembled the last F-22 Raptor ever. It’s the USAF’s one and only fifth-generation fighter (the F-35 is still far from being active). It has never seen combat. It spent part of its life grounded. Now they want to sell you a new one.

The only problem is that the United States military doesn’t really need it.

Lockheed Martin’s sixth-generation proposal appeared on its 2012 calendar, as reported by The Dew Line. It’s not a rendering of a prototype, but a declaration of objectives according to the USAF’s specifications. A wet dream for their fighter program, which will be the heir of the Raptor in 2030. Pure aeroplane porn.

The USAF and Lockheed Martin’s objectives are:

Greatly increased speed, longer range, extended loiter times, multi-spectral stealth, ubiquitous situation awareness, and self-healing structures and systems are some of the possible technologies we envision for the next generation of fighter aircraft.

So they want what the Raptor does but a bit better, yet there’s still no other fighter that can compete with their current wonderjet and there will be no fighters capable of competing with it for decades to come — not to mention that we will not need traditional jets at all by 2030.

No rivals

The reality is that the Russians and the Chinese will not have a fighter capable of competing with the F-22 or the F-35 Lightning II in two decades.

We saw some awesome Russian renderings, but as good as the Sukhoi PAK-FA may be, their industry is still far away from the level of sophistication of the F-22.

The Chinese are even further behind. Despite their mighty industrial and economic power, I doubt they would be able to go from their current advanced fighter — the Chengdu J-20 — into something like the F-22. The J-20 is still held by tape and glue.

The level of electronic integration and the complexity of the subsystems required to emulate something like the F-22 is still out of reach for the Chinese or the Russians. Most likely, it will remain like that for many years to come. And by then, the whole paradigm of air warfare would have changed completely.

Drones invading the skies

That’s in fact the main question here, not the money or the enemy: do we really need an aeroplane like this anymore? The shift is already happening everywhere. Fighters are the last step.

Unmanned Fighters would be safe for pilots, they would be harder to detect, they would have a lower cost because they wouldn’t require expensive life support, human-friendly specs and cabin instruments. More importantly, they would be able to do crazy manoeuvres that a human wouldn’t be able to survive. The manoeuvring alone is a good enough argument to ditch the traditional fighter jet model.

I know it’s not romantic — hey, I always dreamed to be a fighter pilot myself — but the fact is that the future of fighter jets is remote control. There will be pilots, but they would not need big birds like the F-X. They will be flying from a bunker in their pyjamas.

At the end of the day, a swarm of low cost fighters and bombers would always be more effective than a couple of hundred super-expensivo jets. It’s a pretty simple equation.

More insane spending

The F-22 Raptor program — the USAF’s fifth generation fighter and arguably the most advanced combat jet in the world — had a final price tag of $US66.7 billion. 196 F-22s were made over 14 years of production. You can count that the new sixth generation jet fighter would cost as much as the F-22. Actually, it would probably be a lot more, judging by Lockheed Martin’s own words:

Next generation fighter capabilities will be driven by game changing technological breakthroughs in the areas of propulsion, materials, power generation, sensors, and weapons that are yet to be fully imagined. This will require another significant investment in research and development from a standpoint of both time and money.

Needless to say, we don’t need to sink more money into something that would be dead on arrival. Instead, they can keep manufacturing and improving the Raptor — just like the aerospace industry kept doing with the F-15, F-16 and F-18 — until they fully develop the lower cost fighter drones. That sounds a lot more reasonable.

So no, we don’t need a Raptor II. It would only be another prohibitively expensive beautiful failure with no rivals to fight against. And that’s the last thing the United States needs right now.

Discuss

(18 Comments)
  • [–]

    wsDK_II

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM

    Your doubt that China or Russia are able to match the F-22 for 10-20 years is a perfect example of why america lost in Vietnam, why it lost in Iran, Iraq and why it will continue to lose in both economic and technological terms over the next 20 years.

    • [–]

      JOHN NEW YORKER

      Sunday, April 1, 2012 at 3:05 PM

      OK ~ Lets set things straight… If all of you believe the Goverment You are wrong .. The stealth fighter was invented in the late forties when cell phones and color tv diddent exist..look at cars in the late foties.. The goverment is showing you what we have had for a long time… You have no idea what we have secretly.. Iran is crapping there pants at the fact that we will inialate them within 48 hours.. so is russia and china..WE ARE EVERYWHERE>>WORLD DOMANATION SOUNDS A LOT LIKE HITLAR ..Nato works for us..

  • [–]

    Jaezass

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 9:27 AM

    Drones FTW !

  • [–]

    Inquisitorsz

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 9:39 AM

    There’s this thing called the Eurofighter Typhoon…
    While not technically a competitor since it is a NATO aircraft, it’s still very blatant that American’s think their equipment is that much better than anyone elses.

