Brought to you by

Best Ultraportable Laptops [Battlemodo]

The speed and portability of Ultrabooks (and their tiny-but-not-a-piece-of-crap-netbook nature) have made them a popular option, but which is the best Ultrabook currently available? Gizmodo gets benchmarking. Australian prices listed.

While 2011 saw the first wave of Ultrabooks hit, it’s still a class very much trying to find its footing. Here we’ve rounded up the most notable Ultrabooks available to pin down which are worth your time, and which aren’t. We took into account performance, build quality, usability, battery life, and the general je ne sais quoi of using the laptop as an everyday machine. The SKUs on the models tested didn’t quite match up, but except for a few explicitly denoted instances, performance and specs weren’t major differentiating factors in the experience. So yeah, we ran benchmarks and battery tests, but just as important — or more, even — was which were a delight to use, and which tempted us to smash them into tiny silicon bits. Here’s how they shook out:

Note: CES is just around the corner (ie next week) and we expect to see more models arrived. This round up reflects the best of what’s actually available right now.

Seventh Place: Toshiba Satellite Z830

Here’s the thing about the Portege Z830: It does what it says it’s going to do. Just not much else. It’s the lightest 13″ laptop out there, and it’s got a smorgasburg of ports. That sounds awesome — for, err, some people. But when it comes to using the Portege in the real world, it doesn’t have much going for it compared to its competitors.

It’s a totally unfair thing to base any kind of opinion on, but there’s a symbolism to the TGIFridays-like lump of stickers waiting for you just below the keyboard. And it’s a symbol for “Ugh.” The garish chrome trackpad buttons. The flimsy, plasticy design. The performing way under spec for both its guts and its “Ultrabook” moniker. The extremely disappointing battery life. There’s a lot to gripe about with the Portege, and not too much on the other side. It feels a lot like the Netbook of Ultrabooks. At least it’s got those Ethernet, RGB, and HDMI ports, though?

The Z830 does have a spill-resistant keyboard, which is a half-decent consolation, and its magnesium alloy body is actually decent-looking, even if it feels like it might crack in two at any moment.

More: Full Australian Toshiba Satellite Z830 Ultrabook Review

Toshiba Portege Z830 Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.6cm
Weight: 1.12kg
Processor: 1.4GHz Core i3
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 128GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1366 x 768
Battery Life: 4h10m
PCMark Vantage Score: 5641
Price: Only the faster Core i5 version of the Z830 is available in Australia, starting at $1540.


Sixth Place: Acer Aspire S3

In a lot of ways, the Acer Aspire S3 isn’t as good as the ZenBook or the Vaio Z — not nearly, in some cases. But day to day, the Aspire is just plain simpler and more pleasant to use. There’s an honour to that.

If you’re looking for a true performance ultraportable, you should probably look elsewhere. The Aspire S3 is competent enough, but you’ll get some slowdown here and there that you won’t see on other computers on this list. The screen isn’t all that sharp — it’s a little washed out — and the overall build just feels… cheap. The battery is also not up to snuff compared to the other ultraportables; it got just a little over two hours during heavy use, and about four hours in our standardized battery test, which simply reloads a web page every 30 seconds.

So what’s redeemable about it, then? It works. You can do stuff on it. The keyboard doesn’t feel well-made at all, really, but typing on it is easier and surer than on the Zenbook or Vaio, which is worth something. Same goes for the trackpad: it’s a little undersized and feels plasticy, but it does what you want it to without much hassle.

Aspire S3 Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.27cm
Weight: 1.36kg
Processor: 1.6GHz Core i5
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 128GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1366×768
Battery Life: 4h15m
PCMark Vantage Score: 5258
Price: $1199 (Core i3 model starts at $999)


Fifth Place: Asus Zenbook

Okay, so the Zenbook is the cloniest MacBook Air clone out there, but that doesn’t have to be the worst thing in the world. It looks great and has very solid specs and performance. The ZenBook does a lot right and is really impressive in some areas, but messes it up with design and usability oversights that keep it from living up to its spec sheet and glamor shots.

