Study: Nicotine Is Good For You

Nicotine patches significantly improved attention and memory in older people suffering from mild cognitive impairment, which often leads to Alzheimer’s, according to a new study.

Before you get excited, smokers, the researchers say the study has nothing to do with cigarettes. They looked at 74 non-smokers with an average age of 76. Half got a nicotine patch of 15mg per day for six months; the other poor bastards got a placebo. Neither group knew whether they had the real patch.

Dr Paul Newhouse, Director of the Centre for Cognitive Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, reports in the journal Neuroscience that the patches helped patients do better on cognitive tests for “attention memory, speed of processing and consistency of processing”. After six months of treatment, the nicotine group regained 46 per cent of normal long-term memory for their age. The placebo group got 26 per cent worse.

Dr Newhouse doesn’t recommend running out and buying nicotine patches for elderly family members, or yourself for that matter, because precise dosage seems to be important: “If you’re already functioning fine, but slip down the hill, nicotine will push you back up toward the top,” he says in a press release. “A little bit of the drug makes poor performers better. Too much, and it makes them worse again, so there’s a range. The key issue is to find the sweet spot where it helps.”

Plus, while nicotine alone is not nearly as bad for you as when it’s delivered via cancer stick, it’s not entirely safe. Some of the bad things it does on its own include possibly increasing your chance of getting diabetes, it can speed up tumour growth, it can be intensely addictive, and it can kill you if you overdose. There might be more, research is ongoing.

But in addition to potentially treating Alzheimer’s symptoms, researchers are looking to nicotine as a potential treatment for Parkinson’s. Studies have also found nicotine helps ulcerative colitis patients suffer fewer flare ups. Stanford research found nicotine helps grow new blood vessels, which can be good in people like diabetes patients with poor circulation (but it’s bad when the blood vessels are in tumours).

Something many of these studies have in common is acetylcholine, a naturally occurring compound and neurotransmitter in the brain that helps nerve cells fire. Nicotine is similar to acetylcholine structurally, so it behaves similarly: it stimulates and regulates the firing of neurons and the release of brain chemicals including serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine (which also makes it a mood booster for some people). Researchers think nicotine’s similarity to acetylcholine has something to do with blood vessel formation as well: endothelial cells, which line the inside of blood vessels, carry a receptor that binds to acetylcholine (and probably nicotine too).

The following is my thinking alone, and not a recommendation in any way to anyone: With the recent news that cognitive decline begins as early as age 45, it’s a little bit tempting to stock up on nicotine patches. Or e-cigarettes? Oh, and in the study published today, subjects also lost weight. Hm. Twist my arm? [Neurology]

Image: Shutterstock/lev dolgachov

Discuss

(12 Comments)
  • [–]

    Damo

    Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 9:51 AM

    New study – brought to you by Phillip Morris?

  • [–]

    Eccentric

    Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM

    There are two main reasons cigarettes kill people! First sucking smoke into your lungs is a very silly thing to do! Secondly, cigarette companies add a multitude of carcinogenic compounds to them in order to get the smoker hooked on their product. Nicotine is well known as a ‘pick me up’ so a pure and untainted patch of the stuff. seems like an acceptable way to get the benefits without the poison!

    • [–]

      light487

      Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 10:34 AM

      Yup.. nicotine is no more harmful (relatively and “simply” speaking) than caffeine is. It’s only anti-smokers (and I don’t just mean people who don’t smoke) who can’t see past the acrid, cancer causing smoke and see the benefits of nicotine. Objectively speaking, if you remove the carcinogens, and just have the pure nicotine in a safe dosage (obviously pure “most things” are toxic) then it’s pretty much a win…

      Caffeine itself is NOT coffee.. heck you can have decaffeinated coffee, so that should be pretty obvious.. but the point is that nicotine does not equal cigarettes/cigars.

      As for the knee-jerk phillip-morris comment above… think about what you’re saying. Phillip-morris are into selling cigarettes.. not nicotine.. this would be a hit to their profits rather than a way to get new customers. The winners, financially, are more likely to be BigPharma than BigTobacco.

      • [–]

        Sam

        Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:12 AM

        @Eccentric + @light487

        I’m not going to preach to anyone here, but where did you obtain the knowledge that Nicotine itself is neither addictive, nor harmful? I’d love to see your sources on that if you could please provide them.

        I was always of the understanding that yes, while cigarettes aren’t good for you – both tobacco and nicotine aren’t particularly healthy either (why else would chewing tobacco be linked to various forms of mouth cancer if it’s the “smoking” part which is unsafe?).

