Top 5 Smelly Things That Should Be Banned In Aeroplanes

The US Department of Transportation wants to ban electronic cigarettes, even while they only produce water vapour that doesn’t contain any cancerous chemicals. They say this will increase the comfort of other passengers. Perhaps they should ban other things first.

The logic is that the vapour from the e-cigs would bother other passengers, according to US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood:

Airline passengers have rights, and this new rule would enhance passenger comfort and reduce any confusion surrounding the use of electronic cigarettes in flight.

Do you know what really confuses me, Ray? Do you know what really gets in my nostrils and my bloody nerves?

5. Perfumes, colognes and scented deodorants. Why do people insist on dousing themselves on perfumes when they come into a plane? Aren’t they aware that smelling like a walking whorehouse can bother people as much as a real cigarette? At least, it bothers me to the point of nausea.

4. After-shaves. These are even worse than perfumes. I don’t even like scented after-shaves in the open. There should be a worldwide ban on them, but aeroplanes would be enough for now.

3. People wearing socks and sandals. I remember that flight in which the passenger behind me was wearing these, probably after a long day of walking around the terminal, waiting for his flight to board. I had to hold my vomit for an entire intercontinental flight.

2. Not showering. Of course, the smell of sweat is even worse than numbers 4 or 5 combined (actually, quite often 4, 5, 3 and 2 come combined). The Department of Transportation must install showers on each gate, and any passenger who smells of sweat should be made to take a shower. Some passengers should also be disinfected. Or, if they want to avoid showering because it’s against their beliefs, just put them inside hermetic full body suits.

1. Farting. Only solution: Just install buttplugs in all passengers.

(Extra bonus: Ban all things that make crunchy noises when eaten, like chips).

All those things should be banned in planes, trains, buses, submarines and space stations. Air marshals should tase anyone who doesn’t abide to these rules. Don’t protest. This all makes sense following the perfect logic of the Department of Transportation. [LA Times]

Discuss

(7 Comments)
  • [–]

    Matt L

    Friday, September 16, 2011 at 10:45 AM

    Yeah, don’t e-smokers have rights too? Aren’t they valid passengers? Is this discrimination? I think so…. Haha, e-smokers suck…. On the e-cig.

  • [–]

    Andrew

    Friday, September 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM

    What about kids kicking the back of your chair

  • [–]

    Jonathan

    Friday, September 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM

    Last paragraph: tase isn’t a verb. Isn’t Taser a proper noun anyway?
    You should ‘shock someone with a Taser’

    • [–]

      WhiteDaemon666

      Friday, September 16, 2011 at 2:55 PM

      Actually, it is an acronym: Thomas And Smith Electric Rifle.
      Therefore, it should be all caps (But no one ever does)

      • [–]

        olearymo

        Friday, September 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM

        I thought it was Tomas A. Swift, named after Jack Cover’s childhood hero?

        Jonathan, agreed, but only if we can also ban the term ‘gift’, as in ‘I’ll gift this to you.’

  • [–]

    GAKUNA NIGGANA

    Friday, September 16, 2011 at 5:23 PM

    you can still fart with a buttplug in

  • [–]

    chris

    Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 1:38 AM

    If i was to smoke an e-cigg on a plane i wouldnt blow it out into the air for all to see, its easy to just blow it down to your lap and no one would know the wiser.. its just because people see it and associate it with smoking that thier mind makes it dirty.. at most if you are a point blanc range my grape flavour has a faint hint of grape smell, like purple hubba bubba.. so yes plenty of other things to ban before these things

Join The Discussion