
So the iPhone 4S has been announced, and the big question is: is it worth upgrading if you’re already an iPhone owner? Gizmodo’s editor Alex Kidman is an Apple enthusiast; Lifehacker’s editor Angus Kidman less so. But when it comes to this upgrade, they’re surprisingly in agreement on the main points.
Lifehacker: Alex, you’re a long-term iPhone user. Leaving aside your professional need to play with the latest hardware, would you be tempted to upgrade to the iPhone 4S?
Gizmodo: It’s an interesting question, although it should be noted that we’re something of an odd couple to discuss it; it seems unlikely you’d ever use an iPhone, and my day to day phone is a Samsung Galaxy S II right now. But then, I never moved up to the iPhone 4 from the 3GS; my 3GS is now my wife’s phone, and I’ve been pondering for a while whether it’d be worth jumping back to iOS when the next phone came out. There is some stuff to like in that arrangement; clearly there’s less to be wowed about if you’re already an iPhone 4 user.
LH: Yes, that’s the nub of it. If you’re one of the many, many people I know who were on a two-year contract for the 3GS and were waiting for that to run out before jumping on the upgrade bandwagon, then there’s no particular reason not to move to the 4S. But if you’re only halfway through a two-year contract, it hardly seems worth paying it out purely to get access to an improved camera and the ability to issue commands in an American accent to your phone. (Yes, I know the claim is that it’s Australian “voice ready” but the same claim was made about Android; I’ll believe it when I see it.)

To be fair, the other big hardware change is the switch to some kind of multiple antenna/frequency approach. I didn’t watch the whole launch presentation; what’s your take on that aspect for upgraders?
G: What, you need sleep, or something? That’s what coffee abuse is for. That aside, the ‘world phone’ aspect of the iPhone 4S is arguably of minimal impact for most Australian users, unless you do a lot of travelling and plan to do a lot of swapping out of MicroSIMs. There simply isn’t a CDMA network in Australia for users to hook into, and frankly if you are someone who’s going to need that CDMA access (predominantly those who travel to the US a lot and for some reason want to use the CDMA networks there), I’d say (without access to the carrier pricing, which we’ll presumably get in fairly short order) that buying outright would be your better bet anyway; less stuffing around with either roaming or unlocking issues.
The outright pricing is pretty much in line with what Apple’s charged for iPhones in the past; I paid slightly more outright for a 3GS some years ago. My accountant still weeps openly about that.

Voice commands? I’ve got to be honest here; I don’t want to shout at my phone (any phone — be it Android, Windows Phone, whatever) in a public place per se, and I always tend to file voice commands in the same slot as handwriting recognition, simply because it so rarely works.
The other big hardware shift is the camera phone and inclusion of HSDPA for faster data access. Those are the hardware features I’d buy an iPhone for — or to keep my accountant happy, go onto a contract for. Perhaps.
I wrote yesterday that the iPhone launch should matter to Android users, and copped a LOT of flak for it. That’s fine (I’ve got a thick skin), but oddly in retrospect, I still reckon that’s right. But for slightly different reasons; Apple has brought itself up to speed with its competition, and that opens up a window of opportunity for the next big thing, if Android, Blackberry or Windows Mobile can pull it off. Do you reckon iPhone users (leaving the fanatics aside) might shift platforms?
LH: I’ll note in passing that a footnote on the Apple site says that “CDMA only available if iPhone 4S is sold and activated for use on a CDMA network”, so I’m not sure that option will work well even for the world traveller scenario.
I have encountered quite a few people this year who switched from iPhone 3GS to Android because they couldn’t see sufficient difference with the iPhone 4, and I guess that thinking will persist for some of them. One thing Apple hasn’t done is make any serious push towards the price-conscious end of the market ($449 for a 3GS is still too much for a lot of people), which is one area where Android has made some major inroads. So I wouldn’t be surprised if the uptake for 4S isn’t quite as broad as we’ve seen in the past. But don’t get me wrong; this thing is still going to sell bucketloads.
On reflection, it also makes sense for Apple to ease up a little on the “here’s a brand new phone every year” schtick, if only because of the 24-month contract requirement. If the iPhone 5 hits in 2012, a lot of people will jump straight across from their existing iPhone 4 contract. Happy carriers, happy Apple. But it definitely leaves a gap for 3GS owners who came in late and haven’t yet shifted, and that (I guess) is where other manufacturers will take aim.
