Pictures Show How Good New Photoshop Deblurring Can Be

Our brains melted when Adobe demoed their upcoming blurry picture killer in Photoshop. Wha!? No more blurry pics? Is that possible? Is this real life? YES. Here are a few examples — including the most famous blurry picture — of the upcoming deblurring tool working its magic.

The newly deblurred photos are being shown off by Jue Wang (the guy who demoed the deblurring feature) and he’s soliciting images to test Photoshop’s new tool with. Remember, the deblurring tool only kills camera shake — they can’t yet deal with motion blur or defocus blur. Also, their research on deblurring is ongoing so it’s very possible that new techniques will allow for even better deblurring. Which is crazy, as it’s already out of this freaking world. Creating reality out of thin air. Anyways! On to the examples. [Juew.org via PetaPixel]

The original picture was captured by Robert Capa and it’s probably the most famous blurry picture ever — it is a snapshot of D-Day, after all. Wang says that the image makes for a great ‘extreme’ test because the picture quality is so poor. He goes on to talk about the new non-blurry image:

It recovers some details that you won’t be able to see easily in the original. Of course the noise gets boosted somehow, we applied a small amount of noise removal on the output, but maybe a decent denoising algorithm can help here.

How the deblurring tool works is that Photoshop measures the “blur kernel” which tracks how much the camera moved while taking the picture. In this picture’s case, the blur kernel shows the camera moving 55 pixels long. According to Wang:

[That]means to recover a single pixel, we have to consider at least 55 pixel nearby (in practice far more than that).

This deblurring thing is just amazing.

Awesome. Read more about Wang, learn more about the upcoming Photoshop Deblurring Tool and see more pictures of it in action here.

Discuss

(21 Comments)
  • [–]

    wsDK_II

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 8:45 AM

    I think what you mean is “less blury pics”. they are still blury but are not bad!

    • [–]

      Priggle

      Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 10:44 AM

      +1

    • [–]

      Antipodean

      Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 11:45 AM

      Better than the original is still a pretty good outcome. Sure, there’s still some artefacts but it’s still good stuff. Cant wait to get hold of the next version of PS personally.

  • [–]

    Matt

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 9:09 AM

    Not bad, but also not fantastic.

    • [–]

      Ozoneocean

      Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM

      The fact that it works at all is fantastic. This is excellent!

      • [–]

        Antipodean

        Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 2:27 PM

        +1

  • [–]

    Stuii

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 9:17 AM

    so what happens if you take a slightly above average pic and run the deblurer?

  • [–]

    Kyle

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 9:40 AM

    This feature is practically useless

    • [–]

      Ozoneocean

      Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 1:36 PM

      On the contrary! Anyone who has to do anything with photos in a professional sense will find this tremendously useful!
      You’d normally just simply throw out slightly blurry images as useless and unrecoverable- it is almost impossible to manually edit out blur, certainly far too much trouble to bother with. With this deblur feature you can make use of a LOT more of your images.

      This would also be fantastic for reprocessing old films, and if it could be done on the fly this would be awesome in TVs for improving picture quality from low-res sources.

      • [–]

        Antipodean

        Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 2:31 PM

        Agreed, the possibilities are endless, you could restore an otherwise useless old photo from days of yore, and make them relevant, restore that blurry old picture of a relative that had no other photos,.. simply endless.

      • [–]

        Simon

        Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 11:04 PM

        I deal with photographs professionally and whilst I can see the advantage in fixing substandard happy snap images, if I was sent an image similar to the “fixed” ones shown here or in the demo that Adobe has run I would sack the photographer!

  • [–]

    chris

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 10:18 AM

    that is awesome! i can’t believe you all expected crystal clear photos as a result. You have to be realistic, and that is better than i thought would have been possible.
    Pretty damn impressive if you ask me

    • [–]

      Fenix

      Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 10:46 AM

      Yeah exactly, sometimes you have an image that’s the tiniest bit blurry (shutter was too slow or you moved mid shoot). I think it could work really well for these situations.

      In fact, I’m happy that this tool isn’t going to magically fix every noobs blurry photo.

  • [–]

    cleverclogs

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 12:00 PM

    Zoom to grid D7! Enhance! Enhance!

    • [–]

      Jake

      Tuesday, November 1, 2011 at 1:53 PM

      Hehehe

  • [–]

    amy

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 1:57 PM

    What if you kept on applying the ‘less blur’ script on the same image; will you get a perfect looking image?

  • [–]

    Arcane

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 6:49 PM

    Adobe should just use this on a load of blurry UFO pictures and find out what they really are.

  • [–]

    Perri

    Thursday, October 27, 2011 at 12:55 AM

    Be a professional and take good photographs the first time. If you don’t know how to use your camera to the point where you can’t eliminate blur, put it down.

    • [–]

      Mitch Bus

      Monday, October 31, 2011 at 6:29 AM

      What if they have a disability of some sort? Like a mild form of Parkinson’s, or essential tremor?

    • [–]

      Jake

      Tuesday, November 1, 2011 at 1:55 PM

      I imagine you hold your camera perfectly still every time the shutter opens as you appear to be quite dense. Good on you pal.

    • [–]

      poita

      Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM

      Yeah, I guess you never took a blurry picture, or have kids, or had a perfect shot but not quite enough time to grab it and it came out blurry. I guess if you are perfect you don’t need photoshop at all, you would get the exposure and saturation so perfect and could control the weather, so you just print straight from your camera and never do any adjustments of any kind. Kudos to you sir.

Join The Discussion