
Google+ users just got a pretty horrible new feature: search your name, and instead of finding out information about yourself, you’re asked to provide it. Quite simply, Google won’t give you information until you give it information. Guh.
As Drew Olanoff of The Next Web noted today, Instead of giving you the results you are looking for, a Google vanity search now prompts you to fill out the remainder of your Google+ profile. It’s a clear example of Google prioritising Google+ over search. It’s allowing a social network to hijack your search screen until you feed it personal data. (When I tried this myself, the prompt took over the entire window of my 13-inch screen.) Google is increasingly acting like an overbearing second grade teacher. If you don’t share, you can’t have any for yourself.
So what happens if you do try to “complete your profile?” Mine was nearly complete, at 85 per cent. I filled out my university information and added a photo to my “scrapbook” (related: what the hell is my scrapbook and who can see it?) which were the only two missing fields in the “Update your profile” window. But that only took me to 95 per cent. I tried editing my profile directly from within Google+ itself, dutifully filling out each and every field, including the really intrusive stuff like my relationship status and “who are you looking for?” (I’m just looking for myself!)
I’m still only at 95 per cent. I have no idea what I need to do to get to 100. Maybe it’s some philosophical lesson that represents the fundamental loneliness of the human condition by never allowing you to reach completion. I have no idea.
But even worse than the constant nagging is that I’m not sure what I get in return by giving Google any more data. The benefit of actually filling all this stuff in is not at all obvious to me. Because perversely, the more information I give Google+, the less relevant my search results become.

For example, I find more photos of myself when I don’t include search plus your world results, or when I’m logged out of Google altogether, than when I do things Google’s new way. When I don’t include Google’s social results and search Google images for my name, I tend to see photos of myself — be they ones tagged with my name on Flickr, or various headshots I’ve used across the web. By contrast, when Google adds social results, when I search Google images for my name I simply get a mish-mash of Google+ image uploads. Some are photos I’ve taken of other people or even objects. Others are simply photos that I’ve commented on. The top image result for my name when I include Google’s social results? It’s a photo of the ocean.
Google’s solution is, apparently, to nag me even more. When I try to click through to that photo of the ocean, or any other photo it thinks is me when I’m logged in, I’m prompted to turn on facial recognition feature in Google+. I wasn’t even using Google+. Why is Google asking me to turn on a feature in one of its products when I’m using another?

Look, I know Google+ is still very young. Yet in the few months it has been around, it’s gone from being something I found intriguing and interesting, to boring, to mere pollutant in my search results.
And it’s not as if I haven’t tried. I’ve given Google+ lots of my data already. I’ve automatically uploaded photos from my Android phone, I’ve filled out all the fields in my profile, I’ve dutifully put people in circles and tried to dive in. In fact, I very much want Google+ to succeed. I want Facebook to have a strong competitor. I want to see someone else take on Twitter in the realm of open, real-time conversation.
And yet the bottom line is that the more social data I give Google+, the more Google Search gets wrong. But rather than looking for its own solution, the company is essentially asking me to fix it. I’m sorry, Google, but I’ve given you quite enough already.
Original image: Alberto E. Rodriguez-Staff/Getty Images Entertainment


















TSH
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 10:15 AMY’know, Bing has got a lot better in the last 9 months or so. Used to suck so I stayed with Google, but nowadays for general search they’re about equivalent.
Flux
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 12:00 PMPretty sure Mat’s last rant was on exactly that topic – he was urging a switch to Bing because Google started featuring social results in search. It seems to me that it must be simpler to just log out of your google account when not using e-mail/G+, but whayever floats your boat…
Big Windows
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 10:33 AM‘Don’t be evil’… Give me a break…
Snacuum
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 11:27 AMI read this in Gilbert Gottfried’s voice.
olearymo
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 12:54 PM“Google’s New Plan: Annoy You.”
Zeruel
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 12:58 PMGoogle one the search wars years ago because it offered search. It didn’t try foist a media portal on users and other shit.
Now they want shove social media down our throats. I have a FB account. I got FB for that. I don’t want it when I’m searching.
Wok
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 1:12 PMI relectantly have a FB account to keep in contact with some old freinds / to not be rude.
I use search all the time and I don’t want the two to meet.
Google used to be clean and simple, no annoying banner ads and the like not so much now. I really do think Bing is better at search.
Just This Guy ...
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 1:20 PMYou know folks. Google search still works the same as it always has. Just don’t “stay logged in”
I only log in to my G+ to see what’s relevant to me in that context.
Otherwise, I’m never logged in and search remains the same.
Not sure I understand why people have so many problems with this simple remedy, but then I find most ‘netizens to be kind of odd in their thinking.
Probably just as well I’m not a behaviorist then.
Ozoneocean
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 1:38 PMI dunno. I’m logged into Google plus all the time at home, I don’t access it much but it hasn’t bothered me about anything. It nags a HELL of a lot less that bloody facebook- which keeps suggesting I be “friends” with people it dredges somehow from my past and present who I would really rather not be friends with on FB
It keeps on making private data and posts PUBLIC over and over with each stupid new revision of its privacy controls and settings and even though I’ve stripped most of the personal info I can out of it, Facebook actually tries to reconstruct that info from other facts and display it anyway.
Google + on the other hand leaves me the crap alone. Privacy controls are SOOOOOO much simpler and easier. It’s far less obtrusive or intrusive.
The only mystery is why I got friended to an excessive amount.
Big Windows
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 3:31 PMYou say interesting stuff…
light487
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 3:03 PMYer.. I hate that results that include me are filtered out because I am searching for stuff.. the same happens on FB now.. it’s very annoying.. just give me the results and stop trying to be smart..
typedmillepede
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 3:31 PMThe simple lesson here is: don’t use google plus. use facebook for people and google for search. easy. i had a g+ account for 5 minutes then deleted it. what a waste of time.
Scottz
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 4:38 PMyeah thats not happening to me then again I’ve been a happy member of G+ for over 6 months
Sicarius123
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 5:42 PMGoogle – The next MySpace.