
The Importance of RAM
Did I mention that this is going to be an all-encompassing guide on RAM? No? Well it is, so those of you who already know what RAM is for and how it works can skip ahead.
RAM stands for Random Access Memory and it stands as somewhat of a buffer between your hard drive and your CPU. There’s really nothing random about it; the CPU (generally) knows exactly what data it’s playing around with. When the CPU is processing data, it’s grabbing small bits in your systems memory, constantly jumping from place to place, reading, writing and rewriting information. Hard drives work well when working with large blocks of data, but are extremely slow when jumping from sector to sector or switching from read to write. If your CPU had to process data directly on the hard drive, there would be a massive bottleneck.
So that’s why you need RAM. Having more RAM means you need to read from the excruciatingly slow hard drive less often, and faster RAM means your CPU can grab its bits faster. Of course, this still doesn’t answer how much RAM you need or in what circumstances faster RAM is actually useful.
There’s really no such thing as too much RAM, but there is such a thing as spending too much on RAM. What you do with your computer is what dictates whether or not more memory is actually practical. Below are some of the key stepping stones when it comes to how much memory a system needs.
IBM’s latest supercomputer Watson has 16TB of RAM. Overkill?
2GB — The Bare Minimum
There is such a thing as not enough RAM, and anything below 2GB is bordering on just that. In fact, the 64-bit version of Windows 7 won’t even install on a system with less than 2GB of memory. Now, that’s not to say 2GB isn’t enough for anything. Your every day computing tasks, such as web browsing, editing documents, and even HD video, will be fine on such a system, so long as you’re not doing all of it at once.

G.Skill’s balance of performance and value makes it a popular brand.
Running on just 2GB does have some limitations, though. Ever since Windows Vista, we’ve had a tool called SuperFetch which pre-loads your most used apps into memory so that they open faster when you need them. Windows likes to keep about half of your total memory free, using the rest as SuperFetch space. Small problem: with just 2GB of RAM and essential operating system resources taking up about a gig of memory to begin with, it doesn’t leave much space for SuperFetch to use.
Things will still run just fine, but additional RAM will give a large jump in performance, and at the current prices, stepping up to 4GB is a pretty worthwhile investment. Apart from netbooks, you’d be hard pressed to find anything modern that comes with just 2GB of memory anyway.
4GB — An All-Around Sweet Spot
When it comes to a balance of cost and performance, 4GB is just about perfect, at least for the time being. In every day computing, you probably won’t ever come close to filling it all up — well, unless you’re like me and have a nasty habit of leaving 116 tabs of Flash rich content open in Chrome.

Crucial is a very popular brand amongst hardcore gamers.
Even high-end gaming performs well with just 4GB of memory. Feel free to enjoy a casual bit of Photoshop and/or video editing, too. Apart from some very purpose specific computing, like extensive hi-res photo editing or industrial grade 3D modelling, 4GB is the number to aim for.
8GB and Beyond
Stepping up to 8GB can still be practical, especially when building a new system in which the additional investment would be fairly negligible. Any performance increases in going from 4GB to 8GB won’t be particularly noticeable, but it does open up a few doors.
Unless you partake in very specific computing practices that can actually fill up the entire 8GB, you can go ahead and disable your pagefile entirely. This will give you slight performance increases under certain circumstances, improve your system’s security, and put less strain on your hard drive.

Kingston has been in the game for years and has a wide selection.
From a gaming perspective, putting 8GB of memory into a system is primarily a form of future proofing; however, in a professional environment, as a workstation running commercial grade software, 8GB may very well be necessary to keep things running smoothly.
3GB, 6GB and 12GB
You may have noticed the absence of any recommendations relating to 3GB, 6GB and 12GB solutions. That’s because achieving 6GB of RAM, for example, requires an odd combination of DIMMs (memory sticks). In this example, you would need three 2GB DIMMs, meaning you would not be able to run them in a Dual Channel Configuration.
Dual Channel memory allows the CPU to access both DIMMs simultaneously, essentially turning the 64-bit memory bus into 128-bits. As far as gaming and your average computer use is concerned, dual channel and single channel configurations will perform almost identically, but any memory intensive operation, such as audio or video transcoding, will see significant improvements.