The Zenbook’s problems are a lot the same as the things that weigh down the Vaio Z. The keyboard is purdy, but the keys are shallow enough that it loses keystrokes and, frankly, feels kind of cheap. Same goes for the trackpad. When we first saw the Zenbook, we were excited because its trackpad is big and beautiful. But using it — oof. Not only is the scrolling jerky, but actually clicking or dragging is terribly difficult. You basically have to click in the verrrry bottom left corner of the trackpad to be sure it won’t misclick; and even then it might not register your click at all, or maybe the cursor moved off somewhere else as you were banging on the buttons. The “one finger open” lid actually turns into a death lock that you have to pry open with two hands if you leave it closed for too long. The lid’s also built like a refrigerator door, and because it’s so heavy, it’s impossible to keep it in place if you’re sitting at any kind of angle.

It’s all a shame, because underneath that is a really great machine. Browsing doesn’t lag at all, battery life is great, the screen looks good (note: the Zenbook we tested was the 11″ X21; the 13″ X31 has a 1600 x 900 resolution), and it’s actually a really nice looking machine. It’s also cheaper than the laptops at the top of this list, so there’s value to be had, too.

Zenbook Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.7cm
Weight: 1.1kg
Processor: 1.8GHz Core i7
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 128GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1366 x 768 (11″ model; 13″ is 1600×900)
Battery Life: 4h40m
PCMark Vantage Score: 10514
Price: Around $1400 (13.3-inch UX31E; from $1100 for Core i5 model); 12.1-inch UX21E with Core i7 available from around $1200.


Fourth Place: Sony Vaio Z

Sony’s Vaio Z is really fast, really light, and really, really, really hard to use. Which is a shame, because it’s actually a great little machine that outdoes the other laptops on this list in a few areas.

Let’s start with the good. It’s fast. You can load up a few dozen web pages, a video, and a few other apps and not really miss a beat. That’s mostly to do with the i7, but it was impressive how much we had to load up the Vaio before it started to slow down (it killed on the synthetic benchmarks we ran). You also have the option of using the Power Media Dock and the Radeon 6650M it houses, though the onboard integrated graphics are passable for most usage. Still, it’s nice to have the option. The Vaio looks great, and its matte plastic body makes it light and deals with heat better than the aluminium bodies on some of the other laptops. And the screen: It’s very, very good. The screen can be customised up to 1920×1080 (on 13 inches!), which is the highest of any display on this list, but Sony’s colour performance and the brightness of the screen are big plusses too. Watching a video side-by-side on the Vaio and the other Ultrabooks, there’s a very noticeable difference in picture quality.

The not so good? Kind of everything about using it. The keyboard looks good — the green tinted backlit keys are pretty — but the keys are a little too short (in both height and depth) and have a tendency to not pick up keystrokes because there’s not enough throw to them. And then there’s the itty bitty, faux carbon fibre trackpad with cheap plastic buttons that are hard to press. The trackpad is fairly responsive, but after using the large, beautiful pads on the other laptops, it’s a really tough sell.

Vaio Z Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.67cm
Weight: 1.18kg
Processor: 2.7GHz Core i7
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 256GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1920×1080
Battery Life: 5h20m (Double with battery pack)
PCMark Vantage Score: 11555
Price: From $2999


Third Place: Lenovo U300s

Lenovo’s U300s is the Ultrabook that proves that class of computer doesn’t have to be a MacBook Air clone. It’s light and powerful and falls into the world the MBA created while being legitimately different and smart and its own thing. The U300s is the most expensive “Ultrabook,” but it’s also the one that bears paying attention to.

The keyboard has a much deeper throw to it than every other laptop on this list, which is a good thing for most people. The keyboards on Apple and Samsung’s machines are great, but for anyone who’s looking for something resembling a more traditional keyboard on their laptop, this here’s your peach. The U300s also feels sturdy, more so even than the MacBook Air and its unibody shell. It’s just a really solid, really pretty machine. Its performance falls mostly within the totally-workable range of Ultrabook specs: quick SSD, strong processor, good batter life.

