Apple’s Most Amazing Products Under Steve Jobs

From 1974 up until the other night (with a brief NeXT/Pixar interlude), Steve Jobs powered the company that brought the world some of the most innovative products we’ve ever known. (Screw you, wheel!) These are his greatest hits.

1983: The Apple IIe

First introduced in January of 1983, this is the computer that catapulted Apple into people’s homes. It came standard with a whopping 64KB of RAM! (For those of you playing the home game, you’d need 62,500 IIes to match the standard RAM of one MacBook Pro.) The IIe has the distinction of being Apple’s longest-lived product; its form factor barely changed in the 10 years before it was discontinued, in late 1993.

Image: Wikimedia Commons/Apple2gs

1984: The Macintosh

This first time I saw one of these as I was blown away. Graphical input! You just click on something and it opens stuff! Amazing! And what is this “mouse” you speak of? This computer would be the template for generations to come (think Windows and, you know, all other modern operating systems). It was also one of the first all-in-one computers (with the screen and brains all in one case), and it was very, very fast for its time.

Image: Wikimedia Commons/Grm wnr

1985: The LaserWriter

Didn’t see that one coming, didja? The LaserWriter wasn’t just some printer, it was the printer that opened a new frontier for desktop computer publishing. It had a tight resolution of 300 dpi and a printing speed of eight pages per minute. It worked with Apple’s PageMaker software and was among the first to utilise the image processing of Adobe PostScript interpreter — a major game-changer in indy publishing. It was $US6995 when it launched.

Image: Wikimedia Commons/All About Apple

1985 – 1996: The Dark Ages

Steve was gone. Apple sucked hard and almost died.

1998: The iMac

I’ll admit it, I didn’t like it. I thought it was the Volkswagon Beetle (the new one) of computers with its bright colours and big round arse. But damnit if consumers didn’t love it, and this is where Apple began making its way back into people’s homes bigtime. This was the original all-in-one Macintosh’s great-grandson, and it gave Apple a major foothold with students — one they haven’t given up since.

1999: Final Cut Pro

I hadn’t used an Apple computer since my childhood IIe; Final Cut Pro is the product that brought me back. It was a major leap forward in non-linear video editing, not just for its features, but for its accessibility. Microscopically budgeted filmmakers could buy Final Cut Pro and a reasonably powerful Apple computer for thousands less than it cost for an Avid system. It made independent movies much, much better. Today some of your favourite movies and TV shows — No Country for Old Men, The Social Network, a gabillion others — are edited in FCP. True story.

1999: The Power Mac G4

When the G4 came out (and for years after) it was illegal to take it out of the country because it was classified as a supercomputer. How crazy it that suddenly we were living in an era where supercomputers were available to consumers? Suddenly musicians, photogs, image/video video editors could realistically work from home and they wouldn’t have to spend a million hours waiting for something to render. It was majorly major for artists.

2001: The PowerBook G4

Remember all that good stuff I just said about the Power Mac G4? This was the laptop equivalent. Nicknamed TiBooks for their titanium bodies, these laptops weren’t just for travel, they were a legitimate replacements for desktop powerhouses. Before the PowerBook you really had to sacrifice a lot of speed to make a computer portable. Now you could do some very CPU-intensive work (video/image editing and rendering) while you were sitting on an aeroplane. Amazing. These evolved into the little beast that is the modern MacBook Pro.

2001: OSX

While Steve Job’s was away from Apple he wasn’t just sitting around with his thumb up his butt; he started a computer company called NeXT. While NeXT was somewhat ill-fated, they had some extremely good ideas, and when Jobs returned to Apple he brought those ideas (and patents) with him. NeXT’s OS, called OPENSTEP, would eventually become OSX, the operating system that would lead Apple’s resurgence. Each iteration has borne the name of a different big cat, starting with Cheetah leading all the way up to the current version, Lion (what’s next, Liger?). It also spun off iOS, which we’ll get to in a minute.

2001: The iPod

(Yes, 2001 was a big year for Apple.) Let me put this very plainly: the iPod changed the way we consume music. Did digital music files exist before? Yes. Did portable MP3 players exist before? Yes again. What’s significant is that the vast majority of the general public didn’t give two rat-farts about those things until the iPod. It brought geek tech to the common people, and together with iTunes (which radically changed the way we purchase music), it reshaped the music industry, sending it into careening into the 21st century.

2007: The iPhone

The original iPhone is unquestionably most significant — and influential — phones ever built. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it was the first smartphone that didn’t require a smart person to operate it. It was, and still remains, elegantly laid out and extremely intuitive. It, and its successive models, became the phone by which all other phones are measured, and every smartphone that’s come since that’s actually worth a damn has taken at least some inspiration from it. It augmented the way we interact both with each other, with the web, and with technology (and this is coming from an Android user).

