Denying Pill To Girls Puts Politics Ahead Of Science

In a rare example of overruling her own experts and the US Federal Drug Administration — while apparently ignoring the highest teen pregnancy rate of any industrialised country — Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is prohibiting teenagers younger than 17 from buying the morning-after pill over the counter.

Right now, teenagers who are 17 or older with proof of age can buy the pill — also known as Plan B — over the counter. Teva Pharmaceuticals, which makes the drug, asked the FDA to lift the age limit, and the FDA planned to do so. FDA scientists found allowing young girls access to the drug would bring more benefit than harm. But in what looks like a politically motivated decision, Sebelius won’t take the FDA’s advice.

“I think the decision to overrule the FDA is a bad one,” Art Caplan, director of the centre for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, told me. “I don’t think its consistent with the science and I suspect it’s motivated by politics.”

If taken within 72 hours after unprotected sex, Plan B can prevent a fertilised egg from implanting in the uterus. An old argument that refuses to die says the pill will encourage promiscuity in young girls. But there’s no convincing evidence that contraception, whether it’s the life-saving HPV vaccine or Plan B, leads to more sex. European teenagers use much more contraception than teens in the United States. But both have sex about the same amount. The real difference? Americans have a pregnancy rate six times higher and an abortion rate three times higher.

After decreasing over the previous decade, teen pregnancies in the United States increased again in 2005. Though they decreased in 2009, the United States has long had the highest teen pregnancy rate of all industrialised nations. In 2009, 39 out of 1000 teen girls got pregnant, while in the Netherlands the number was 4, in Japan and Italy it was 5, and in France it was 7. The only countries that came close to the US were Bulgaria and Turkey.

Young girls who find themselves pregnant have often been manipulated by an older boyfriend, uncle, neighbour, etc, into having sex. They’re ashamed, scared and need help, Caplan says.

A lot of girls are going to feel uncomfortable talking with their parents. What we should do is rather than say you can’t have the pill over the counter is require an insert that first gives information on how to prevent unwanted pregnancies, and second helps young women find resources on how to bring this up with their parents or where to find a religious counselor or principle to talk to. Give them some help, don’t take away the pill. The manufacturer should do that anyway.

Caplan also points out that the abortion argument still lies at the heart of protests against Plan B. The pill prevents a fertilised egg from implanting in the uterine wall so it never becomes a foetus, scientifically making it not abortion. Nevertheless, during the Bush administration, some pharmacists refused to sell the drug and some hospitals still refuse to stock it. Never mind the fact that Plan B has repeatedly been proven safe and surgical abortion can be, in comparison, much more dangerous.

Reuters reported that Teva didn’t convince Sebelius that younger girls would understand how to use the pill without the help of a doctor. Does Sebelius seriously believe young girls wouldn’t be able to comprehend simple written instructions describing how to take a single pill? We’re not talking about a series of precisely timed doses here. It’s one pill.

[Reuters, Associated Press via The New York Times]

Image: Shutterstock/Monkey Business Imaging

Discuss

(16 Comments)
  • [–]

    olearymo

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 11:04 AM

    so… she’s going to adopt, take care of and pay for the resulting babies?

  • [–]

    Wana

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 11:08 AM

    What do you expect, this woman is a politician, not a doctor or scientist.

  • [–]

    light487

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM

    Not suprised.. it wouldn’t be the first time, nor the last, that political agendas overrule rational, logical and scientific thinking.

    • [–]

      RB

      Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 3:44 PM

      Plus, well, it is America… o.O

  • [–]

    Josh

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM

    Idiot

  • [–]

    S0ULphIRE

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM

    Talk to your parents/principle or a religious counselor? WHAT THE FUCK?!

    • [–]

      Osiris Fox

      Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 12:22 PM

      principle or a religious counselor – agreed, that’s just dumb. But parents, come on, that is the right thing to do. How old are you anyways? Only someone very immature would think that people under 17 don’t have an obligation to tell their parents about serious life events such as these.

      • [–]

        S0ULphIRE

        Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 12:35 PM

        Main thing was the religious counselor, I mean wtf…by what basis are they at all qualified to help.
        But you think if I was under 17 I’d have an OBLIGATION to tell my parents? Haha, hell no. Sorry to break your little fantasy bubble, but not all parents are good ones. Some kick you out of the house because you weren’t married first…

        • [–]

          Johnno

          Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM

          Just because they belong to a religion doesn’t mean you have to trash them. A huge portion of their job is counselling.

