
Invented by chemist Gerald Hurst while at the Atlas Powder Company, Astrolite technically is a family of binary liquid-state high explosives that are formed when you mix ammonium nitrate and anhydrous hydrazine (the rocket fuel). This produces a clear liquid explosive called Astrolite G — it has a very high 8600m/s detonation velocity — nearly double that of TNT and greater than any other non-nuclear explosive. If you then add aluminium powder to Astrolite G, you get Astrolite A (for aluminium) which has a velocity of detonation of 7800m/s.
Now while they have a very high detonation velocity (it expands very quickly), Astrolite does not have a lot of mass (there’s less explosive to detonate per volume). That means that it’s not suitable for heavy demolition but excellent as an anti-personnel/light armour mine.
As a 1968 issue of Stars And Stripes described it:
Latest development is a “Liquid Land Mine” using Astrolite, the most powerful known explosive…Poured directly onto a dirt road, the stuff soaks into the first few inches of earth, giving tremendous upheaval power. Although the land mine was fired remotely in the test, a pressure-sensitive fuse can be sued that will react to the weight of a passing vehicle…Liquid Land Mine can be simply poured from canteen like containers says its maker, Explosives Corporation of America, or sprayed from trucks or helicopters.
That’s right, you simply just spray it on — as little as 1oz is needed to incapacitate an enemy soldier — and sew in a detonator. It will remain active and detonatable in the soil for four days, unaffected by rain, but will eventually inactivate itself, eliminating the need for de-mining. The most useful feature is the fact that even when active, the Astrolite can’t be detected by normal mine detection equipment.


















EckyThump
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 8:12 AMWhy are you talking about this shit like it’s a good thing? It’s just another vile weapon to maim or kill for Christ’s sake!! #[
olearymo
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 8:25 AMWell it’s science/gadget related.
And, admittedly, there is an advantage in that it’s self-deactivating. Many people are killed by ‘left-behind’ mines. Which would you rather people use? (Apart from ‘none’ which is unrealistic).
I do agree on the sadface sentiment. But I’d much rather this was used than traditional mines that kill children decades later.
EckyThump
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 8:35 AMLaying of mines is a violation now! They’re not supposed to be making them at all! I realise that some countries still do, but they are mostly using old and improvised mines. I’m more disturbed by the flippant tone used in the article than the content, though Andrew most likely transcribed it from an original. I think this is a subject that should be taken seriously! I’m an ex Army Engineer, so I learned more about mines than I ever would’ve liked. #[
bazuden
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 9:23 AMFlippant tone? There’s nothing wrong with the tone of the article. There’s no jokes, or light-hearted comments that I can see at all. Pull your head in, mate.
EckyThump
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 11:25 AMHow much do you know about mines, I’m going to guess two fifths of buggerall, I know what they do and I know how much of a burden they are on those areas that they get left in by the thousands.
“excellent as an anti-personnel/light armour mine”
What I see in the article is basically a glorification of mines, there’s no mention of anything to do with the humanitarian side of this article because there’s nothing humanitarian about it! Flippant may be a little strong but it serves my purposes here! If you want to glorify these hideous things that’s your deal, don’t tell me to pull my head in when clearly those writing about it don’t mention how friggin dangerous they are! #{
glokpud
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 9:06 AMolearymo – off topic but anything to do with motorcycle accessories/clothing… ?
EckyThump
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 11:31 AMSorry dude, I get real passionate about this kind of thing! The reason there are so many of the damned things is because there was a strong market, and some asshole made a literal killing out of them!
Ads
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 12:30 PMDude, really, this article is alla bout how a failed rocket fuel was turned in to a MUCH SAFER form of land mine.
Yeah they are bad full stop, but surely you can see the shades of grey here?
Desease kills more people every year than weapons do, so we better not see any more atricles about desease either!
Barry
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 8:42 AMEcky, get off your high horse mate.
Yes landmines are illegal and should be, as oleaymo said, it’s “science/gadget related” and it’s very interesting stuff.
This stuff could be used to help mining companies instead of them using TNT or some other type of explosive. Did you think of what it could be used besides land mines? I did.
Don’t forget ekcy that a lot of the things you take for granted today came from mil research and development.
Quin
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 9:47 AMAlso note this was developed in the 60s, when mines weren’t yet illegal under international law.
Barry
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 9:55 AMGood point and it was also first developed as ROCKET FUEL
EckyThump
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 11:43 AMI read
“Latest development is a
“Liquid Land Mine”
as being a new development
Barry
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 12:08 PMIt also read “As a 1968 issue of Stars And Stripes described it”
I read it as latest development in 1968
trace
Monday, August 22, 2011 at 3:35 PMSorry but who said mines were illigal? International law is….?
This is an interesting story, where did it come from!?
Maybe the stuff is to volitile for real world applications.