2010: The iPad

The iPhone begat the iPad; together, they ushered in a new era of people staring at things in their hands. Tablets certainly existed before the iPad; Apple had even made previous attempts with the Newton MessagePad 100, which came out way back in 1993. The thing is that tablets weren’t nearly as functional or cool before the iPad. The cool-factor can’t be understated; it’s become so popular that some people *CoughHP’sCEOLeoApothekerCough* point to it as killing the PC industry. I wouldn’t go that far, but it’s basically created the consumer tablet market, which really didn’t exist before it and is now absolutely exploding — almost entirely on the strength of, well, iPad sales. Damned impressive.

2011-?: The Great Wide Open

While Steve Jobs has stepped down as CEO, his DNA is deeply fused with Apple’s (and he’s still Chairman of the Board). People selling their Apple stock based on this news are cretins of the highest order. Do you think Apple only plans a week in advance, and next Monday they’re going to start from scratch? No. Steve has already directly overseen the development of devices we will not even see for years. They’re still his babies, even if he’s left the village. They may have many different surrogate parents, but they’ll have their daddy’s nose.

Discuss

(35 Comments)
  • [–]

    Simon

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM

    Outstanding article, one the first articles I have actually read in its entirety in some time!!! Nice work!!

  • [–]

    Joel

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM

    Waiting for the “stop-posting-Apple, Gizmodo” army..

    In 3.. 2.. 1..

    • [–]

      The Saint

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM

      Agreed.

    • [–]

      Rhys

      Monday, August 29, 2011 at 7:58 AM

      I didn’t mind this article, it’s alot better than that crap Jesus Diaz puts out.

      We owned an iMac, the first one was crap, the second one was alot better.

  • [–]

    marcus

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM

    Ok, how bout a MASSIVE THANK YOU to Jonathan Ive! Sure it was Steve that got him the gig, but with out his amazing industrial design Apple would be as interesting as a Microsoft Zune.

  • [–]

    moloko

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 10:48 AM

    Yeah I think Giz lost a lot of readers over the past 2 or 3 days LOL. Probably gone to a real Tech news site.

  • [–]

    Brandt Hardin

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM

    Jobs is done but left his mark on every corner of wireless technology. It only leaves us asking who won the war between the two titans of modern computer technology? Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates / Apple vs. Microsoft– check out my rendering of an epic match-up of their cyborg selves on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/08/end-of-era-steve-jobs.html

  • [–]

    Mal Reynolds

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM

    How is Apple not Tech news? its the biggest IT company in the world! don’t like it? stiff cheese! I hear steve balmer calling you

  • [–]

    Charles

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 12:25 PM

    Yeah jesus, Apple is a very important company whether you like their products or business practices or not. It’s gonna be reported on and have articles.. blah.

  • [–]

    moloko

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 12:30 PM

    Yeah article after article how Steve Jobs was some big God like figure, Piss off with your fan boy shit.

    • [–]

      Ted

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM

      +1

    • [–]

      RealView

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 1:51 PM

      +1

    • [–]

      Kroo

      Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 11:17 AM

      You saw the header and could have scrolled past, but no, like a true troll you had to click the link and spread your infantile bile. Don’t like it, then go to some douchie PC blog instead. NOBODYS FORCING YOU TO READ ANY ARTICLES FUCKWIT! Now fuck off and have a wank to your poster of Steve Ballmer.

      Apple has always pushed the boundaries and it’s competitors to give us the rich tech world we have now. Without Apple, Gates wouldn’t have had anyone to steal ideas from. Apple made Microsuck!

      • [–]

        Blindwilly

        Monday, August 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM

        Wow, don’t over-react too much there!
        And I am unsure why the Apple vs PC rant was required. All he was saying was lighten up on the ‘Jobs is God’ articles.
        Yes he is clever, yes we feel sorry for him with his health but unless the laws of the universe have changed Apple and Jobs are not at the center of it.

  • [–]

    Alex

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 12:42 PM

    There were many great apple products. I don’t think the Macintosh was one of them. My Amega shit all over it with colour graphics and way better games. We had to use the Mac at school and everyone hated it and wanted to use the PC.

    The imac was crap. When you needed to upgrade your pc, you had to buy a new monitor too. Great for the environment.

    I think the main thing that turned me off macs were the price. Everything was so damn expensive and it was hard to get pirated games for them.

  • [–]

    Ruen

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 12:58 PM

    (here I am Joel)

    I honestly am starting to wonder if every member of the Gizmodo US site feels compelled to reiterate the same crap about how Apple created everything. WE F*CKING GET IT! You don’t need to repeat essentially the same goddamn article ad infinium.

    Seriously whats next, are they gonna get the janitor to give his opinions on how we should be worshipping at the altar of Jobs, god what is this place gonna be like when Jobs’ passes away?

    • [–]

      RealView

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 1:51 PM

      Also +1

  • [–]

    isreversi

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM

    Real tech is innovative concepts that earn wide acceptance through their merits. Steve Jobs as the head of Apple deserves respect for delivering a fair bit of real tech.
    In the last line in the para on OSX, the writer said they would say more on iOS in a minute… its been a long minute.

  • [–]

    John

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM

    Enough already please.

  • [–]

    Norgan

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 2:59 PM

    um ” it was the first smartphone that didn’t require a smart person to operate it”

    Maybe you should look at HTC again and remember a little thing called Sense. Made the smartphone usable for the average Joe.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Sense

    How about some balanced reporting here?!

