Apparently, Android Is The Least Open Of The Open Source Platforms

Sorry Android. You get by with having this reputation of being open but in reality you’re the least open/most closed “open platform” around. In a study with eight other platforms, Android finished dead last. And it wasn’t even close.

The study, done by market research firm, VisionMobile took a look at Android, Eclipse, the Linux kernel, MeeGo, Firefox, Qt, Symbian and WebKit and focused on their open governance, inclusiveness, transparency, and ease of access to source code. In the “open governance index”, Android finished with a measly 23 per cent. It was far and away the lowest score, Android was the only open source project to score less than 58 per cent (the best score was Eclipse at 84 per cent).

VisionMobile cited reasons such as Google’s “unilateral Android project decision-making processes” and “closed contributions process model” along with:

“Visibility to the roadmap is limited, as there is no Android roadmap publicly available. In fact, development of the Android private branch and the roadmap is controlled by Google, with little input from external parties or the Open Handset Alliance members. When launched, the Open Handset Alliance served the purpose of a public industry endorsement for Android. Today, however, the OHA serves little purpose besides a stamp of approval for OHA members; there is no formal legal entity, no communication processes for members nor frequent member meetings.”

And a ton more reasons. It’s just one report by one research firm but their explanations make a whole lot o’ sense (and are things we’ve heard before). Remember, calling Android not open doesn’t make it any less good. Just be careful when you use the word ‘open’ because clearly, it’s not as open as it could be. [VisionMobile via Ars Technica]

Discuss

(8 Comments)
  • [–]

    WTF

    Friday, August 5, 2011 at 7:50 AM

    Still beats the crap out of anything with an i in front of it.

    • [–]

      wsDK_II

      Friday, August 5, 2011 at 9:31 AM

      +1^999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 Internets to you!

      :)

      • [–]

        Math Nerd

        Saturday, August 6, 2011 at 10:28 AM

        1^99999999…. still = 1

  • [–]

    2SHY

    Friday, August 5, 2011 at 8:19 AM

    Flawed report is flawed. If they arguing greater openness is greater success, Apple and Microsoft have confounded this model.

  • [–]

    poltak

    Friday, August 5, 2011 at 9:00 AM

    This isn’t new… it’s up against some of the most famous FOSS projects here. It doesn’t take a genius realise who’s going to come last here.
    Android 3.0+ isn’t even open-source. It’s all closed until further announcement apart from the kernel, of course.

    I think Android’s reputation for being open comes from comparison with the other major smartphone OS’s. Although Symbian OS is obviously a lot more open and accessible than Android.

    • [–]

      Jazz

      Friday, August 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM

      Umm.. Not entirely true. I have Honeycomb source code on my computer right now, downloaded from Google. I just can’t submit my changes back to Google.

      As sucky as this is though, it makes sense to me. Having worked in the telecoms industry in a previous life, mobile carriers would bauk at a phone OS that was not under the full control of a trusted entity. Meaning if it was totally open, it wouldn’t get carrier support and hence would not have become as popular as it is.

      At the end of the day though, you can still download it, modify it and load it on your phone and guys like Cyanogen are picking up the open source mantle in that regard.

  • [–]

    Martin

    Saturday, August 6, 2011 at 1:28 AM

    Agreed…

    People seem to forget that Google is a business entity. When Google release a brand spanking new version of Android it’s usually their devices that get it first, Just look at the Google Nexus S, first Gingerbread device to market. Holding back on giving Gingerbread to vendors until their phone hits the market boosts sales… plain and simple, Android is a product.

    Besides, The spirit of open source is that the source is available for you to download and browse, modify and tinker with or even fork your own version (CyanogenMod is probably the best example). Being able to contribute to a project doesn’t make it less open than another…

    It’s extremely easy to get the source:
    http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html

  • [–]

    LGB

    Monday, August 8, 2011 at 5:33 PM

    I hate the fact that I am totally at the mercy of my carrier in regards to whether or not I get the latest OS or if HTC Sense is setup and supported.

    I shouldn’t be forced to root my phone to do any of these things…

Join The Discussion