That said, no SD card slot kinda stinks at this point in the game, and the screen doesn’t stack up to the Vaio or MacBook Air. And while the big trackpad is also one of the nicer ones found on an Ultrabook, we ran into some firmware issues with the trackpad that seem to crop up for some owners. And even when it is working, it’s a little herky jerky with two-fingered scrolling. Clicking and navigating is silky smooth, though, so if you don’t run into the same issue, the trackpad is actually a big positive.

U300s Specs As Tested

Processor: 1.8GHz Core i7
Memory: 4GGB
Storage: 256GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1366×768
Ports: 2 USB 2.0/3.0, HDMI
Battery Life: 5h50m
PCMark Vantage Score: 9973
Price: $US1500 (Not yet officially listed by Lenovo Australia)


Second Place: Samsung Series 9

The Samsung Series 9 is the best, least MacBook-like ultaportable laptop. More than the MacBook Air or the Zenbook, this is the one that people perk up and ask about when they see it. And it’s shocking, but aside from the sensible-but-garish glossy plastic that surrounds the keyboard, the design and aesthetic of the Series 9 might be stronger than the MacBook Air.

There’s no standout spec for the Series 9, really. Its screen is good, but not astonishingly so like the Vaio’s. It handles multiple tabs, movies, and the heat generated from use fairly well, and it’s got just-above-average battery life. The build quality is very strong, too, and even the eyesore glossy plastic serves the purpose of dissipating heat.

And then there’s this, inexplicable as it is unexpected: The Series 9 has the best and most usable two-finger scrolling to be found on a Windows laptop. That’s kind of a really big deal for day-to-day use. On top of that, the trackpad can go toe-to-toe with Apple’s, and the keyboard might actually be better than the MacBook Air’s. The only complaint to be drummed up experience-wise, really, is a bit of light leakage from the backlit island keyboard that can get distracting in darker environments.

The Series 9 isn’t a powerhouse quite like the the Vaio or the Zenbook, but the user experience and build quality of the Series 9 is so, so, so much better that if you need to be on a Windows machine, it makes sense to pay the premium for the Series 9 (or the U300s).

Series 9 Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.63cm
Weight: 1.31kg
Processor: 1.4GHz Core i5
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 128GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1366×768
Battery Life: 5h10m
PCMark Vantage Score: 8205
Price: From around $1300 (cheaper models start at around $1150). View model comparison.


Bestmodo! MacBook Air

It’s not fair, really. Apple’s still working with too much of a head start for this generation of Ultrabooks/portables to put up much of a fight against the MacBook Air, especially now that it’s not gimped with generations-old guts like it had been with the Core 2 Duo.

The keyboard, screen, and trackpad are all top notch and make interacting with your computer almost totally double-check-free. The touchpad specifically is the best on any laptop at all. The only real negative hardware-wise is the general lack of ports that all Apple laptops suffer from, but that’s mitigated by the Thunderbolt port that you probably won’t use too much just yet, but will be mighty impressed with when you do.

Yeah, we’d like to see an option for more than 4GB of RAM, or at least make it expandable. And yeah, the price tag can be tough to swallow. But the MBA does everything that ultraportables are supposed to do better than everyone else. Things like two-fingered scrolling, keyboard ergonomics, battery life, design and build quality — for now, Apple’s still got a leg up. The gap should narrow over the next few years, but for now, the MacBook Air’s still the one to beat. For now. Tune in next week to see what’s new at CES.

MacBook Air Specs As Tested

Thickness: 1.73cm
Weight: 1.08kg
Processor: 1.7GHz Core i7
Memory: 4GB
Storage: 256GB SSD
Screen Resolution: 1440×900
Battery Life: 6h40m
PCMark Vantage Score: (Windows) 10,458
Price: From around $1799 for this top-end 13.3-inch model (11-inch models start at around $1099). View model comparison.

Battery Test: Brightness set to 50 per cent, refreshing a webpage every 30 seconds to simulate browsing.

Discuss

(55 Comments)
  • [–]

    light487

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM

    Just curious what the tester of these products uses for their own netbook/laptop? When you’re doing subjective-based reviewing, you really need to disclose all possible conflicts of interest.

