
Motion controls make sense in some contexts. With your Wii, you can swing the controller like a baseball bat, aim it like a gun, or putt it like a club. It’s fun, because it helps you pretend you’re doing the virtual activity on the TV. You’re tricking your brain a little bit! Kinect functions (well) along these same lines. You can’t replicate the experience of punching someone with buttons as well as you can with your arm.
But a TV remote is simple. You’re only going in two directions. Up or down. Left or right. Make something louder, or make it softer. Type in a channel. These are little tiny actions that are perfectly suited for little buttons moved with your little fingers. Remotes can be innovated — beautiful, even — just look at Apple TV’s. But converting these actions to wild arm flappings, hand jerkings, and various wrist bobs isn’t just stupid looking — it makes it harder to watch TV. What a great quality in a TV remote!
Look at the video. What requires less effort: shaking your wrist to move from one channel to another, or applying slight pressure to a button you’re holding in your hand? Do you want to have to memorise different hand gestures for everything you might want to do to your TV? How could this possibly make your life easier?
The Move TV is the most absurd, shameless trend cash-in I’ve seen in some time. It makes using your TV harder. It makes motion controls alienating. It makes me want to throw it into a lake. Movea: burn this idea. [Engadget]



















Markk
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 8:44 AMAgreed. Plus it makes the universal remote useless and we’d be back to multiple remotes
EckyThump
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 8:45 AMPlus, you couldn’t keep it in your lap, or accidentally move it, you’d have to put it down very carefully… you’re right! this is a bloody stupid idea!#[
justsomeguy
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 2:38 PMYou hold down a button while gesturing perhaps?
EckyThump
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 2:42 PMwhich means you’d have to hold that button when you picked it up! Seems a bit awkward that way to me. #]
Kent
Monday, September 12, 2011 at 2:38 PMI can see gizmodo regretting saying this. if it were done well, I wouldn’t mind one.
citizen7
Monday, September 12, 2011 at 10:47 PMThe TV remote does need a bit of re-engineering though… compare the number of buttons the average TV remote has; compared with a modern smartphone.
What is also required is an integrated approach that considers the different peripherals we plug into it as well (e.g. DVD/Blu-Ray disc players, Cable/IPTV receivers, gaming consoles).
P.S: Hey Gizmodo? Don’t be too quick to shoot an idea down; build on it instead.