G: Absolutely. I suspect the survival of the 3GS in the local market has a lot more to do with the ‘free’ status it’s going to enjoy in the US than any desire to sell new 3GS models; it’ll quickly be shuffled to the side in most Apple stores, the same way that the iPod Classic is. It’s feasible, I guess, that one of the low-cost carriers might grab it as a real bargain basement model, but the profit margins would have to be quite slim there.
Clearly there’s a market for the diehard fans who want the latest and greatest, and it’s also worth noting that people are very good at losing and breaking smartphones of every stripe; Apple may do well there. It’s not quite Apple’s fault that the iPhone 4S didn’t live up to the rumour hype — Apple itself never promised an iPhone 5 — and it’s clear that the company is on a softly-softly approach with this particular generation of iPhone. We still don’t know the carrier plan pricing, although it’s a fair guess it won’t change much to speak of, given Apple’s outright pricing. That’ll shift opinions one way or another — my own included.



















Jeneiva
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 11:33 AMInteresting round ups of iPhone 4.5. BTW, are Alex and Angus related?
light487
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 12:58 PMYes, they are.. :)
Tim
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 12:15 PMI’m trying to work out why so many people are having a problem with the fact that it’s not the iphone 5, the point is that Apple has been making only major upgrades every second year, fitting nicely into contract periods.
I am unfortunately on contract in the in-between years, but feel that I’m better off not getting the first of the ‘new’ models (case in point, probs with iphone 4) anyway.
The competition (Android) is doing well, but Apple realises they don’t need to reinvent the wheel every single year, they just need to keep improving.
Why do people expect to upgrade their phone every year when they’re on a 2 year contract?
Damo
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:44 PMMy single issue is that it doens’t have a larger screen. If everything else was identical but the screen size I would leap at it. As it is I’ll wait for (hopefully) June.
Spanky Mc G
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 12:36 PMAny idea what the “Proximity sensor” (quoting Apple website), which i’m guessing is in that bit above the handset speaker…
Why is there no mention of this anywhere?
What will it be used for on the iphone?
olearymo
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:41 PMAre you kidding? The proximity sensor has been there since the very first iPhone. It detects when the phone’s against your face, and turns off the screen for you to avoid accidental touches.
Wok
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:16 PMErr, it’s been over a year since iPhone 4…
Shepard
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:25 PMErr, not everyone upgrades on release date
Adam
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:46 PMIm getting myself a Galaxy s2 today. And will laugh at my friends if they get this phone. If you want something revolutionary, wait for the next Nexus, or Galaxy, they are going to legendary :).
Another Aaron
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:07 PMDo you have a big mole on your chin in real life or only in emoticons?
i’ve got a pretty big nose so I always use a hyphen, like so :-)
Matt L
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:14 PMI’ve always wanted to know if an emoticon is a valid punctuation mark… It clearly defines an attitude towards the sentence which contains it and can change the meaning of the sentence just like a question mark would… Are you the bloke who controls the english language?.
Ash
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 11:11 AMHe probably isnt, but are you the guy who ponders or debates useless thoughts?
Matt L
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 12:33 PMUseless thought? Do you think it’s valid that emoticons may become useful in literature? Actually… I correct that, emoticons ARE useful in literature. Someday they’ll teach it to children in primary school… But emoticons are so good, that they probably wouldn’t even need to teach that to children… However, when people look back at our history, they’re going to recognize the emoticons, and they aren’t going to be confused by it…. So… Where should it stand in formal literature? No where… Yet… And yes… I am the guy that ponders random shit most of the time… The rest of the time I’m spending is with your mum. (Your mum jokes are also going to be recognized my historians of the future). And just to note, I’ve noticed you’re just the guy who just comes here to troll other comments in the most typical troll like way possible.
Matt
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 1:56 PMThe amount of errors in this article is quite alarming.
To me, the most shocking mistake would be that you were asked about the dual antenna system and fobbed it off because Australia doesn’t have a CDMA network. That’s true, but that’s not what the dual antenna system is about at all.
The dual antenna system refers to the iPhone 4S’s technology that switches a radio signal between its two exterior antennas to provide better reception. That’s potentially a killer feature. As someone who works in a retail position at a Telco, the biggest complaint I get about the iPhone is the reception. It could swing a lot of customers Apple’s way.
