
Kodak insists there is no impending bankrupcy, and that they have $US862 million in cash, but bleeding money at the rate they are, that won’t last them through 2012. Maybe that’s what the Mayans were pointing toward this whole time: the end of an epoch, the death of a king. At the time of this writing, Kodak is valued at $US1.05.
The sad thing is not just that Kodak was great in the past. They’re still making some fantastic things — like the highly revered image sensor in the Leica S2 — they’re just not making any money off them. Their plan to get back into the black? They hope to win patent lawsuits against Apple and RIM. Yes, because Apple is very easy to sue. Oh, and they still have printers! Just like HP still has printers. Sigh.
Kodak isn’t dead, but the time for resuscitation is rapidly running out. The laws of evolution have caught up to them. Unless they come up with something new and wonderful that everybody wants, they will be a memory. I’m not going to wax nostalgic about Kodak’s long history — Michael Hiltzik’s LA Times article did a better job of that than I could have — but I will say this: we see companies go the way of the dodo all the time, and usually they’re met with a shrug. Kodak is different. They are a well-entrenched part of American (and global) history. When it goes we’ll feel just that much further away from the Norman Rockwell paintings of yesterday. [LA Times]



















RodK
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 12:33 PMMama, don’t take my Kodachrome away…
TSH
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 12:43 PMHad a Kodak digital camera in 2002. *all things considered* it was pretty good. In 2006 it was replaced by a Canon digicam.
Bought a Kodak AIO printer in 2007. Was great ’till it screwed up. In 2008 it was replaced by a Canon Pixma printer and LiDE scanner that I use to this day.
Maybe Kodak could talk to Memjet?
http://www.memjet.com/
TSH
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 12:47 PMhttp://www.memjet.com/technology/videos/category/home-office/
Just watching some videos now. Wow. (no, I’m not an employee. I’m just really impressed)
Zip
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 1:35 PMwow!!
InformedGamer
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 10:51 AMwow… nothing more can be said, I want one haha
Ozoneocean
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 12:53 PMThere best bet could be to go back to film… It’s still far higher resolution and better colour than most digicams, even today. But they could start a new retro thing like people have done with crappy old vinyl records (which were crap even back in the day). Get those hipsters onboard.
Ozoneocean
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM*Their. Dammit!
alphamone
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 1:22 PMproblem is you still need to develop it, you need to be more careful with your shots, and you need a high quality dedicated negative scanner to get the greater detail.
TSH
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 2:57 PMFilm is only better for pro photographers with the right tools and skills. And those pros who want to still use film, are still using film.
Your average Joe iPhone-owner couldn’t care less about managing the aperture, focus and DOF. They use “tools” like Instagram to actually make photos look (objectively) *worse*! So … I guess what I’m saying is that yes there is a market for film, but it’s a tiny part of the overal imaging market and it’s already saturated. Kodak can’t really do anything more in that space IMHO.
Steve
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 3:12 PMFilm is beyond the scope of ordinary civilian photographers. 35mm film is still being used in motion pictures, and I’ve no doubt that some other sectors still use it. But the advantages of film over digital for most people is negligible. 5-8MP is more than enough clarity for 99% of needs if you’re just looking at pure resolution.
Ozoneocean
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM“Saturated” Hahaha, good word in this context!
Lee
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 1:01 PM“At the time of this writing, Kodak is valued at $US1.05″
Hmm. Gizmodo does finance reporting. If Kodak was really worth $1.05, I would happily by them with the chnage in my back pocket. Either they’ve left off suffix (e.g $1.05b) or they’yre talking about the share price.
Splintex
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 1:15 PMMy brain automatically interpreted that as a share price.
Morkai
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 3:02 PMYeah I read it as a share price…
Jimmy
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 2:04 PMWhere oh where to get empty film canisters from now???
Andrew
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 2:54 PMDammit i never got a chance to shoot with kodachrome :(
Ghazarios
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 4:38 PMThis saddens me. :/
mark c
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 10:19 PMAll this doom and gloom talk about kodak, no one ever talks about the amazing machines they produce for the press industry such as the nexpress series, at $600K+ and with arguably the best finish out there atleast there leading the pack somewhere!