
Charles Henderson, a professor of geoscience at the University of Calgary, led the study that pinpointed more precisely than ever exactly when (252 million years ago) and for how long (about 20,000 years) the mass extinction happened.
The time frame, Henderson says, suggests the cause was massive volcano eruptions and the resulting carbon dioxide release from a region known as the Siberian Traps. Similar carbon dioxide releases have occurred before in Earth’s history, and there’s no reason it couldn’t happen again.
“Certainly, the current concerns over global warming are related to greenhouse gases and we have become the ‘new volcano,’” Henderson told me in an email. “Our study suggests that in the case of the End Permian extinction, high levels of CO2 were persistently detrimental to life for at least 20,000 years in order to achieve this largest extinction in Earth’s history.”
Henderson and a team of researchers studied 23 geological sites and 1500 species of marine fossils. In particular, the teeth of tiny eel-like creatures called conodonts that lived in the Arctic and Western Canada provided a relative time scale based on their changing shape over time. They also looked at rocks and crystals, Henderson said:
We also correlated layers by determining the stable carbon isotopic signature of the rocks and this was very important to show the rapid environmental deterioration. … the absolute dates that were essential for this study were determined by the radioactive clocks found within tiny zircon crystals (about 0.1mm) that are found in numerous volcanic ash layers interbedded with the fossiliferous layers.
They used mass spectrometry to determine stable isotopic ratios and radioactive ages. And they studied the fossil species using a computer program called CONOP9, created by Pete Sadler at the University of California at Riverside.
It’s kind of a big deal study that shows greenhouse gases can and did kill the earth. But a cataclysmic event like the one in the Permian isn’t the only way it could happen. Enough years of carbon emissions will do the trick.
[Science]


















Que
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 9:54 AMThis comment has been deemed inappropriate [Arm Chair Editor] and has been deleted
Jaymz
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 11:40 AMI’m hoping for the sake of consistency you also posted this on the story about sea-sponges, sour lollies and hydroponics. Otherwise you’d just look irrational.
Matt
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM+1
I also don’t understand the ‘Occupy’ reference? Is it supposed to be some sort of insult? I have a lot of respect for those people.
Oh wait, I just realised you get all your information from mainstream news sources so you thought it was an insult.
Que
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM‘Respect for these people’. OK everyone back away very slowly,…
Steve
Saturday, November 19, 2011 at 1:25 PMMy experience is that anti-science morons like you are the ones to back away from. I’m very much into reading the occasional science article on this site, so why don’t you just stomp off to achtung.com for the latest head-in-the-sand article denying global warming and leave Gizmodo to post whatever factual science articles they like. Ya Vole?
Pat
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 10:04 AMWhat is a “mass distinction”?
me2
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 10:05 AMEveryone couldn’t go outside which resulted in the “mass distinction” by students who had no choice but to study…
Ron Van Wegen
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 10:27 AMIt’s articles like this that make me want to stop reading this site.
Ben White
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 11:16 AMhttp://cl.ly/3W3d1I3l0v3x0G0K2p1J
Relax.
Tim
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 11:46 AMIgnore the detractors Ben, Conservatives (for some reason known as Liberals here) don’t believe in science and do not see a correlation between science and technology.
Although i take issue with “can and did kill the earth” if it killed the earth we wouldn’t be here but it can alter the environment to be very unpleasant for/kill life.
Que
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 12:00 PMWell argued. There are no conservatives in science or technology.
You sir are a twit
Que
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 11:26 AMI agree
Jaymz
Friday, November 18, 2011 at 12:05 PM…Why?