Corsair has always been one of our favourite memory brands.
In order to enable the dual channel memory bus, you need an even number of identical DIMMs, which is why 3GB, 6GB and 12GB won’t work; however, unless you plan on doing a lot of memory I/O intensive work, the performance benefits of more RAM generally outweigh the benefits of the larger memory bus.
There is one exception — triple channel memory. In the case of the LGA1366 Core i7, memory can be configured into a triple channel bus using three identical DIMMs, meaning 6GB and 12GB are much more practical.
What about Speed and Latencies?
So you’ve figured out how much RAM you need, but how fast should it be? Well, for the best results, it should be as fast as your motherboard allows. This would be for anyone who wants to be on the bleeding edge of performance, like a hardcore gamer. The average consumer won’t have much need for the fastest RAM in the world, and that stuff can get pretty expensive. Instead, DDR3-1600 is a nice middle ground. It’s still fast, but not so fast that it costs a hefty premium.
But wait! Before you run down to the store and fork over all of your hard earned money for fastest rated RAM you can find, there’s one more thing to consider: Latency. Memory modules are also rated in “Timings”, generally a sequence of numbers, such as 9-9-9-24. The most useful of these is the first number known as the CAS Latency. This is the number of clock cycles it takes the RAM to access a column of data (the smaller the better), and in conjunction with the speed of the RAM, can be used to calculate its response time. The formula is
1000 * CAS
———-
(RAM Speed ÷ 2)
This will give you the response time in nanoseconds. So for example, a certain DDR3-1866 module of Kingston HyperX memory has a CAS latency of 11 while G.Skill makes a DDR3-1600 module with a latency of just six. The result? G.Skill’s slower RAM can respond in just 7.5ns where it takes the much faster HyperX RAM 11.7ns. This means that the G.Skill memory will be faster when it comes to random access; however, the higher clock speed of the HyperX memory still nets it more bandwidth, making it better suited for bulk operations.
Typically speaking, you want to settle on a clock speed first and then use CAS latencies to decide from there. Keep in mind that tighter timings mean more expensive. For instance, the difference between a CAS of 7 versus 8 is almost negligible.System Compatibility
When it comes to RAM, there are a lot of questions regarding compatibility. There are also a lot of subtleties that can go overlooked and lead to compatibility problems. These are a few of the most common questions and mistakes.
DDR, DDR2 and DDR3 — Does It Matter?

YES! DIMM design is different between all three DDR standards. Not only will a DDR DIMM be incompatible with a DDR2 system, but it won’t even fit in the DDR2 socket. Trying to force it in could break your motherboard. Fortunately, DDR and DDR2 platforms are pretty much extinct. If you have a modern computer, odds are it’s DDR3.
What Is a SO-DIMM?

A SO-DIMM is a miniaturised version of a regular DIMM, generally used in laptops and other low profile systems. Just like a full sized DIMM, it’s important not to mix up DDR, DDR2 and DDR3 modules.
Will a DDR3-2000 DIMM Work With a DDR3-1600 Motherboard?
Kind of, though it can be a gamble. Memory modules have an internal table of speed and timing settings so when you install a module that is clocked higher than your motherboard is rated, your motherboard will simply run it at a slower speed. For example, if you put a DDR3-2000 DIMM into a DDR3-1600 motherboard, it would run at 1600MHz rather than 2000MHz. Compatibility isn’t guaranteed, though, and it’s typically better to match your RAM with your system’s capabilities.
This trick is, however, useful when overclocking. Because memory clock speeds are derived from the CPU’s FSB, using the faster memory can result in a more stable overclock.
Voltages — Too Often Overlooked
Memory voltages are actually very important when it comes to compatibility. The DDR3 standard is 1.5V, but many performance DIMMs require higher voltages to achieve higher clock speeds and lower latencies. This can cause problems as not all motherboards can recognise the proper voltage for these DIMMs and will supply the default 1.5V. If this isn’t enough to keep the memory stable, your system won’t even boot up enough for you to get into the BIOS and manually raise the voltage. Make sure you’re familiar with your motherboard’s capabilities before purchasing RAM with increased voltage needs.
Operating System Limitations
32-bit operating systems offer one last serious limitation in that they can only address about 4GB of memory. You may think that’s perfect since 4GB is currently ideal, but the limitation is on total memory, not just RAM. A few bits here and there are reserved for PCI and ACPI peripherals, and video memory is included, too. With modern video cards sporting up to 2GB of video memory, you could have 4gigs of RAM in your system yet be stuck running on less than 2GB. The moral of the story is stick with a 64-bit OS.

Maximum PC brings you the latest in PC news, reviews and how-tos.



















