Doctor Who: The Movie (Again!)

Gizmodo AU

I might be a bit busy for the rest of the day. I’ve got to march on Hollywood with a burning torch, and I’m told that’s a rather long and wet walk from Sydney. The reason for my outrage? Hollywood’s planning a series of Doctor Who films. History suggests they’ll be anything but good.

Variety reports that David Yates — director of the last four Harry Potter films — is working on developing Doctor Who as a big screen franchise.

Just stop it. Now. Yes, it’s horribly unfair to dismiss a project that doesn’t even have a proper script yet, but if history is any judge, this won’t end well, if it ends up happening at all.

The last time the US got its hands on Doctor Who proper, it made Doctor Who: The Movie. Poor Paul McGann… although now that I think about it, he probably was paid pretty handsomely for the role. More recently, the US version of Torchwood, Miracle Day, was… long. That’s about as nice as I can get describing it, especially when children might be reading.

The Variety article quotes Yates as saying this wouldn’t be a continuation of the TV series

“Russell T. Davies and then Steven Moffat have done their own transformations, which were fantastic, but we have to put that aside and start from scratch”

The last time Doctor Who was in the cinemas with a “fresh” approach? That’d be the pair of Peter Cushing Doctor Who movies, which were at least UK helmed, but aside from being interesting period pieces, were never terribly good. Then again, Doctor Who film projects have been kicked around by the BBC for decades. It may well come to nothing. I can hold onto that hope, can’t I?

Oh, who am I kidding? I’ll be lining up to watch this once it hits the silver screen. I just know it. [Variety]
Image: Shining.Darkness

Discuss

(17 Comments)
  • [–]

    BenDTU

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:17 AM

    Why they can’t just do a feature length movie as a massive-budget episode of the series is beyond me.

    • [–]

      Palms

      Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:21 AM

      They should make the Christmas special movie length.

    • [–]

      olearymo

      Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:22 AM

      Maybe because it’s not just about big budget? They have this thing called plot.

      • [–]

        BenDTU

        Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 12:02 PM

        I guess that’s why they pulled Davis in to help.

        /rimshot

        • [–]

          olearymo

          Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM

          who?

  • [–]

    Jaezass

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM

    Why can’t they use their current setup? Sending the doc to Hollywood is a mistake! Also if they do they need another Doctor, because Matt Smith’s face looks like a smashed crab, yeah I know, I shouldn’t be so silly, but seriously… smashed crab!!

    • [–]

      olearymo

      Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 12:06 PM

      while your face is just a testament to all that is beauty?

      • [–]

        Jaezass

        Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM

        Mate, I’ve seen a lot of your comments and for the most part you come across as an angry little man, who has a negative opinion about just about everything! Do me a favour and don’t reply to my comments any more, unless of course you develop a sense of humour in the meantime!

        • [–]

          CraftyNinja

          Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 2:11 PM

          Mate,
          you need to learn to relax, Olearymo’s comment was acerbic, yet funny.

          And for the record, I like Matt Smith’s portrayal of the doctor.

          • [–]

            olearymo

            Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 9:45 AM

            Also, agreed, Matt Smith is the best Doctor yet. It’s amazing, every time there’s a new Doctor I’m like “oh he’ll suck I miss Eccleston/Tennant”, but then the new one always grows on me!

            Good ole crabface. (Seriously come on, he’s not the weirdest looking guy).

        • [–]

          olearymo

          Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 9:44 AM

          You said someone looks ugly, and I called into question your own looks in response to your apparently harsh judgement. Maybe your sense of humour needs development? Responding to me with ‘look who’s talking!’ would probably have been more in keeping with having a fun, humourous atmosphere.

          But getting your back up and calling me an ‘angry little man’… goodness, take a chill pill.

    • [–]

      Titsnass

      Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 2:50 PM

      Hah, that is one ugly mug I agree, but I don’t mind the guy as the Doctor.

  • [–]

    Shane

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 11:09 AM

    From what I understand, it’s meant to celerbrating the 25th anniversery of DW…with a limited series instead…hmm, I know what I would prefer…

    • [–]

      dj_salinger

      Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 1:22 PM

      I think you mean 50th anniversary.

  • [–]

    smith

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    If they’re going to screw it up, let’s do it good and proper. Bring back Martha and Rose and make Charlie’s Angels:Doctor Who edition.

  • [–]

    chrisp

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 7:31 PM

    My Lei, Abu Ghraib, the remake of Being Human, Merryl Streep as Lindy Chaimberlain…. no evil that the USA has visited on the rest of humanity matches this. Not even if they throw in a nekkid Amy Pond scene.

    • [–]

      olearymo

      Friday, November 18, 2011 at 9:41 AM

      now, now, let’s not be rash. Let’s, um, consider that… scenario… carefully…

Join The Discussion