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 11:44 AM

      Jeez man, relax. Re conflict of interest. As tech journos, we test and play with lots of gear and even (shock horror) have favourites — just like you. The best-written pieces (like this one but certainly not all storis on Giz) put favouritism aside and just try and give you a fair impression.

      • [–]

        light487

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM

        I tried to phrase my question as politely as possible but instead you got all hot and bothered by it.

        I understand. I was a tech journalist for 4 years myself. My point is that if someone is to write a subjective piece that is not just simply based on numbers/benchmarks but rather about subjective “feelings” of how a keyboard might “feel” to them (or in your own words “which were a delight to use, and which tempted us to smash them into tiny silicon bits.”), it really pays to disclose what you currently use yourself to show where you are coming from.

        To elaborate on my reasoning:
        If I am a Windows user, who has hardly touched a Mac, and I go on to review the latest MacOS in relation to subjective things like aesthetics of the user interface and general usability rather than pure numbers based on benchmarks, then I am going to paint a decidely different picture to someone who has grown up with Macs.

        By knowing that the person writing the article is a long-time Windows user, the reader will know why certain things agravate the person and why other things will seem new and fresh, and perhaps wow them. By knowing this, the person can get more from the article than not.

        Didn’t mean to cause offense or grief.

        • [–]

          Danny Allen

          Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM

          Heya, thanks for elaborating.
          Not hot and bothered, mainly just realising that you chime in on almost every post on Giz and more often than not, there’s a negative tone…even when you agree. Just gets old.

          Still, I do hear what you’re saying here.
          Whenever a journalist writes a review it’s subjective. I just don’t think we’re at the point where disclaimers are needed like politics or religion.

          Outside of the likes of writers like Jesus Diaz, think of Giz as an independent voter.

          • [–]

            light487

            Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM

            I do like to play devil’s advocate.. it’s just my nature.. :)

            I’ll try to add more smileys to my posts from now on :)

            • [–]

              Danny Allen

              Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM

              Love it man, your opinion (and facetiousness) are always welcomed around here

        • [–]

          Titsnass

          Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM

          Danny pointed out a major issue with your posts mate, there’s too many of them. If you were a Journo for four years you should know that. Your posts are generally interesting, don’t get me wrong, just pull it back a bit is all!

          • [–]

            light487

            Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM

            :)

            I can’t help it! :)

            I am addicted to writing stuff :)

            (DISCLAIMER: I like writing stuff.)

            :)

          • [–]

            Danny Allen

            Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:08 PM

            boobies

            • [–]

              RooBoy

              Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM

              5318008 actaully ;-)

  • [–]

    silentwolf

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM

    To be honest, i’m a PC person and after doing my own research a while back , I came to the same conclusion that the MBA was the best.

    Just get rid of OSX :P.

    • [–]

      Ryu

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM

      I agree, that would be best of both worlds. Quality build and performance with useability.

  • [–]

    cleverclogs

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 11:45 AM

    I use the Samsung Series 9 – absolute beauty of a laptop, if you don’t look at the price-tag.

  • [–]

    Drew

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM

    Shock horror Gizmodo put MacBook Air in first place.

    I knew that’d be the case before I even read half the title.

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:34 PM

      OK for you to disagree, but please explain why you do rather than just moan.
      Other readers may find your insight useful. We welcome (and I actually encourage) your differing opinion!

      Constructive criticism is one thing, but moving forward
      I’m deleting stupid comments — anywhere on Giz — that:

      - Attacks other readers or authors in a rude manner; or
      - Are racist, sexist, etc; or
      - Aren’t on topic and don’t have any substance; or
      - Point out some small typo in a overly rude way; or
      - Moan why a story was posted on Giz (if weird science doesn’t interest you don’t click on it then complain); or
      - How, because your favourite product wasn’t chosen then Giz must be biased. It’s OK to disagree.

      Bottom line: Comments are to discuss the actual content of the article.

      Anything else goes bye bye.

      Cheers.

      • [–]

        Drew

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:11 PM

        I just have a feeling that some tech sites like Gizmodo and Engadget for example are slightly biased towards Apple products for whatever reason.

        Naming the MBA as THE gadget of the year for 2011? Come on! My grandmother could have pulled out something better than that.

