Hate him or love him, but this man led some of the most talented bands of engineers in the history of the planet to create gadgets that have changed the way we understand technoloy. Here’s his greatest works.
For the fandroids, trollboys, and other computing history ignorants of this world, it is easy to dismiss the influence of Steve Jobs in today’s world. But the fact is that, from the Apple II to the Mac to the iPod to the iPhone to the iPad, the Steverino has redefined the stuff you use again and again. The computer you are using now, the smartphone you are using now, the tablet you are using now, all of them are tied to a person that has been defined as the man with a vision by every other man and woman that matters in Silicon Valley.
The big leaps
The Apple II jumpstarted the entire personal computing era, prompting IBM to create the first Intel-based PC. If you are using a computer now, it’s because Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak got the idea to create a simple-to-use, affordable computer that anyone could buy.
The Macintosh made the graphical user interface a viable product for consumers. Jobs took a costly experimental machine out of Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center and he commanded a band of pirates within Apple — some of whom came out of Xerox — to turn that into a better machine that made computing easy for the first time. Even if you’re using a Dell PC with Windows 7 now, you should be grateful that he made it happen.
The iPod created an entire industry from scratch. When other cheap manufacturers have failed, the iPod’s user interface — which included its now legendary click-wheel — made music on the go a joy. Consumers bought millions and it defined the way we all see digital music now. No matter what MP3 player or what music store or what music streaming you use now, it’s there because of the iPod.
The iPhone. It changed everything again. It took lame phones and made them dumb. If you are using an Android, Windows Phone 7 or WebOS handset right now, make no mistake about it: It’s because Steve Jobs zeroed on creating the best phone possible. He succeeded, and now many people can’t understand life without their smartphones.
And finally the iPad. Hate it or love it, but when HP — the largest PC manufacturer in the world — CEO implies the death of the PC as we know it saying that “the iPad effect is very real” and when Google and Microsoft are turning their OS strategies to catch up with Apple’s most popular computer, you can be sure that the iPad is the future. Whatever tablet you use, it will be because this man thought that a product like this would be insanely great.
Like all the rest.
So even while he may be a dick at times, even while he’s known from being tyrannical and mercurial, even when we all know he can sell fridges to eskimos, the fact is that this is a man who saw beyond the current state of technology every single time. He understood what was needed to reach humans like you and I, and that’s why you should be thankful. Without his drive and vision, we wouldn’t be here today.
His DNA is in every technology product out there.



















olearymo
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:44 AMAnd Charles Babbage invented the computer. So therefore, HE invented all Apple Dell and other computer related products.
What’s your point?
David
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:46 AMHahaha :) Easiest and most simply way to stop this load of BS in it’s tracks.
FrancisM
Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 1:18 PMThe iPod was an important device but to say it created an entire industry from scratch is a bit of a stretch.
Napster got people thinking about mp3 in a major way – without that there would be no iPod or iTunes store, so it’s incorrect to say this (albeit important) device did it all from nothing.
I’m starting to think I’ll just filter anything by Jesus out from now on – too biased and often incorrect.
And for the record I have a truck load of i-devices, I’m neither fanboy or hater but I can see that these articles by Jesus are just way too imbalanced and slavish.
Rhys
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:47 AMSHUT THE F*CK UP JESUS! Why do we have to put up with the American fanboy trash.
There is no foundation in your acticle, it is purely blind faith.
Benny
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:49 AMWhat has Charles Babbage done since? That is his point.
Kezza
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:21 AM…well, he broke Vigenère’s autokey cipher, invented the cow-catcher for trains & the ophthalmoscope for looking into the eye and diagnosing eye conditions.
I’d say Mr.Jobs stands very-much in Babbage’s shadow.
what do you know
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:53 AMThis is why you guys are not running a multi billion dollar company, you are are clueless!
Roland
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 8:54 AMBAHAHAHA! Oh man… please stop Jesus… you’re stirring up the natives… :-P
Nads
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:02 AMJust because you may not like Apple products, does not mean you should deny the huge HUUUGEE influence that Jobs has had on tech.
Nate
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:03 AMWhat a load of bollocks
The iPod was just the marrying up of the walkman and mp3.. pretty obvious step forward.
bri_cheese
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:34 AMAgreed… and already in the market from other companies… Creative from memory, surely others too.
Ruen
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:06 AMDidn’t when Danny Allen take over writing for Gizmodo Australia he suggested less Apple, and most of the comments were in favour of less Apple.
I know this guy is from the States, and is a massive goddamn Apple fanboy. But since his article’s are routinely flamed by the people down here, why do we keep posting them on this site.
Rhys
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:34 AMI popped over to us.gizmodo.com, they don’t take well to his articles there either.
Quin
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:11 AM+1 to no more Jesus Diaz biased posts…
jonny
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:15 AM… and Ronald McDonald practically invented or was at least, hugely influential in the development of burgers. No, like the mythical Jobs, he just marketed and distributed them better to people who didn’t care much about the quality.
olearymo
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:15 AMYeah I gotta second that, Jesus does some good writing but Aussie Giz Editors, have you considered filtering a bit of his stuff? Some of it really seems like indulgent editorial rants.
Not to mention his not-at-all subtle jabs at anyone who disagrees with him (‘fandroids’, ‘trollboys’) – this is the sort of language one expects from drunken commenters, not the author.
Not sure how much veto power you guys have… but I gotta agree with the others that some of Diaz’s stuff is over the top.
For example, Steve Jobs is an important figure in the tech world. But an article basically asking us to get on our knees for the guy ‘inventing’ everything leaves a bad taste in the mouth. If you know what I mean!
Samo
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:30 AMI wish there was a way of filtering this guy
Jon
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:02 AMThere is, by stopping whoever grabs this piece of rubbish from GizUS and purposely post it in GizAU
Shane-o
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:47 AMThis article has it’s point. But it would have been better off just stating something along the lines of “Computers & technology may not have evolved in such a way as they have without the influence of Steve Jobs’ decisions made within the Apple company”
To say that Dell IS Apple is just a hyperbole to reflect the enthusiasm that the writer has for the company.
Shane-o
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:49 AMBTW Apple iPod Nano no longer sports a click-wheel..
Troy
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:08 AMYeah that was a huge loss of respect in my opinion, the 5th gen or whatever (tall ipod nano with camera) was a great design, then they went and built this tiny fiddly thing. Failure from my perspective.
Jon
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:59 AM“For the fandroids, trollboys, and other computing history ignorants of this world”, and You Jesus Diaz are the biggest dickhead of Apple Fanboy of all..ironically, how ignorant do you have to be to even write that sentence and still be considered as a journalist ??
“His DNA is in every technology product out there.” , i don’t recall him invented the first mobile phone ever, and he surely wasn’t around when nokia, motorola, ericcson started rolling out mobile phones…hmmmm funny that eh. check your so-called history again diaz.
Nobody is denying that Steve Jobs is one of the great leaders in tech world out there… but seriously, this “article” is just an apple fanboy flexing his steroid-infused tiny dick to everyone.
NO MORE JESUS DIAZ’s so-called article that filled with nothing but absolute rubbish !!
Craig
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:04 AMHey look, I’m a hardened MS fanboy, but JD is right. Steve Jobs has defined everything he’s touched, love him or loathe him his credit is due & deserved.
I’ve never bought an Apple product, I’m a nerd I don’t like the simplistic experience, but I wouldn’t hesitate to say that Jobs was to User Experience as Newton was to Science.
bob
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:06 AMIts not the devices. I don’t get why people don’t see it.. It’s industrial design.
Everything Apple did up until 2002 was utter crap and was done better and more successfully by other companies. Don’t forget that they nearly wen’t belly up until the prodigial son came back.
When they employed a team of industrial designers to put fancy cases on everything, that’s when their ‘coolness took off.
Barry
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:08 AMI have to disagree with the iPhone paragraph, I think he saw a Nokia smartphone and said to himself “I can do that” (like Xerox GUI) and he did but I think it’s more Nokia (not to mention Apple’s hype marketing as well :-) )
Dave
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:09 AMAmiga’s Were better :)
Ollie
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:15 AM…and no mention that ol’ Stevie originally stole the GUI idea from Xerox PARC?
Death Duck
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:28 AMEditors, is there any way we can please have a function where we can log in with a profile and then select which authors we wish to ignore?
If you want to change this to the “We Heart Apple” blog, then go for it. But I’m over reading this opinionated, unfounded rubbish and I’ll take my advertising clicks elsewhere.
Joel
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:53 AMPeople get very worked up over an article they can so easily scroll past..
You know it tells you the name of the article and who wrote it before you click on it? You really don’t have to come here to read it and post a comment on it.
And face it people, he’s right, Steve Jobs is a huge influence on the technology industry. Whether the article is poorly written or not, take off your blinders, agree or disagree, and go away.
FrancisM
Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:13 PMI think the point is we don’t deny Jobs has had a huge influence, but it’s more for his savy business sense and ability to sieze opportunities and shape a market.
The problem with the article is it glosses over the important earlier efforts of others that were in place as stepping stones for Jobs + Apple, and in many cases wrongly attributes him to being their inventor or creator from scratch.
He wasn’t always – in many of the cases described he was just the first and best to manufacture and capitalise on them, in much the same way that Bill Gates didn’t write the first DOS for the PC; but he did realise a good deal and how to make money out of it when he saw it.
These articles are so biased you have to wonder – were they paid for, should they be declaring conflict of interest and should they have the “advertising” banner around them to make it clear they are not factual journalistic pieces ?
They certainly aren’t objective, and that completely defeats their purpose – unless the purpose was to re-write history.
Jobs we got no problem with, Jesus needs to go.
jonah
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 11:19 AMI’m not much of a fan boy, but i think he’s right in the article, Tehre would be no good phones or ipads if steve jobs didn’t come back to apple. he really did invent, or at least make much better, all the technology we have today.
you guys are all wrong and jealous
samantha
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 11:25 AMtotally, i can’t understand these people that just don’t like apple when it makes such good computers and iphones and things, everyone really does love them
Ollie
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 11:54 AMNo, both sides are wrong on this one. Steve didn’t push the invention of most of this stuff, a lot of it was already being researched at places like Xerox PARC.
Apple don’t “make” computers, they don’t even design computers components technically, they take existing designs for components from manufacturers (who are the ones really doing the research – Samsung, TI, ARM etc) and put them together to do something. Sure they’ve developed their own OPERATING SYSTEM, which is a different kettle of fish.
Technically, they didn’t even “design” the iPod, they took an existing idea, eg Sony Walkman, improved on it, updated the technology, and made bazillions off it. If Sony had have had the smarts to do it first they they’d be the ones we’re talking about now, not Apple.
Andrew
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 12:01 PMthe OS is built on BSD. They just gave it a fancy front end so lets not credit them on creating their own OS either.
samantha
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 1:21 PMyou’re wrong, steve made it all work so well with apple products and it’s very sad he passed away, he will be missed
olearymo
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 2:17 PMha! nice.
Rhys
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 3:15 PMHaha! Classic
RobbyM
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 12:00 PMSo what’s really happening is someone invented something and Jobs slapped his name on it because it was invented by someone working for his company? Most companies have this sort of clause in their employment contract.
I wonder who put more effort into creating the original Apple computer? Woz or Jobs?
Andrew
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 12:02 PMWoz… Jobs just flogged it for cash after. Woz is a genius. He deserves waaaaaay more credit for the way computing is today than Jobs.
Jon
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM+1 for this, amen.
Simon Reidy
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 1:11 PMI clicked the link to this article in Google Reader, specifically to laugh at all the inevitable angry Fandroid responses. Thanks for not disappointing me :)
olearymo
Friday, August 26, 2011 at 2:18 PMYou are the only person in all the comments to have mentioned android even vaguely.
So um… what the hell are you on about?
Steve
Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 11:41 PMWhat’s this have to do with Android? God, I use an IP4 right now, but it doesn’t mean I have to gargle Steve Jobs’s balls while I’m at it.
Attributing goddamn everything to Steve Jobs while concurrent tech evolution was going on is both irresponsible and the worst kind of fanboyism. The difference between Jesus Diaz and the fanboys in this article, is that HE unfortunately has a soapbox to spread his disingenuous garbage.
You can acknowledge a man’s contribution to tech while being both bipartisan and reasonable but Jesus Diaz’s latest articles are a pile of biased bullshit. Why? Because I’m Jesus Diaz and fuck you that’s why.
Giz US’s content is sinking into muckraker territory and Jesus Diaz is its Glenn Beck. I know it pisses off readers, generates buzz and clicks on your page but I know I’m not the only reader who’ll seriously consider jumping ship to TIMN/The Verge and simply use Whirlpool for my localised content.
Jamie
Monday, August 29, 2011 at 10:51 AM+1
or *likes
or whatever that latest fad is.