Another major mistake – you said, “the other big hardware shift is the camera phone and inclusion of HSDPA for faster data access.” The iPhone 4 has always had HSDPA. The “hardware shift” is the inclusion of 14.4mbps HSPA+. HSPA+ will be a big deal until LTE really gets going in Australia. With 14.4mbps HSPA+ on Telstra’s NextG network, the iPhone 4S could get incredible data speeds. And other telcos (Vodafone at least) will be switching on HSPA+ later this year.
This is exactly why I read Giz US and only check in for some local news occasionally on Giz AU. Come on guys, try a little harder.
Alex Kidman
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:10 PMiPhone 4S is (as per Apple’s own tech specs sheet for the phone) HSDPA. I’m not going to argue with them about their own toys before I’ve had a chance to break them!
Given the whole antenna issues of the 4, I’d expect the next model to do better (and they did learn with CDMA versions, anyway). CDMA is the thing they’re focusing on in videos, during the presentation, etc — so that’s what I commented on as well.
Matt
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:17 PMYou referred to HSDPA on the iPhone 4S as a “hardware shift,” suggesting the inclusion of HSDPA was a new feature. The iPhone 4 ALWAYS had HSDPA. In fact, I’m quite sure the iPhone 3GS had HSDPA as well. The iPhone 4S on the other hand has HSPA+. I was just correcting your mistake. HSPA+ as opposed to HSDPA.
The iPhone 4S’ multiple antenna approach is a massive improvement. Like you said, the inclusion of a CDMA radio will literally mean nothing to most Australian customers, but the multiple antenna system is designed to offer improved reception. That’s a big deal, especially, like you said, given the issues Apple faced with the iPhone 4. Not mentioning it at all in response to a question about the iPhone 4S’ antenna just seemed like bad journalism to me and I was just having my 2 cents. As I understand, that is the purpose of having comments on a blog.
@Barii – see above. The iPhone 4S has HSPA+. Give your buddy google a whirl and see what that tells you. No point questioning it.
Alex Kidman
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:48 PMApple’s own specs on this are poorly laid out — but if you check http://www.apple.com/au/iphone/specs.html you’ll find that they list the 4S as HSDPA, not HSDPA+. Given the speeds suggested in the launch this morning, I suspect Apple’s just dropped the ball on its specs page (I made note of that in the meta liveblog this morning) in fact.
Matt
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:11 PMI understand that. But still, your article is wrong.
kaisnowy
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:32 PMWoah there Matt, I’m afraid you are wrong my sorry excuse for a retail telco employee (I sure hope your not working for my telco geez….perhaps its a very small one? Maybe located in Tasmania?) Alex Kidman is indeed correct, I myself watched the presentation via a live blog and unless my memory is wrong, it was shown that the IPhone 4S has a maximum download speed of 14mb/s, which is definately HSDPA. HSPDA+ my friend, has a max download of 42mb/s…..which is definately not what the IPhone 4 has…HSDPA+ is more like what Telstra are calling 4G dude…..so yeh, you are wrong…and watch out man, if you give your customers the wrong info, they might not be very happy….I know I wouldn’t be…
Source: HSDPA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Downlink_Packet_Access
HSPDA +
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSPA%2B
dmag87
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 8:58 PMnow now now, don’t bring poor little Tasmania into this. Matt does NOT sound like a Tasmanian. More like a Queenslander actually.
Matt
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 9:05 AMNo need be condescending buddy. I am definitely not wrong. I guarantee the iPhone 4S has HSPA+. There is no doubt in my mind what-so-ever. The figures you’re giving are hypothetical maximums and mean absolutely nothing. Every other reliable news source is reporting the iPhone 4S as sporting HSPA+.
And if you really don’t want to believe me that doesn’t really matter. That doesn’t change the fact that the article was wrong. The author implied the inclusion of HSDPA was a new feature (a “hardware shift”) when in fact even the iPhone 3G has HSDPA. No matter what way you look at it, this article is riddled with errors.
And get YOUR facts straight buddy. Telstra are NOT calling HSPA+ 4G and certainly never have. Telstra has had HSPA+ since 2009 if I remember correctly and has always just referred to it as a part of their NextG network. Telstra is rolling LTE which they are calling 4G (which, even then, is jumping the gun a little because LTE isn’t technically 4G).
