
The televisions that are going to be invading our living rooms in 2012, the ones that Samsung and LG and the rest have been trotting out this week at CES? They’re the most exciting gadgets of the year, and not because of any apps or gimmicks or third dimensions being shoved down our throats. In fact, they’re wonderful in spite of all that.
The TVs of last year were boring and reliant on cheap tricks. They were supposed to be smart — which translated to awful glitchy menus we didn’t need and a heap of apps we already had. They were so 3D — which meant bulky eyewear, sore retinas and sparse content. 3D is a dud, mostly, and “smart” TVs have been garbage, entirely. Companies decided TVs weren’t about watching things on TV. Companies really screwed up.
TV had lost its way. TV was boring. TV is back.
This year’s TVs tout the pointless features of the past, yes. But the off-key bells and whistles are an afterthought. Why? We’re too busy gawking at how fabulously amazing the pictures are.
OLED, 4k, Crystal Display, 8k. A supernova of new technologies that aren’t trying to make you tweet while you’re watching 3D Scooby Doo. This new wave of displays are pointed at one thing: looking good. Pornographically good. Samsung, LG and Sony aren’t trying to make your life better, easier or more connected. These screens exist for one reason only: to stroke your eyeballs with stupidly sharp pictures, stratospheric HD resolutions and colours that look so realistic you might literally want to have sex with an LCD panel. Teensy-thin levitating rainbow portals into another dimension. Our Casey Chan had the world’s first ocular ejaculation.
We’ll be watching these TVs in our underwear pretty soon.
The TVs of our near future aren’t great because of any feature list, but because of phenomenal picture quality. Streaming conveniences and great interfaces are nice, but they should always be secondary. Far, far secondary. A TV should make pretty pictures like a rocket should be fast, like a spoon should hold cereal, like a rare bird should sing exotic songs. Make TVs do what they’re meant to do, and make them do it really, really well.
In fact, make every gadget do what it’s meant to do, and make them do it well. Purge the gimmicks. Purify the things we buy. Earn our thousands. We don’t need our hardware to multitask just because it can. I don’t want a tweeting toaster or videos in my dishwasher. I want technology that does what it’s supposed to do, and does it better than anything else ever has before.
Samsung’s OLED TV is simply the best digital image I’ve ever looked at in my life. Sharp’s 8k set is the most awesomely overwhelming gadget I’ve ever been in the presence of. Biblically so. Being able to type that with sincerity is so, so, so refreshing. Beautiful TVs are a pure, wonderful thing.
We’re sick of smart, sick of overcomplicating, sick of lag and promises that don’t work out. Gadgets should make us happy. Looking at a big, gorgeous TV makes us happy. We need more of this, and we need it soon: companies are showing us things that make us happy. That’s rarer than any exotic bird.


















Ash
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 10:51 AMI bought a Sony Bravia 46″ LCD tv in the Summer of 2009 (only 6 months before the first 3D tv’s hit Australia) and definitely aint gonna buy another TV until a Bravia is available that has the following:
- Glasses free 3D TV
- OLED screen
- 200hz motion flow
- Slim
- Built in PVR function
- Smart TV (that is actually 100 times better than what they call Smart TV now)
- Wifi built in (no optional dongles please)
- A good dose of 4K wouldnt be bad either (but not betting on it).
So basically, I wont be upgrading my current TV at least until my current TV hits 10 years of age. Hopefully by that time there will be actual content to support all these new fuctions and gimmicks.
Ash
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 10:55 AMForgot to add, the TV has got to have a built in webcam. Its unnacceptable that in this day and age of Skype-everywhere (laptops, tablets and mobiles) we still cant use our TV”s to Skype. This should become a standard feature just like how 3D has almost become a standard feature.
Drongo
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 12:59 PMI bought a samsung LED around the same time. Actually just before Sony brought out their ‘monolithic’ design with the long slab stand which I still love the look of. Anyway. I agree with you but if all this features can come sooner than 10 years and for a reasonable price I could be tempted. Especially if a little company called Apple can match the Sony design. Wow, did I just put Sony and Apple and design in the same sentence. Just hurry up already with the 4-8k OLEDS!
Tezz
Sunday, January 22, 2012 at 3:09 PMnothing is shot in 4k – 8k res. Whats the point in having a TV capable of such resolution if nothing, no games or film will ever get close to that res. in 10 years time, we might have some stuff shot in 4k but current tv shows aren’t even fully 1080 yet.
vin
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 1:23 PMOLED and slim pretty much go hand-in-hand…
a fair fe wof those options are already available, and will become more standard (200Hz, smart TV, Wifi)
i agree, smarts could be better, and they will! (my guess is in the short term rather than long…)
my request is simple… the ‘all in one’ solution…
i hate having 10 remotes! having to buy more things to control more things!!!!!!
why not a smart tv that was smart enough to manage its peripherals? big tv brands also make a plethora of extras, so why is it such a mess!? what good is a sleek, sexy tv, if it’s ruined with a gazillion cables?!?
…really grinds my gears…
jabo
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:45 PMLogitech Harmony One? The best 100 dollars I spent for a while. Sale or Ebay.
Cranny
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM+1 best money I ever spent. Replaced 5 remotes switching three just to move from blueray to tv etc to one button that does all
Nate
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:49 PMThis comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted.