Chasing Norway’s New Stealth Cruise Missile

This is the Naval Strike Missile, Kongsberg’s latest and greatest cruise missile, as it skims over the Pacific Ocean before tearing into its target on the far side of an island.

The testing for this next-generation anti-ship missile took place off Point Mugu, California, in June of this year. According to Konsgberg, the NSM had only 1.5 seconds to acquire and positively ID the ship as its target before striking.

The state-of-the-art missile weighs about 400kg and has a range of 100 nautical miles, both along the coast and in the open ocean. It uses GPS, inertial and terrain reference systems to maintain its bearings. Being a cruise missile, and the only fifth-generation long range precision strike missile in existence, the NSM is capable of flying over land while avoiding obstacles and skimming just above the surface of the ocean to avoid radar detection. The NSM will also make a random high G-force manoeuvre in order to confound enemy countermeasures just before it strikes with a 125kg multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead. The NSM is also capable of independently detecting and recognising targets through its imaging infrared (IIR) seeker and on-board target database.

It’s being developed as the basis for the Joint Strike Missile program to be carried aboard Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II “Joint Strike Fighters” when they enter service. The Royal Norwegian Navy has also already chosen it for service aboard Fridtjof Nansen class frigates and Skjold class patrol boats as well as by the Polish Navy. [Wikipedia, Kongsberg]

Discuss

(9 Comments)
  • [–]

    RB

    Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM

    Long gone are the days of big, powerful guns on huge tanky ships. With precision weapons like this, it’s now all about not putting all your eggs in one, easy to wipe out target, and focusing more on numerous, small, fast, maneuverable ships.

    Naval warfare certainly has evolved quite rapidly in the last 50 years…

  • [–]

    attila

    Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM

    Was it supposed to hit the container and go through into the water on the other side?

    • [–]

      AnthonyP

      Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM

      Good question.. I would have thought it should have hit the ship just above the water line to create greater damage to the hull.

    • [–]

      Dave

      Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 12:23 PM

      Yep. Shipping containers are cheap. The barge that they are sitting on is expensive, so they wouldn’t want to sink it. That’s also why there was no bang – no warhead for the test to limit damage.

      • [–]

        Sam

        Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 4:05 PM

        What he said

  • [–]

    DarthDVD

    Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 4:04 PM

    I bet that “miss” was deliberate as to not sink the barge. and the shipping containers didnt look to be in such good nick (the where probly going to be scrapped anyhow)

    so on the production run of these they would lower the aim point…. unless Norway wants to make a reef with a old warship.

  • [–]

    Nathan

    Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 6:40 PM

    Ok Norway, I’m listening.

  • [–]

    jayarrr

    Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    so …. is it time to liberate norway?

  • [–]

    Geoff

    Wednesday, September 28, 2011 at 6:10 PM

    Am I the only one who found the idea of being killed from 110 miles away and there being NO WAY of knowing it’s coming… just a little bit frightening? Guess seeing it in action made the concept just a little more real.

Join The Discussion