    • [–]

      Joel

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM

      Actually the writer of this article was mostly right – before the iPhone, most people that I know hadn’t even heard of Smart phones, touch screens or even the brand HTC. The iPhone made smart phones more accessible to average consumers, and really started the avalanche of touch screen smart phones that we see today.

    • [–]

      olearymo

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM

      Norgan, do you mean HTC Sense, the thing built from HTC TouchFlo, which was first used on the HTC Touch, which was released in June 2007, several months after the iPhone was announced and shown in detail?

      That HTC Sense?

      How about some balanced commenting here?

  • [–]

    Joel

    Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 5:10 PM

    Well I was right, thanks for not disappointing guys.

    Keep it coming with the Apple articles, Giz. See how long it takes until they completely crack lol

    Apple makes great products. Steve Jobs did a lot for technology. End of story people, no point arguing.

    • [–]

      Hanson

      Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM

      Too bad Apple didn’t invest some money into dialysis machines or other such medical devices instead on consumer nick-nacks. The sooner the end to this blind consumerism the better for everybody.

  • [–]

    Adrian

    Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 6:53 PM

    More iBlah from the now renamed ‘iModo’.

    • [–]

      Kroo

      Monday, August 29, 2011 at 12:02 AM

      Troll. The guys dying and you can’t help yourself. Karma comes in the form of your virus riddled PC. HA!

      • [–]

        Adrian

        Monday, August 29, 2011 at 6:57 PM

        Kroo your an apple loving F#ck witt. I was not having a go a Steve and what he may or may not have achieved. I was having a go at this site for repeatedly coughing up basically the same story.

  • [–]

    Snacuum

    Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 7:33 PM

    “gave Apple a major foothold with students — one they haven’t given up since.”

    All of my hate.

  • [–]

    stevejobsinc

    Monday, August 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM

    I would argue that Steve’s FAILs are just as amazing as his hot selling successes. Remember the Cube? After Apple put down this lame horse, the Cube enjoyed a cult following that only Apple customers are capable of demonstrating. Cube owners grew to love their cracked up little box They hang on to his decade-old computer like an old man hangs onto a gas-guzzling ’58 Ford Edsel. I wrote all about his glorious wins and spectacular losses in a post on my blog http://stevejobsinc.blogspot.com/2011/04/steve-jobs-brings-sexy-back.html

  • [–]

    Sam

    Monday, August 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM

    Ok, while I am not a “fanboy” (I have an xbox, and prefer using a PC then a Mac) please do look at what Jobs has done for the technology industry, they are good products he makes, just because you and your little army of haters don’t like them doesn’t make them bad. Who cares if they didn’t make the first Smart Phone, what they did was make a very good one, which resulted in other companies making them also to try and compete, thus giving you a choice (not just for smart phones, that was just an example). If you think these products Apple makes suck, please do go ahead and go to the biggest Tech company in the world and tell them what they are doing wrong

    • [–]

      Sam

      Monday, August 29, 2011 at 4:30 PM

      Might I note the comment below me is not actually me >_>

  • [–]

    Sam

    Monday, August 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM

    SUBJECTIVE OPINION ALERT. I dislike and think everything on that list is an unintuitive, crappy product except the ipod and Final cut pro

  • [–]

    Lee

    Monday, August 29, 2011 at 7:02 PM

    “From 1974 up until the other night (with a brief NeXT/Pixar interlude)…”

    11 Years is not a “brief interlude” – it’s 30% of the company’s history!

    Also, the time where “Apple Sucked and Almost died” wasn’t completely fruitless: for example, the Newton was born then which is possibly largely responsible for PDAs and Smartphones as we know them today. And there were product flops under Jobs too: Apple Technical Support advised customers to drop their Apple IIIs to relodge chips that would come loose due to extremes of temperature. This was the result of insufficient ventilation: a case of aesthetics of practicality.

    I admire Steve Jobs for what he is: A visionary innovator who was also a controlling tyrant. The man hasn’t died, he’s just stepped down from top job. But the way tech bloggers are reacting anyone would think their own mother had died.

    If Steve Jobs was a brilliant leader, his loss should be relatively inconsequential as he would have made preparations for his eventual departure. The way tech bloggers are reacting, they musn’t think he has those leadership qualities.

  • [–]

    Cg

    Monday, August 29, 2011 at 8:05 PM

    I thought Gizmodo hated Apple after they got beaten for the leaked iPhone nonsense.. When did this change?

  • [–]

    James

    Monday, September 26, 2011 at 9:56 AM

    Joel: “Waiting for the “stop-posting-Apple, Gizmodo” army..

    In 3.. 2.. 1..”

    Could’nt have put it better mate. Man, So many retard Apple haters, it’s just sad. They can’t handle the fact that everything they use right now on their PC’s was created by Apple…as well as their smartphones, tablets, mouse’s, iPods, etc…..

    Sour grapes is a bitch aint it. LOL

    Weaksauce.

Join The Discussion