Galaxy Nexus Review: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back

The long-awaited, much-hyped, Android 4.0 flagship is here at last. You already know we like Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), but what about the first phone to bear it? We’ve talked software, it’s time to hit the hardware.

Note: Testing was conducted on the European version of the Galaxy Nexus.

Why It Matters

It matters because it’s a Nexus. Nexuses (Nexii?) are designed by Google (and a manufacturing partner — in this case Samsung) to be the standard-bearers, to show what’s possible from the Android OS. In this case, it was designed specifically to show off Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. Not only is it currently the only phone that has ICS, but it’s probably one of the few phones that will ever have a pristine version of Android the Fourth, unspoiled by manufacturers’ unpleasant skins.

Again, I just want to point out that this is a hardware review, not a software review. You can and should read Mat Honan’s full review of Android 4.0 to hear all about the software. I’ll add a bit here and there, but as much as possible — and it’s not entirely possible — I’m going to be isolating the hardware from the software.

Using It

The phone is big, but surprisingly light — without feeling cheap. The iPhone 4S feels tiny in comparison, like your fingers suddenly grew at little bit. But don’t let that big 4.65in screen scare you. The phone’s body is almost exactly the same as the Galaxy S II, which has a 4.3-in screen. And actually, most of the time, the usable part of the screen is the same as a 4.3in screen, with the bottom area being used for a revamped set of navigation buttons that are no longer separate from the screen. But switch on a video or a game and the nav buttons fade away leaving an awesome full-screen experience in their place. There’s more metal on the phone than there is on a typical Samsung device, which makes it feel more solid than usual. Also, despite its size, it’s actually 5g lighter than the iPhone 4S. It’s thinner, too: 8.89mm vs. 9.4mm.

The micro USB port is centered on the bottom, right where it should be. But then — what the heck?! — the headphone input is down there too. The bottom of the phone is actually its thickest part, and there’s a glowing LED notification light down south as well (taking a page from the trackball on the Nexus One). It’s almost as if you’re supposed to keep the phone upside down in your pocket. The phone also lacks a dedicated camera button.

Like

The screen is gorgeous. It’s the first Super AMOLED HD screen (with full 1280×720 resolution). It doesn’t have quite as high a pixel density as the HTC Rezound (316ppi vs. 342ppi), but it makes up for it by being far brighter, having more vivid colours, and inky, deep blacks. What about against the iPhone 4S? The pixel density is slightly lower (316ppi vs 330ppi), but the colours are more vivid, the blacks are blacker and it’s more than an inch bigger. For watching an HD movie or playing an HD game, the Nexus has the best screen you can get. Call quality (both for myself and the receiver) was absolutely superb. It also packs an NFC radio, so it’s ready for the mobile payments revolution which may or may not be on its way.

And it has a barometer! Nobody really knows what that’s about yet, but it’s still cool. Oh, and battery life is fantastic. In 3G mode I almost always got through a whole day despite very heavy use. The other new Android heavies, Droid RAZR and the HTC Amaze 4G, simply can’t compete in this department.

Speed. It is very fast, but this is where we get into murky territory. Because the Galaxy Nexus is currently the only phone natively running Android 4.0, it’s tough to tell whether these speed enhancements are coming from the new OS or if the hardware’s a smoker. And judging it against other Android phones is comparing apples and oranges. That caveat aside, here’s what I found: The user experience is extremely fast and fluid. Scrolling around webpages is quicker and smoother than any other mobile browser I’ve used (and with all of its new enhanced features, I would call ICS’ version of Chrome the best mobile browser out there). It also has the fastest camera shutter out there, easily beating even the iPhone 4S and the rest (in speed).

The closest thing to a Nexus Galaxy is the Galaxy S II — an older handset (also made by Samsung) that has been the reigning Android champ all summer. Thing is, the S II is actually faster than the Nexus in some regards. Others, not so much. One aspect of performance that regular people will feel a lot is Java and browser speed — an objective measurement of how quickly the phone parses the code that makes up the Internet (many apps, too) and turns it into the stuff that hu-mon eyes can understand.

In this area, the Nexus trounces the S II (and the iPhone 4S too). But when it comes to raw number-crunching, the kind of stuff that has a major effect on graphics performance, the S II gets its revenge. In Quadrant Standard tests, the S II slaps the Nexus silly with an average score of 3316 versus the Nexus Galaxy’s 1785. And the S II is quicker at starting up and opening apps too. Take that, new kid.

