Giz Tests A Remote-Controlled Flying Shark [Video]

Gizmodo AU

Ah, sharks. Those natural predators of the air, known for their nesting habits, not to mention their habit of swooping through the air to attack their sky-based prey. OK, that doesn’t sound much like a shark. But what about a flying shark?

I’ve wanted to test one of these things out for a good long while now, but particularly this month. All month long, I’ve been writing about exploding sharks as part of NaNoWriMo. So given the chance to blow one up for real, I jumped at it. Our review shark was provided by LatestBuy, who sell either an inflatable shark or clown fish for $49.95. Batteries aren’t included, but then neither is helium; any good party or flower store should be able to inflate the shark, but it’s worth noting that this is a big balloon, and they will charge a fair bit for it; our inflation at a party store in Wynyard was a hefty $20.

A couple of words of warning beyond the cost, though.

The instructions are terrible. Really quite poor, and to add insult to injury (and there was one trying to get into the battery compartment of the remote control) some of the printed areas on the shark were upside down, adding to the confusion. There’s also a word to describe the build quality of some of the shark’s parts, and that word is poor. The counterweight and motor section that hangs underneath the shark are made from the cheapest plastic possible, as is the switch. We ended up adding quite a bit of tape to the shark in order to keep some bits on, as well as a bulldog clip to add extra weight to keep him down.

Was the shark fun? Yeah; I think it’d be hard to say that we weren’t having fun (while productivity around the office dropped to an all-time low) flying a shark around the office. That being said, at $49.95 for the shark and then the cost of the helium on top of it, it’s not exactly inexpensive fun. [LatestBuy]

Discuss

(20 Comments)
  • [–]

    Timmahh

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:28 AM

    Shark week on PayTV this week.. just a coincidence, I’m sure?
    Sounds like the developers are getting them built for the lowest cost possible, maybe too low though!

    • [–]

      Alex Kidman

      Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM

      I don’t have PayTV, so I can say in all honesty that yes, that is just a coincidence.

      Although from when I did — isn’t it Shark week at least once a month on Pay TV?

      • [–]

        Timmahh

        Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM

        Heh, yeah seems that way to me to :)

  • [–]

    chugs

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM

    what, no Christmas decorations in the office??

    • [–]

      Alex Kidman

      Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:46 AM

      What, a flying tiger and flying shark don’t count as decorations?

    • [–]

      MDolley

      Friday, November 25, 2011 at 12:02 PM

      The 2010 Doctor Who Christmas special featured a flying shark so this totally counts

  • [–]

    awallafashagba

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM

    This thing was on Catch of the day for $29 – the only thing that stopped me buying was the lack of helium … thanking myself now that i didnt

  • [–]

    Paula Lay

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 12:10 PM

    My boyfriend bought this off catch of the day as well, yet to use it. By the way, it’s also best to keep helium filled sharks away from water (put a bag over them on rainy days). Unlike their underwater cousins, water shortens their lifetime.

  • [–]

    Andrew

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 12:16 PM

    Helium? Pfft. Helium is for wimps. HYDROGEN, now there’s a gas!

    • [–]

      Danny Allen

      Friday, November 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM

      Seconded. What could go wrong?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster

      • [–]

        Alex Kidman

        Friday, November 25, 2011 at 12:45 PM

        Hey, Danny, can I fill the shark with petrol now? It’d make an even better video. I could weight it down with C4 to stop it floating away…

        • [–]

          Andrew

          Friday, November 25, 2011 at 1:29 PM

          You also forgot the obstacle course consisting of flaming rings of fire ..like what a real shark would encounter on a daily basis. :)

      • [–]

        Sam

        Friday, November 25, 2011 at 1:34 PM

        It’s a common misunderstanding is that Hydrogen was the accelerant in the Hindenburg disaster (it was the official reason, and only debunked a few years back). The accelerant was actually dope (the lacquer used to seal the envelope and ballonets). Eyewitness accounts all say Hindenburg burnt with an orange flame; hydrogen burns blue.

        • [–]

          Flux

          Friday, November 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM

          Thanks for pointing this out, Sam – I’m often amazed at how persistent some myths can be!

  • [–]

    maddogeco

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 1:36 PM

    The real question is what will kill the humans first? Robot, Zombies or freaken sky sharks!!!

  • [–]

    brrr

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM

    What? No lasers?

  • [–]

    p2k

    Friday, November 25, 2011 at 7:25 PM

    I got one of these off of ozstock a few weeks ago. Good fun but it definitely needs heavier reinforcement with tape to keep the fins and motor track on.

    Spotlight also sells helium cannisters with 30 balloons for between $40 and $50. I’ve found you can get 3-4 sharks out of one cannister.

  • [–]

    Michael

    Saturday, November 26, 2011 at 12:15 AM

    you can get these for 20 bucks of dealextreme, makes it a bit better value

  • [–]

    klaw81

    Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 4:13 PM

    Needs helium for lift? Pffft. This one runs an electric ducted fan, and can do aerobatics. http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=13424

  • [–]

    Scott

    Friday, December 2, 2011 at 2:41 AM

    This sharks going for $25.00 on oBaz.com, check it out https://www.obaz.com/deals/156 So cheap!

Join The Discussion