Brought to you by

Nikon D4 Hands-On: The Photographer’s Newest Deadly Weapon

If you’re used to shooting with an everyday DSLR, the Nikon D4 is like holding fully-automatic machine gun for the first time.

Pulling the trigger on the D4 is wonderfully satisfying. When you’re shooting in continuous mode, frames peel off super-fast thanks to Nikon’s new EXPEED 3 processor, which gets you up to 11 fps in RAW. The camera has a big buffer for continuous shooting, but I learned that the new processor is so powerful that it will capture up to 50 RAW frames before even going to buffer. I didn’t push that last claim to its conclusion at the Nikon CES booth, but I held down the shutter release for a while without the camera choking up.

Compared to inexpensive DSLRs the Nikon D4 is big and heavy, but it’s actually much more manageable than other professional cameras. It’s light enough to use with one hand for maybe a minute, but make no mistake: This is a lot of camera. Don’t plan on hanging the D4 from your neck all day. It fills up both of my hands when I hold it on the bottom and from the grip on the right side. To really get the most out of the camera’s programable dials and buttons, you’re going to want to hold it this way anyway.

Other notes: The camera sports an impressive autofocus that adjusted instantaneously on the show floor. I watched some of the HD video shot with the camera blown up to the size of a wall and it is gorgeous. Based on what I could see on the LCD, the camera makes good decisions and takes great photos in automatic and priority exposure modes. On the brightly lit show floor I couldn’t try the low-light performance we’ve heard so much about, but I’m looking forward to seeing it in action when production models are available.

We obviously can’t say anything definitive until a full review, but, it’s pretty plain to see that the D4 is going to be a powerful workhorse of a camera. Unfortunately, if you don’t have $US6000 lying around you’re never going to own one.

Discuss

(17 Comments)
  • [–]

    Zac

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM

    I’m still not sure about the bulbous pentaprism area. I know its not a fashion accessory but it just looks a bit big. I prefer the look of the D3 series. The other features look awesome though. Not that I’ll ever be able to get one D:

    • [–]

      Brett

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 4:51 PM

      I like that it sticks out from the body. First thing I always did with previous dSLRs was buy the eye-peice attachment that pushed the viewfinder out away from the body like in the D4.

  • [–]

    Foles

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 3:20 PM

    Does anyone know of a feature movie shot entirely on a DSLR?

    • [–]

      Brett

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 4:57 PM

      By memory Rubber http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1612774/ was filmed using a 7D and a 5D Mk II. It’s a purposely B grade horror though. There are probably others.

      Several higher budget films have used dSLRs too, but they weren’t used exclusively. Red Tails coming out soon would be a good example of a *good* movie that uses a lot of dSLR footage.

      • [–]

        Foles

        Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 3:46 PM

        Thanks Brett, I’m pretty partial to cheesy B horror too. Will check it out :)

    • [–]

      Gavin

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 6:04 PM

      Yes, http://vimeo.com/34666308 was shot on the D4.

    • [–]

      Glenn

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 9:06 PM

      Not sure about films, but the last episode of one of the series House was filmed with a 5D2. Season 4 maybe? I’ve never watched the show but I specifically watched that!

      Also Vincent Laforet is a leading photographer who has used everything since the 5D2 for many short films, I’d look him up amd watch a few.

      • [–]

        Foles

        Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM

        Hey Gavin, thanks for the link. Amazing film and I picked up some great tips too re: digital editing tricks/tips which is always good. I owe you one virtual beer :)

    • [–]

      thomas

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 9:50 PM

      not a feature film.. but this short video shot entirely with the D4
      http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/08/nikon-d4-dslr-1080p-amazing-sample-video/
      or on youtube:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZZMIo7Zfys

    • [–]

      Foles

      Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM

      Cheers to everyone who took the trouble to reply to my question and go the extra mile to post a link too! :) Another reason why I love this site! Thankyou.

      • [–]

        Foles

        Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM

        Hey Thomas…one virtual beer coming your way too. :) appreciate the heads-up.

  • [–]

    Jazz

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:58 PM

    Do want. It’s a tough choice between getting a D4 or an engagement ring for my partner. Choices, choices….

    • [–]

      Graeme

      Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 2:22 PM

      Buy the D4. That way you won’t even heave to buy any engagement ring or pay for a honeymoon. You may have to pay for more “ready meals for one” though.

    • [–]

      Vebi

      Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 8:14 PM

      Chances of seriously using the D4 (and getting better results than you would have with a cheaper camera): meh.
      Chances of seriously using an engagement ring: I’d say this one takes the cake.

      Trust me, I don’t use the 5D as much as I should.

    • [–]

      Lillee

      Monday, January 16, 2012 at 9:29 AM

      That’s a simple problem! D4! Sif engagement, I made that mistake 10 years ago and now I’m stuck with 2 kids as well. Think of all the D4′s, sleep and “ready meals for one” I’ve been missing out on!!!

  • [–]

    Heisenburg

    Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 1:34 PM

    Good to see some competition for the 1DX.

Join The Discussion