        I expressed my opinion, without attacking anyone or anything of the kind. Maybe you can get off your high horse and do the same.

        • [–]

          Danny Allen

          Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM

          Heya Drew,
          Thanks for following up. Unlike the deleted comments below, you’ve explained your thoughts clearly and fairly and I thank you for that. That’s all I was “on my high horse” about.

          I just have a feeling that some tech sites like Gizmodo and Engadget for example are slightly biased towards Apple products for whatever reason.

          Is that because we named the MacBook Air as the laptop of the year?
          http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/11/gizmodo-awards-2011-best-laptop/
          No, that was based on reader votes.

          Was it because we named the iPhone the best phone of the year?
          No, both editors and readers picked the Galaxy S II:
          http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/11/gizmodo-awards-2011-best-mobile/

          And Gadget of the year?
          http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/12/gadget-of-the-year-gizmodo-awards-2011/
          We picked the Galaxy S II and Apple iPad 2.

          Naming the MBA as THE gadget of the year for 2011? Come on! My grandmother could have pulled out something better than that.

          Giz didn’t name the MBA as the gadget of the year.

          You’re referring to a US story titled “Most important gadget of the year” which was incorrectly (and only briefly) posted to the AU site — incorrectly because it was based on US reader votes and doesn’t make sense to run here unless Aussies can vote.

          So even that was based on reader votes, not an editor’s choice.
          And it was important gadget of the year. Not best.

          For “Importance” — Personally my pick would have been a tie between MacBook Air and Galaxy S II. The MBA paved the way for all the Ultrabooks you see in this list. And the Galaxy S II, in my opinion, was the first Android phone to really make the average guy on the street realise that Pepsi can taste just as good as Coke, if not a little better.

          • [–]

            Drew

            Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:23 PM

            You better delete your own comment there as it does not have any “substance”.

            I hope you didn’t take my above comments personally, I love Gizmodo :)

            • [–]

              Danny Allen

              Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:43 PM

              Yeah the … was weird…fixed!

              But all good man, you’re a welcomed part of the Giz conversation. :)

      • [–]

        Sam

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM

        Dan,

        Without intending to sound like I’m brown nosing, I think all of the guys at Allure do a great job with original content on Gizmodo. Alex as the primary editor on Giz pumps out an amazing amount of content daily, and in my opinion he produces great un-biased tech journalism. I know that US stories such as this are sub-edited, and I’m sure there’s no shortage of curse words that come out of Allure’s sub-editors’ mouths about incorrect grammar, and I can appreciate that there’s only a certain amount of sub-editing that can be done before an article becomes convoluted.

        In having said that, I’m willing to bet Gizmodo on an international scale probably owes a lot of its reader-base to US Gizmodo’s coverage of the lost iPhone 4 prototype last year. As a result, of course Apple and iPhone related stories are going to play a large part in the stories published – but I think it’s also worth taking on board feedback from readers who leave comments. Yesterdays “The Most Important Gadget Of The Year” article is probably the best example (I also note that this article appears to have now vanished from Gizmodo.com.au). I personally refrained for weighing in on this particular one, but the article did seem poorly thought out, and far from un-biased. My own feeling is you can’t proclaim something as “Most important” or “best” if you’re not being impartial in the content you’re writing.

        I try to think of Gizmodo as a collective blog rather than a publication, and as such opinion is both helpful and necessary – but in this particular case the vast majority of comments were against the general tone of the story. Even if you take the stance of the silent majority supporting such content, surely feedback such as what was given is a sign that some content has become just too opinionated. I agree that some commenter’s definitely are out of line, but Gizmodo’s reader base is the bread and butter of the site – and it is worth taking into account the feedback.

        In having said that, it is a shame that what seems to be un-biased stories seem to become targets if they even suggest a particular Apple product may be the best – as is what I believe to be the case here. I have no issue with the Macbook Air, and while I haven’t used one – various reports I have read has rated this machine highly.

        Long and short of it is; I agree with your stance that disclaimers are uncalled for – I would argue Allure needs to be vigilant that if an objective article is being published, the tone used in the content remains that way.

