BBC’s Frozen Planet Crew Fakes Polar Bear Scene In A Zoo

Like all its documentaries, the BBC’s Frozen Planet is fascinating and exquisitely filmed. Their crew has captured amazing things, including the creeping ice tornado. Unfortunately, they cheated on their viewers when they faked a crucial polar bear scene in a zoo.

The fourth episode of this documentary — which took four years to film — follows the life of a polar bear in the Arctic. At one point, the camera follows a polar bear mother into the cave she just excavated deep in the ice. Then the camera moves into the cave, where viewers enjoyed the tender scenes of the mum and her cubs. Needless to say, everyone melted because of the cuteness overload.

The only problem is that the cave was fake. It wasn’t in the Arctic. It was built with plywood and cement in zoo in Germany. Nowhere during the scene warned the viewers of this fact. It was presented as is, misleading everyone into believing the crew was actually filmed that scene in the Arctic, like every other scene.

Sir David Attenborough, who has been accused of blurring the lines between fact and fake in the past, says that they couldn’t get into the real cave, so they had to reproduce it with different bears. They didn’t want to disturb the animals, they say. Which is good. The only problem is that they don’t warn the audience about the true nature of the scene.

Attenborough argues that they didn’t try to mislead viewers. On their defence, they posted scenes showing how they made the cave in a behind-the-scenes web video, but I doubt many of their eight million viewers actually checked that out. [Daily Mail]

Discuss

(10 Comments)
  • [–]

    Stuart

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM

    There will be a range of opinions on this obviously, but I think that few viewers ever truly expect that they are seeing complete continuity when they watch the story of some animal in a doco. Who can really tell one wildebeest calf from another, honestly? To me, each shot of an animal doing it’s thing is good enough, and I’m happy to let the producers weave that into a story to entertain and captivate us. The fact that the individual shots are of different animals or places, doesn’t change the fact that somewhere a remarkably similar story is being played out in real life out of view of our cameras. I think that Attenborough’s position that the constructed den was available to discover on the web-video is reasonable, and I don’t think it harms his integrity. Perhaps some of the Giz readers will feel differently, but maybe that’s because the idea of someone installing cameras in a real bear den was more interesting to them than the actual footage?

  • [–]

    Antonia

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 11:07 AM

    Why are you judging as though its evidence present in a court? Its TV ie entertainment. Let great people weave their magic to create art.

  • [–]

    Exposed Monkey

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM

    Yeah, let’s not pull this apart too much. It’s yet another outstanding documentary from the BBC and Sir Attenborough..

    Just a shame about the ads every 4 minutes on Gem..

  • [–]

    light487

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM

    Good old Daily Mail rubbish.. move along intelligent people, nothing to see (read) here.

  • [–]

    Mikey

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 12:02 PM

    No way, stuff on TV is faked? My life is shattered.

  • [–]

    S0ULphIRE

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 12:20 PM

    HOW DARE HE!!!

    But seriously, don’t care. Like you said, it’s even included in the behind-the-scenes video. Not like they were trying to hide it.

    • [–]

      light487

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 12:48 PM

      Indeed.. they stuck it in the middle because of continuity (ie. production values).. they could have missed over that whole bit and put it in the BTS section but it would have ruined the continuity…

  • [–]

    Ozoneocean

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM

    Eh, I liked naturist series better when Attenborough actually went to the places and showed them to us first hand instead of just sitting back and narrating them. I know he’s a bit old and frail now, but I’d still like to see him in front of the camera a little more.
    I dislike purely narrated nature shows as a rule, they tend to look that adverts constructed out of agency bought footage from various anonymous mercenary camera crews.

    • [–]

      nathan

      Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 2:05 PM

      He gets in front of the camera for episode 7 of this series, the one about global warming. You can see why he didn’t go out there for the whole series, I don’t think he went to antartica at all. In the behind the scenes footage from bbcs “life” you can tell he is struggling for bits of it. I would much rather David attenbourough continue to narrate without actaully going out there considering the alternatives.

      If anyone has seen “one life” with Daniel Craig narrating over recycled footage you know what i mean.

  • [–]

    Spock

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM

    It’s not like it was a fake polar bear.

Join The Discussion