NASA: No World-Consuming Supernova In 2012

I find this funny and sad at the same time: someone at NASA had to write an article explaining the obvious to those claiming that the world will end in 2012 because of a nearby supernova.

Here’s how Francis Reddy, from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, starts his article:

Given the incredible amounts of energy in a supernova explosion — as much as the sun creates during its entire lifetime — another erroneous doomsday theory is that such an explosion could happen in 2012 and harm life on Earth. However, given the vastness of space and the long times between supernovae, astronomers can say with certainty that there is no threatening star close enough to hurt Earth.

But the fact is that there are no stars near Earth that can go supernova and disrupt our planet, as Reddy explains right after that paragraph:

[F]or Earth’s ozone layer to experience damage from a supernova, the blast must occur less than 50 light-years away. All of the nearby stars capable of going supernova are much farther than this.

Reddy then spends quite a few paragraphs explaining supernovae, why they happen and how they affect nearby objects. [NASA]

Discuss

(6 Comments)
  • [–]

    Daniel

    Saturday, December 17, 2011 at 12:26 PM

    Thanks nasa! Where would we be without such a source of information!

  • [–]

    JohnHedge

    Saturday, December 17, 2011 at 1:34 PM

    We are indeed the lucky country on the lucky planet.

  • [–]

    olearymo

    Monday, December 19, 2011 at 9:47 AM

    1. I don’t understand why everyone hates NASA so much these days.

    2. Really, if the world was going to end, would they tell us? What would be the point? Really, there’s no way to know either way. Any one of us could die any second, so it’s a moot point.

  • [–]

    TSH

    Monday, December 19, 2011 at 11:46 AM

    NASA and CSIRO are probably my favourite government bodies ever. Good on ‘em.

    On the other hand … a supernova is so powerful it could pwn Earth’s ozone layer *from 50 light years away*. Good to know we’re safe, but holy shit that’s a lot of energy. Consider the inverse square law, the distance and the fact that Earth’s ozone layer isn’t really affected by daily bombardment from our own star at a mere 1AU.

  • [–]

    Ringo

    Monday, December 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    IF the supernova began 49 light years ago – we will only know about it when it’s light arrives here in the next year, right?

    • [–]

      chugs

      Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 2:21 PM

      we’ve already observing those stars close to us and have been observing them for some time. If any were to go nova they would have been giving out indications of that i.e. changes in the luminosity, size, colour

Join The Discussion