        • [–]

          Danny Allen

          Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM

          Heya Sam,
          Thanks for the comment and critisisms.

          Re: yesterday’s “most important” story — please see what I’ve written above.
          That was reader voted and incorrectly posted to the AU site — taken down because Australian readers didn’t get the chance to vote and this is Giz AU.

    • [–]

      Nick

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:03 PM

      It got first place because it’s simply better than what the competition has to offer, not because of the logo.

      • [–]

        olearymo

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:08 PM

        Ding!!

        That’s the thing. The thing about Apple is, it only makes products it can make really, really well. They’ll tend not to even be in some categories other companies are, simply because they know they can’t make it well (yet, perhaps) and so don’t try. e.g. games consoles, projectors, etc etc.

  • [–]

    Andy

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    This comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted.

  • [–]

    Latchland

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    This comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted.

  • [–]

    Zac

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM

    Was battery life on the Mac done with windows installed on it? ( im guessing it wasn’t ) would be interesting to see what it gets with win7 installed, cant say windows would improve the battery though haha.

  • [–]

    Spuddy

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM

    Could you include screen sizes of the tested models?

  • [–]

    Ozoneocean

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM

    Wow, I don’t recall the comments being this heated when this was first published towards the end of last year!

    • [–]

      Labrys

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 2:27 PM

      I think it’s all the recent law-suits from Apple ticking people off. Those that mildly disliked apple before seem to have now reached pathological hatred levels and therefore anything that seems to be praising Apple is attacked no matter what.
      The Apple vs Android or Apple vs Everyone Else arguments are quickly reaching religious fundamentalists levels with people almost willing to now bring out the pitchforks and fire to burn the heretics. It’s kind of disturbing actually.

  • [–]

    Dang

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 3:02 PM

    Is it still possible install Win OSes using Bootcamp on the MBA?

    Love the MBA hardware, not a fan of MacOS though.

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 3:15 PM

      Yep, that’s part of its appeal

  • [–]

    MotorMouth

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM

    This comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:54 PM

      Just so you know, and assuming they don’t do the same here, all I did was to suggest that having compared two of the PCs rated here before buying one of them, that it was hard to find much merit in this comparison. There was nothing personal, no bad language, just a critical, alternate perspective based on actual experience. If someone from Gizmodo would like to tell me exactly how it was inappropriate, I’d be more than happy to modify my behaviour in the future.

      • [–]

        Danny Allen

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 5:03 PM

        Heya MotorMouth,
        Sucked to have to delete your comment, but please don’t go calling editors idiots just because you disagree with their methodology. Rest of the comment was fine. All good man, I often look for your comments in threads. Just please help us maintain community standards per below.

  • [–]

    Rocketman

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM

    Wow Danny, just wow, i have no issue with the article itself but the bit of over reaction on the commenting situation. I am not having a go man, just i don’t think you will make very many fan’s deleted comments all over the place. I understand that some of them may seem offensive but i would be very careful about how you go about it! I actually am a big fan of allure media and am a regular over at Kotaku so I just hope Giz just keeps being awesome in 2012 ;)

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM

      Heya Rocketman,
      Thanks for the concern. I’m being very careful, and really only tageting the minority of commenters who don’t adhere to community guidelines (and some of our awesome regulars who forget sometimes).

      There’s no reason for the negativity that has begun to creep into some Giz comments. It has to go. Visit big comment threads on sites like Kotaku and BloodyElbow (1000+) and you won’t see it.

      Here’s the important part. If the editors miss an inappropriate comment — please use the “report comment” button to inform us. Help us keep the conversation moving forward. Cheers!

      Comments only removed if:

      - Attacks other readers or authors in a rude manner; or
      - Are racist, sexist, etc; or
      - Aren’t on topic and don’t have any substance; or
      - Point out some small typo in a overly rude way; or
      - Moan why a story was posted on Giz (if weird science doesn’t interest you don’t click on it then complain); or
      - How, because your favourite product wasn’t chosen then Giz must be biased. It’s OK to disagree.

      • [–]

        Rocketman

        Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM

        no worries dude and thanks for taking the time to reply!

