
Microsoft’s in the middle of an attempted renaissance, and leading the way is ol’ sweatstains himself, Steve Ballmer. Ashlee Vance at Businessweek has a nice, sprawling feature that’s as much about the tongue-wagging chrome dome as it is about the company he leads.
Conventional wisdom on Balmer is that he’s big and loud and crazy and brash, and probably incapable of moving Microsoft out of its enterprise-centric track. But now businesses are wary of jumping into bed with Microsoft because it’s long been perceived as being out of touch with the consumer market. That contradiction, and the underlying untruth of it, is really clear when it comes to the cloud:
The fullest expression of Ballmer’s ambition is Microsoft’s cloud computing strategy. About 40 million people subscribe to the $US60-per-year Xbox live service that delivers games and television shows. There’s also the Zune service for music and movies, which runs across Xboxes, PCs, and phones. This year, Microsoft moved its Office software to the cloud, and it has tens of thousands of paying customers on its business software service called Azure. Through its consumer service SkyDrive, people can store files online and automatically have the photos and videos they take with their Windows phones saved in the cloud and then access them from their PC or Xbox.
Microsoft’s actually got its junk together pretty well in the cloud, but companies are still hesitant to hitch up to the Microsoft name. To that end, Ballmer and Microsoft have been running a relations and marketing blitz to try to change its image:
At present, Microsoft has 14 retail stores and plans to open up to 75 more over the next three years, usually placing them as close as possible to Apple outlets. “Well, the traffic is going to be there, and we’ve got to beat them anyway,” Ballmer says with a shrug. Meanwhile, Microsoft has been giving the Best Buys (BBY), Wal-Marts, and other third parties an education in the New Microsoft at a 20,000-square-foot facility a few miles from its Redmond headquarters called the Retail Experience centre, or REC.
But refreshingly, Ballmer seems to get that the only way for Microsoft to get back to being the point of envy, not a cautionary tale, is to make great things, to be great:
Microsoft’s shabby track record at anticipating technology trends adds to the angst. The company spent $US9 billion on research and development last year-more than any other tech company by far-yet remains in a costly game of catch-up. Ballmer tends to argue away product failings by saying the company does not chase after fads. Microsoft invests for the long term, and history has shown that it tends to win out in the end. “Perception is discontinuous,” he says. “You are what you are, whatever it is. And then there’s an aha! moment when people say you’re something else.”
So yeah, Ballmer knows his Microsoft has been screwing an assortment of pooches for a while now, but he’s trying to make good with great products and ideas. And it’s working, for the most part. Windows 8 looks amazing. Windows Phone is the freshest thing going in mobile. And because Microsoft has such a massive amount of money to throw at R&D, there’s always the danger — the hope, really — that it might put those crazy resources to use making amazing things. There’s way more on Ballmer in Vance’s full profile, so be sure to check that out over at Businessweek. [Businessweek]


















Ozoneocean
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:20 PMI don’t think they’re that bad at anticipating tech… They did try to push tablets for years and years, but without giving them the great interface that they needed.
It wasn’t till Apple put the low-power tech that’d been popularised and perfected in Windows netbooks into a tablet, with a much better tablet OS, that they finally took off. But Windows was there from the start.
They really do need to become more consumer centric though.
Richard
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 6:30 PMTo me that was a classic example of poor anticipation along with their other big failure and that is execution. They didn’t anticipate the need to have seperate UIs for the tablet and the desktop which has resulted in them falling behind. It’s partially an execution issue, but the poor execution hinders strongly on poor anticipation of where things were going and what people wanted.
To be honest, banking on tablets was not that bold a move, it was always an area that had obvious advantages.
MotorMouth
Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:08 PMI’d suggest it is more an indication of their long-term thinking. They probably realised that something like iOS would only be a transitionary product, like a hybrid car, and that tablets would very quickly develop enough power to easily run a full desktop OS. And I think they got it right. We have just seen the first Tegra3 tablets and hot on the heels of that will be Win8, ready to take full advantage of all that power while iOS continues to offer shiny toys and no productivity.