What gives? If I were a betting man, I would say that the Exynos processor in the S II is just simply way faster than the OMAP in the Nexus. Why didn’t they use the Exynos in the Nexus? Good freakin’ question. All that said, you’re not going to feel a speed deficiency in the Galaxy Nexus unless you’re doing some really heavy gaming.

And I’ve resisted, but it must be said, Android 4.0 is better in almost every single way. It’s still supremely customisable, but it’s way more intuitive, more user-friendly, and, as Mat said, “more human” than any other Android version by a tremendous margin.

No Like

The Galaxy Nexus is one of the few Android devices that doesn’t have a micro SD card slot, which means there is you’re stuck with what you’ve got in terms of storage. The volume on the external speaker is sub-par. The LED notification light pulses too slowly and subtly, making it easy to miss. The lack of a physical camera button is maddening. The only other thing is I just can’t shake the feeling that they should have gone with the Exynos processor you find in the Galaxy S II.

And for all of Ice Cream Sandwich’s improvements, it ain’t perfect yet. Not all of your old apps are going to play nicely with it (yet). Some just have small quirks, others force-close like a mofo. Other anomalies:

• Under “Accounts and Sync” you have the option to add a Facebook account, but pressing that button doesn’t do anything.

• Face Unlock is a cool feature, but it only worked about 40 per cent of the time despite my righteous and recognisable Movember ‘stache. If you’re at all backlit (which you usually are, when you’re looking down at your phone) the camera adjusts to the brighter light behind you, instead of the light on your face.

The camera is somewhat of a let-down. When I heard they’d gone with a 5MP sensor instead of the now-standard-on-high-end-phones 8MP sensor, I promised I’d reserve judgement until I’d tried it. The camera does pretty OK in bright daylight, but it doesn’t come anywhere near its competition, plain and simple. Colours are washed out, low-light shooting is a noise-fest, and it’s not nearly as sharp. Why would you totally revamp your camera software, make it fast and awesome, include time-lapse, panorama and really fun face-morphing video features, and then put a piece of crap camera in there?

Watch the video in 1080p, if you can.

Should I Buy It?

Yes, you should buy it. The only truly bad thing about this phone is the camera. Even with that, I’m comfortable calling this the best Android phone. But that’s only because it’s the only Android phone you can get with a clean build of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, and that supersedes all of its faults. The improvement over Gingerbread really is that big a deal. But it needs to be said: This phone shouldn’t be getting bitch-slapped by a previous-gen handset from the same manufacturer. If that’s Google’s idea of a flagship, it should consider whether it wants to take its armada to war.

Specifications

OS: Android 4.0.1
Screen: 4.65in 1280×720 Super AMOLED HD
Processor and RAM: 1.2 GHz dual-core TI OMAP processor / 1GB RAM
Storage: 16GB or 32GB
Camera: Back: 5MP/1080p HD, Front: 1.3MP
Weight: 135g
Battery: 1750 mAh
Price: $999 RRP
Giz Rank: 4 Stars

Discuss

(20 Comments)
  • [–]

    Steve

    Saturday, December 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM

    Surprisingly fair review. After playing with mine for a week, my negatives are much the same as this. No MicroSD slot, camera is okay, but could be better and there are still some compatibility issues with certain apps (Tiny Tower comes to mind). Everything else is very well-built and runs buttery smooth. But since I don’t play games on my phone or much into phone cameras, it’s more than enough for me.

  • [–]

    Anna

    Saturday, December 3, 2011 at 8:23 PM

    Don’t complain about a phone with a new OS because an app doesn’t run. Complain about the developer who hasn’t updated the app.

  • [–]

    matt

    Saturday, December 3, 2011 at 8:49 PM

    hmm sounds like the S2 is the better phone hardware wise, is there an easy way to upgrade it to ICS without the usual bloatware?

  • [–]

    Guy

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 12:11 AM

    “And it has a barometer! Nobody really knows what that’s about yet, but it’s still cool.”

    Serious? Its used in conjunction with the GPS to determine a more accurate location. -_-”

  • [–]

    Nate

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 12:34 AM

    Leaning a bit towards the s2 still at the moment. Due to its cost etc.