  • [–]

    Stew

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:31 PM

    Yeah I’m very anti-”love Apple just because it’s Apple”, and the cynical side of me was thinking “pffft I bet the MBA will top this list since it *is* Gizmodo we’re talking about here”

    …BUT…

    The MBA is one awesome little unit (as is the iPad2). You gotta give credit where credit’s due, and both of these devices deserve a lot of it, especially in the hardware & performance categories.

    I can swallow my anti-pro-Apple (note: that’s different to anti-Apple) sentiment and admit that yes, probably, the MBA does really deserve 1st place, especially with the option to put Win7 on it. Nice roundup!

    • [–]

      lambomann007

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 6:19 PM

      “love apple just because it’s apple”
      I don’t see much of that these day’s, usually it’s “hate apple just because it’s apple”
      But yeah, I gotta agree with you. Apple makes great hardware, they just aren’t entirely perfect.

    • [–]

      Kev

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM

      Love apples approach to design, so much so that it’s almost converted me in recent years. But I still can’t stomach having to use OSX…

      • [–]

        Danny Allen

        Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 4:30 AM

        Install windows 7 on it?

  • [–]

    Greg

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 5:10 PM

    Sadly only the Sony has a screen resolution worth considering. Ultrabooks need to get a half decent screen resolution (1920×1080 minimum, 1920×1200 better) and fast.

  • [–]

    Andy

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 6:46 PM

    I am not sure, why the Editor delete my comment.. It wasn’t rude.. I was very honest in my option. Not only me, a lot of other Gizmodo reader feels the same way… WHY you guys always have to take APPLE as the best product in everything?

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 7:00 PM

      We named the Samsung Galaxy S II as the best phone of 2011 — and equal best gadget of 2011 (along with the iPad 2). The MacBook Air was voted by readers as the best laptop, and when it comes to ultraportable laptops (in this story) we agree. So far from “everything”.

      To further answer your question — your original comment was deleted because you clearly haven’t read through all the comments in this thread and you haven’t (and can’t) back up your myth-perpetuating opinion.

  • [–]

    Andy

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 7:18 PM

    When I submited my Comment (12:42).. their were only few comments…

  • [–]

    Jay

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM

    Any of those bad boys run Linux? Well?
    If Linux ever gets the fine set of robes that OS X put on BSD, I’d take any one of those “PC” netbooks (except the way overpriced Sony)

  • [–]

    illogical

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM

    can Giz please do a keyboard review and close up of all available laptops? Thanks.

  • [–]

    Asashinator

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 10:34 PM

    Just thought id comment as I feel that I’m qualified to do so.
    Ive always wanted an ultraportable and I used to use a Netbook because portability was my biggest concern(samsung N150 from memory)
    Anyway – i recently bought a top of the line air and have installed Win 7 using bootcamp. I regularly switch between the two OS’s and i have to say that the Air is just another laptop when running windows. Battery life isn’t as good and speed and generally the whole thing is just smoother and better.

    I gave up on my iPhone and currently use an N8 because i hate the audio
    quality of iPhones. I guess what I’m trying to say is that I’m no apple fanboy but this thing is the ducks nuts – its really that good.

    I mainly use mine for browsing and email – browsing is SOOOOO much better because of the two finger scrolling and other gestures _they just work. \
    Email took me a long time to grasp – i use the win 7 partition with Office 2010 for work and have done for ages and it is different but very smooth…

    In fact – thats the way I’d sum it up – Smooth.

  • [–]

    Kev

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 10:38 PM

    I love the idea of ultrabooks, but I’m still not convinced about the execution and pricepoint. Gonna stick to a regular laptop for a few years until these bad boys beef up.

  • [–]

    FiveStein

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 10:55 PM

    I still prefer my old HP mini netbook, once I got fedora setup on that it was great for some highly mobile computing. Especially when it came to consoling into networking equipment while standing on a ladder

  • [–]

    netzis

    Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 6:07 AM

    Macbook Air weight is wrong, the 13″ MBA was reviewed but the 11″ weight was listed.

