
This is what it will have, according to TechCrunch:
Hardware
• Full-colour 7-inch touchscreen.
• Unlike the iPad, it will probably only support two finger multitouch, not 10 fingers.
• It apparently has one single-core processor.
• Maybe only 6GB of storage — possibly more cloud oriented
• No physical buttons on the front
• No camera
• Rubberised back, like the BlackBerry PlayBook.
Software
• It’s built on a forked version of Android (apparently older than 2.2), but there are no visible Google apps of any kind — you’ll be able to get Android apps through Amazon’s appstore
• It has Apple Cover Flow-ish user interface, with all the content—books, movies and music—showing in a carousel. The UI is “very responsive”, unlike the Nook Color.
• In portrait mode, it has a dock where users can add their favorites. It hides in landscape mode.
• The book reader app is much like the iOS and Android Kindle app.
• The music app connects to Amazon Cloud.
• Logically, the Amazon Kindle will provide a storefront for the whole of Amazon (I imagine this looks a lot like the Amazon Window Shopping application on the iPad).
Apparently the tablet is not in production yet, but they are very close, with a release in November. And the big deal? It will only cost $US250. And, it might come with a free Amazon Prime subscription, which is normally $US79 a year.
The first true iPad competitor
I like their idea a lot. And it may be underpowered compared to the iPad 2, but that doesn’t matter one bit if the thing runs as fast as TechCrunch says it does. And it doesn’t matter for a huge majority of consumers who don’t play hardcore, hardware-intensive games but want just content and casual gaming.
In fact, this may very well be the first true iPad competitor because of four key factors:
First, Amazon will be the first company to have the complete ecosystem. Like Apple’s closed garden, but plugging into all of Amazon’s products and services.
Then, they count with the customer base. They can attack their customers from their store and offer them this device as a simple, quite inexpensive tablet that acts as an extension to their content and services.
The third factor, and perhaps the most important, is that the Amazon Kindle will offer a super simple user interface that is centered around the content itself. If what you want is give consumers access to stuff to consume, that seems like the best option. Anyone would be able to use it. Their approach is a lot better than replicating Apple’s app-oriented iOS interface, like every other iPad-clone maker does.
And finally, their tablet will plug directly into a very strong cloud solution. Unlike Apple — who is now only about to deploy the unproven iCloud after multiple previous failures — Amazon has a lot of experience in cloud services for serving content. If they manage to offer the same experience as in the desktop—and there’s no reason to think otherwise—Apple will have a formidable enemy. Not an iPad killer, but certainly a real enemy that could damage them. [TechCrunch]



















Steve
Saturday, September 3, 2011 at 3:54 PMCool. A Jesus Diaz article.
This thing is basically just a new competitor to the Nook Color, the Lenovo A1 and the recently-announced Galaxy Tab 7.7. Barring the 7.7, everything else is the same price, or cheaper than this Amazon tablet.
Just from glancing over the article, it doesn’t seem to offer any advantage over a generic Android tablet with the Amazon Appstore. I’m not saying it’s a good addition to the market, but all of these points can also be applied to Android + Amazon Appstore (except being aggressively marketed by Amazon themselves). It’s IOS with the ‘no in-app payments’ rule, not Android.
Not Steve
Saturday, September 3, 2011 at 7:20 PMI have an iPad 2 and the reason I bought a Kindle was because of the eInk technology.. This seems like just another tablet, except for the fact that all my kindle books can be transferred easily onto this one.
MotorMouth
Saturday, September 3, 2011 at 8:07 PMYeah, I wouldn’t be interested in upgrading my Kindle to something like this. Surely Amazon wouldn’t be stupid enough to remove the one great advantage Kindle has over every tablet computer – the eInk display. I expected the next Kindle to use the new colour eInk display, not become another me-too tablet. Very disappointing.