I think it is the same with Ultrabooks – Apple, who usually get their timing right, were way too quick with the first Air. Any $500 netbook could perform just as well. It is only in the past 6 months, with SandyBridge, that the Air has finally fulfilled its promise. Just a few months later, the first Ultrabooks hit and are already overtaking Apple in every way – better design, better performance and better value. Win8 will take Ultrabooks to a whole new level and, unless Apple are spending their tiny R&D budget on the same kind of overhaul MS hare in the middle of, I think Apple could find themselves well out of competition before the end of this year and totally irrelevant in another couple. Apple have sprinted out of the gate but seem to me to be running out of steam, while MS have been pacing themselves and are about to get the whip out for a big sprint down the main straight.
Marcel
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:38 PMIt would help if they stopped being so dishonest in their marketing, I avoid buying products from any company with no ethics where I can, like a nerdy version of Greenpeace, so Microsoft and Apple are out. I see Balmer as part of that problem as they continue to promote their products with disregard for integrity or facts. A company built on shit foundations is always going to fall eventually. Unless Balmer is gone and they re-pour the cement.
MotorMouth
Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:11 PMWhat? MS’s marketing is total krap but I’m not aware of them actually being dishonest. Even Apple are really only deceptive, but they do walk a fine line.
Simon Reidy
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:45 PMPersonally as much as I hate to say it (because I’d miss him!) I think Ballmer should step down. Whether its a misconception or not, the general perception is that he has been out of touch on too many occasions, over-promising (Remember that HP tablet he held up at CES a couple of years ago? and his crazy claims that windows 7 was great for tablets?) and then majorly under-delivering. Or worse – getting a stupid idea and taking the company in the wrong directon altogether. His crazy off the wall rants (entertaining as they are) don’t help matters much either.
I accept that a lot of Microsoft’s failures are not directly Ballmer’s fault, but the truth is they happened on his watch. A CEO should inspire confidence and creativity. I think many people quietly lost confidence in Ballmer’s ability to lead Microsoft, quite some time ago. And he doesn’t have a creative bone in his body.
Ozoneocean
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 3:25 PMHe sort of acts like a juiced up sales rep who’s had mega injections of testosterone and anabolic steroids.
I don’t think mega-sales reps make good CEOs either.
Frank
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 3:34 PMDon’t forget it is not the CEO’s job to be creative, its his job to back the businesses decisions. It is his team managers that make the technical decisions recommendations.
Frank
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 3:37 PMthat was supposed to read technical recommendations.
HTS
Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 2:09 PMA CEO may not need to be creative but at least have a vision else it might be a bit difficult for customers and consumers to follow. For example, if the vision is to move everything onto the sharepoint platform then…
TSH
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 3:35 PMI don’t know why anybody pays attention to keynote speeches and media events, and judges a CEO or company based on that. These are not politicians who owe a responsibility to the general public – they only owe a responsibility to their shareholders and this is usually best served by serving their customers wants and needs.
So, what has MS actually provided to the consumer in the past few years?
- Windows 7
- WP7
- Kinect
- Skydrive, Office Live
- Quite decent peripherals
- Xbox Live!, and extensions to its offering through Xbox360
- Bing
Naturally there have been experimental failures and not everything that was promised has come to pass. But actions speak louder than words, and they all point to a company that isn’t perfect, but nonetheless delivers good products that its customers like.
smurfydog
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 6:43 PMI agree.
Microsoft is a company with an aweful lot to offer the consumer. (not just enterprise as has been suggested). Ballmer is just an occasionally amusing distraction.
olearymo
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 4:12 PMThe man’s a walking PR headache.
MotorMouth
Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:21 PMIts kind of weird because, whilst I’ve not always had a great opinion of Microsoft, I’ve not ever thought they were out of touch or anything. They have generally delivered worthwhile products – the original Intellimouse Explorer is still one of the best mouses of all time and WinNT has always been rock-solid.
Since I first saw the Arc Mouse, I started to see that they were willing to take risks that you wouldn’t normally expect from big companies. That thing makes every piece of design Apple have ever come up with look boring and uninspired. Then I discovered the ZuneHD, which makes every iPod look stupid and toy-like, with a UI so fresh you could almost taste it. From that point on I’ve been sold on their renaissance. It is taking a while and I’m sure they won’t get it all right – “Microsoft Answers” is still the greatest misnomer in history and Zune in Australia has been butchered into irrelevance – but it is clear they are really stepping up to the mark and I reckon they will be back with a vengeance this year.
Osiris Fox
Monday, January 16, 2012 at 12:56 PMMicrosoft rocks! Kinect is going to be huge!
HTS
Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 2:18 PMIt’s been out for a while, we are yet to see that…