  • [–]

    Jordan

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 2:38 AM

    barometer is used to obtain a faster GPS lock on as this is done in 3 dimensions including height, the barometer provides the height for the GPS coordinates much quicker and thus reduce the time taken for an overall lock :)

  • [–]

    Epicaricacy

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 3:16 AM

    Can’t see why you would recommend this and call it the best Android phone after the review. Surely no microSD, poorer graphics capabilities and an inferior camera would make the S2 a better purchase, espeically as ICS is coming to it – and you said “I’m comfortable calling this the best Android phone. But that’s only because it’s the only Android phone you can get with a clean build of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich”

    Doesn;t really make sense to me. Surely you shoudl say – Don;t buy iy – get the Sammsung and wait for the ICS implementation, then you will have more space, a better camera AND ICS….

    • [–]

      beatrixasdfghjk.

      Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM

      I doubt TouchWiz counts as ‘a clean build of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich’.

  • [–]

    Cameron

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 11:10 AM

    ” Oh, and battery life is fantastic. In 3G mode I almost always got through a whole day despite very heavy use.”

    No… That isn’t fantastic. It’s barely acceptable. Just because it’s better than the competition doesn’t make it “Fantastic”.

    • [–]

      S0ULphIRE

      Monday, December 5, 2011 at 12:12 PM

      Subjective adjectives like “fantastic” rely on comparison to other items in the same field. Otherwise, until we get a phone that has a battery that last until the end of time, you can NEVER use the work “fantastic”. Honestly…

  • [–]

    JohnHedge

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 1:17 PM

    I was thinking of buying it but I’ll hold off for better hardware.

  • [–]

    Tim

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 4:07 PM

    If it had 64GB of internal storage would we still be bemoaning the lack of an SD card slot?

  • [–]

    Jon

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 9:53 PM

    Umm, to all who say “Duh, get the S2, with ICS coming in future and S2 has better performance!”, the ICS you get will be Samsung’s Touchwiz-ed crap (or wait an eternity for a bug-free custom ROM), and also the screen on the Nexus is *1280×720* as opposed to *800×480*.

    • [–]

      Apollo

      Monday, December 5, 2011 at 10:09 AM

      Or you could just turn TW Launcher off.

  • [–]

    Greg

    Sunday, December 4, 2011 at 10:15 PM

    With a lot of the benchmarks wouldn’t a much higher resolution screen account for the large score differences? The S2 and Galaxy Nexus are very similar hardware aside from the screen resolution, I have a feeling that pushing all those extra pixels is the thing that giving the Galaxy Nexus the worse scores in comparison.

    Oh and the Nexus S has the micro USB and the headphone Jack on the bottom. I really don’t get why the reviewer felt the need to harp on about this in the hands on and mention it in the review. Its logical placement, I don’t want the headphone cord hanging down from the top of my screen when I’m playing music and reading.

    • [–]

      boris

      Monday, December 5, 2011 at 2:34 AM

      Greg – I thought the same thing so I looked into it – i found the graphics tests write to additional “off screen” memory – to simulate the presence of extra pixels – so the amount of pixels per phone is then normalised and thus comparable.

    • [–]

      TSH

      Monday, December 5, 2011 at 11:21 AM

      Re: the headphone socket – totally agree. I really dislike having the headphone cord sticking out the top of my phone when it could be neatly tucked into the bottom. Who cares what orientation the phone is when it’s in your pocket, so long as it’s comfy? In fact upside-down is better: you don’t have to turn it around when you reach in and grab it naturally. Think about it.

  • [–]

    Pres

    Monday, December 5, 2011 at 11:20 AM

    EVERY review has complained about the headphone jack. which puzzles me as I always keep my phone upside down because then when i take it out of my pocket I don’t need to turn the phone around. Seems odd that EVERY review has made a big deal about it when it’s the obvious place for it, where else would it be? think about it, come on people. pretend you’re a designer.

  • [–]

    Zanza

    Monday, December 5, 2011 at 1:30 PM

    How does the camera compare with the HTC Desire? I’ve found the camera on my desire pretty poor, and would be happy with any upgrade from that.

  • [–]

    Julian

    Monday, December 19, 2011 at 2:53 PM

    A complete guess but perhaps the choice of processor was in regards to the battery life?

    If the screen resolution and size are both bigger than the S2, then there has to be some reason why the battery life is so good compared to similar phones.

Join The Discussion