    • [–]

      James

      Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM

      As a smoker myself, I find your comment an incredibly difficult pill to swallow.

      I’m sorry, but just because nicotine is a “pick-me-up”, means it’s not a toxin? Well by golly, I’ve just had the route of administration wrong all these years!

      And if you want to further perpetuate the (admittedly, well founded) theories on the tobacco conglomerates, might I remind you that you’re simply swapping one addiction for another here.
      Pharmaceuticals aren’t always the safest option. The right tool, for the right job.

      Now excuse me, my tourniquet is numbing my arm, and I need to get this syringe full of pick-me-up into my veins.

      • [–]

        Titsnass

        Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM

        There is no evidence that nicotine is addictive or at least no where as addictive as the crap they put in cigarettes! Why the hell do you think they put that other crap in them in the first place? Beside that, being addicted is not that big an issue, its the cancer you get from the other chemicals in cigarettes that is the problem. Do yourself a favor, put the coffin nail down!

      • [–]

        light487

        Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM

        You didn’t read my comment correctly. I said that in the correct dosage, Nicotine is no more harmful than Caffeine.. go and read the literature and you will see this is not just an opinion but an actual fact of science. I also pointed out that pure nicotine IS toxic.. highly toxic infact.. just as pure caffeine is..

        I never spoke about swapping addictions, nor using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Take the chip off your shoulder, do a bit of research and think about it objectively.

        As a smoker for 19 years (1.5 packs a day) and being brainwashed by the health reform (read: deform) agencies of the world for much of my life, I can understand why you would think the way you do… but I spent the last 2 years reading up on nicotine, tobacco harm reduction and other subjects of similar nature. It’s an eye-opening experience, let me tell you.

        Now I use non-tobacco products to get my nicotine. It’s still a poison, it’s still the same basic addiction at its core, I have NOT quit smoking, in my mind, I am still very much addicted to nicotine.. however, I am not burning tobacco and sucking the smoke it produces into my lungs any longer.

        I also drink coffee, 1-2 strong cups a day, because if I don’t I will get caffeine withdrawals and.. I like drinking coffee.. just as much as I liked smoking.. but now I just do it without the actual smoke part.

        • [–]

          James

          Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM

          You didn’t read my comment correctly. Or more to the point, the fact it was in response to Eccentric.
          Either way, it doesn’t really matter.

          As an anal-retentive drug user (yes, this means I dabble from time to time in the illicit materials too) I research. And research.
          …and research.
          I understand that I’m putting all manner of chemicals/toxins/poisons into my body willingly, and I try my hardest to understand exactly what’s going to happen if/when I dose, whether it be nicotine, alcohol, or other.

          I enjoy my smoking, and nicotine is one of my few vices, I’ll admit. But I know what I’m doing to my body, and I understand the consequences.
          Harm minimization and drug awareness make a world of difference.
          After that, it’s all up to the user. No sympathy.

          With that in mind, kudos on giving up the cancer sticks. I’ve found the most difficult thing is the muscle memory, the actual act of lifting the hand to the mouth. Well done.

          • [–]

            light487

            Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM

            Sorry.. I thought your’s was a reply to mine.. anyway..

            I use electronic cigarettes now.. I’ve gone beyond what you saw Johnny Depp using in “The Tourist” movie.. and honed it to a fine thing that I use daily.. it’s nothing like smoking but I still get the “muscle memory” (hand to mouth), the simulated smoke (water vapour) and nicotine :)

            • [–]

              glittalogik

              Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM

              You say “nothing like smoking” as though it’s a bad thing, or a compromise! After vaping for two weeks I ran out of battery in a pub and decided to scab an analog cigarette off a friend to tide me over; it was disgusting! Once your taste buds come back, and with the right combination of gear and juice, electronic cigarettes are superior in every way.

  • [–]

    S. Nolan

    Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 3:33 AM

    The idea that nicotine is not particularly addictive has been put forward by several researchers. From what I’ve read part of the reason smoking is so addictive is the combination of nicotine, whole tobacco alkaloids and MAO inhibiitors. Here’s a copy of links for further reading:

    http://www.medicaldaily.com/news/20100719/330/study-says-smokers-are-not-addicted-to-nicotine.htm

    http://www.forces.org/evidence/evid/addictiv.htm

    http://www.statepress.com/archive/node/7194

Join The Discussion