Nokia Lumia 800 Review: Unattainable Foreign Beauty

Windows Phone has been sort of a ship without a port for a while now, getting along as a platform without a must-have, lightning-rod handset. Nokia’s Lumia 800 is the first serious contender for that honour, but Mango’s knight in shining polycarbonate might not be enough to make its presence felt across the pond.

Giz Au Editor’s Note: This is a review from our US sister site; there isn’t an announced carrier for the Lumia 800 in Australia — yet.

Like

Using the Lumia 800 doesn’t feel like using other Windows Phones. Everything is better, faster, slicker — from touch events to app performance to the general responsiveness of the software. Using it, you get the sense that this is how everything should be. Third party apps especially operate a lot more smoothly, even compared to similarly specced phones. It still has some lag in heavier apps, but in general it clears up a lot of the stability issues that the 7.5 Mango launch introduced to the platform.

The Lumia is also gorgeous, of course. The matte polycarbonate body and sleek, curved design feel great in the hand, and the phone is sturdy enough that you won’t constantly fret about setting it down. It’s got some heft to it, as well, but not in an unwieldy way — like a little Scandinavian Cadillac in your pocket. The ClearBlack AMOLED display is really impressive, especially with colour quality and viewing angle.

Despite our initial hems and haws about them, the two Nokia apps that come loaded on the Lumia 800 are actually pretty useful. Nokia Drive simplifies WP’s native turn-by-turn map functionality, and Nokia Maps is a really impressive mapping alternative that’s enough to make you stop writing love letters to Google Maps. The public transportation feature that tells you how many and which stops you need to take is especially awesome, and a welcome improvement over Windows Phone’s pre-loaded Bing Maps.

No Like

Despite the fanfare it received, the Lumia’s camera isn’t in the same league as the iPhone 4S’s. It’s above average and a bit better than, say, the camera on the new Motorola Razr, but top notch cameras like the 4S and the Galaxy S II wreck the curve for everyone else. The Lumia 800 doesn’t capture colours nearly as well as those two. Its auto-focus and shutter are slower, and even on its macro focus setting, the Lumia had trouble focusing on super-near objects.

Aside from the camera, the hardware leaves little to complain about. If you want to really pick at some nits, there’s the push-to-open flap at the top of the phone that protects the micro-USB port, which could be concerning for long-term I’m-definitely-going-to-eventually-break-this reasons.

The rest of the complaints are the same ones that have been levied against it since it was announced: a mere 16GB of non-expandable storage; no NFC; no front-facing camera.

Should I Buy This

The Lumia 800 is by far the best Windows Phone you can buy. You could import it if you reallyreallyreally want to. But sadly, right now it comes at a high enough premium and with enough hardware caveats that you’re probably better off waiting for Nokia’s official Australian launch, expected in early 2012.

Nokia Lumia 800 Specs

  • Processor: 1.4GHz single-core MSM8255
  • Memory: 512MB RAM
  • Storage: 16GB (non-expandable)
  • Display: 800×480 AMOLED ClearBlack
  • Battery: 1,450 mAh
  • Dimensions: 116.5 x 61.2 x 12.1 mm
  • Weight: 142g
  • Frequencies: 850/900/1900/2100

Discuss

(26 Comments)
  • [–]

    Wok

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM

    SHIP!

  • [–]

    Que

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM

    whoever has it in stock will get my cash. nuf said.

  • [–]

    TSH

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM

    I already snapped and bought a HTC Trophy (Ebay FTW, should be arriving on Fri), but assuming my Mango experience is as good as I hope, when my plan is up next year I’m definitely getting this handset.

    MS ecosystem + smooth UI + unique and beautiful build and quality. Put aside a blue one for me, Vodafone!

  • [–]

    MotorMouth

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 2:07 PM

    Haven’t the people at Gizmodo heard of eBay? How do they think we all got our Samsung Focii? Its interesting that he mentions Mango instability like it was common knowledge, because it is the first I’ve heard of it. My phone has been going gangbusters since I installed the upgrade.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 5:33 PM

      Yeah, that’s pretty much what I think and Zune is great for managing it all.

  • [–]

    WPDownUnder

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 2:37 PM

    I’ll pass and wait for the Nokia Lumia 800 or Ace, whatever the premium model is for 2012 which they are keeping up their sleaves.

    Expect 4G, FFCamera, 32GB and 4″screen and I’m in! :D

    • [–]

      WPDownUnder

      Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 2:37 PM

      Woops 900

  • [–]

    matt

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 2:41 PM

    I got one from nokia world conference. its great! much, much faster than the samsung omnia 7, which is the next fastest one I’ve used.

    the camera certainly beats the one in my old 3GS… it doesn’t focus well on near objects, but outside, its great! but yeah, just 5 seconds looking at my friends Galaxy S 2, and the camera does seem noticeably better in that.

    the built in GPS spoken directions stuff looks pretty good too. and the nokia maps app on the old symbian phones is pretty great, though I’m yet to get it to work on the lumia.

    its a great looking phone too, with a quality feel, the screen is great, and the touch screen is even more responsive than any iDevice!

    fun fact, not sure if its the norm these days, but it uses a micro sim

  • [–]

    mango

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM

    16gb and non expandable? pfft! if its in 64gb then by by apple :)

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 3:08 PM

      Just out of interest, why do you need 64Gb on your phone? I mean, I invariably fill mine up with music but even a 64Gb phone won’t hold my entire collection, so I don’t feel that it is any better than 4Gb really. When someone gets around to offering 128Gb, I’ll be really interested but for now 16Gb seems like heaps to me.