Matt
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 9:13 AMAnd I won’t be wrongly informing my customers buddy, take a look at my very first comment. I’m 100% aware that the maximum speeds the iPhone 4S can achieve are 14.4mbps.
It’s not all about max data speeds mate. Just because the maximum hypothetical maximum speed that can be achieved using HSPA+ is 84mbps or something like that doesn’t mean all devices are built to handle that maximum speed.
Honestly, I have a feeling I’m going to keep being shot down as wrong here but I suppose I’ll just have the satisfied knowing I’m right.
Rick
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 9:47 PMThe way they described it during the keynote they’ve actually rolled their own faster version of HSDPA that is equivalent in speed to the HSDPA+ networks. The advantage of Apple’s solution being that you don’t need HSDPA+ coverage as the higher speeds should be achievable on regular HSDPA due to the use of dual antennae. I may be wrong here but that’s the impression I got from the keynote and I’m sure they’re not calling it HSDPA+ for a reason.
Barii
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:12 PMMate there is nothing wrong with it! iPhone 4S has a HSDPA not HSDPA+, do some research. and regarding the other info, the guys are writing it to make everyone understand “GENERAL PUBLIC” as Google Australia will definitely be placing Gizmodo on the top of its results!
say thanks or don’t say anything and stay with Giz US
kaisnowy
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:17 PMsorry, that second source link should read HSPA+
LKI
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 1:02 AM“… amount of errors …”
Try ‘number’. Nice error, btw.
z3d
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:06 PMwhat i don’t get, is that people were expecting an “iphone5″ instead of an “iphone4S”. What does that mean? what is the difference between the iphone3gs and iphone4? faster processor, better camera … major new features in the OS. the screen is not the biggest out there, but it is still one of, if not the best out there today. it just depends if you’re talking size or quality? Ultimately, are people just pissed off that it looks the same? or is it just the apple haters? I don’t see how the 3gs to the 4 was any bigger a jump. Perhaps Apple made the mistake of not calling it a 5.
ryxxi
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM……..screen pixel density, weight,shape,size,gorilla glass…..
z3d
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:46 PM…i think you were just about to make your point when…
John
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:40 PMI’m one of those unlucky buggers with a contract expiring at just the wrong time – April 2012 in my case. I was hoping to be upgrading from my 3GS to an iPhone 5 then, but instead the upgrade will be to a 4S.
3GS to 4S is a great upgrade, don’t get me wrong – but said upgrade will lock me into a two-year contract again six months (presumably) before the iPhone 5 comes out.
I’m assuming that upgrading an iPhone just six months into a two-year contract will be stupidly expensive (someone correct me if I’m wrong), so I may have to stick with my 3GS as a pay-as-you-go phone for six months.
Or is there a solution I haven’t worked out?
Fei
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:57 PMIf you’re keen on the iPhone 5, I would keep your 3GS contract for the six months or so until it’s released then change/upgrade your plan.
Ftruck
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:34 PMI personally just buy mine outright every year. but for those after a cheaper alternative each year just get them on a 12mth contract..would probably be around 40/50 dollar repayments on a 50 dollar plan for the largets capacity (unless you’re with telstra then its like 80/90) so around 100 bucks a month for 12 months gets you sorted with phone and service.
Daz
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:00 PMAs Fei stated just go month to month when your contract runs out. or you could even grab a sim and prepaid plan from one of the many providers offering really cheap rates like Boost, TPG and AnySIM. Then when new iphone comes out you can then decide the best option for you to get it, 1/2 year plan or outright.
You could also get the lastest and greatest Android that will likely be released at around that time!!
John
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 11:48 PMYes, I’m thinking pre-paid sim for six months is the way to go. Maybe save some money too!
Sicarius123
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:05 PMI’ve been able to upgrade from my 3G-S since last October. I didn’t find the iPhone 4 a good enough upgrade, with it’s faulty antenna design and easily broken case.
I also didn’t find the gen 1 WP7 appealing, with the OEM’s doing a terrible job of putting tiny SD cards behind warranty void if removed stickers.
So you know what? I’ve still got my launch day 3GS. Hell my missus 3G-S doesn’t even do 3G anymore, and we’re still not interested in locking into a 2 year contract for any of the current crop of smart phones.
