Newt Gingrich Is Bizarrely Terrified Of Electromagnetic Pulses

Moon mining isn’t the only thing election and adultery enthusiast Newt Gingrich is worried about — the GOP candidate has repeatedly, publicly, manically claimed that America is on the verge of being hit with an EMP attack. This is crazy.

The NYT reports Gingrich’s record of EMP hysteria, stretching back through years of public speeches and written fretting — he wrung his hands especially hard in the forward to a recent sci-fi novel, which ought to be telling. Unfortunately for Newt, an EMP attack is more the stuff of sci-fi and Command & Conquer than pressing defence policy.

The principle behind an electromagnetic pulse attack is simple: an enemy heaves a hail mary nuclear warhead above the US, and detonates it mid-atmosphere. The resulting shockwave knocks out everything electrical below — the power grid, cars, computers, all of the Rokus — and the Stone Age aftermath would send western civilisation into a tailspin of cannibalism and warlords with giant spiky shoulder pads.

Fortunately, none of the countries that dislike the US are anywhere near capable of doing this — even the ones that have nukes to begin with (*cough* Iran). North Korea has a hard enough time keeping its tractors running, let alone launching a nuclear ICBM high across the Pacific, where it’d be most vulnerable to missile interception. And even if they did, the entire concept of an EMP attack is entirely theoretical — it’s the speculation of some physicists, not the purview of the Pentagon.

But Newt is undeterred: an EMP attack would cause “Millions [to] die in the first week alone,” a “giant lightning strike,” and a likelihood that ought to be “terrifying for all of us.”

If we have enemies capable of getting a nuke over the US, which we don’t, wouldn’t we be more worried about that? Why would anyone want to turn off our lights instead of, say, destroying New York City or Washington? Why would any country start World War III with an attack that only might-kinda-work on paper? They wouldn’t. Nuclear physicist Dr. Yousaf Butt, in a long analysis of the EMP threat, concluded “It is highly unlikely that any adversary would choose to — or, in the case of a terrorist cell, even be remotely capable of-carrying out a nuclear EMP strike against the US.” And yet, Gingrich insists “We are on the verge of catastrophic problems.”

Though as this pseudo-science scaremonger and pie-eyed sensationalist becomes a realistic contender for the 2012 election, I can’t help but agree. [NYT]

Photo: John W. Adkisson/Getty

Discuss

(15 Comments)
  • [–]

    Bulkbill

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM

    Y so Nuclear? Terrorists could conceivably build an Explosively Pumped Flux Compression Generator which could take down a power grid, or in my mind several key data centers (remembering that they love things which go BOOM at the same time). Tech-terrorists could also build a Vircator (VIRtual CAthode oscillaTOR) which is tunable and capable of very high power levels.

  • [–]

    olearymo

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 9:27 AM

    While I mostly agree, you have to admit that using an EMP would make more sense, for an invading force, than ground-level nuclear detonation. It’d lessen resistance surely.

    • [–]

      Spanky

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:07 AM

      I agree, it’s really annoying when your red-dot scope stops working!

      • [–]

        cayal

        Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM

        They’ll have to fire from the hip.

  • [–]

    Corey

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM

    Your group of sites are so biased to the Left, it’s ridcoulous. Maybe you should join with ABC?

    • [–]

      Matt

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:31 AM

      How so?
      Do you care to even point out where this article is wrong? He is proving Newts fear mongering to be wrong with logic and common sense.

      And you can’t even rebuttal it besides point out the retarded left-right spectrum shit.

    • [–]

      Theo

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:32 AM

      Almost as “ridcoulous” as Newt Gingrich

  • [–]

    jayrrr

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:47 AM

    you people arguing this are idiots…. newt is a HUGE freaking idiot.. c’mon america… you dont need another bush. r u F***ing kidding me! more people have died in lightning strikes in the last 20 years than they have in terrorist attacks world wide in the last 20 years (true) where is our war against lightning strikes?! must the US government put its people permanently in a state of being afraid of everything so they can play them like puppets!?! wake the F**K up people! geez………. ps vote ron paul lol

    • [–]

      Corey

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 5:49 PM

      My vote goes to you learning how to make posts that don’t look like they were written by a 17 year old in a chat room.

  • [–]

    alien

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 12:15 PM

    ron paul guys, ron paul. oh and north korea does have EMP weapons, along with China and Russia.

  • [–]

    Ozoneocean

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 1:29 PM

    Basically, there’s far, far more likelihood of getting flattened by a meteorite.
    So let’s all wear titanium umbrella hats! 500% safer than the old fashioned tinfoil kind, but still guaranteed to block mind control! Weeeeeeeeeeeee!

  • [–]

    LGB

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM

    An EMP of that magnitude is more likely to come from a non terrestrial source anyway – ie that giant nuclear furnace above our heads.

  • [–]

    LucasF

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM

    Since when is EMP a theory and not a fact…they have tested it…its real…what the bejesus are you on about “Sam Biddle” if that is your real name!!!!!!

  • [–]

    Mark Whiting

    Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 6:31 AM

    Newt Gingrich didn’t make up the EMP threat, and the NY Times article and the Yousaf Butt essay miss the major point that it is science, not science fiction, and that the damage from a severe solar flare can take down electric grids as thoroughly as a nuclear EMP attack. The problem I see is that people aren’t separating the issue from the person, and throwing both out. Fine if you don’t like Newt, a lot of people don’t…but look up EMP and you’ll see it’s something we have to deal with.

  • [–]

    David

    Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 4:37 PM

    Coughing doesn’t magically make Iran a nuclear power.

Join The Discussion