I woke up this morning excited to discover that the GTA V trailer was out… and that I could get an interactive encyclopaedia of all things Doctor Who for iPad. My excitement, sadly, abated all too quickly.
I’m a huge (and entirely unashamed) Doctor Who nerd. Fanboy. Geek. Call me what you will (and worse), the chances are if it’s got a TARDIS stuck somewhere on it, I’m going to get excited by it.

At one level, the Encyclopaedia is excellent; it gets the idea of a touch interface down pat and mixes it with impressive visuals for an enjoyable browsing experience. Contextual links are sensibly placed, and it’s easy to browse through the content on offer. Yes, it’s iOS only, but I can’t see a specific reason why this couldn’t run on Android for what that’s worth. My problem’s not with the layout, but the content and pricing.

$7.49 is pretty cheap for an Encyclopaedia, but there’s a catch. That covers some 800-odd entries, but they’re entirely based around the eleventh Doctor’s run. If you want David Tennant’s entries, that’s another $7.49. Christopher Ecclestone’s content? Another $7.49, please.
Those other chaps — you know, Messrs Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Baker, Davison, Baker, McCoy or McGann? Don’t exist.

For my money, an encyclopedia — even one that comes in distinct parts — should cover all that could be known about a subject. We’re only a couple of years off Doctor Who being fifty years old, so treating it like it’s only been going for seven years is a bit off-putting for a purist like me.

It gets even worse than that, though — look up a long-running series stalwart like, say, the Silurians, and there’s no mention of their first appearance at all; just the new series stuff. It’s not like the author (and former editor of Doctor Who Magazine) Gary Russell is ignorant of Who history after all, but then he’s almost certainly written the tome against a commission from the BBC, who clearly want to push the new series — and only the new series — for all it’s worth.



















Jahn
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:13 PMWell that was a big drop from Excited to WTF!
Guest
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:16 PMAgreed…
David
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 11:30 PMAgreed. I would have bought it on sight. Now, not a hope.
Rick
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:25 PMThank you for the heads up. This is something I probably would have picked up on a whim. Now I’m not going anywhere near it.
Bill
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:32 PMSo disappointed. Saw the headline and got excited. But then I read your review and there’s no way I will pay for an app like this that totally disregards all of the Who-niverse.
Adam
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:35 PMReally? I bought the Encyclopedia last night, and only had to pay $7.49 for it.. So far haven’t come across any IAP at all :/. Admittedly I haven’t delved too deep yet.
Roachless
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 2:43 PMI will still buy it.
While I have seen bits and peices of the old series, I am still very much a “New Who” fan. I was never interested in the old until I got hooked on the new.. Bit annoyed we have to pay that much for EACH doctor though. I think I will skip the 9th Doctor purchase. Maybe if it goes on special…
Luke
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 4:29 PMIf BBC produced it, then that explains the extreme overpricing of it
sparhawk0
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 4:43 PMCome on, Alex. The Beeb knows that obessive completist fans will pay pretty much any price for this kind of stuff, in whatever form they can get it.
You know what they say, a fool and his money are soon… ooh, Krillitane!
Alex Kidman
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 8:40 PMI’d like to deny that. But the number of Peter Haining books on my bookshelf would instantly put a lie to that denial…
Aliasalpha
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 9:10 PMHeh who knew that even encyclopedias (encyclopediae?) would have “should have been on the disc” DLC?
Richard O'Neill
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 9:52 PMIt’s a new series encyclopedia. I would have thought the fact that there are only pictures of Eccleston, Tennant and Smith on the cover would have made that obvious.
Ozoneocean
Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 10:25 PMNothing after McCoy is Dr Who, so this is absolutely worthless. :(