Just because you’re able to upgrade doesn’t mean you have no choice. I’ll probably have this phone until the Nokia WP7 comes out unless they screw the pooch with under 32gb of memory.
MotorMouth
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:57 PMI am also a little confused. From what I’ve read, Apple have delivered on everything that was rumoured, apart from a new form-factor and the “5″ designation. That those two things seem to have disappointed so many simply shows how little it matters how substantial an Apple launch is, if it doesn’t involve sleight-of-hand, no-one will be impressed.
As a WinPhone 7 user, the 4S seems like a very impressive upgrade, both in terms of hardware and software. That it only manages to match the competition is really no different from any other iPhone launch. i.e. iPhone has always struggled to keep up with the competition, usually jsut managing to get level before everyone else roars ahead. Kal-El should be with us before Xmas, at which time all iOS products will suddenly seem terribly, terribly under-powered, I’m sure.
i2
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:45 PMI tend to agree with you. They delivered on most of the rumors. I just think people are disappointed because the release of iOS”5″ + all dodgy pics and cases from China had peoples hopes up for a new form factor phone.
I disagree though with “iPhone has always struggled to keep up with the competition, usually jsut managing to get level before everyone else roars ahead.” This (IMO) should be looked at in terms of what came first, the chicken or the egg. Each major release release of an iphone (3G, 4 and 5 next year) will always be followed by new spec competition to try and stop the masses buying iphones.
MotorMouth
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:21 PMI’m sorry but when teh first iPhone was released, it had a 2 megapixel camera when most other phones were doing 3.2 and 5. I don’t see any point in differentiating between smartphones and other phones, the fact is that iPhone was feature-poor at launch and even earlier this year, when I was in the market for one, I found the experience didn’t stack up against either Android or WinPhone7. i.e. iPhone relies far too much on 3rd party apps to remain relevant. To me, apps are just shiny things (true across all platforms) and the vast majority of truly useful ones are just as easily done with a bookmark to a web page.
Out of the box, iPhone lacks substance. The same is true of many of their products. As a graphic artist, I’ve been using Macs fo ryears, but I’ve never understood what anyone saw in them. I always spec one up when I’m buying a new computer but they never make the grade. However, I almost bought both an iPod and an iPhone, until I actually did some research and discovered there are much better alternatives out there.
vin
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:17 PMthe fact is that Apple charges a premium price for a product that is no more than just ‘standard’ in today’s world.
i’m a little over my 3GS, but there’s no way i’m buying a phone that isn’t future-proof.
no 4G support, and no NFC is a deal breaker for me…
the 4S is ok, but it’s not a standout. Compare it to the galaxy s2 (which you can get for half the price if you know where to look), then tell me it’s justified.
Ben
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 4:23 PMIf you have an iPhone 4 why would you bother? I dont understand these people that change phones every year, they must have ADD and short attention span.
I have stuck with the iPhone 3G since it was released, and after hearing the announcement of iPhone 4S it is not enough to entice me to keep on with iPhone, I will be going with Samsung Galaxy now.
smurfydog
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:30 PMI’m totally with you on this. But…
When my original contract expired I was happy to stick with my iPhone 3G and just get a pre-paid thingy.
But when my contract ended I had a chance to join a different carrier who has better reception in my area, AND save $25 a month on what I was already paying, AND get the iPhone4 for free! (I say free – I actually made money on this after selling my old iPhone)
And this came with so much calls, texts and data that I could ditch my home phone as well – saving even more.
So I agree – If you’re on an iPhone4 contract, don’t bother, but if your contract is up then look around to see if you can get a better deal and a new free (or very cheap) phone.
Davo
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:15 PMuhhh.. I dont get why everyone appears to be upset about the HOUSING ONLY remaining the same. The hardware changes are essentially what you’d find if it were actually an iPhone 5 release.
Personally i’m happy with it..
MotorMouth
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:24 PMYeah, that’s the thing – if they had called it “iPhone 5″, there would be none of this krap going on. There is certainly more than enough in it to justify the “5″, it seems strange to me that they went with 4S.
smurfydog
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:36 PMThey seem to reserve the numbers (3, 4, …5?) for new handset designs, rather than internal specs.
The 4S is a major upgrade, but it’s not a new design.
I’m actually glad that they do this – it’s just a little less bullshit than you might otherwise expect.