    • [–]

      RB

      Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM

      While I do agree that the F-22 isn’t the be-all-and-end-all of combat fighter planes, it’s stealth capabilities do set it apart from the Eurofighter Typhoon and Su-30MKI. Once it loses it’s element of surprise in a combat situation tho, all bets would be off IMO.

      • [–]

        E

        Friday, January 6, 2012 at 2:39 PM

        the Eurofighter was pretty shocking, if they took out the VTOL thruster it completely screwed the plane and half their clients didn’t even need that feature in the first place. Design standpointwise it was a pretty big fail, but then again, so is the F-22, so the question is who fails more?

  • [–]

    james_whatsit

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM

    wow, american snobbery much?! yes america, u just keep right on thinking that the rest of the world is still running off cliffs waving two sticks in the air

    • [–]

      Reana

      Friday, January 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM

      Hey, it’s true that Japanese cars are still held together with ricepaper and bamboo.

    • [–]

      JezzK

      Friday, January 6, 2012 at 1:53 PM

      Meh. The arrogance and ignorance expressed by many Americans leaves the rest of the world laughing at them frequently. Just listen to how their tourists conduct themselves when travelling overseas – it’s almost embarrassing to watch. Don’t get me wrong though – I do like America – the people inside the US, while woefully ignorant of the rest of the world, are quite friendly.

      While I respect that national security is important, perhaps some of this money would be better spent on the education system that is failing their children, the US economy that is going down the drain, the high unemployment rate, geography/cultural lessons… etc.

  • [–]

    Frank

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM

    Put simply, wireless control can be easily jammed by a military with the capability. Once jammed drones are useless and rely on preprogrammed responses to act which are predictable.

    You can even capture them, Iran have managed to do this already. I can hear Americas enemies already. Thanks for your stuff America, please send more.

  • [–]

    EMH

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:56 AM

    Claims that Russia (or any other country) cannot compete with the F22 and F35 are sheer nonsense. First and foremost, “stealth” technology used in the US aircraft is very much misunderstood and is nowhere near as stealthy as most people think it is. There are several Russian fighter aircraft that have been able to outmanoeuver the F22 and F35 for some years. This ability is far more valuable than the so-called “stealth” technology used by the US. And as it happens, old RADAR units using longer wavelengths are easily able to “see” these aircraft.

    Confidence in the superiority of one’s country has never won a war, but it has lost a few! Let the confident beware.

  • [–]

    Andrew

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM

    I also agree that the US is overly confident about their capabilities. The new sukhoi fighters are supermanoeuverable, are equipped with AA-12 (which are roughly equivilant to late model AMRAAMs) and AA-11 (they outperform sidewinders on every level).Additionally, new Russian developed radar modes using widely separated transmitter and receiver effectively defeat most forms of non-absorbing stealth. Still, drones aren’t the answer, pilot training and possibly better air-air missiles are.

    • [–]

      Nonono

      Friday, January 6, 2012 at 4:58 PM

      Where the hell did you hear that? Do you think the transmitters and receivers are 100km apart or something.

      If the EM energy of the radar is being reflected WELL away from the radar source by stealth shaping, then it doesn’t matter how wide they are apart. Sorry, just simple physics.

      • [–]

        Andrew

        Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM

        for fixed sites of the S-400 missile, the transmitter is surrounded by recievers at a distance of between 25 and 150km

  • [–]

    Edward

    Friday, January 6, 2012 at 1:52 PM

    Why not build space ships instead?

    • [–]

      LucasF

      Friday, January 6, 2012 at 3:57 PM

      Yeh!!!

  • [–]

    MD

    Saturday, January 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM

    Well who cares….

    Fire and forget, afteral once the ground targets are obliterated, the government will fall… Air superiority isn’t worth a lot when there is nothing to be superior over….

    When was the Last real Dogfight between fighter Jets???
    1991….??
    For piloted aircraft:
    Now everyone has fully vectored thrust any country can match manoeuvrability of each other…

    All countries have access to off-axis targeting….

    And once visual has been made, what use is radar stealth….

    For Drone like aircraft (and cruise missiles), if the drone is operating in a closed loop off-line autonomous manner, there is no way it can be hacked (but it also can’t have its mission altered)….

    If they were being used smartly, against dedicated (technologically advanced) targets, they would likely operate without an operator in the loop, as having remote control functionality will always be a vulnerability. (All you have to do is fake the GPS signal and the plane will eventually believe that its onboard IMU has failed and will believe the new GPS signal, and land in anyone’s back yard (even Iran)).

    AMERICA keep thinking you are the only country technologically advanced enough to wipe your ass, and everyone else will be happy…

    Hey it isn’t America that is advanced, it is the companies who make this stuff. Lockheed isn’t really the US government, neither is Boeing etc….

    So what makes you think that the international competitors aren’t as advanced…. Industrial espionage is fairly active, it they don’t know about it yet, they will in a month, people talk, they even brag to their counterparts in other countries….

Join The Discussion