
OHKI’s 3D TV 42-inch screen uses an LG panel. It weighs in at 18kg and measures 26cm deep and 70cm tall. It has a built-in tuner, two USB ports, three HDMI ports and comes with one HDMI cable. The real sweetener is in the built-in PVR functionality, which allows you to record any TV program onto an external hard drive, as well as pause and rewind live TV without having to purchase a separate PVR unit.
Compared with the $3000 Sony Bravia 3D TV in our office, you can see where OHKI made compromises to hit that sub-$700 price point. The full HD (1920×1080 resolution) display shows signs of minor light leaking, but we were quite impressed by the bright, sharp 2D images, and the sound coming out of the speakers is more than satisfactory. The blacks are pretty average, but that’s somewhat expected on an LCD screen lacking LED backlighting. OHKI includes a generous four pairs of 3D glasses, but they don’t sell any additional pairs. If you ever need more, you can use the RealD glasses you get from the cinemas. Four pairs should be enough to be getting started with, but what they make up for in quantity they lack in quality; the glasses are very basic in both design and function, and it didn’t take much for them to fall off my face. Glasses wearers should note that they will fit, but they weren’t as comfortable as Sony’s active shutter glasses that we’ve got in the office.
The great thing about the passive 3D technology that OHKI uses in this TV is that even though it tends to make for a less immersive 3D experience, you don’t have to deal with the annoying flicker that you get with more expensive active shutter 3D glasses. Despite having a standard 178-degree viewing angle, you’ll have to seat yourself directly in front of the screen at a distance of no more than a metre or two to get the best 3D image.
If you want a decent 2D TV with 3D functionality for the odd occasion, and you’re not too picky about the 3D picture quality, the OHKI 3D TV will get the job done. It comes with a 12-month warranty, and they’re throwing in free delivery to anywhere in Australia. But if you have the coin to spend, invest it on something with a faster refresh rate and higher contrast ratio for deeper blacks and brighter whites. Your head and your heart (and your eyes!) will thank you for it. [OHKI]




















light487
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 10:08 AM“you’ll have to seat yourself directly in front of the screen at a distance of no more than a metre or two to get the best 3D image.”
That’s pretty close… even when I am gaming I don’t sit that close, though I do tend to sit closer when I am gaming than when I am just watching a flick.
Sam
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 11:28 AMWas thinking that myself and was going to comment on it. Seems you beat me to the punch!
Ben
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 10:14 AMThere is a Samsung 51″ FullHD Samsung 3D plasma for $799 at Myer at the moment. D550 is the model I believe.
I would much rather buy that.
Sam
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 11:33 AMYeah, but it’s plasma. Sure their purchase price is cheaper, but they suck through power like nothing else, and the advantages of plasma over LED/LCD are no where near as great as they once were!
…Arguably though, choosing Samsung over OHKI could be advisable!
Nicholas
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 12:14 PMI thought the power consumption difference between the technologies had become pretty small, but I don’t have anything to back me up on that :/
I too would MUCH prefer the Samsung. We’ve got an older sammy plasma and it really is very pretty.
glennc
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 5:27 PM“Yeah, but it’s plasma.” this is a good thing. 3D sucks on LCD/LED whatever. We are talking 3D TVs here. the power differences are not as bad as when i bought my plasma. when i buy a TV picture quality always comes first.
however you look at it this TV can’t come close to the Samsung.
Buying a TV is rarely “you get what you pay for” and more “you get what you researched”. Plasma beats out LED/LCD in every way but power usage and that isn’t so bad (oh, and weight). why is it that 90% or the knowing world thinks LED is better yet the other 10% (the experts) say otherwise. it is because the king of marketing stopped selling plasma, i.e. Sony… nothing more. Now 3D has arrived they don’t have shit to compete with Pana/Sammy.
Sam
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM…The real sweetener is in the built-in PVR functionality, which allows you to record any TV program onto an external hard drive, as well as pause and rewind live TV without having to purchase a separate PVR unit…
True, however in my experience, most sets that offer this feature do so with only one tuner included, so you can only record the same channel that you’re watching.
…The blacks are pretty average, but that’s somewhat expected on an LCD screen lacking LED backlighting…
In a budget unit such as this, I’d say the fact it’s only CCFL LCD is potentially a good thing.
LED LCD is still in its (relative) infancy, and has a long way to progress. I’ve heard bad things about a lot of cheaper models featuring edge lit LED, versus the more expensive back lit LEDs that other brands are beginning to use more. CCFL LCD on the other hand has been around a helluva long time and has come about as far as it will. While arguably the technology is at the end of its life, it’s far more developed and stable than LED LCD is.
…But if you have the coin to spend, invest it on something with a faster refresh rate…
You failed to mention what the refresh rate is ;) I presume it’s 50 Hz.
Again, I wouldn’t be quick to strike this feature as being a negative. With TV, DVD and BluRay all natively 50 Hz having a screen which has the same refresh rate is the only way to ensure you’re getting the picture as it was originally intended.
100 Hz and 200 Hz TV’s do allow some level of artificial clarity, but do so by blending previous and future frames to fill in the void where previously there was none. The quality of the panel isn’t going to make any difference if the image processor included in the TV is cheaply made and badly programmed. On a budget TV like the OHKI, sticking with 50 Hz ensures the picture isn’t modified, and stays clear.
Also, that remote is hideous! Those buttons look seriously uncomfortable to use!
Water Bear
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 2:04 PMIn regard to the refresh rate, follow the links, its 60hz.
Sam
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 2:39 PM60 Hz is an NTSC standard, which is downward compatible with 50 Hz (PAL standard which we still use in Australia).
Most manufacturers these days produce TVs that meet both 50/60 Hz specifications, so they supply to a global market.
Water Bear
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 3:40 PMThat is entirely uninteresting. Thanks
light487
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 1:13 PMThe article also fails to mention the butt-ugly remote control :)
It really is ugly and I personally wouldn’t want it seen on the coffee table.
sandy
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 4:51 PMbought one of these a few weeks back. I find sitting about 3 metres from the screen best for 3D. For 699 I can’t fault it. Very happy with the TV and was delivered within 48 hours for free
bryan
Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 9:32 AMbought 42 ohki but i need code so i can use samung 8500 remote to control tv