Steve
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:45 PM“There is certainly more than enough in it to justify the “5″ ”
No there isn’t. Let’s go over the improvements shall we? Camera, Processor, Antenna. That’s what they’ve been soldiering on for the past 16-18 months.
Compare this with the 3GS > 4 transition which improved ALL of the above (minus antenna lol) on top of considerably better screen, build and size.
And Siri isn’t a justifiable reason as to why the 4S is so much better, because it works just fine on the 4. Apple just pulled it from the app store, artificially limiting the preceding device to make their current model look more attractive.
LKI
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 1:04 AMDragon Dictation is app of the week.
Sicarius123
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 7:26 PMBecause the iPhone 4 has fragile glass breaking housing with a shit antenna design that should of been recalled?
The iPhone 4 had great guts, the housing was the worst part.
Gary
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:21 PMI’ll be upgrading to the 4S. Not because I’m a fanboy (I much prefer Windows, especially when needing to fix the computer), but because my iPhone 3G has been getting progressively slower every iOS update. I know I don’t need to update it, but it’s habit, and it’ll be nice to be able to play fifa lag-free for once.
Steve
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:38 PMI alwyas thought Alex and Angus Kidman were the same person. Mind blown.
prashy
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 5:46 PMI’ll only get it if Telstra offer me an upgrade deal, for say $100. I currently have the 4.
Rituparno
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 6:05 PMAmazing conversation! Check out this amazing application Siri on iPhone 4S that lets you use your voice to send messages, set reminders etc – http://liveoncampus.com/wire/show/3114234?user=apple&utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=Seeding&utm_campaign=Ritu
Marten
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 7:58 PMTotal crap.
People updated from 3GS to 4.
Now while your all upset. There is a good upgrade path for 3GS users (and there are lots of them) to now go to 4S.
Stop crying and harden up.
The phone has gorn 3G, 3GS, 4 and now 4S. Your craving for a 5 will have to wait.
feral
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 9:07 PMWont be going there, I’ve given Apple way too much money already, somehow they made me do it even though I’m a PC.
Matt
Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 9:27 PMI have a 3GS and was planning on upgrading to the new iPhone straight away, but not anymore. Previous design aside, I don’t understand what makes this such a huge improvement? My 3GS performs fine, and I’m not a grandpa using it as “just a phone”. I never use the camera. I couldn’t care less about Siri or Facetime. I’ve never had problems with reception. And there’s nothing iOS 5 can do on a 4S that it can’t do on a 3GS.
I don’t usually bash Apple, but I think this is an extremely poor update (it’s mostly a catch up, really) especially considering the long gap between the 4 and 4S. I personally can’t justify a new 2 yr contract and/or spending a few hundred dollars on “iPhone 4 SP1″.
Timmy
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 12:22 AMI think it was pretty bloody obvious it wasn’t going to be a new form or iphone5.
Think about the history or pattern…
2008 iPhone 3G
2009 iPhone 3GS
2010 iPhone 4
2011 iPhone 4S
2012 iPhone 5 ???
People are just complaining because it didn’t fit with there personal contract or upgrade timing needs – if you have been on the right cycle you get a new iPhone every two years that’s the newest form (2008,2010)
Tim
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 12:40 AMI’m amused by all the people talking about switching to the Galaxy S II, which to me is not that much of an upgrade from the original, but has actually used an Apple tactic of making it prettier and smaller.
I actually don’t mind Android, but after owning a phone for a while, all the so-called ‘advantages’ were just window dressing, and didn’t seem to make it easier to use, giving more options doesn’t necessarily make something better.
Tim
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 12:42 AMI meant to say prettier and thinner, a bigger screen for something you put in your pocket is not always an advantage either.
LKI
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 1:07 AMAgreed, and Apple was right in saying there was no need to revamp a design which is already pretty fantastic
Another Jim
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 1:08 AMI welcome this upgrade, as hardware is less relevant when the software is industry-leading.
Steve
Tuesday, October 11, 2011 at 3:44 PMIndustry leading? Siri has been on the app store for years, they just pulled it recently for this cash grab. The rest of the improvements in iOS5 are rip-offs of Cydia Tweaks, which in turn, were inspired by features of decade old Nokia’s, Android and even WP7.
Adrian
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 1:55 PMMr COOK!
bigger screen!