    I would have one if it wasn’t for the lack of ports including USB3 and ethernet, you don’t need to use it much but when you do it is a godsend for a techie. I am skeptical about how useful thunderbolt will be while you are on the move, and will I still have the same laptop by the time affordable thunderbolt peripherals get released?

  • [–]

    MotorMouth

    Saturday, January 7, 2012 at 5:21 PM

    OK, now that it no longer matters I shall attempt to be less confrontational in picking out the serious errors of judgement exhibited in this comparison. As some of you may know, I recently bought an Asus UX21. Whilst I kind of did it on a whim, to take advantage of an excellent price offer, it was not like I hadn’t been doing my homework for the several months previously. Specifically, I had really, really wanted to be able to justify the purchase of a Samsung Series 9 but I just couldn’t. I am totally mystified as to how it could possibly have out-rated the UX21. The UX21 is several hundred bucks cheaper and it performs better, too. It looks at least as good and comes with some impressive value-added extras, like a slip-case plus ethernet and VGA adapters that also come in a little pouch.
    Contrary to the review, I find the trackpad on the UX21 far more usable than any other I have used. OTOH, I found the Series 9′s to be much harder to get a click out of, especially a right-click (and I have demoed at least three different units). Yes, the keyboard is a bit so-so but you know what? It took me just a couple of sessions to modify my typing style to the point where I actually make fewer typos with it now that I do with my wireless keyboard.

    I also think that far too much emphasis is placed on things like the keyboard and trackpad. The reviewer seems to forget that these are computers and are compatible with the full gamut of peripherals, not just expensive doo-dads with an “i” at the start of their name. I use a keyboard and desktop mouse with mine 90% of the time or more. Given that, I think priority would be more correctly given to the number and type of ports available. Specifically, I don’t see how a machine without USB 3.0 could be rated above a similarly specced machine with it. Thunderbolt/Light Peak may have a lot of potential but right now it is largely a waste of time, whereas there are more and more really good USB 3 peripherals available every day.

    The bottom line is that the issues raised around the Asus are all things that are easily remedied via a couple of peripherals that everyone already owns – mouse and keyboard – and that are always a better option anyway, where some of the other machines in the comparison have problems that aren’t so easily sorted. Of the 4 of these machines with which I am familiar – Series 9, Acer S3 and MB Air – the Asus is the one that works best for me and I am someone who pushes their computer more than most, as I do 3D animation (3DS Max), visual effects (After Effects, Combustion and Nuke) and I occasionally get up on stage and rely on my laptop to play realtime music (as opposed to a bunch of backing tracks coming out of Pro Tools or a CD or iPod). It has the fastest SSD I have ever used (my other lappie has two SSDs in RAID-0 and is not as fast), it is superbly built and feels unbreakable. It has a great screen, the best laptop audio I have ever encountered (something completely ignored in this comparison) and offers the best value, given what you get in the whole package. Even the Asus software extras are pretty handy (way more useful than my old Dell or my Vaio). My only wish is that it had one of those little blue tit things in the middle of the keyboard. They are way better than stupid trackpads.

    BTW, the “hard to open” problem only happens to me when it has been in my bag all day and is a result of the screen being sealed like a fridge door, with a rubber bead running all the way around. To me, this is infinitely preferable to 3 or 4 little rubber stopper thingmies that fall out after a year or so and is well worth the occasional need to pry it open with a fingernail.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Monday, January 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM

      I also just noticed that the Asus is only bettered by the Vaio Z Series in the PCMark Vantage score, which further confirms my suspicion that it is the best bang for your buck here. I find it strange that opening the lid and using the keyboard/trackpad can be more important than actual performance.

  • [–]

    zac

    Monday, January 9, 2012 at 12:39 AM

    am I the only person who is bothered by the inconsistent images?
    To see this impartially the same angle lighting and position should be used but instead we have 2 top views of closed laptops 1 close-up top view of a closed laptop 1 close-up of an open laptop and 2 top views of closed laptops. this just makes it difficult to get a true feel for the similarities and differences.

  • [–]

    Richard

    Tuesday, January 17, 2012 at 12:51 AM

    How does the HP Folio compare to all these and where would it sit if included?

Join The Discussion