          And why are they on there? To quote you: “not all parents are good ones”. What if there was nobody else you could turn to?

          • [–]

            S0ULphIRE

            Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 2:26 PM

            Any counselor who bases their decisions off religious teachings I would *not* send my kids to. What are they gonna say? God loves em anyway? It’ll be ok if they repent now but they have to have the baby because abortion is killing? What’s wrong with “normal” counselors?

  • [–]

    Osiris Fox

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 12:03 PM

    I agree with making it only available to girls 17 and over, younger girls need to tell their parents.

    • [–]

      bdc

      Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 10:09 PM

      lol, your country is messed up, in Australia we have the right to private medical records, if minors are at risk child protection services will be notified.

      Also, you can get abortions without parents knowledge, and emergency contraceptive pills are over the counter.

      Also you can get a contraceptive that goes under your skin for a more long term solution.

      Poor US, one day you will realise how in the dark ages your country is socially…hopefully you won’t have dragged the rest of the world back there with you before you do.

  • [–]

    light487

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 1:06 PM

    I think a good solution to appease both would be to have a “Permission Card” system whereby the parents or counseler has provided the child with a signed (and witnessed) card to be able to buy them. This would mean that the child could discuss the ins and outs of sex and then contraception and all that stuff.. and then be given the card as a backup. This means that when the deed is done and they are already terrified, embarrassed, ashamed etc of the consequences, they can just whip out the card and deal with it.

    They may be minors under protective care of the state or parents but they are still human beings with feelings and they are young, meaning they are more likely to make a mistake and also more likely to hide from the mistake if they need to front up to the same guardian/authority figure.

    • [–]

      light487

      Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM

      Also, every time the card is used a report back to the government could be made as well.. girls buying an excess of them could be buying for their friends or simply being overly “uncautious” and the reporting could alert authorities to that to be followed up with the parents/guardians and so on.

  • [–]

    Steve

    Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 5:53 PM

    “Young girls who find themselves pregnant have often been manipulated by an older boyfriend, uncle, neighbour, etc, into having sex.”

    …Uncle?!

  • [–]

    Elizabeth (Aust)

    Sunday, March 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM

    You can hardly say you care about women and their health when you put unnecessary medical barriers around birth control pills – I know many American doctors still refuse to prescribe the Pill until women submit to completely unnecessary, unrelated, unhelpful and potentially harmful bimanual pelvic and breast exams and they coerce women into elective cancer screening, pap tests, and more, coerce them into over-screening which greatly increases the risks for no additional benefit. A rare cancer has been turned into a multi-billion dollar industry based on over-screening and over-treatment. It is nothing more than using women for profits and worrying and harming vast numbers. I think women’s health is controlled by vested and paternalistic interests and is also highly emotive and political – I think tying up birth control is one example, the lack of respect for informed consent in women’s cancer screening, our legal right, is another, plus the willingness of the profession to deliberately mislead women – most women don’t even need pap tests, but they generate a fortune for vested interests with very high over-treatment rates. The Finns have the lowest rates of cc in the world and send the fewest women for biopsies/colposcopy – they offer 7 pap tests, 5 yearly from 30 to 60 and the Dutch are about to move from the same program to 5 hrHPV primary triage tests offered at 30, 35, 40, 50 and 60 and ONLY those positive and at risk from this rare cancer will be offered a 5 yearly pap test. Those negative and not at risk can follow the HPV program and there is a reliable self-test option, the Delphi Screener, or if monogamous or no longer sexually active, can forget about screening and revisit the subject if their risk profile changes. By age 40 only 5% of women are HPV positive. This program greatly reduces pap testing, false positives and potentially harmful over-treatment. (which also means fewer women with cervical stenosis, having premature babies & high risk pregnancies, needing c-sections and cervical cerclage etc) BUT it also means profits would plummet and vested interests will fight that…
    American doctors use both pap and HPV tests which just causes confusion and leads to potentially harmful over-treatment – HPV negative women don’t need pap tests, biopsies or treatments.
    It’s time for women to walk away from this harmful excess and fight this paternalistic control and demand something better, something that’s in their interests.

Join The Discussion