      • [–]

        Andrew

        Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 4:44 PM

        I was talking with a mate about this the other day. If you can’t fit all of your content, then you need a good music management option. Once you have that sorted, it’s actually very reasonable to have ‘just’ 8GB. More storage actually becomes a bit of a burden.

        The alternative is more, but 64 still won’t do.. I’d have to get 128GB… 256? Yeah, nah, just learn to manage your content.

    • [–]

      Jeff

      Saturday, November 12, 2011 at 6:08 AM

      Wp7 has Sharepoint where you can simply upload anything onto it and retrieve it when you want. The limit is 25GB. 16GB internal + 25 GB whenever storage = More than enough space!

      • [–]

        mango

        Saturday, November 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM

        good luck finding a 25gb+ 3G dataplan. i have a 32 gb iphone and its filled to the brim with apps and songs. 16gb is just the basic for a phone now. if this phone comes at least in 32 with micro sd i’d definitely ditch the iphone for this!

        • [–]

          MotorMouth

          Sunday, January 29, 2012 at 4:37 PM

          I can’t agree at all. I could easily get by with 1 or 2 gigs. Yes, I fill my phone up with music but in the last 5 years I have probably listened to music on it for a total of around 2 hours (30% of that time was yesterday). Even then it was just because I could. Books take up almost no space at all, I only have 20 or so photos on it and I have never even tried to shoot video on any phone I’ve owned so yeah, 1Gb would be fine.

  • [–]

    Sicarius123

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 3:33 PM

    I’m presuming the 900 will be 32/64GB next year?

    Also given this phone wont work properly on Telstra it’s definitely not anything I’d touch.

    Pretty dissapointed that there doesn’t seem to be any real flagship devices in the WP7.5 launch, just a lot of bottom of the range, and middle of the range devices.

    • [–]

      Joe P

      Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 3:40 PM

      Frequencies: 850/900/1900/2100

      The above applies to both 2G and 3G frequencies so it will work fine on Telstra and not include all of their associated bloatware.

      • [–]

        wsDK_II

        Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM

        +1

      • [–]

        Sicarius123

        Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM

        There seems to be far more web stores claiming the specs wont work with Next G than will, and articles mentioning the fact that this wont work well on Telstra that I’d be very hesitant. Not to mention the lack of HSPA+.

        Hands on are also claiming poor speeds on AT&T which uses the same bands as Telstra.

        Wouldn’t want to get a device that had metro only 2100mhz 3G that is meant to be turned off in 2012, although if I did buy this phone it would definitely be a middle of the range placeholder waiting for a 900 with hopefully 32+GB of space, front facing camera and 4″ screen.

        • [–]

          MotorMouth

          Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM

          You could always change carriers. I’d go without a phone before I’d give Telstra another penny of my hard-earned money.

          • [–]

            Sicarius123

            Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 7:26 PM

            I’d stop using a phone before I’d go back to that awful Optus network I had to go through the TIO to get out of.

            And we all know Vodafone aren’t any better.

            So what if calling Optus gets you through to an operator quicker? I never have to call Telstra, it just works.

            • [–]

              MotorMouth

              Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 8:36 PM

              I’ve never had any problems at all with Optus. Their customer service isn’t what it used to be but their coverage is excellent in my experience. I really couldn’t tell you the last time I couldn’t get a signal when I needed one.

          • [–]

            chugs

            Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM

            telstra is slow at releasing comes because they do proper testing (uat) and force firmware changes optimized for their network

            • [–]

              Sicarius123

              Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 9:46 AM

              In Canberra Optus are definitely the worst network, I’d say at least 3/4 calls I made would drop out, and I’d frequently get scrambled lines making calls sound like Megatron having an orgasm under water. Not to mention the incredibly slow 3G internet.

              Optus tried blaming my phone, however after the TIO assisted in early contract termination, I’ve had no issues with the same phone on Telstra, and the only time I ever get the above issues now is on phone calls with Optus customers.

  • [–]

    Flux

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    See, this is something I’m looking out for – I’ve got friends and relatives looking for new phones who I think would really rather like WP7, but there just hasn’t been a handset I could bring myself to recommend them. Sounds like this is a pretty decent unit, but I haven’t been keeping my eye on the news like some of you. So an honest question for WP types, is this the one to wait for? Or is there something better around the corner?

  • [–]

    pv

    Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 1:08 AM

    just a repackaged N9 in MS software and upped the chip by 0.2 ghz, the rest remain constant.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Sunday, January 29, 2012 at 4:38 PM

      No, it is not. It has had some N9 features removed and others changed. It just happens to use the same casing but it is a very different piece of hardware.

Join The Discussion