Aliasalpha
Saturday, September 3, 2011 at 9:15 PMHmmmmm the loss of eink and its power saving would be a real loss for me since its the best reading experience I’ve ever had (including paper books)
What would be ideal (though probably wildly impractical) is to have a screen on the front and back of the device, tablet on the front, eink on the back. Have a hinged cover that is made to lock into place over either screen and deactivate it to save power and double as a protective cover and hand grip. Give you the advantages of both types of device.
Sadly it’d also give you the disadvantages of the price of both and probably be outside the price range of the average buyer
person287
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 3:28 AMEven though it runs Android, if I’m honest I don’t think it stands to beat, or even come close to the iPad. The iPad just has something no other tablet has. The lower price point might appeal to some people, but to be honest it’s still not cheap. I’d have to see it properly though, and in a few months time I might have to completely eat my words!
MotorMouth
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 9:58 AMSpoken like a true fan-boi. I think you are missing the point of the article, which is suggesting that amazon.com does have the missing secret ingredient that makes iPad successful – a mature, bountiful ecosystem to back it up. Given that mp3 albums on amazon.com are often half the price of the same thing on iTunes, I think they have a real advantage in that area. I would also suggest that the fact that their device will be less powerful than iPad is also taking a leaf out of Apple’s book (or should that be “from Apple’s tree”?) After all, what is an iPad, other than a gutless, uselessly underpowered computer? Apple obviously realised that we had reached a point where more power was no the driving force behind people’s computer purchasing decisions and took full advantage. Now amazon.com are saying that even an iPad is over-powered (and therefore over-priced) for the things most people do with it, so they are coming out with something even more gutless and much, much cheaper (assuming all this speculation is accurate).
And they might just be onto something – I don’t know the raw processing capabilities of my Kindle, I just know that I can use it for all the things I bought it for (and a bunch of other things I don’t really need from it) and that I can’t remember how long it has been since I last needed to charge it. OTOH, I look at an iPad and I can’t see that it does anything that I might need from a device like that, because I still look at it as a computer first and foremost, and on that level it fails miserably.
olearymo
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 8:56 AMum… person287 are you going to tell us what the ipad has that no other tablet has? Or do we have to guess?
Steve
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 6:56 PMGuys, this isn’t replacing the Kindle. The Kindle will still be sold alongside this thing, similar to B&N has both the new E-ink Nook and Nook Color selling.
But really person287,
“The iPad just has something no other tablet has.”
Which is? I’m just quivering with anticipation!
Max
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 3:53 PM“The iPad just has something no other tablet has.”
… And that is?
Daniel
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 1:57 PMIt’s Magic der.
Jonathan
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM25% profit per unit?
gumbi
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 8:18 PMWatch out amazon, next thing apple will be sueing you for infringing on some rubbish they did out of their scrap pile.
Johnny P
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 9:03 AMNext headline: Apple sues Amazon for infringing on its coverflow technology
light487
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 10:33 AMThe number one thing about my Kindle that I love is that it is NOT an backlit touch screen. Take this away and it suddenly becomes very similar to so many other offerings on the market. I know that Nook has a NookColor (which is basically their version of the tablet) and that Amazon has to compete with not only the Nook but other things too but I just feel they shouldn’t use the “Kindle” name on it because it is not anything like the other Kindles.
The 3rd gen Kindle is awesome.. I use it more than my iPod Touch.. it’s almost exclusive in my usage now.. if my Kindle was not as unique as it is, I probably would have gone with another eInk reader.
BenDTU
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 1:13 PMComing to a Woolworths near you?
LG
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 2:42 PMSo any confirmation on replacing the e-ink Kindle and having this as the Kindle Tablet?
Jacob
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 11:36 AMThe absence of a web browser kind of nueters it’s advantage.
piers7
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 11:56 PMeInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk. eInk.
eInk.
piers7
Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 12:01 AMCRN still think we might get eInk for Christmas anyway: http://www.crn.com.au/News/269132,colour-kindle-coming-in-time-for-christmas.aspx