Azza
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 9:32 AMI am currently looking at laptops and the main thing I am looking at is high RAM, as I am thinking I will want it to last a long time and be able to play games sometimes.
Is this the right attitude? And how much should these be reasonably cost?
I’ve come across some laptops that are 8GB and go for $500-$600, this seems a little too good to be true.
Stephen
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:03 AMIf you’re wanting to play games, have a look at the video card you’re getting as well.
Azza
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 11:13 AMYeah I was thinking some sort of mid-range video card and cpu might be sufficient
Andrew
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 1:17 PMWell,. If you can wait till the end of the year, this is one hell of a laptop for the price. I have no idea what yer budget and requirements are, so it’s hard to say for sure, but the GPU and CPU will game ok.
Samsung 7 Series:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/08/samsungs-new-notebooks-are-super-skinny-macbook-clones-and-look-damn-good/ (Ignore the title.. needless to say, if you end up with a Mac, you’ve failed).
If gaming is your only goal, then building a high end PC will run you $1500ish.. and that’s for something fairly epic. For less than $1000 you can build something that will seriously crush even the very best of gaming laptops.
Man
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:21 AMAlso, most makers don’t put a warranty seal on the ram cover (sometimes on the bottom of the laptop, sometimes under the keyboard, sometimes both) so if you look up some guides you should be able to buy a laptop with say 2gb and then buy the extra ram and install it yourself. It will be significantly cheaper than a laptop that comes pre configured with that much. If you need to send it back just under warranty just don’t forget to take it out again!
Azza
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 11:14 AMI used to expand the RAM in my desktop, but was under the impression that it can be a bit more difficult with a laptop – this is why I was thinking I’d want something I won’t need to upgrade.
Steve
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 11:58 AMYou will find investing in a high end video card much more worthwhile than RAM for playing VIDEO games.
ben
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM@azza
ram is not the only thing you should be considering, i would suggest doing some more research on laptops. for 500-800 dollars you are not going to get a computer with a very powerful cpu/graphics card. remember with laptops and pc’s in general they have a life of about 6 months before they are procceded by a newer/better model.RESEARCH RESEARCH. try out a few forums before you buy.
brad
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 9:57 AMpretty good guide. it does however, remind me of one reason why i switched to mac. windows is just a complete pain in the ass.
Stephen
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:05 AMWhat? Are you saying you switched to Mac because you had no idea of technology and preferred to have someone hold your hand?
Your comment makes little sense.
Harvz
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:09 AMwhile i agree that its a bit harder seeing as you need to look at your mother board and what OS your running, i still love being able to build my PC for what i need and my budget then upgrade it later for a tenth of the price.
But thank im really happy apple came back from the dead to give Microsoft and PC makers some comp
Guy
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:18 AMI’d much rather put a bit of research into building my computer (even if it is a pain in the ass for some, I actually enjoy it) and save >1000 on the total cost than have a set configuration handed to me with a note saying “This will do, give me $2500.”
Richard
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 12:59 PMHow is choice of RAM any different on Windows vs OS X? You can easily buy a prebuilt pc if you don’t want to deal with the hardware or like me, you can buy a macbook and then replace the ram yourself.
Ethan
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 6:39 PMThat makes no sense. Macs are even MORE picky with memory than normal PCs. Also, Snow Leopard and Lion are as heavy if not heavier than Windows 7 in terms of memory.
If you have memory that is a higher frequency than a motherboard can deal with, it’s down-clocked automatically. If you do the same thing with a Mac, it will sit there and beep until you take it out.
I use both and have no problem with people using either, but in no way are Macs easier when dealing with memory.
Morkai
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:14 AMI’ve only just picked up a G.Skill 6Gb Triple Channel set last week to go with my Core i7 920, i should be formatting and installing it tomorrow morning, and i hope to see a few boosts to loading times etc at the LAN i’m attending tomorrow.
Chemenski
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 11:18 AMI have 12GB of RAM in my rig. Found it pretty pointless TBH. Never really use more than 4 unless running multiple Virtual Machines.
However Future Proof FTW!
Steven
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 4:08 PMRAM FUTURE-PROOFING.
oh wait, cpu-gpu-ddr4
Oops
Jamesmag
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 12:45 PMWow, you guys recommend Corsair RAM? Rookie mistake.
I work for an IT reseller and we refuse to sell Corsair RAM now, out of all the Corsair RAM we’ve sold in the past 3 years, only 5 modules have not been returned under warranty, that’s out of 4000 modules sold. Corsair used to be good but are now just living off a good name, their quality leaves a lot to be desired.
However, Kingston is a very good choice, extremely reliable, and relatively cheap.
bolagnaise
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 2:07 PMso you have seen 3995 CORSAIR RAM modules returned………………..DOUBTFUL. even with the good name that corsair has, that kind of failure rates dont stay hidden, and its the first im hearing of it.
Ethan
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 6:45 PMI find that VERY hard to believe. We sell around half-half Corsair and Kingston. In my experience, Kingston has a higher fail-rate, especially in the higher end (I’ve seen quite a few dead Hyper-X kits). That’s not to say that Kingston has a high failure rate, by any means. I’d still happily recommend it.
If they had a 99.999% failure rate, like you mentioned, more people would know about it and they wouldn’t be in business.
With failure rates like that, I’d say your customers are probably incompetent.
Xheis
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 4:06 PMI would recommend never turning your page file off, especially on Solid-States. Page files only right sequentially, so it wont reduce ssd life.
Lakshan
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 11:04 AMThat is 100% correct, never disable your page file no matter how much ram you have. This is a myth and has been shown to have negative impacts on performance even if you have 8GB of ram. Windows is smart enough to use the file intelligently. Just do a quick Google and find out.